Transversus Abdominis Plane Research Articles

Classical TAP vs. I TAP Using the Same Dose of Local Anesthetic in Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The effectiveness of postoperative pain control following a Cesarean section influences mother-child attachment, improves early healing, and undoubtedly hastens discharge. Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) and ilioinguinal iliohypogastric (ILIH) blocks have been used to minimize postoperative opioid intake, although their relative effectiveness is unknown. The study aims to determine which procedure was more effective at reducing the need for postoperative rescue analgesics after lower segment Cesarean section (LSCS). TAP block or I TAP (TAP block plus ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerve block). Both procedures used the same amount of local anesthetic. A sealed envelope technique was used to randomly assign 210 patients who received LSCS into two equal groups to receive either ultrasound (US)-guided TAP block or US-guided ILIH nerve block with US-guided TAP block at the conclusion of the procedure. As per the study protocol, the charge nurse in the postoperative ward gave rescue analgesics to patients who complained of discomfort. At hours 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 following surgeries, a blinded observer checked on the patient and noted the effectiveness of pain management, the quantity of rescue analgesics used, and patient satisfaction. While there was a substantial decrease in pain score while resting at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 postoperative hours in the ITAP group, there was not a significant change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the first postoperative hour. However, there was a large delay in the first request for analgesia in the ITAP group (13.15 ± 1.85) as opposed to the TAP group (10.06 ± 1.61) and there was a significant decline in nalbuphine use as well as a higher satisfaction score in the ITAP group. Following LSCS, ITAP block offered better postoperative analgesia than TAP block in terms of quality.

Effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in reducing atelectasis after laparoscopic surgery in children: A randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAtelectasis is a commonly observed postoperative complication of general anesthesia in children. Pulmonary protective ventilation strategies have been reported to have a beneficial effect on postoperative atelectasis in children. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block technique in preventing the incidence of postoperative atelectasis in children. Materials and methodsThis study enrolled 100 consecutive children undergoing elective laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair and randomly divided them into the control and TAP groups. Conventional lung-protective ventilation was initiated in both groups after the induction of general anesthesia. The children in the TAP group received an ultrasound-guided TAP block with 0.3 mL/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine after the induction of anesthesia. ResultsAnesthesia-induced atelectasis was observed in 24% and 84% of patients in the TAP (n = 50) and control (n = 50) groups, respectively, before discharge from the post-anesthetic care unit (T3; PACU) (odds ratio [OR], 0.062; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.019–0.179; P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the control and TAP groups in terms of the lung ultrasonography (LUS) scores 5 min after endotracheal intubation (T1). However, the LUS scores were lower in the TAP group than those in the control group at the end of surgery (T2, P < 0.01) and before discharge from the PACU (T3, P < 0.001). Moreover, the ace, legs, activity, cry and consolability (FLACC) pain scores in the TAP group were lower than those in the control group at each postoperative time point. ConclusionUltrasound-guided TAP block effectively reduced the incidence of postoperative atelectasis and alleviated pain in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Spinal Anestezi Altında Sezaryen Doğumda Postoperatif Analjezi için Transversalis Fasya Plan Bloğunun Transversus Abdominis Plan Bloğuyla Karşılaştırılması: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Objective: Transversalis fascia plane (TFP) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are used for postoperative analgesia in many lower abdominal procedures such as cesarean section. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the postoperative effects of TFP and TAP blocks for postoperative multimodal analgesia in patients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods: We retrospectively searched electronic medical records to identify patients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia between November 2021 and June 2022. A total of 497 patients were identified, and 120 patients were included that meet our criteria in our analysis. The patients were divided into three groups: TFP, TAP, and control. Data were obtained from the files of the patients. Results: The block groups had significantly lower numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, less non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption, and lower complications than the control group. No opioid consumption was observed in the block groups. Although no non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption until the 4th hour and no opioid consumption until the 8th hour were observed in the control group, the need for additional analgesics increased as time passed. While the TFP group needed analgesics later than the TAP group, the NRS scores and total analgesic consumption were lower (p&lt;0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the block groups than in the control group (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Transversalis fascia plane and TAP blocks are effective as part of multimodal analgesia in cesarean section. The TFP block is superior to the TAP block in terms of pain scores, additional analgesic requirements, and patient satisfaction. Keywords: Cesarean section, postoperative pain, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, transversus abdominis plane block, transversalis fascia plane block

Genel Anestezi Altında Göbek Altı Ameliyatları Geçiren Çocuklarda Postoperatif Analjezi için Quadratus Lumborum Bloğu ile Transversus Abdominis Plan Bloğunun Karşılaştırılması: Prospektif Randomize Çalışma

Objective: Quadratus lumborum block (QL block) is a new addition to the truncal blocks used for postoperative analgesia of both upper and lower abdominal surgeries. We conducted this study to evaluate and compare the effect of the two truncal blocks QL-II block and transverses abdominis plane block on the of duration of effective analgesia in children undergoing infra umblical surgeries under general anesthesia. Methods: A prospective randomised study in patients between 1-7 years of age undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. 33 patients in each group. Group A received ipsilateral ultrasound guided Quadratus lumborum (QL) block group (0.5 ml kg-1 0.2% bupivacaine) and Group B received ipsilateral ultrasound guided Transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) (0.5 ml kg-1 0.2% bupivacaine). The primary outcome was the duration of effective in the postoperative period and secondary outcomes were the distribution of FLACC scores and Parent Satisfaction score. Results: The duration of effective analgesia was longer in group A (mean of 18.0 hours) when compared to group B (mean of 9.5 hours) in Quadratus lumborum (Type II) block group tends to have lesser pain scores (FLACC scale) and better parent satisfaction levels when compared with TAP block. Conclusion: Quadratus lumborum-II block provides longer duration of effective analgesia in the post–operative period in children aged 1-7 years undergoing infra umbilical surgeries under general anaesthesia. It also tends to achieve lesser pain scores and better parent satisfaction levels when compared with TAP block. Keywords: Bupivacaine, quadratus lumborum, satisfaction, analgesia, children

Comments on the published article: Efficacy of analgesia using ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block, transversus abdominis plane block and diclofenac after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A non-randomised clinical trial.

Comments on the published article: Efficacy of analgesia using ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block, transversus abdominis plane block and diclofenac after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A non-randomised clinical trial.

Comparison of Quality of Recovery between Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block through Perichondrial Approach versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides a wide analgesic range. Herein, we examined the quality of recovery (QoR) of M-TAPA for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) and measured plasma levobupivacaine concentrations (PClevo). Forty female patients undergoing TLH were randomized to each group. Nerve blocks were performed bilaterally with 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine administered per side. The primary outcome was changes in QoR-15 scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 from the preoperative baseline. The main secondary outcomes were PClevo at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after performing nerve block. Group differences (M-TAPA—OSTAPB) in mean changes from baseline in QoR-15 scores on POD 1 and 2 were −11.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), −24.9 to 2.4, p = 0.104; standard deviation (SD), 22.8) and −7.0 (95% CI, −20.5 to 6.6, p = 0.307; SD, 18.7), respectively. Changes in PClevo were similar in both groups. The post hoc analysis using Bayesian statistics revealed that posterior probabilities of M-TAPA being clinically more effective than OSTAPB were up to 22.4 and 24.4% for POD 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, M-TAPA may not be superior to OSTAPB for TLH.

The Role of TAP/RS Block in Minor Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare, in patients undergoing minor gynecological laparoscopic procedures, the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) + rectus sheath (RS) block versus no TAP/RS block in terms of post-surgical pain control using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the degree of patient satisfaction, according to the main goals of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The primary outcome is to value the postoperative abdominal pain using NRS in both groups. Secondary outcomes are to evaluate blood values, presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus, level of patient expected satisfaction, time of discharge, length of stay (LOS), and the amounts of additional analgesics required. Design: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) group, who received TAP and RS block under US guidance, or no loco-regional anesthesia (N-LRA) group. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive bilateral TAP/RS block with ropivacaine or sham treatment (patches were applied on the abdominal wall of the patients under general anesthesia). Participants: All patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-2, undergoing laparoscopic minor gynecological surgery, were enrolled. Setting: The study was conducted to the University of Campus Bio-Medico Hospital of Rome. Methods: Half an hour before surgery, all patients received gabapentin 300 mg per os. Once the patient underwent general anesthesia, US-guided bilateral TAP/RS block was performed by the anesthesiology team, while the uterine manipulator was positioned by a gynecology resident (not involved in the study). In the operative room, all patients received the same standardized anesthetic regimen. Postoperative abdominal pain was assessed at rest, after palpation, during movement, and after a cough by evaluating the patient at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after surgery, using the NRS from 0 to 10 in both groups. The amount of drug used for analgesia in the first 48 h after surgery was recorded. Moreover, hemoglobin, white blood cells, and c-reactive protein levels were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h. The presence of PONV and the postoperative ileus was recorded throughout convalescence. The expected level of patient satisfaction at discharge and finally the LOS were assessed. Limitations: The major weakness of this study is that 60 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to each patient, without considering weight differences, yet contemporary literature rarely suggests volume/dose titration in fascial blocks. Results: A total of 104 women, undergoing gynecological minor laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled and assigned to LRA group (53 pts) and N-LRA group (51 pts). Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in patients who received TAP/RS block. A reduction in the intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after surgery was registered in LRA group (p < 0.01). Moreover, a significant reduction of LOS (45.97 ± 9.87 vs. 65.08 ± 17.32 h; p < 0.01) and PONV was observed in the LRA group, as well as a better level of patient satisfaction at discharge (9.43 ± 0.94 vs. 8.26 ± 1.19; p < 0.01), compared to the N-LRA group. Conclusions: US-guided TAP and RS block significantly reduces postoperative pain after minor gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and improves patients’ post-operative recovery.

Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery.

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are an established method of postoperative analgesia for abdominopelvic surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine providing up to 72 h of analgesia. This study aims to determine if transversus abdominis plane blocks performed with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with reduced opioid consumption and level of pain intensity compared to conventional bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution between December 2020 and December 2021. After institutional review board approval, we identified patients who underwent lower abdominopelvic surgery with transversus abdominis plane blocks done with liposomal or conventional bupivacaine and collected demographic, clinical, and procedural information for analysis. We compared total opioid consumption over 72-h postoperatively in milligram morphine equivalents (MME), frequency of opioid utilization, and average level of pain intensity between groups. These outcomes were also evaluated after adjusting for covariates. Data were presented as mean ± SD, median [IQR] or frequency (%), as appropriate; p < 0.05 was accepted as significant. A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria, with 79 patients receiving an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine and conventional bupivacaine and 99 patients receiving conventional bupivacaine. The liposomal bupivacaine group had a median opioid consumption 72-h postoperatively of 47.5 [18-91.8] MME compared to 88 [43.8-160] MME in the conventional bupivacaine group, p = 0.045. Differences in opioid consumption between the groups did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, p = 0.11. There was no significant difference in frequency of opioid use or average pain intensity. Transversus abdominis plane blocks using an admixture of liposomal bupivacaine conventional bupivacaine are not associated with decreased opioid consumption or reduced pain up to 72 h following elective abdominopelvic surgery.

Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery with Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) emerging as potential techniques. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023445513). We included five RCTs encompassing 255 patients. QLB was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain (MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14; and p=0.004; I2 =94%). However, we found no difference in 24-h opioid consumption between QLB and TAPB groups. QLB may offer superior pain reduction. However, its effect on opioid consumption remains unclear.

Learning curve of ultrasound-guided surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane (UGSA-TAP) block on a porcine model

BackgroundSurgeons commonly perform ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks to manage acute pain following abdominal surgeries. There is no consensus on whether surgeons should undergo basic hands-on training to perform TAP blocks or if video-based learning is sufficient. We theorized that simulation-based learning is superior to video-based learning. In the present study, we present the analysis of technical skills of UGSA-TAP block performance on a live porcine model by general surgery trainees after undergoing video or simulation-based learning. MethodsWe performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. Ten surgery residents and two surgery critical-care fellows (n = 12) without prior experience in performing the TAP block were recruited. The participants were randomized either into a video-based or simulation-based training group. After that, all participants performed a TAP block on a live anesthetized pig, which was recorded and scored by three blinded anesthesiologists. All participants completed a post-performance survey to assess their confidence in gaining competency in the UGSA-TAP block. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsAll simulation-based learning participants successfully performed a survey scan, identified the three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, and identified the transversus abdominis plane compared to 50 %, 50 %, and 33 % video-based learning group participants for the respective parameters (p < 0.05). While some performance metrics showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, substantial effect sizes (Cohen's ℎ up to 1.07) highlighted notable differences in participants' performance. Both groups exhibited confidence in core competencies, with varied rates of satisfactory skill execution. Performance assessed using a global rating scale revealed a higher passing rate for the simulation group (83 % vs. 33 %). Participant feedback via the Likert scale reflected confidence post-training. Inter-rater reliability (0.83–1) confirmed the robustness of study evaluations. ConclusionThe UGSA-TAP block curriculum should be introduced into the surgical residency programs with an emphasis on simulation-based learning to enhance the procedural skills of the trainees before transitioning to surgical patients.

Open Approach to the Transversus Abdominis Plane in Horses: A Cadaver Feasibility Study.

The study's objective was to evaluate the feasibility and dispersion of an open approach to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in eight adult equine cadavers. A ventral midline incision was made, starting 2 cm cranial to the umbilicus and extending 25 cm cranially. In total, 0.5 mL/kg of new methylene blue (NMB) was injected per horse, divided into six injections. Using an 18 g, 8 cm Tuohy needle, three injections were made per side. The needle was guided blindly into the TAP using palpation. A 60 mL syringe was attached directly to the needle, depositing ~0.08 mL/kg at each site. The time to complete the injections was recorded for each cadaver. Following injection, the ventral body wall was dissected to determine if the dye was present within the TAP space as well as to measure the extent of the dispersion of the dye, the cranial to caudal extent, and the width of the dye's spread. Complete deposition of NMB into the TAP (six of six sites) was achieved in 5/8 horses. The median time needed to perform all the injections was 263 s. Increased adiposity (retroperitoneal fat) was associated with unsuccessful injections. This approach to the TAP was easily and quickly performed, though less successful in horses with increased retroperitoneal fat and increased BCS.

Laparoscopic vs. ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

The transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is effective for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, evidence regarding the optimal delivery method, either laparoscopic (L-TAPB) or ultrasound-guided (U-TAPB) is lacking. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these delivery methods. We carried out a literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to include randomized studies comparing patients receiving either L-TAPB or U-TAPB during minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption in the first 24h after surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB-2 tool. Effect size was estimated for each study with 95% confidence interval and overall effect measure was estimated with a random effect model. The literature search revealed 294 articles, of which four randomized trials were eligible. A total of 359 patients were included, 176 received a L-TAPB and 183 received a U-TAPB. We established the non-inferiority of L-TAPB, as the absolute difference of - 2.6 morphine-mg (95%CI - 8.3 to 3.0) was below the pooled non-inferiority threshold of 8.1 morphine-mg (low certainty level). No difference in opioid consumption was noted at 2, 6, 12, and 48h (low to very low certainty level). Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting were similar between groups at different timepoints (low to very low certainty level). No TAPB-related complications were recorded. Finally, the length of hospital stay was similar between groups. For postoperative multimodal analgesia both L-TAPB and U-TAPB may result in little to no difference in outcome in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Registration Prospero CRD42023421141.

Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Blinded, Active-Controlled, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthetic nerve blocks are widely used in the treatment of pain after outpatient surgery to reduce opioid consumption. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique with promising results in different scenarios. OBJECTIVES: To compare ESP block efficacy with the commonly used transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing robot-assisted inguinal hernia repair. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, blinded, active controlled, superiority trial with 2 parallel groups. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Registration took place on www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT04750512. SETTING: Adults undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair were recruited between January 2021 and April 2022 in a single referral center of southern Switzerland. METHODS: To ensure blinding, the study employed a “double dummy” design, where all patients underwent both TAP and ESP blocks, but only one block was therapeutically active. The therapeutic block contained ropivacaine 0.2%, while the other infiltration contained placebo. The therapeutic intervention varied between groups, with one group receiving the TAP block as the active treatment and the other group receiving the ESP block as the active treatment. Computer generated 1:1 randomization determined allocation, which took place immediately prior to the intervention. As a result, blinding included patients, anesthesia, and surgery providers, outcome assessors and statistical analysts. The main outcome measure was the highest reported pain score on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the 6 hours following the end of general anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at set intervals, analgesic consumption, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (25 per arm) were enrolled and included in the analysis. The study found no significant difference in the mean maximal VAS scores between the 2 groups (TAP block 22.2, ESP block 20, difference 2.2, 95% CI is -12.1 to 16.5). Secondary endpoints, including VAS pain scores at different time points, use of rescue analgesics, time to first walk, duration of stay, and frequency of adverse events, did not show any significant differences between the 2 groups. However, post-hoc analysis suggested a more stable effect over time for the ESP block compared to the TAP block. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is a higher variance in VAS scores than expected in the power calculations. CONCLUSIONS: ESP block was not superior to TAP block in the treatment of post-operative pain among patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair. KEY WORDS: Inguinal hernia, conduction anesthesia, postoperative pain, robotic surgical procedures, ESP block

Analgesic Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III and Type II Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

Appropriate pain management promotes immediate mobilization and allows the parturient to adequately care for her neonate after cesarean section (CS). This trial objective was to compare the type III and type II quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) regarding postoperative analgesic effect in CS. This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial involved 60 women presenting for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were assigned randomly to either the QLB type III, QLB type II, or lateral TAPB group. All blocks were performed using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally at the end of the operation with ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The level of patient satisfaction was graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Numerical rating scale measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours and total consumed meperidine in the 1st 24 hours after the operation were reduced significantly in QLB III than in QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05) with an insignificant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). The onset of the first request for analgesia was delayed significantly in QLB III, compared to QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05), without a significant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction and adverse events (e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension) exhibited insignificant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). The QLB type III ensured better analgesia as evidenced by significantly lower pain measurements and amount of meperidine in the first 24 hours after the operation with delayed time of the first rescue analgesia in comparison to QLB II and TAPB; however, QLB II and TAPB were similar.

A Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Decreases Hospital Length of Stay Compared to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Open Radical Cystectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background: Poorly managed postoperative pain can prolong hospital stays and increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). Despite strong support from the clinical guidelines for using surgical site-specific peripheral regional anesthetic techniques and neuraxial analgesia, their effects on postoperative outcomes are unclear. Objectives: This study aims to fill the above knowledge gap by comparing thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and continuous transversus abdominis plane (CTAP) blocks in ORC patients. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we conducted chart reviews at a quaternary care academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, between March 2015 and September 2017. Patients undergoing ORC and receiving either CTAP or TEA were included. The primary outcome was the hospital length of stay (HLOS), and secondary outcomes included time until ambulation, postoperative narcotic usage, and renal function as measured by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: We studied 146 patients, 124 of whom met our inclusion criteria. Patients receiving CTAP had a 17.4% reduction in HLOS (95% CI: 3.2, 29.4; P = 0.02) and a 13.9% reduction in time until ambulation (95% CI: 3.4, 23.3; P = 0.01) compared to those receiving TEA. This was equivalent to a relative decrease in HLOS of approximately 2.1 days in the CTAP group as compared to the TEA group. No significant differences were observed in narcotic usage or GFR between the two groups. Our sensitivity analyses using instrumental variables analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions: Continuous transversus abdominis plane was associated with a shorter HLOS and quicker time to ambulate compared to TEA, without affecting narcotic usage or renal function. These findings suggest that CTAP may be a viable alternative to TEA for perioperative analgesia in ORC patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

The Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane (SCTAP) Block on Postoperative Pain Relief in a Patient Undergoing Cholecystectomy: A Case Report

Introduction: Handling post-operative pain in cholecystectomy requires several considerations, especially in terms of pain management. Various multimodal analgesia strategies to optimize postoperative pain control include epidural catheter placement, intravenous opioids, and the recently introduced ultrasonography (USG)-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (SCTAP) block. This case report aims to describe the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided SCTAP block in a patient undergoing open cholecystectomy.&#x0D; Case presentation: A 57 year old female patient with a diagnosis of multiple cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, was planned to undergo cholecystectomy, under general anesthesia and SCTAP block, with an ultrasound probe placed under the costal margin, the transversus abdominis muscle fascia was identified and local anesthetic infiltration laterally with bupivacaine plain 0.25 % 20 ml each on the left and right sides. Postoperatively, the patient returned to the room and received oral analgesics without opioids for pain management.&#x0D; Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided SCTAP blocks provide effective postoperative analgesia, reduce the need for postoperative analgesics, while supporting recovery after open cholecystectomy.

Two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block as an equivalent alternative to thoracic epidural anaesthesia in bowel resection—an explorative cohort study

PurposeWe evaluated the effect of the two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block (TS-L-TAPB) in comparison to thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and a one-stage L-TAPB (OS-L-TAPB) in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic bowel resection.MethodsWe compared a TS-L-TAPB (266 mg bupivacaine), which was performed bilaterally at the beginning and end of surgery, with two retrospective cohorts. These were patients who had undergone a TEA (ropivacaine/sufentanil) or an OS-L-TAPB (200 mg ropivacaine) at the beginning of surgery. Oral and i.v. opiate requirements were documented over the first 3 postoperative days (POD).ResultsPatients were divided into three groups TEA (n = 23), OS-L-TAPB (n = 75), and TS-L-TAPB (n = 49). By the evening of the third POD, patients with a TEA had a higher cumulative opiate requirement with a median of 45.625 mg [0; 202.5] than patients in the OS-L-TAPB group at 10 mg [0; 245.625] and the TS-L-TAPB group at 5.625 mg [0; 215.625] (p = 0.1438). One hour after arrival in the recovery room, significantly more patients in the TEA group (100%) did not need oral and i.v. opioids than in the TS-L-TAPB (78%) and OS-L-TAPB groups (68%) (p = 0.0067).This was without clinical relevance however as the median in all groups was 0 mg. On the third POD, patients in the TEA group had a significantly higher median oral and i.v. opioid dose at 40 mg [0; 80] than the TS-L-TAPB and OS-L-TAPB groups, both at 0 mg [0; 80] (p = 0.0009).ConclusionThe TS-L-TAP showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits over TEA and OS-L-TAP in reducing postoperative opiate requirements.

Analgesic Strategies for Urologic Videolaparoscopic or Robotic Surgery in the Context of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol: A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block.

Regional anesthesia in postoperative pain management has developed in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic or robotic urologic surgery. This was a prospective observational study; 97 patients (ESPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in each side at the level of T7-T9 and 93 patients (TAPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375% or 0.25%. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, which was significantly lower in the ESPB group on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.001) and, consequently, the number of patients requiring postoperative supplemental analgesic rescue therapies was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Concerning the secondary outcomes, consumption of ropivacaine was significantly lower in the group (p < 0.001) and the total amount of analgesic rescue doses was significantly lower in the ESPB-group than the TAPB-group in postoperative days from 2 to 4 (1 vs. 3, p > 0.001). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the TAPB group and no block-related complications were observed. Our data indicate that ESPB provides postoperative pain control at least as good as TAPB plus morphine, with less local anesthetic needed.

Comparison of epidural infusion versus intrathecal morphine block as part of enhanced recovery after open pancreatoduodenectomy.

The accepted approach to pain management following open pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial, with the most recent enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols recommending epidural anesthesia (EA). Few studies have investigated intrathecal (IT) morphine, combined with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks. We aim to compare the different approaches to pain management for open PD. Patients who underwent open PD at our institution from 2020 to 2022 were included in the study. Patient characteristics, pain management, and postoperative outcomes between EA, IT morphine with TAP blocks, and TAP blocks only were compared using univariate analysis. Fiftypatients were included in the study (58% male, median age 66 years [interquartile range,IQR: 58-73]). Most patients received IT morphine (N = 24, 48%) or EA (N = 18, 36%). The TAP block-only group required higher doses of postoperative narcotics while hospitalized (p = 0.004) and at discharge (p = 0.017). The IT morphine patients had a shorter median time to Foley removal (p = 0.007). Postoperative pain scores, non-opioid administration, postoperative bolus requirements, postoperative outcomes, and length of stay were similar between pain modalities. IT morphine and EA showed comparable efficacy with superior results compared to TAP blocks alone. Integration of IT morphine into PD ERAS protocols should be considered.

COMPARISON OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE WITH TWO DIFFERENT ADJUVANTS (DEXAMETHASONE VS. DEXMEDETOMIDINE) IN ULTRASONOGRAPHY-GUIDED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK FOR UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLINDED CONTROL TRIAL

Objectives: Ultrasonography (USG)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing intraabdominal surgery. This study was aimed to compare the post-operative analgesia, hemodynamic variables, sedation, and adverse effects of levobupivacaine with two different adjuvants (dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine) in USG-guided TAP block for patients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy under subarachnoid block. Methods: A double-blind randomized control study, conducted on 96 patients, allocated in three groups of 32 each. Patients in group C received 0.25% levobupivacaine (20 mL) with normal saline (2 mL), group D1 received 0.25% levobupivacaine (20 mL) added with 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone (2 mL) and group D2 received 0.25% levobupivacaine added with 0.5 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted in NS (2 mL). Pain was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The time for request of first analgesia (TFA), total number and total dose of rescue analgesic in 24 h were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using unpaired Student’s t-test and ANOVA. Results: At 12 and 24 h &gt;30% of patients had VAS ≥4 in control group while it was &lt;10% in groups D1 and D2 (p&lt;0.001). TFA was earliest in control group (6.10±0.96 h) as compared to group D1 (7.26±1.22 h) and group D2 (7.49±1.02 h) (p&lt;0.001). The total number and total dose of analgesic given were higher in the control group than other two groups (p&lt;0.001). However, it was comparable between groups D1 and D2 (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine when added as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine for TAP significantly prolonged the duration of post-operative analgesia as compared to levobupivacaine alone, however, it was found to be comparable between adjuvant groups.