Transtibial Pullout Research Articles

Comparison of the effects between arthroscopic transtibial pullout technique and all-inside repair in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears

Comparison of the effects between arthroscopic transtibial pullout technique and all-inside repair in the treatment of medial meniscus posterior root tears

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair With Modified Mason-Allen Technique for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

Medial meniscal posterior root tears are a well-known risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. Transtibial pullout repair is mostly reported, and good results have been reported for pullout repair using the modified Mason-Allen technique; techniques using suture anchors have also been reported. Herein, we report a technique for suture anchor repair using the modified Mason-Allen technique. An anchor with 2 sutures is inserted at the attachment site of the medial meniscal root via the posteromedial portal using a curved guide. A vertical suture was made on the posterior portion of the meniscus with one suture, and another suture is then inserted just medial to the vertical suture and tied over the first vertical suture using a self-locking sliding knot through the anteromedial portal. This technique may potentially improve medial meniscal posterior root tears repair outcomes and provide some technical advantages, especially in combination with high tibial osteotomy.

Suture anchor and transtibial pullout refixation of the posterior medial meniscus root tears restore tibiofemoral contact pressure and area to intact meniscus levels.

To compare the load distributed to the medial tibial articular cartilage after refixation of posterior medial meniscus root tears between the suture anchor and transtibial pullout techniques in posterior medial meniscus root tears. Twelve Thiel's embalmed human cadaveric knees are used and divided into three groups (four knees in each group): (1) intact meniscus (IM), (2) fixation with suture anchor technique (SA) and (3) fixation with transtibial pullout technique (TP). Each group applies an axial compression load up to 1500 N by Instron E 10000 at two knee flexion angles (0° and 60°). A Tekscan 4000 pressure sensor is used to record the contact pressure and the contact area for each testing condition. The contact pressure and the contact area between the three conditions are not significantly different at 0° and 60° knee flexion angles. The peak contact pressure and contact area are 3734.8 ± 2642.2 kPa, 288.2 ± 115.0 mm2, 4510 ± 2930.5 kPa, 204.4 ± 36.8 mm2 and 5328.8 ± 2607.7 kPa, 219.2 ± 84.7 mm2 in IM, SA and TP, respectively. Both suture anchor and transtibial pullout refixation of PMMRT can restore contact pressure and contact area similar to the intact meniscus. This finding suggests that either technique can be reliably used in clinical practice to preserve joint function and potentially reduce the risk of osteoarthritis progression following posterior medial meniscus root tear repairs. Level III.

Biomechanical Comparison of Suture-Relay All-Suture Anchors and Conventional Suture Anchors for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair in Porcine Models.

Posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tears (PMMRTs) can be repaired using various techniques to promote healing. However, the biomechanical properties of suture-relay all-suture anchor (ASA) versus conventional suture anchor (CSA) and loop-locking transtibial pullout (TTP) have not been well established. To compare the biomechanical properties of PMMR repairs using suture-relay ASA, CSA, and loop-locking TTP. Controlled laboratory study. A total of 33 fresh-frozen porcine knee joints with intact medial menisci were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 11 specimens in each group: ASA, CSA, and TTP. The study involved cyclic loading, with displacement measurements taken after 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Subsequently, the specimens were loaded until clinical failure (defined as 3-mm displacement) and then to ultimate failure of the construct, with data recorded for displacement after cyclic loading, load to 3-mm displacement, and ultimate load to failure. After 1000 cyclic loadings, the suture-relay ASA group showed considerably less displacement than the loop-locking TTP group (1.8 ± 0.7 mm vs 2.9 ± 0.3 mm; P < .001), but the displacements did not differ considerably between the suture-relay ASA and CSA groups (2.2 ± 0.9 mm; P > .05). The mean loads to clinical failure were significantly greater in the suture-relay ASA and CSA groups (61.3 ± 6.5 and 57.5 ± 9.7 N, respectively) than in the loop-locking TTP group (38.3 ± 9.4 N; P < .05). The ultimate load to failure was significantly greater in the suture-relay ASA group than in the loop-locking TTP group (153 ± 55.1 N vs 102 ± 12.9 N; P < .05). All specimens in the loop-locking TTP group failed by suture elongation mode, whereas only 2 specimens (18%) in the suture-relay ASA group and 5 specimens (45%) in the CSA group failed by suture elongation. Nine specimens (82%) in the suture-relay ASA group and 6 specimens (55%) in the CSA group failed due to suture cutout through the meniscal tissue. The biomechanical properties after PMMR repair did not statistically differ between the suture-relay ASA and CSA groups. The suture-relay ASA technique had a higher load to failure than the loop-locking TTP technique. The suture-relay ASA technique is a promising option for the repair of PMMRTs; its repairing strength is also comparable to that of the CSA technique. Notably, the suture-relay ASA technique can be utilized without establishing a posteromedial portal, resulting in decreased procedure time and mitigating challenges associated with working from the posterior aspect of the knee.

Biomechanical comparison of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sutures of different thicknesses of the tensile strength for pullout repair of medial meniscal posterior root tear.

Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) are a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis. The predominant treatment for MMPRT is transtibial pullout repair, and loop suture remains the gold standard procedure. This study aimed to investigate the structural properties of the meniscus-suture-tibia (MST) complex after loop stitch using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape of different thicknesses. This study used 20 fresh porcine MMPRT model knees. All specimens were randomised into two treatment groups: (1) pullout repair using 1.3 mm suture tape (thin group, n = 10; 1.3 mm PERMATAPE, Mitek Sports Medicine) fixation and (2) pullout repair using 2.5 mm suture tape (thick group, n = 10; 2.5 mm PERMATAPE, Mitek Sports Medicine) fixation. The single-loop stitch MS technique was utilised. The MST complex specimens were placed on a tensile tester. The structural properties of the MST complex (yield load, maximum load, liner stiffness, and elongation at failure) were identified. No significant differences were found between the thin and thick groups in terms of maximum load (108.8 ± 49.6 vs. 90.1 ± 33.6 N; p = 0.34), yield load (43.8 ± 15.2 vs. 39.4 ± 15.5 N; p = 0.53), liner stiffness (12.6 ± 8.4 vs. 11.2 ± 5.5 N/mm; p = 0.45), and elongation at failure (27.1 ± 19.4 vs. 19.9 ± 10.0 mm; p = 0.32). The structural properties of the thickness of the different UHMWPE were comparable in MMPRT repair. Additionally, 1.3 mm PERMATAPE may demonstrate similar repair potential as 2.5 mm PERMATAPE. Level Ⅳ.

Intra-Tunnel Knotless Anchor Fixation for Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Novel Technique.

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) are radial tears that occur within 10mm of the posterior root tibial connection, also known as lateral meniscus posterior root avulsions. A common surgical approach for LMPRT (2) that contributes to positive biomechanical outcomes is independent transtibial pullout repair.(6,7,8) If this treatment is performed on people who need both LMPRT repair and ACL restoration, an extra tibial tunnel is required. The installation of a tibial tunnel increases surgical challenges and lengthens operation time, as well as the danger of iatrogenic damage to the normal architecture of the knee. To circumvent these drawbacks, we have developed a novel technique for intra-tunnel LMPRT repair using a knotless anchor construct at the upper posterior edge of the tibial tunnel. A stab incision is made to create the standard antero lateral portal and after introducing the trochar and the scope, a round of diagnostic arthroscopy is performed and the posterior root of lateral meniscus tear is identified. After creating an anteromedial portal, With help of 1 fiber tape, a loaded bite is taken with the help of a first pass mini device (Smith & Nephew), via the antero medial portal, deep into the posterior root ( around 5mm), using a self winching technique, and reduction of the LMPRT is checked. The position for the anchor entry is visualized in the superior edge of the tibial tunnel along its posterior wall, and the tapes are passed through the knotless anchor extra-articulately outside the AM portal. Thereafter, the anchor is shuttled in through the AM portal and punched in the footprint on the posterior-superior edge of the tibial tunnel with visualization of the reduction of the LMPR to the footprint. This technique offers a simple solution to a complex problem in the form of a simple procedure. This technique is a good choice when a tear of the posterior root of the LM occurs.

Biomechanical analysis of four different meniscus suturing techniques for posterior meniscal root pull-out repair: A human cadaveric study.

Tocompare the biomechanical properties of the slip-knot technique with three other transtibial pullout suture repair constructs for meniscal root tears. Thirty-two fresh-frozen cadaveric menisci were randomly allocated to four meniscus-suture fixation constructs: Two simple-sutures (TSS), two slip-knot (TSK) sutures, two cinch-loop (TCL) sutures, and two modified Mason-Allen (TMMA) sutures. Cyclic loading from 5 to 20 N was conducted for 1000 cycles at 0.5 Hz, and then loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Parametric data (displacement during cyclic loading, ultimate load, yield load, and displacement at failure) were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas nonparametric data (stiffness) were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. After 1000 cycles, the TCL construct significantly displaced the most (mean ± SD, 6.78 ± 1.32 mm; p < 0.001), followed by the TMMA (2.83 ± 0.90 mm), TSK (2.33 ± 0.57 mm), and TSS (2.03 ± 0.62 mm) groups. On ultimate failure load, there was no significant difference between the TSK group (123.48 ± 27.24 N, p > 0.05) and the other three groups (TSS, 94.65 ± 25.33 N; TMMA, 168.38 ± 23.24 N; TCL, 170.54 ± 57.32 N); however, it exhibited the least displacement (5.53 ± 1.25 mm) which was significantly shorter than those of the TCL (11.82 ± 4.25 mm, p < 0.001) and TMMA (9.53 ± 2.18 mm, p = 0.03) constructs. No significant difference in stiffness was observed among the four meniscus-suture constructs. The slip-knot technique has proven to be a simple, yet robust and stable meniscal root fixation option; moreover, it exhibited superiority over the more complex modified Mason-Allen suture construct in resisting displacement at the ultimate failure load. Not applicable.

Accurate tibial tunnel position in transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears delays the progression of medial joint space narrowing.

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the progression of medial joint space (MJS) narrowing, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores and the tibial tunnel position in pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). This retrospective study examined 54 patients. Changes in MJS (ΔMJS), MME (ΔMME) and clinical scores and their relationship with the tibial tunnel position were evaluated using correlation coefficients. The distance from the anatomical to technical attachment position in the tibial tunnel position was measured in the anterior and medial directions, and the direct distance was measured using the Pythagorean theorem. The mean ΔMJS and ΔMME were 0.6 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, and the mean anterior, medial and direct distances were 1.4 ± 2.3, 2.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. ΔMJS had a significant positive correlation with the medial (r = 0.580, p < 0.001) and direct (r = 0.559, p < 0.001) distances, while ΔMME had a significant positive correlation with direct distance (r = 0.295, p = 0.030). Several clinical scores were significantly negatively correlated with these distances. In transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs, accurate tibial tunnel position delayed the progression of MJS narrowing and MME, leading to improved clinical outcomes. The progression of MJS narrowing was associated with the mediolateral direction of the tibial tunnel position, while the clinical scores were associated with the anteroposterior direction of the tibial tunnel position. These findings indicate the need to orient the tip of the guide in a more posterolateral direction when creating the tibial tunnel. Level IV.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Repair and Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee

As an important structure for maintaining the hoop tension of the medial meniscus of the knee joint, the posterior root is receiving increasing attention. Medial meniscus posterior root tear is an important reason for the occurrence, development, and kinematics changes of knee osteoarthritis. It is necessary to repair the posterior root of meniscus for restoring joint kinematics and improving clinical efficacy. This Technical Note reports a medial meniscus posterior root tear repair technique using arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) combined with tibial condylar valgus osteotomy. The aim of this technique is to repair the posterior root of the medial meniscus while correcting the force line through osteotomy, opening the joint gap, improving the joint surface fit, providing a good mechanical environment for meniscus repair, thereby improving the healing rate of the posterior root of the meniscus and reducing the risk of retear. Although clinical evidence is currently limited, we believe that this technology may have more clinical advantages compared with ATPR alone or ATPR combined with high tibial osteotomy.

Superior outcomes of pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears in partial tear compared to complete radial tear

PurposeTo reveal the outcomes of partial medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair compared with the outcomes of complete radial meniscus posterior root tears.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 15 consecutive patients (male/female, 5/10; average age, 64.4 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repair for partial medial meniscus posterior root tears and compared their results with those of 86 consecutive patients who underwent the same surgery for complete medial meniscus posterior root tears. All patients underwent second-look arthroscopy on average 1 year postoperatively, and a semi-quantitative meniscal healing score (anteroposterior width, stability, and synovial coverage, total 10 points) was evaluated. Medial meniscus extrusion was evaluated preoperatively and at second-look arthroscopy.ResultsPostoperative clinical scores were not significantly different in the short term. However, second-look arthroscopy revealed a significant difference in repaired meniscal stability (partial tear; 3.3 points, complete tear; 2.3 points, p < 0.001) and total meniscal healing scores (partial tear; 8.3 points, complete tear; 7.1 points, p < 0.001). Medial meniscus extrusion progression was significantly different (partial tear; 0.4 mm, complete tear; 1.0 mm, p < 0.001).ConclusionPartial medial meniscus posterior root tears showed better meniscal healing and less medial meniscus extrusion progression following pullout repair than complete medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Initial tension at suture fixation affects the suture breakage following medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate whether the initial suture tension when pullout sutures are fixed affects postoperative clinical outcomes following medial meniscus posterior root repair. MethodsThe data of 48 patients who underwent transtibial pullout repair using two simple stitches (outer and inner sutures) with an additional all-inside posteromedial pullout were retrospectively investigated. The patients were sequentially divided into two groups to compare the clinical efficacy of the initial pullout tension (N) when pullout sutures were fixed: the 30 N Group (April 2019 to September 2019, 24 patients) and the 15 N group (October 2019 to February 2020, 24 patients). The rate of suture breakage (suture cutout or rupture) at the second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively and clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively were compared between the two groups. ResultsIn both groups, each clinical score significantly improved at 2 years postoperatively. At the second-look arthroscopy, the rate of posteromedial suture breakage was significantly higher in the 30 N group (19 patients, 79 ​%) than in the 15 N group (10 patients, 42 ​%); the rate of outer suture breakage was also higher in the 30 N group (five patients, 21 ​%) than in the 15 N group (no patients). On comparing 2 years of preoperative clinical scores between the groups categorized according to posteromedial suture breakage, the pain score was significantly higher in the suture breakage group. ConclusionsThe initial tension of pullout repair of the medial meniscus posterior root tear is related to suture breakages. To prevent suture breakage, 15 N is a more initially suitable condition than 30 N. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Revision Transtibial Medial Meniscal Root Repair With Concomitant Medial Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy

Background: Complete meniscal root tears disrupt dispersion of axial loading forces through hoop stresses. This increases point-loading on tibiofemoral cartilage and leads to chondromalacia and accelerated osteoarthritis (OA). Posterior root tears may be treated successfully with a transtibial pullout repair. Varus malalignment also leads to increased medial compartment pressures, increasing the risk of early OA and putting increased stress on the meniscus and stabilizing knee ligaments. In particular, revision medial meniscal root repairs without correction of varus malalignment are at increased risk of failure. Genu varum may be corrected with a medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (OW PTO). Indications: Meniscal root repairs are indicated for acute or chronic tears in active patients with healthy cartilage. OW PTO is indicated for varus malalignment in ambulatory patients with healthy cartilage, or who are at risk for failure of meniscal or ligamentous procedures. Technique Description: After exposure of the osteotomy site, arthroscopy is performed through the incision and the revision posterior meniscus root repair is performed via a double-tunnel transtibial pullout technique. The positioning of these tunnels is modified superiorly so as to not cross the planned osteotomy site. The osteotomy is then performed by drilling 2 guide pins under fluoroscopy to delineate the plane of the cut. An OW plate is placed, and the root repair is tensioned last. Results: Double-tunnel transtibial pullout repairs increase meniscal fixation contact surface and have been shown to be biomechanically superior to all-inside fixation techniques. Medial OW PTO restores knee alignment and reduces supra-anatomic stresses in the medial compartment, additionally decreasing the risk of a revision medial meniscus repair failure. Discussion: Biomechanical studies have shown that meniscal root tears are functionally equivalent to complete meniscectomy. Varus malalignment increases the risk of medial meniscal tears, and reduces the risk of a successful long-term repair. We describe a technique for a revision transosseous posterior root repair with concomitant proximal tibial osteotomy, with discussion of surgical pearls and pitfalls. This technique restores anatomic position and native function of the medial meniscus while correcting tibiofemoral malalignment that could jeopardize the repair. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form.

Weight loss enhances meniscal healing following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

This study investigated the impact of weight change on the success of transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (MMPRTs). The study included 129 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who had undergone transtibial pullout repair. The patients were screened between July 2018 and November 2021. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MM extrusion (MME) and ΔMME (postoperative MME - preoperative MME) were calculated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into weight loss (body mass index [BMI] decrease of at least 0.5 kg/m2 after primary repair; n = 63) and weight gain (BMI increase of at least 0.5 kg/m2 ; n = 66) groups. Both groups had similar demographic variables and preoperative clinical scores; patient-reported outcomes significantly improved postoperatively. The weight loss group had significantly greater improvement in KOOS-quality of life (weight loss, 29.4 ± 23.7; weight gain, 23.9 ± 27.6; p = 0.034), lower postoperative MME (weight loss, 3.9 ± 1.7 mm; weight gain, 4.2 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.043) and lower ΔMME (weight loss, 0.8 ± 0.8 mm; weight gain, 1.2 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.002) than the weight gain group. Total arthroscopic healing scores (weight loss, 7.6 ± 1.0; weight gain, 7.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.048) and associated subscales, including anteroposterior bridging tissue width (weight loss, 4.0 ± 0.0; weight gain, 3.8 ± 0.7; p = 0.004) and MM posterior root stability (weight loss, 2.6 ± 0.7; weight gain, 2.4 ± 0.7; p = 0.041), significantly differed between the groups. Weight loss was associated with better meniscal healing and less MME progression after MMPRT repair, highlighting the significance of weight management in individuals undergoing meniscal surgery. These findings provide valuable insights into the clinical significance of weight loss in the success of transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs. Level III.

Intercondylar notch width and osteophyte width impact meniscal healing and clinical outcomes following transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears.

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between intercondylar notch width (ICNW), osteophyte width (OW), and the healing of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) following arthroscopic pullout repair. The study included 155 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who underwent transtibial pullout repair. Meniscal healing status was evaluated on second-look arthroscopy using a previously reported meniscus healing score. Patients were divided into two groups based on this score: the high healing score (group HH, healing score ≥ 8 points) and suboptimal healing score (group SO, healing score ≤ 6 points) groups. Computed tomography scans were performed on patients 1 week postsurgery. ICNW and OW widths were measured and relatively evaluated based on their ratio to the intercondylar distance (ICD), represented as the ICNW/ICD ratio (%) and OW/ICD ratio (%), respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). There were no significant demographic differences between the SO and HH group (n = 35 and 120 patients, respectively). Regarding radiographic measurements, significant differences were observed in the ICNW/ICD ratio (group SO, 24.2%; group HH, 25.2%; p = 0.024), OW (group SO, 2.6 mm; group HH, 2.0 mm; p < 0.001), and OW/ICD ratio (group SO, 3.5%; group HH, 2.7%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar preoperative clinical scores, but postoperative clinical scores, including KOOS-activities of daily living (group SO, 83.4; group HH, 88.7; p = 0.035) and VAS (group SO, 19.1; group HH, 11.3; p = 0.005), were significantly better in group HH. The study suggests that ICNW and OW may play a crucial role in MMPRT healing following arthroscopic pullout repair, as evidenced by the worse clinical outcomes associated with a narrower ICNW and wider OW. These findings highlight the potential significance of ICNW and OW assessments when evaluating meniscal repair indications. Level III.

Correlation between Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture of the Knee and Osteoarthritis Progression in Patients with Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

A medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) contributes to knee joint degeneration. Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) may restore biomechanical integrity for load transmission. However, degeneration persists after ATPR in certain patients, particularly those with preoperative subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK). We explored the relationship between preoperative SIFK and osteoarthritis (OA) progression in retrospectively enrolled patients who were diagnosed as having an MMPRT and had received ATPR within a single institute. Based on their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), these patients were then categorized into SIFK and non-SIFK groups. OA progression was evaluated by determining Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade changes and preoperative and postoperative median joint widths. SIFK characteristics were quantified using Image J (Version 1.52a). Both groups exhibited significant post-ATPR changes in medial knee joint widths. The SIFK group demonstrated significant KL grade changes (p &lt; 0.0001). A larger SIFK size in the tibia and a greater lesion-to-tibia length ratio in the coronal view were positively correlated with more significant KL grade changes (p = 0.008 and 0.002, respectively). Thus, preoperative SIFK in patients with an MMPRT was associated with knee OA progression. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between SIFK lesion characteristics and knee OA progression.

Hybrid Repair of a Medial Meniscus Mid-Body Radial Tear

Background: Meniscal radial tears are associated with altered contact mechanics, as they have the potential to disrupt the meniscal hoop stress mechanism. In prior studies, radial tears are associated with higher grade of cartilage damage, as well as higher rate and severity of meniscal extrusion in knees with a radial tear relative to other types of tears. Improved understanding of the meniscus biological potential together with modern developments in surgical technique has paved the way for the current emphasis on repairing even radial tears. Indication: Large or complete radial tears of the meniscus without prohibitive joint space narrowing or severe cartilage damage. Technique Description: A hybrid technique of meniscal radial repair is described, combining (1) 2 transtibial pullout cinch-loop sutures, (2) 2 inside-out vertical rip-stop sutures and 2 oblique sutures in a “cross-tag” configuration, and (3) 1 horizontal mattress all-inside suture. The repair is biologically augmented with a notch marrow-venting procedure. Results: Recent evidence has demonstrated significant biomechanical benefit in terms of increased load to failure and construct strength when adding transtibial tunnel augmentation to radial repairs. In addition, rip-stop sutures decrease the chance of cut-out relative to nonreinforced repairs. Those biomechanical advancements are reflected in excellent patient-reported outcomes as well as healing rates following radial repair. Discussion/Conclusion: We present a hybrid technique encompassing the most biomechanically effective novel radial repair techniques, backed by excellent clinical outcomes following radial repair in the current literature. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Insufficient restoration of meniscal extrusion by transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

The long-term changes in the dynamics of the medial meniscus after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) are not completely understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of transtibial pullout repair on MMPRTs and whether the effects would be sustained. Nineteen knees with MMPRTs that were treated by trans-tibial pullout repair were enrolled in this study. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured by ultrasonography during knee extension (no weight-bearing with the knee at 0° extension: NW0°) and 90° flexion (no weight-bearing with the knee at 90° flexion: NW90°) with the patient in the supine position and with full weight-bearing (FW0°) preoperatively and at 3 and 12months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score. The difference in MME with NW0° was not statistically significant between the preoperative (3.4 ± 1.0mm) and 12-month postoperative (3.7 ± 0.6mm) time points. The MME with NW90° at 3 (2.1 ± 0.7mm) and 12months (2.9 ± 0.6mm) postoperatively were significantly lower than the preoperative values (3.4 ± 0.8mm) (P < 0.05). However, the value significantly increased from 3 to 12months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The MME with FW0° at 12months postoperatively (4.3 ± 0.6mm) was significantly larger than that at pre-operatively (3.6 ± 0.9mm) (P < 0.05). All the patients' clinical conditions were significantly improved at 12months postoperatively when compared to their preoperative clinical conditions. Surgery did not reduce the extrusion in the no weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions at knee extension, and these values increased in the postoperative period. In addition, while the surgery reduced the extrusion in the knee flexion position, the restoration achieved by the surgery was not sustained in the long term. Level IV.

Comparison of medial tibiofemoral joint mechanics between all-suture anchors and transtibial pullout technique for posterior medial meniscal root tears

BackgroundThe posterior medial meniscal root tear (PMMRT) seriously impacts the tibiofemoral joint biomechanics. Two available techniques for PMMRT repair include the transtibial pullout (TPO) repair and all-suture anchor (ASA) repair techniques. These techniques have not been compared biomechanically.MethodsA total of 20 fresh porcine cadaveric knee specimens were used. All 20 knees were randomly and evenly distributed into four groups (five specimens per group): (1) intact posterior meniscal root, (2) PMMRT, (3) TPO repair technique for PMMRT, and (4) ASA repair technique for PMMRT. The tibiofemoral contact mechanics were investigated using a pressure sensor. All knee specimens were tested by being loaded with 600 N axial compressive force at three different flexion angles (0°, 45°, and 90°). The contact surface area, contact pressure, peak pressure, and time-zero displacement were recorded.ResultsThe PMMRT caused a significant decrease in contact surface area, an increase in contact pressure, and peak pressure from the reference values observed in the intact meniscus group (P = 0.05, 0.016, and 0.008, respectively). After fixation, no significant difference was observed between the ASA and intact group. Meanwhile, significant differences were found between the TPO and intact group in terms of contact surface area, contact pressure, and peak pressure. In the comparison between the two techniques, the ASA group demonstrated higher contact surface area than the TPO group at the average knee flexion angle (p = 0.05).ConclusionFor most testing conditions, the ASA technique demonstrated superior biomechanical property in terms of contact surface area compared with the TPO technique under compressive loading conditions. The ASA technique could also restore the tibiofemoral contact mechanics to be comparable with those of the native intact knee. Meanwhile, a significant difference in tibiofemoral mechanics, compared with the intact knee, could be observed in the TPO technique.

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Different Sutures for the Tensile Strength of the Pullout Repair of Posterior Meniscal Root Tear.

Background Medial meniscal posterior root tear has garnered attention because it causes increased joint contact pressure and loss of load distribution function. Currently, the common treatment for posterior meniscal root tears is transtibial pullout repair, and loop suture remains the gold standard procedure. Purpose The aim of this study is to validate whether the meniscus-suture complex exhibits better structural properties after loop stitch using a suture tape versus the conventional thread. Study design and methods This is a controlled laboratory study. In total, 20 menisci harvested from castrated male pigs were prepared and randomly assigned to two suturing techniques: loop stitch using ULTRATAPE (n = 10, tape group) or loop stitch using 2-0 UltraBraid (n = 10, control group). The single-loop stitch meniscus-suture technique was used. A single suture using ULTRATAPE or 2-0 UltraBraid was placed through the meniscus 5 mm medial from the resected edge of the posterior meniscus horn. The meniscus-suture complex specimens were mounted on a tensile tester to apply tensile load on the meniscus-suture complex parallel to the long axis of the stitched suture materials. Each specimen was stretched to failure at a crosshead speed of 50 mm/minute. The structural properties of the meniscus-suture complex (maximum load, linear stiffness, and elongation at failure) were determined. Results In the tape group, all the repaired complexes were torn at the ligature; conversely, in the control group, the threads were torn in three of 10 specimens, and the repaired complexes in the remaining seven specimens were torn at the ligature. No significant between-group differences were observed in linear stiffness (9.0 ± 4.1 vs 7.1 ± 2.9 N/mm) and elongation at failure (15.8 ± 6.1 vs 19.6 ± 20.1 mm); however, the tape group exhibited a significantly higher average maximum load than the control group (104.6 ± 41.2 vs 62.6 ± 32.1 N; P = 0.020). Conclusion Suture tape can be a potential alternative to the conventional thread for Medial meniscal posterior root tear repair. Clinical relevance Medial meniscal posterior root tear repair using tape rather than the conventional thread may be beneficial in obtaining better structural properties.

Meniscus Radial Tears: Current Concepts on Management and Repair Techniques.

This review provides a historical perspective on the approach to radial tears and collates the currently available evidence on repair techniques, rehabilitation, and outcomes following the treatment of meniscus radial tears. Recent literature shows that the repair of meniscus radial tears reports improved patient-reported outcome scores with high return to function and activity. However, no single technique nor construct was proven better than the other. Various methods of repairing radial tears can be employed, with biomechanical research supporting all-inside double vertical sutures, the addition of vertical "rip-stop" mattress sutures, and transtibial pullout augmentation. To ensure proper healing before undergoing physical therapy, it is crucial to abstain from weight-bearing and deep knee flexion for the first 6weeks after surgery. Despite considerable heterogeneity in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols found in the current literature, studies reporting on radial repairs report positive results, with high healing rates and improved patient-reported outcomes.