Transradial Artery Approach Research Articles

E0639 Clinical study of Endeavour stent in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluated the safety and efficacy of Endeavor Stent in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via trans-radial artery approach for de novo...

Transradial and Transbrachial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Carotid Angiographic Examination and Stenting Using Catheter Looping and Retrograde Engagement Technique

The purpose of this study was to introduce a novel and safe technique with high procedural success for carotid artery stenting (CAS). From April 2004 to May 2009, 161 patients underwent CAS using either a high transradial arterial approach (TRA, defined as 10 cm above styloid process) or a transbrachial arterial approach (TBA) with a 7F arterial sheath. Selective carotid angiography was performed using a 6F Kimny guiding catheter and Teflon wire (260 cm in length) by Catheter Looping And Retrograde Engagement Technique (CLARET) with the guiding catheter seated on the right coronary cusp and its tip engaged into the common carotid artery (CCA). Teflon wire was introduced into the CCA again after the diagnostic procedure, followed by replacement of the 6F Kimny guiding catheter by a 7F Kimny catheter for CAS using one of the following techniques: (1) direct-engagement method, i.e., from right innominate artery into the right CCA; (2) looping method plus double-wire technique (utilized two Teflon wires to provide an adequate support) for both the right and left CCA; and (3) looping method plus a PercuSurge balloon anchoring at the external carotid artery. This distinctive technique offered 100% diagnostic success and 99.4% CAS success. Two patients (1.2%) experienced major ischemic stroke after CAS and two (1.2%) died during hospitalization. The results of the present study showed that high TRA/TBA using CLARET for CAS in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis is safe and technically feasible with an extremely high success rate.

AS-46: Transradial and Transbrachial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Carotid Angiographic Examination and Stenting Using Catheter Looping and Retrograde Engagement Technique

AS-46: Transradial and Transbrachial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Carotid Angiographic Examination and Stenting Using Catheter Looping and Retrograde Engagement Technique

SHA 08. Feasibility and safety of transradial arterial approach for simultaneous right and left vertebral artery angiographic studies and stenting

SHA 08. Feasibility and safety of transradial arterial approach for simultaneous right and left vertebral artery angiographic studies and stenting

AS-50: Is the Transradial Artery Approach Feasible for Percutaneous Angioplasty for Central Vein Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients?

AS-50: Is the Transradial Artery Approach Feasible for Percutaneous Angioplasty for Central Vein Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients?

Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventional procedures in the aged

：Objective To evaluate the safety and effect oftransradialartery approach for coronary intervention in the aged.Methods There were 314 cases whichwere more than 60 years old with coronary artery disease in hospital from Mar 2007 to May2009, who accepted coronary intervention.They were randomly divided into Transradialgroup(TRA, n=157) and Transfemoral group(TRF, n=157).The success rate and time ofpuncture, x-ray exposure time, procedure duration, complication in puncture site andpulmonary embolism were observed in the two groups.Results 149 out of 157 cases success inTRA group and 155 cases in TRF group.The success rate was not different.The success rateof puncture,xray exposure time and procedure duration had no difference between the twogroups.But the complication in puncture site and pulmonary embolism were more in TRF groupthan in TRA group. Conclusions Pereutaneous transradial artery approach is secure andeffective for coronary intervention treatment in the aged and has few vascularcomplications. Key words: Aged; Radial artery; Femoral artery; Angioplasty;

Outcomes of Interventions Via a Transradial Approach for Dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino Fistulas

The transradial artery approach to angioplasty has rarely been reported as a method for treating dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulas. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and 1-year efficacy of this method for treating dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulas. We retrospectively evaluated 154 consecutive procedures in 131 patients (age, 58.3 +/- 11.6 years; male, 48.1%) who underwent the transradial approach in dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulas in the 1-year period after the procedure. The operator determined the use of a regular or a cutting balloon (two cases) in combination with urokinase injection (one case) or catheter thromboaspiration. Radial artery puncture was successful in all cases. Fifty-two cases (33.8%) had totally occluded fibrotic lesions. The overall anatomic success rate and clinical success rate were 61% (94/154) and 81.1% (125/154), respectively. In cases with a totally occluded fibrotic lesion, the clinical success rate was 46%. Successful intervention was associated with a significant reduction in the radial arterial systolic and diastolic pressures. There were no complications of symptomatic arterial embolization or pulmonary embolism, and one complication of venous rupture was successfully treated by compression. The primary patency rates based on intention-to-treat were 75.3% at 30 days and 39.0% at 1 year after the procedure. Excluding the cases with a totally occluded lesion, the clinical success rate was 99% (101/102) and the primary patency rates were 84.3% (86/102) and 52.0% (53/102) at 3 months and 1 year after the procedure, respectively. In conclusion, the transradial approach is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative for catheter intervention for dysfunctional Brescia-Cimino fistulas. Its success rate in cases with a totally occluded fibrotic lesion is unsatisfactory.

Safety and Efficacy of Transradial vs Transfemoral Arterial Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction Single-Center Experience

The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the transradial arterial approach (TRA) is not inferior to the transfemoral arterial approach (TFA) for <or=Killip 3 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study enrolled 506 AMI patients undergoing primary PCI using the TRA (group 1) between March 2002 and May 2007, and 810 AMI patients undergoing primary PCI using TFA (group 2) between May 1993 and February 2002. The results demonstrated that puncture to first balloon-inflation time was similar in both groups; however, the procedure time was shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (P<0.0001). Additionally, the incidences of stenting, tirofiban therapy and final normal coronary blood flow of the infarct-related artery were higher, whereas the frequency of intra-aortic balloon pump support was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (all P<0.02). Although the 30-day mortality rate did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.341), the rate of combined major vascular and bleeding complications was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (P<0.0001). Initial selection of TRA is not inferior to initial selection of TFA for AMI patients undergoing primary PCI. However, in the present study, the incidence of combined vascular and bleeding complications was lower with the TRA than with the TFA approach.

Incidence of vascular complications in patients submitted to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by transradial and transfemoral arterial approach

OBJECTIVE: To describe the vascular complications of transradial and transfemoral artery punctures in patients submitted to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Prospective cohort study including patients submitted to PTCA. An interview was performed and an instrument applied to collect risk factors/predictors of complications. After the procedure, a physical examination was performed, vital signs were measured and the puncture site was assessed. RESULTS: 199 patients were included, age 64±10 years. Complications found for the radial and femoral approach were respectively: ecchymosis (18.29%), (17.14%); bruising (17.66%), (14.27%); urinary retention (2.43%), (25.71%); loss of vessel permeability (8.53%), (0%). CONCLUSION: The complications found were considered minor or secondary, depending on the classification found in literature. A higher rate of vascular complications related to transradial artery punctures compared to the interventions performed by transfemoral approach.

Feasibility and Safety of Transradial Arterial Approach for Simultaneous Right and Left Vertebral Artery Angiographic Studies and Stenting

This study investigated whether the transradial artery (TRA) approach using a 6-French (F) Kimny guiding catheter for right vertebral artery (VA) angiographic study and stenting is safe and effective for patients with significant VA stenosis. The TRA approach is commonly performed worldwide for both diagnostic cardiac catheterization and catheter-based coronary intervention. However, to our knowledge, the safety and feasibility of left and right VA angiographic study and stenting, in the same procedure, using the TRA approach for patients with brain ischemia have not been reported. The study included 24 consecutive patients (22 male,2 female; age, 63-78 years). Indications for VA angiographic study and stenting were (1) prior stroke or symptoms related to vertebrobasilar ischemia and (2) an asymptomatic but vertebral angiographic finding of severe stenosis (>70%). A combination of the ipsilateral and retrograde-engagement technique, which involved a looping 6-F Kimny guiding catheter, was utilized for VA angiographic study. For VA stenting, an ipsilateral TRA approach with either a Kimny guiding catheter or a left internal mammary artery guiding catheter was utilized in 22 patients and retrograde-engagement technique in 2 patients. A technically successful procedure was achieved in all patients, including left VA stenting in 15 patients and right VA stenting in 9 patients. The mean time for stenting (from engagement to stent deployment) was 12.7 min. There were no vascular complications or mortality. However, one patient suffered from a transient ischemic attack that resolved within 3 h. We conclude that TRA access for both VA angiographic study and VA stenting is safe and effective, and provides a simple and useful clinical tool for patients unsuited for femoral arterial access.

Bilateral Cardiac Catheterizations The Safety and Feasibility of a Superficial Forearm Venous and Transradial Arterial Approach

The transradial approach for left heart catheterization has become increasingly popular recently because of its clinical benefits. We examined the safety and feasibility of a transforearm approach for bilateral cardiac catheterizations, using the radial artery and a superficial forearm vein (the cephalic, basilic, or median antecubital vein). Between August 2002 and October 2003, 296 right heart catheterizations were performed in our hospital. A superficial forearm vein was used in one group of 101 patients, of which 98 had a concomitant left heart catheterization through the radial artery. The femoral vein was used for right heart catheterization in the second group of 195 patients. Of these patients, 37 underwent left heart catheterization through the radial artery and 157 through the femoral artery. All instances of bilateral catheterizations were successful except for one complication of pseudoaneurysm occurring in the transfemoral group. The procedure time for right heart catheterization was significantly less in the forearm group than the femoral group. The transforearm group had a larger proportion of males and of patients undergoing diagnostic right heart catheterization for congestive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Patients with aortic stenosis (AS), atrial septal defect (ASD), and mitral stenosis (MS) were mainly restricted to the transfemoral approach. We conclude that the transradial artery and superficial forearm venous approach for bilateral cardiac catheterizations is a safe and feasible alternative to the femoral approach in a wide range of patients, with the exception of patients with AS, ASD, or MS.

Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and performance of a novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for engaging both coronary arteries via the right transradial artery approach. A total of 160 patients were randomized between the standard Judkins (5F R4, L4; Cordis Corporation, Miami, FL) and the 5F Tiger II (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) catheters. End points included the duration of various procedures and the assessments of angiographic image quality and catheter performance. The Tiger II was associated with a significantly shorter (40%) total procedure time (199.6+/-50.2 vs. 331.5+/-72.9 s, p=0.001) and a 33% shorter total fluoroscopic time (93.1+/-33.8 vs. 138.2+/-47.6 s, p=0.001) for diagnostic coronary angiography, compared with those with the Judkins catheter. There was no significant difference between the Tiger II and Judkins catheters for left coronary angiographic quality (left anterior descending, 2.82+/-0.48 vs. 2.94+/-0.29, p=0.084; left circumflex, 2.90+/-0.38 vs. 2.87+/-0.44, p=0.629). The Tiger II provided superior right coronary angiograms, compared with the Judkins catheter (2.99+/- 0.11 vs. 2.82+/-0.48, p=0.003). For the left coronary angiograms, the initial randomized catheter completed the procedure in 91% of the patients with the Tiger II and in 98% with the Judkins (p=0.167) catheters. For the right coronary angiograms, 100% were completed with the Tiger II and 95% with the Judkins (p=0.120) catheters. There were no angiographic or clinical complications in either group, so the procedural success rate was 100%. The potential of the Tiger II catheter for use as a multipurpose catheter for right transradial coronary angiography to reduce procedural and X-ray times to the level of classic transfemoral coronary angiography has to be confirmed in a randomized study.

Feasibility and safety of transradial artery approach for selective cerebral angiography

The transradial artery (TRA) approach is a conventional means of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and catheter-based coronary intervention. However, to our knowledge, the safety and feasibility of cerebrovascular angiographic studies using the TRA approach for patients with brain ischemia has not been reported. This study investigated whether the TRA approach using 6 Fr Kimny guiding catheter for both extracranial and intracranial angiographies is safe and effective for patients with a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or significant carotid stenosis. From February 2003 to June 2004, a total of 46 consecutive patients with an age range from 50 to 83 years were enrolled into the study. The retrograde engagement technique that involved lopping the guiding catheter was utilized. Outpatient carotid angiography was performed in 40% of the study patients. The overall procedural success (defined as completely evaluating both carotid and vertebral arteries and intracranial vessels) was 93.5% (n = 43) using the Kimny guiding catheter. Significant cerebrovascular stenosis (> 50%), including carotid artery in 52.2% (n = 24), vertebral artery in 15.2% (n = 7), and intracranial major artery in 15.2% (n = 7), was found in 82.6% of the patients. Notably, 17 (37.0%) of these patients with severe carotid stenosis (> or = 70%) required staged carotid stenting. Concomitant vertebral artery stenting was performed in four (8.7%) patients because of severe stenosis (> or = 70%) of these vessels. Two patients experienced transient dizziness (duration < 30 min) following the procedure. TRA approach for selective cerebral angiography is safe and feasible in patients with a history of brain ischemia.

Transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery of intracranial vascular lesions

The authors present their experience in performing a transradial approach for neuroendovascular surgery of intracranial vascular lesions when a transfemoral approach was unfavorable. Eight patients ranging in age from 52 to 88 years underwent a total of nine neuroendovascular procedures for intracranial vascular lesions. A transradial approach was used in all patients. The patients had previously undergone a transfemoral approach for the endovascular intervention, but that procedure was unsuccessful. Five patients had intracranial basilar artery (BA) aneurysms, one patient had symptomatic BA stenosis, one patient had a dural arteriovenous fistula in the posterior fossa, and one patient had a high-flow arteriovenous malformation in the frontal lobe. In each case, a transradial approach achieved a stable platform that allowed intracranial microcatheterization for neuroendovascular intervention. None of the patients experienced complications attributed to the transradial artery approach. During neuroendovascular surgery for the treatment of intracranial lesions, the transradial approach is a viable alternative if the transfemoral approach is unfavorable. This series represents the first known description of neuroendovascular surgery for intracranial lesions via a transradial approach.

Stent placement for vertebral artery occlusive disease: preliminary clinical experience

Symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency may precede neurological sequelae in up to 50% of patients. Although select patients may benefit from microsurgical revascularization, combined perioperative morbidity and mortality rates can be as high as 20%. The authors present their preliminary clinical experience using stent placement for symptomatic vertebral artery (VA) occlusive disease. Six patients with clinical symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency in whom VA stents were placed from 1995 to 1998 were identified. Diagnostic four-vessel cerebral angiography identified causative stenotic, atherosclerotic lesions in all cases. A transfemoral or transradial artery approach after the patient had undergone full heparinization was chosen for endovascular stenting. Guidewire placement across the lesion followed by urokinase infusion preceded stenting. Prestent angioplasty was performed in two patients. Following the procedure, all patients were maintained on daily antiplatelet therapy. Patient age ranged from 45 to 76 years (average 63 years). Four patients were men and two were women. Angiography revealed greater than 95% stenosis in five patients and greater than 70% stenosis in one. Three patients had complete occlusion of the contralateral VA; in one other, the VA supplied only the posterior inferior cerebellar artery; and the remaining two patients had VAs with greater than 70% stenosis. Ten stents were placed in six patients for five VA origin lesions and one distal VA stenosis. A VA dissection occurring poststenting was treated by placement of three additional stents. One patient had transient double vision. All had resolution of their presenting symptoms. Follow up ranged from 1 to 24 months (average 8.4 months). Angiograms obtained in four patients at least 3 months postprocedure have revealed stent patency in all cases without evidence of restenosis. Vertebral artery stent placement can be safely performed and is a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency.