Nerve Transposition Research Articles

Compression of the Ulnar Nerve by the Arcade of Struthers: Look and You Shall Find.

The arcade of Struthers was first proposed by Kane et al in 1973. Clinical investigations of this structure have been limited to small case series, focusing on the arcade as an isolated cause of compressive ulnar neuropathy. The purpose of our study was to investigate the incidence of this structure in patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. A retrospective chart review of prospectively maintained data in a single surgeon's practice was performed. Records of patients undergoing surgery for compressive ulnar neuropathy at the cubital tunnel were evaluated for documentation of a compressive arcade of Struthers. In addition, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken to better characterize current understanding of this structure and its recognition in clinical practice. A total of 197 patients underwent ulnar nerve transposition. The overall incidence of a compressive arcade of Struthers was noted to be 67 out of 197 (34%). All patients with a compressive arcade were noted to have an internal brachial ligament running below the nerve. Patients undergoing revision surgery were found to have a compressive arcade 51% of the time (20/39), whereas 30% of patients undergoing primary surgery were found to have a compressive arcade (47/158). Only 12 clinical studies examining the arcade of Struthers have been published in the last 20 years, the majority being single case reports. Compression of the ulnar nerve by the arcade of Struthers is a common finding and can contribute to compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow both in primary and revision cases.

High variability among surgeons in evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation of medial ulnar collateral ligament injuries

BackgroundThe incidence of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries has been increasing, leading to advances in surgical treatments. However, it is not clear that there is consensus among surgeons regarding diagnostic imaging, the indications for acute surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. Hypothesis/PurposeThe purpose of this study is evaluate surgeon variability in the presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical treatment of MUCL injuries regarding the imaging modalities used for diagnosis, indications for acute surgical treatment, and postoperative treatment recommendations for rehabilitation and return to play. Our hypothesis is that indications for acute surgical treatment will be highly variable based on MUCL tear patterns and that agreement on the time to return to play will be consistent for throwing athletes and inconsistent for non-throwing athletes. MethodsA survey developed by six orthopedic surgeon with expertise in throwing athlete elbow injuries was distributed to 31 orthopedic surgeons who routinely treat MUCL injuries. The survey evaluated diagnostic and treatment topics related to MUCL injuries, and responses reaching 75% agreement were considered as high-level agreement. ResultsTwenty-four surgeons responded to the survey, resulting in a 77% response rate. There is 75% or better agreement among surveyed surgeons regarding acute surgical treatment for distal full thickness tears, ulnar nerve transposition in symptomatic patients or with ulnar nerve subluxation, postoperative splinting for 1-2 weeks with initiation of rehabilitation within 2 weeks, the use of bracing after surgery and the initiation of a throwing program at 3 months after MUCL repair with internal brace by surgeons performing 20 or more MUCL surgeries per year. There were a considerable number of survey topics without high-level agreement, particularly regarding the indications for acute surgical treatment, the time to return to throwing and time return to play in both throwing and non-throwing athletes. ConclusionThe study reveals that there is agreement for the indication of acute surgical treatment of distal MUCL tears, duration of bracing after surgery, and the time to initiate physical therapy after surgery. There is not clear agreement on indications for surgical treatment for every MUCL tear pattern, return to play time for throwing, hitting and participation in non-throwing sports.

Leave it Alone: Ulnar Nerve Management in Distal Humerus Fracture Fixation – A Large Database Study

ABSTRACT Objectives: To determine the impact of intra-operative ulnar nerve manipulation during distal humerus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) on post-operative ulnar neuritis. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis using the PearlDiver Mariner Database. Patients undergoing ORIF of distal humerus fractures were identified using Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes. Concurrent ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis was defined using CPT-64718, occurring on the same day as the index procedure. Patients with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy within one year prior to the index procedure were excluded. The incidence of delayed ulnar neuropathy, occurring at least 2 weeks post-operatively, was compared at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to evaluate the association between ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis and the development of delayed ulnar neuropathy, adjusting for the effects of age, sex, insurance type, and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Results: 16,881 patients who underwent distal humerus ORIF were identified, of which 2,016 (11.9%) received concurrent ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis. The cohorts differed by age and insurance type (p<0.001). Ulnar neuropathy between 2 weeks and 1 year occurred in 191/2,016 (9.5%) patients who received ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis and 742/14,865 (5.0%) patients who did not (p < 0.001). Ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis was associated with increased odds of delayed ulnar neuropathy at all time points (p<0.001). Conclusion: Ulnar nerve transposition, neuroplasty, or neurolysis at the time of distal humerus ORIF was associated with an increased incidence of delayed post-operative ulnar neuritis.

The necessity of ulnar nerve exploration and translocation in open reduction of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children.

Medial humeral epicondyle fractures (MHEFs) are common elbow fractures in children. Open reduction should be performed in patients with MHEF who have entrapped intra-articular fragments as well as displacement. However, following open reduction, transposition of the ulnar nerve is disputed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the need for ulnar nerve exploration and transposition. This was a retrospective cohort study. The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of MHEF in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022 were collected. The patients were allocated to either transposition or non-transposition groups. Data for sex, age, cause of fracture, duration of follow-up, Papavasiliou and Crawford classification, injury-to-surgery time, preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, intraoperative exploration of ulnar nerve injury, surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, complications, persistent ulnar neuropathy, and elbow joint function were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. A total of 124 patients were followed up, 50 in the ulnar nerve transposition group and 74 in the non-transposition group. There were significant differences in ulnar nerve injury (p = 0.009), incision length (p < 0.001), and blood loss (p = 0.003) between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.012) were risk factors for postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. In addition, ulnar nerve transposition did not affect the occurrence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms (p = 0.468). Ulnar nerve transposition did not improve clinical outcomes. It is recommended that the ulnar nerve should not be transposed when treating MHEF operatively.

Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Localization of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve: From Guide Wire to Novel Clip.

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) decompression and transposition are surgical treatment options for meralgia paresthetica. Identifying the LFCN during surgery may be challenging, and preoperative localization is a valuable adjunct in this case. The objective of this study was to explore a new technique using preoperative ultrasound-guided clip localization (USCL) of the LFCN. After Institutional Review Board approval, data were collected on patients who underwent both preoperative ultrasound-guided wire localization (USWL) and USCL over the past 13 years. Skin-to-nerve time was calculated prospectively. Fifty-six patients were identified, 51 had USWL and 5 had USCL; the skin-to-nerve median time was 7.5 and 6 minutes, respectively. Six wires were misplaced, and this was at the beginning of utilization of the USWL technique. There were no nerve injury, infection, or bleeding complications related to either wire or clip placement. USWL or USCL is safe and time-efficient in LFCN surgeries.

Combined microscope–endoscopy resection of petrous bone cholesteatoma with temporary facial nerve transposition versus nontransposition

PurposeThe narrow supralabyrinthine space affects surgical procedures. To study the effect of temporary transposition of geniculate ganglion of facial nerve versus nontransposition on lesion recurrence and facial nerve function in patients with petrous bone cholesteatoma.MethodsA total of 18 patients with petrous bone cholesteatoma involving the facial nerve were treated in our hospital from November 2016 to March 2023. The main surgical method is the extended supralabyrinthine approach assisted by a microscope and an endoscope. We collected and retrospectively analyzed their medical records.ResultsTemporary facial nerve transposition was performed in five patients, and nontransposition was performed in 13 patients. Cholesteatoma recurred in three patients with facial nerve nontransposition, whereas none in patients with facial nerve transposition. In this study, except for one case with a second operation, postoperative facial paralysis in other cases was improved to varying degrees, and there was no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionTemporary transposition of geniculate ganglion of facial nerve will not affect the postoperative nerve function of patients and can reduce the possibility of cholesteatoma recurrence of the petrous bone.

Ulnar Nerve Decompression With Subcutaneous Transposition

Background: Medial-sided elbow injuries are becoming increasingly common among throwing athletes due to overuse and increased specialization at early ages. High valgus stress and repetitive elbow flexion/extension during throwing not only affects the ligaments and dynamic support of the elbow, but commonly affects the ulnar nerve. Indications: Management of cubital tunnel syndrome is initially rest, therapy, and functional training; however, if conservative measures do not appropriately address the ulnar neuropathy, surgical decompression with subcutaneous transposition is a reliable treatment option. Technique Description: An incision is created over the medial epicondyle. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve is identified and protected. The ulnar nerve is identified and tagged with a vessel loop to allow for appropriate handling of the nerve. Decompression of the ulnar nerve begins proximally by spreading the tissues superficial to the ulnar nerve and splitting the fascia overlying it. Then, dissection deep to the nerve is performed. A small strip of the medial intermuscular septum will be used as a sling to hold the nerve securely in the transposed position. This is released proximally and the distal attachment to the medial epicondyle is left in place. Decompression is then continued distally by releasing the superficial fascia over the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and a portion of the deep FCU muscle belly and fascia. The nerve is decompressed circumferentially, while preserving penetrating branches to the FCU as able. Ultimately, the ulnar nerve is decompressed 10 cm proximal and 10 cm distal to the medial epicondyle. The intermuscular septum is then pulled over the nerve, checked for appropriate length, and sutured in place both posterior and anterior to the ulnar nerve. Results: Symptom improvement after decompression and transposition is high (&gt;90%); however, performance outcomes in overhead and throwing athletes is variable, and return to previous or higher level of play ranges from 60% to 90%. Discussion/Conclusion: Ulnar nerve decompression and transposition can reliably address underlying symptoms, but results are mixed for return to sport outcomes in overhead and throwing athletes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Precontoured anatomical plate fixation is not superior to recon plate fixation for intercondylar fracture humerus in adults

Abstract Introduction: Intercondylar fractures are intraarticular distal humerus fractures that are frequently linked to osteopenia, comminution, and displacement. Due to its intricate anatomy, fractured bone frequently consists of many fragments and has few fixing possibilities. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the best treatment option for these fractures, most commonly either with precontoured anatomical locking plates or recon plates. This study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes and rate of complications in the management of intercondylar fracture of the humerus with recon plates and precontoured anatomical plates. Materials and Methods: We have prospectively evaluated the outcome of precontoured anatomical plate vs recon plate fixation in the management of adult intercondylar fracture of the humerus in 20 patients having 10 patients in each of the groups. The study was done between November 2020 and November 2022. The recon plate group was designated as group 1 and the precontoured anatomic plate group as group 2. Orthogonal plate fixation was done in both groups. Ulnar nerve transposition was not done in any case. The study included seven patients of AO13C1, eight patients of AO13C2, and five patients of AO13C3 type of intercondylar fracture of the humerus. The mean follow-up period was 8.4 months. The functional outcome was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Scoring (MEPS) system and the radiological outcome was by elbow anteroposterior/lateral radiographs. The minimum follow-up duration was 6 months. Results: In both groups, the average duration of operation and hospitalization was comparable. At 3 months follow-up after surgery, the mean MEPS in the locking precontoured anatomical plate group (group 2 = 82) was significantly higher than that of the traditional recon plate (group 1 = 69.50; P = 0.026). However, the mean MEPS was comparable in both the study groups (group 1 = 81.50, group 2 = 88, P = 0.154) at 6 months after the surgery. Range of motion (ROM) was comparable for each study group after 3 months and final follow-up as well. The patients in group 2 took much less time to achieve union than the patients in group 1 (P = 0.001); however, in total 95% of the study patients achieved union. The rate of complications including wound infection, tension band wire backout, implant loosening, and joint stiffness was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Precontoured anatomical plates and recon plates did not significantly differ in the functional results of distal humeral fractures (AO type 13C), including the ROM and MEPS at a mean follow-up duration of 8.4 months; however, there was a considerable variance in the union time, in which patients operated with precontoured anatomical plates showed much less time to achieve union than the recon plates.

Facial Reanimation After Intratemporal Facial Nerve Schwannoma Resection: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To systematically analyze the outcomes of reanimation techniques that have been described for patients undergoing non-fascicle sparing resection of intratemporal facial schwannomas. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Results: Eight hundred forty studies were screened with 22 meeting inclusion criteria comprising 266 patients. Most facial nerve reanimations (81.2%) were performed using an interposition nerve graft. The remaining patients underwent hypoglossal-facial nerve transposition (13.9%), primary anastomosis (3.4%), and free muscle transfer (0.1%). Of the reported interposition grafts, the two most utilized were the great auricular (113/199) and sural (86/199) nerves. Interposition nerve grafts resulted in significantly better outcomes in facial nerve function postoperatively than hypoglossal-facial transposition (3.48 vs. 3.92; p < 0.01). There was no difference between interposition grafts. Conclusion: This study systematically reports that interposition nerve grafts, after resection of intratemporal facial schwannoma, result in superior outcomes than hypoglossal-facial nerve transposition in these patients.

The diagnosis and treatment of Criss-Cross injury of the forearm: A retrospective analysis

BackgroundDue to the paucity of ‘Criss-Cross’ injury, the pathological changes and injury patterns have not been clearly described; as well as the treatment and prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the treatment and clinical outcomes of ‘Criss-Cross’ injury of the forearm. MethodsAll patients diagnosed with Criss-Cross injury meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our Level 3 hospital (most advanced level) from 2010 to 2022, were enrolled in the study. A total of 12 patients were enrolled in our retrospective analysis. Closed reduction was successful in 3 patients, open reduction performed in the remaining patients. 6 patients associated with a fracture, while 2 cases had a concomitant convergent elbow dislocation. The follow-up time in conservative patients was 23.0 months on average (3–51 months), while 38.4 months in surgery group on average (3–108 months). The forearm function was evaluated with the Anderson's forearm function score. The range of motion (ROM) of the elbow and wrist and forearm rotation including any complications was also documented during the follow-up. ResultsOn final follow-up, ROM of the elbow, wrist, and forearm rotation significantly improved after conservative treatment (50.0 ± 24.5° to 128.3 ± 2.9°, 55.0 ± 7.1° to 166.7 ± 5.8°, 83.3 ± 20.8° to 165.0 ± 15.0°, respectively, p < 0.001) and surgical treatment (41.7 ± 22.4° to 102.8 ± 21.1°, 42.2 ± 16.4° to 125.6 ± 25.1°, 34.4 ± 26.5° to 138.3 ± 22.6°, respectively, p < 0.001). However, compared with the contralateral side, there were still significant difference regarding the ROM of the elbow (102.8 ± 21.1° to 143.9 ± 4.9°), wrist (125.6 ± 25.1° to 167.8 ± 5.1°), and forearm rotation (138.3 ± 22.6° to 163.3 ± 3.5°) after surgical treatment (P < 0.01). Anderson's Forearm Function Score was excellent in all conservative cases and 2 of 9 patients treated with operation. 2 patients complained about occasional elbow locking, wrist pain and reduced power after conservative treatment. 2 patients reported ulnar neuritis after the operation, one of which was treated with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. ConclusionThe Criss-Cross injury could be associated with different fractures and/or simultaneous convergent elbow dislocation. The basic principle of treatment is to reduce both PRUJ and DRUJ by closed reduction or surgery, with early rehabilitation. Most of the patients regained good forearm function after receiving either conservative or surgical treatment.

The Boyd approach: a valuable alternative to treating simple to complex elbow fractures and dislocations.

The Boyd approach is a single-incision posterior approach to the proximal radius and ulna based on a lateral anconeus muscle reflection and release of the lateral collateral ligamentous complex. This approach remains a lesser-used technique following early reports of proximal radioulnar synostosis and postoperative elbow instability. Although limited by small case series, recent literature does not support these early reported complications. This study presents a single surgeon's outcomes using the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all patients with simple to complex elbow injuries treated consecutively using a Boyd approach by a shoulder and elbow surgeon was conducted from 2016 to 2020. All patients with at least 1 postoperative clinic visit were included. Data collected included patient demographics, injury description, postoperative complications, elbow range of motion, and radiographic findings including heterotopic ossification and proximal radioulnar synostosis. Categorical and continuous variables were reported using descriptive statistics. A total of 44 patients were included with an average age of 49 years (range 13-82 years). The most commonly treated injuries were Monteggia fracture-dislocations (32%) and terrible triad injuries (18%). Average follow-up was 8 months (range 1-24 months). Final average elbow active arc of motion was from 20° (range 0°-70°) of extension to 124° (range 75°-150°) of flexion. Final supination and pronation were 53° (range 0°-80°) and 66° (range 0°-90°), respectively. There were no cases of proximal radioulnar synostosis. Heterotopic ossification contributing to less than functional elbow range of motion occurred in 2 (5%) patients who elected conservative management. There was 1 (2%) case of early postoperative posterolateral instability due to repair failure of injured ligaments that required revision using a ligament augmentation procedure. Five (11%) patients experienced postoperative neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with ulnar neuropathy. Of these, 1 underwent ulnar nerve transposition, 2 were improving, and 1 had persistent symptoms at final follow-up. This is the largest case series available demonstrating the safe utilization of the Boyd approach for the treatment of simple to complex elbow injuries. Postoperative complications including synostosis and elbow instability may not be as common as previously understood.

Anterior transposition of the radial nerve to achieve primary suture for its reconstruction: Anatomical feasibility study

IntroductionRadial nerve palsy after humeral shaft fractures is often associated with formation of a neuroma in continuity. The current standard of treatment is neuroma resection and nerve grafting with contentious results. Anterior transposition of the radial nerve may reduce the length of its path, allowing reconstruction by primary suture. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum length of radial nerve defect that can be treated by the anterior transposition to allow primary suture to be performed. MethodsWe use 10 arms from five fresh cadavers. The radial nerve was dissected in the lateral inter-muscular septum and along the anterior aspect of the forearm. The radial nerve was transected at the level of the spiral groove and both stumps were than transposed anterior to the medial inter-muscular septum. The length of tension-free overlap that could be achieved was measured. ResultsThe average length of the overlap at zero degrees of elbow flexion was 10.00 ± 1.84 mm. Theoretically, this will allow a defect of 20 ± 3.69 mm SD to be treated by primary suture. ConclusionOur results suggest that anterior transposition can be used for radial nerve defects up to 2 cm; however, dissection of both stumps proved to be challenging.

Chitosan-Based Conduits with Different Inner Diameters at both Ends Combined with Modified Formula Radix Hedysari Promote Nerve Transposition Repair.

Severe peripheral nerve injuries, such as deficits over long distances or proximal nerve trunk injuries, pose complex reconstruction challenges that often result in unfavorable outcomes. An innovative approach to repairing severe peripheral nerve damage involves using conduit suturing for nerve transposition repair. Cylindrical nerve guides are typically unsuitable for nerve transposition repair. Moreover, postsurgical adjuvant treatment is essential to promote the development of axonal lateral sprouts, proximal growth, and the restoration of neurostructure and function. The purpose of this research is to assess the impact of chitosan-based conduits with varying inner diameters on nerve transposition repair when combined with modified formula Radix Hedysari (MFRH). Using chitosan, we created conduits with varying inner diameters on both ends. These conduits were then utilized to repair the distal common peroneal and tibial nerves in SD rats using the proximal common peroneal nerve. Subsequently, MFRH was employed as a supplementary treatment. The assessment of the repair's effectiveness took place 16 weeks postsurgery, utilizing a range of techniques, including the neurological nerve function index, neuroelectrophysiological measurements, muscle wet weight, and examination of nerve and muscle histology. The outcomes of our study showed that following 16 weeks of postoperative treatment, MFRH had a significant positive impact on the recovery of neuromotor and nerve conduction abilities. Moreover, there was a significant increase in the ratio of wet weight of muscles, cross-sectional area of muscle fibers, quantity and structure of regenerated myelinated nerve fibers, and the count of neurons. A combination of chitosan-based chitin conduits possessing different inner diameters and MFRH can considerably promote the regeneration and functional recovery of damaged nerves, which in turn enhances nerve transposition repair efficacy.

Anatomic Step-by-Step Dissection of Complex Skull Base Approaches for Trainees: Surgical Anatomy of the Infratemporal Fossa Approach to the Jugular Foramen.

The infratemporal fossa (ITF) is a complex region bounded by the temporal bone, maxilla, sphenoid, pterygoid plates, and mandibular ramus. Containing a high density of neurovascular and musculoskeletal structures, the ITF can house a number of pathologies, and access is challenging. The ITF approach and its variations can be challenging due to complex anatomy and unfamiliarity by many surgeons. The objective of this study was to present a step-by-step 3-dimensional anatomic dissection for the classic Fisch Type A and modified ITF approach from the surgeon's perspective. Six sides of 3 formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification (JRD and AMN). Standard Fisch Type A and modified ITF approaches were performed on contralateral sides of each specimen. Representative high-quality 3-dimensional photography was performed for each key step. The ITF approach affords excellent access to the posterior ITF and jugular foramen. Modifications to this approach include preservation of the ear canal and limiting facial nerve transposition, thus limiting morbidity while generally still providing sufficient access to key anatomic structures. The ITF approach provides access to the lateral skull base for jugular foramen paraganglioma and other lesions. Modifications of the classic Fisch Type A technique can be used to access pathologies in this region without sacrificing conductive hearing or facial nerve function. Three dimensional operatively oriented neuroanatomy dissections provide surgeons with a valuable resource for learning this complex surgical approach.

Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow

Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow

Comparison of in-situ release and submuscular anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome, previously treated with subfascial anterior transfer–A retrospective study of 24 cases

BackgroundAlthough cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common type of compressive neuropathy in the upper extremities, the indication and optimal surgical method for recurrent or refractory cubital tunnel syndrome remains controversial. This study evaluates the functional outcomes of revision surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome. Material & methodsThis study was a retrospective observational multicenter single-institution study including 660 patients who underwent surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome from 2010 to 2019. Among the 660 patients, 42(6.4%) received revision surgery due to remaining or recurrent symptoms confirmed with electromyography(EMG). After excluding those with concurrent elbow fracture, dislocation, osteoarthritis and wound infection, a total of 24 patients were included in the study. The patients were evaluated of disease severity, revision surgical method, time interval to recurrence, underlying diseases and postoperative functional outcomes. ResultsAll patients received ulnar nerve subfascial anterior transposition for the initial cubital tunnel syndrome surgery. Among the 24 patients (3.7%) who received revision surgery, nine received in situ neurolysis, 12 received submuscular transposition, and three received subcutaneous transfer. 21 patients (88%) reported improved mean VAS score of 4.3, while three patients complained of remaining symptoms that did not improve even after revision surgery. The patients with remaining symptoms all had underlying diabetes mellitus and were treated with subcutaneous transfer. The difference of surgical outcomes between the in situ neurolysis group and the nerve transfer groups were non-significant (p = 0.23). The most common cause of recurrent or persistent symptoms was adhesion and fibrosis at sling area. The mean follow up period before revision surgery was 26.3 months and postoperative follow up period after revision surgery was 8.5 months. ConclusionThe outcomes of this study imply that in-situ neurolysis may be as effective as anterior submuscular transfer of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome after anterior subfascial transfer.

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Transposition With Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Transposition With Ultrasound-Guided Wire Localization: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Inferior alveolar nerve repositioning surgical techniques and outcomes – a systematic review

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) lateralization (IANL) or transposition (IANT) are both techniques allowing for dental implant placement in posterior atrophic mandibles. The aim of this study was to systematically review the implant survival rate and the complications associated with IAN reposition techniques with simultaneous implant placement in atrophic posterior mandibles.This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis). The review was designed to answer the following PICO question: Is IAN repositioning (I) a safe and efficient technique (O) to treat patient looking for fixed dental rehabilitation of an atrophic posterior mandible (P).Thirty-three articles were reviewed, including a total of 899 patients, and approximately 950 IAN repositioning procedures. Dental implant survival rate ranged between 86.95% and 100% with a mean dental survival rate of 90.16%. Among the 269 patients who underwent IANT, there were 93% immediate neurosensory disturbance, and 15% persistent neurosensory disturbance. Among the 350 patients who underwent IANL, there were 93% immediate neurosensory disturbance, and 6% persistent neurosensory disturbance.IANT and IANL are reliable techniques allowing safe dental implant placement in atrophic posterior mandible with high patient satisfaction. IANL seems to cause less persistent neurosensory disturbances compared to IANT. The level of evidence is poor due to the high number of bias present in the included studies. IAN neurosensory disturbance assessment should be better homogenized in order to increase comparability.

Chitin Conduits with Different Inner Diameters at Both Ends Combined with Dual Growth Factor Hydrogels Promote Nerve Transposition Repair in Rats.

Severe peripheral nerve injuries, such as deficits over long distances or proximal nerve trunk injuries, pose complex reconstruction challenges that often result in unfavorable outcomes. Innovative techniques, such as nerve transposition repair with conduit suturing, can be employed to successfully treat severe peripheral nerve damage. However, cylindrical nerve guides are typically unsuitable for nerve transposition repair. Furthermore, angiogenic and neurotrophic factors are necessary to stimulate the emergence of axonal lateral sprouts, proximal growth, and the rehabilitation of neuron structures and functions. In the current study, we used chitosan to make chitin conduits with different inner diameters at both ends, combined with gelatin methacrylate hydrogels that can continuously release dual growth factors, namely, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the nerve growth factor (NGF), and evaluated its impact on nerve transposition repair in rats. At 16 weeks after the operation, our findings showed that the conduit combined with the dual growth factor hydrogel significantly improved the restoration of both motor and conduction functions of the nerve. In addition, histological analysis showed significant recovery of nerve fibers, target muscles, and neurons. In conclusion, the combination of chitin conduits with different inner diameters and dual growth factor hydrogels can significantly improve the effect of nerve transposition repair, which has important potential clinical value.

Outcomes of Therapy and Ulnar Nerve Transposition for Elbow Stiffness After Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures

Following medial epicondyle fractures, a subset of pediatric patients has persistent limitations in elbow motion. This study soughted to understand the patient characteristics of this group and to assess the effectiveness of intensive therapy and ulnar nerve transposition in improving elbow range of motion and patient-reported outcomes. A cohort of 31 pediatric patients with stiffness after elbow trauma was narrowed to 8 pediatric patients (7 female) ranging in age from 9 to 14 years, who were diagnosed with medial epicondyle fractures and underwent intensive therapy and ulnar nerve transposition with or without elbow joint release. We collected demographic and objective data as well as subjective data including Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores before and after ulnar nerve transposition. Following initial intensive therapy, elbow range of motion improved by an average of 56°, and 7 of the 8 patients reached a functional motion arc of 100°. Subsequently, following ulnar nerve surgery with or without elbow release, motion improved by an average of 22°, and 5 of the 8 patients demonstrated improvement from this intervention. Surgery led to improvements in subjective outcomes with an improvement in PROMIS mobility scores by an average of 9 points, pain interference by 6 points, and upper extremity scores by 3 points. Based on a previously determined minimally important difference of three points, these indicate significant clinical improvements. A subset of pediatric patients with persistent stiffness following medial epicondyle fractures may benefit from additional interventions, including intensive therapy, transposition of the ulnar nerve, and open capsular release. However, not all patients were improved after ulnar nerve surgery, and the identification and treatment of ulnar nerve irritability may not fully resolve preoperative symptoms in all patients. Therapeutic IV.