That is a question for a Ph.D. in sociology. Like, what's up with the street wars? Why is this provoking so much passion and energy at the moment. I am not a Ph.D. in sociology. lam an elected official ... Some people think, Wow, this is opening up the city to me in a whole new way and I love what it does to the street, ' and a whole other set of people are saying 7 like my street the way it was and I don't know why we are changing it like this. ' And then that gets mixed up with demographics and politics and media and the blogosphere and then you have this sociologically quite fascinating mix. 2- Councilman Brad Lander, press conference on steps of CityHall, March 7, 2011.1.1 INTRODUCTIONThis paper examines the formation of a movement and countermovement in response to a bike lane installed along Prospect Park West (PPW) in Brooklyn. The paper will briefly explain the emergence of urban cyclists as a social movement, then explore how a countermovement in opposition to the bike lane in Brooklyn mobilized, forged a collective identity, and waged an effective campaign of resistance, focusing on the role of resources, framing, and leadership within the movement. What triggered this movement was the overreach by a radical fringe of cyclists, and their endorsement by an unpopular mayor and transportation commissioner. The bike lane itself was almost an afterthought - a proxy for latent resentment of how a vocal yet powerful minority group was able to reconfigure New York's streets without sufficient consultation. The paper holds important lessons for social movement and urban policy theory, as well as for improved public, urban, and transportation policymaking.1.2 Research Design and MethodologyThis paper employs a case study of a contentious bike lane installed along Prospect Park in Park Slope, Brooklyn in late 2010. I spent the spring of 2011 holding semi-structured interviews of local residents along the park both for and against the bike lane, including leaders of the anti-bike movement, pro-cyclist advocates, a city council member and his staff deeply involved in the issue, local businessmen, concerned neighbors, patrons of Prospect Park, and Park Slope residents, to understand a) their views of the bike-lane issue; and b) their views of cyclists as an urban subculture. But the bulk of my data comes from access to a trove of correspondence and documents - mostly complaints and letters to City Hall and the DOT - obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filed by Park Slope residents during the latter half of 2010. 1 also was given access to private email exchanges between the office of the DOT commissioner and the largest pro-cycling advocacy group, Transportation Alternatives, as well as data from surveys compiled by parties on both sides, news archives and blog posts related to the bike path.3In some ways, this case study is a perfect example of how social movements of disparate individuals and interests mobilize to forge a common identity, overcome their collective action problem, and organize in urban settings. All of the dynamics of contention (McAdam, Tarrow, Tilly, 2001) are present: a salient and emotional issue at stake, a clearly defined movement and countermovement, a well-entrenched elite, radical fringes and spoilers, third parties (city councilmembers, the media, etc.), mechanisms for mobilization, and clearly stated goals (removal of the bike lane versus the installation of more bike lanes and traffic calming measures). The issue would seem to be custom-made for social movement and contentious politics theorists.But this case study is not without problems. First, both movements are widely composed of upper-class elites. The anti-cycling coalition is also not a normal grassroots movement, per se, given its members' well-off means and access to New York powerbrokers (The state senator's wife, who resides along PPW, is among its benefactors). …
Read full abstract