JEL Classification Codes: F18, F36, F55, F69 1. Introduction In XXI century despite the post-industrialization trend and increasing role of the service sector in modern economies, the real economic sector is still satisfying the most part of modern consumers' needs. That is why transport infrastructure, connecting sellers and buyers, becomes paramount in the optimization process of production and distribution system. Moreover, under globalization trans-nationalization is taking place and it is becoming more necessary to transport factors of production (firstly, raw materials and human resources) and finished goods, because such transportations are of global. However, despite the important role of the transport infrastructure in the functioning of the economic systems, nowadays it is characterized by high level of differentiation in different countries that is a serious obstacle for the rationalization of the economic operations. In the context of Russia-EU's international economic relations some disproportions and general low level of transport infrastructure development is a deterrent factor to strengthen economic development. Obviously that currently applied methods and tools to manage transport infrastructures of these economic systems are not efficient. It makes study of opportunities and prospects of Russian and the EU's transport infrastructures and searching for new mechanisms to intensify them, characterized by better effectiveness, topical. The starting point of this research was the hypothesis that transport infrastructure has a big impact on economic growth, and it develops intensively, being influenced by market factors that is why marketing mechanisms are more effective as the tools for its development. This work is aimed at verifying of this hypothesis and determining prospects to use marketing mechanisms to develop transport infrastructure in Russia and the EU. 2. Materials and Methods Theoretical and methodological basis of research, related to transport infrastructure development is considered in the works of such researchers as E.S. Akopova, M.V. Vasilenko, M.A. Golentsova, M.V. Ivanov, N.A. Makhutov, L.V. Balanovsky, V.L. Balanovsky, S.P. Gabourey, I.I. Karabanov, O.S. Sukharev, E.S. Akopova, S.Y. Nesterov, and others (Thalassinos et al., 2010; Theriou 2015). Conceptual and applied aspects of marketing activity itself and related to infrastructure projects are considered in the works of such authors as E.S. Akopova, N.G. Kuznetsov, N.V. Przhedetskaya, T.V. Panasenkova, N.D. Rodionova, L.N. Roshchina, P.V. Taranov, D.V. Frolov, M.V. Shevchenko, and others (Akopova and Przhedetskaya, 2016; Breckova, 2016; Duguleana and Duguleana, 2016; Frank et al., 2016). To verify the suggested hypothesis and to meet the objective of the research the authors appeal to such scientific methods as problematic method, systematic method, regressive and correlative analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, formalization, as well as economic modeling. To determine the significance of transport infrastructure for economic growth and development let us reveal the connection of the level of transport infrastructure development ([x.sub.0]) and GDP ([y.sub.1]) based on example of Russia and leading the EU's countries--Germany, France and Italy--in 2012. The calculations used to do regressive and correlative analysis are presented in table 1. Automated analysis in Microsoft Excel program resulted in the following simple linear regression model: [y.sub.1] = 12.75 + 4,45[x.sub.0]. It testifies that with growth of index of the transport infrastructure development by 1 point GDP in the researched countries grows by 4.45 mln [euro]. The correlation coefficient is 67.5%. It means that economic growth in Russia, Germany, France and Italy by 67.5% is explained by the transport infrastructure development. Consequently, the connection among the analyzed indicators is strong and direct. …