Transplant Surgeons Research Articles

Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: still an open problem.

In the last two decades, the optimization of organ preservation and surgical techniques, and the personalized immunosuppression have reduced the rate of acute rejections and early post-transplant complications. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and evidence suggest a role of chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in this failure. Solid organ transplant recipients may develop chronic dysfunction/damage and several comorbidities, including post-transplant malignancies. Skin cancers, mostly non-melanoma skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma), are the most common malignancies in Caucasian solid organ transplant recipients. Several factors, together with immunosuppression, may contribute to the susceptibility for skin cancers which, although often treatable, could be associated with a much higher mortality rate than in the general population. The rapid identification and treatment (including reduction of immunosuppression and early surgical treatments) have an important role to avoid an aggressive behavior of these malignancies. Organ transplant recipients with a history of skin cancer should be followed closely for developing new and metastatic lesions. Additionally, patient education on the daily use of sun-protective measures and the recognition of the early signs (self-diagnosis) of coetaneous malignancies are useful preventive measures. Finally, clinicians should make themselves aware of the problem and build, in every clinical follow-up center, collaborative network involving transplant clinicians, dermatologists and surgeons who should work together to easily identify and rapidly treat these complications. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, preventive strategies and treatments of skin cancer in organ transplantation.

Contemporary practice and perception of autologous blood salvage in hepato-pancreatico-biliary operations: an international survey

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess contemporary knowledge, attitudes and behaviors around transfusion of intraoperative salvaged blood (sRBCt) during hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) operations. Findings are meant to inform the design of future studies that address provider concerns to change behaviors and improve patient outcomes. MethodsA survey was designed and assessed for relevance, readability and content, and distributed to an international audience of surgeons performing HPB operations. ResultsThe 237 respondents were predominantly distributed across North America (37.55%), Europe (27.43%) and Asia (19.83%). Roughly one-half (52.74%) of respondents had used sRBCt in HPB surgery before. Transplantation surgeons were more likely than HPB surgeons to have previously used sRBCt [odds ratio = 5.18 (95% CI 1.89–14.20)]. More respondents believed sRBCt was safe for non-cancer versus cancer operations (68.57% vs. 24.17%, p < 0.0001). Less than half (45.71%) of respondents believed that sRBCt was safe in clean-contaminated fields. Most did not utilize preoperative strategies to avoid donor transfusion. ConclusionPractices related to sRBCt in HPB operations vary widely and there is no consensus on its use. Concerns seem primarily related to cancer-specific and infectious outcomes. While further studies are pursued, surgeons may increase their utilization of preoperative strategies to boost hemoglobin levels for at risk patients.

Effectiveness of Thermal Barrier Bag for Prolonged Vascular Anastomosis in Kidney Transplantation

In kidney transplantation (KT), efforts to minimize rewarming and optimize anastomosis time during vascular anastomosis improve graft outcomes. We recently reported the safety and efficacy of a pouch-type thermal barrier bag (TBB) made of elastomer gel to reduce second-warm ischemic injury during vascular anastomosis. We aimed to examine the usefulness of the TBB in prolonged vascular anastomosis in KT performed by young transplant fellows. Young transplant fellows performed KT under the supervision of certified transplant surgeons. The kidney graft was placed inside the TBB with an outlet for vessels and preserved during vascular anastomosis. A non-contact infrared thermometer measured the graft surface temperature before and after vascular anastomosis. After completion of the anastomosis, the TBB was manually slid out of the transplanted kidney and removed before graft reperfusion. Clinical data, including patient characteristics and perioperative variables, were collected. The primary endpoint was the median graft surface temperature at the end of the anastomosis. Ten living-donor kidney transplant recipients with a median age of 56.5 years (range, 40-69 years) underwent KT procedures performed by young transplant fellows. The median anastomosis time was 53 (43-67) min. At the end of anastomosis, the median graft surface temperature was 17.7°C (16.3-18.3°C); no serious adverse events or delayed graft function were observed. The TBB can keep transplanted kidneys at a low temperature even with prolonged vascular anastomosis time, thus contributing to the functional preservation of transplanted kidneys and stable transplant outcomes.

MP31-18 TRENDS IN POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AND COST FOR LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMIES ACROSS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP31-18 TRENDS IN POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AND COST FOR LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMIES ACROSS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES Ilon Weinstein, Camilo Arenas-Gallo, Stephen Rhodes, and Jonathan Shoag Ilon WeinsteinIlon Weinstein More articles by this author , Camilo Arenas-GalloCamilo Arenas-Gallo More articles by this author , Stephen RhodesStephen Rhodes More articles by this author , and Jonathan ShoagJonathan Shoag More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003264.18AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Live donor nephrectomies (DN) were initially exclusively performed by urologists. Over time, general surgeons and transplant surgeons adopted DN into their scope of practice. Here, we investigate trends, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and cost across various surgical specialties performing DN. METHODS: Patients undergoing live DN from 2000-2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Physician specialties were reported for each encounter, and patient and hospital characteristics for each specialty was compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess association between physician specialty and postoperative complications and length of stay. Hospital charges and costs were log transformed and analyzed via linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: We identified 11,365 patients undergoing live DN by general surgery (n=3,922), urology (n=3,357), transplant surgery (n=3,123), and other (n=963). DN performed by urologists and transplant surgeons had similar odds ratios (OR) of complications compared to those performed by general surgery (0.91, p=0.4). The hospital length of stay for urology was similar to general surgery (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, p=0.12), and lower for transplant surgery (IRR 0.92, p<0.001). Urology had a slightly lower cost compared to general surgery ($11,666 vs $12,582) (Beta -0.08, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past two decades, general and transplant surgeons performed more DN with similar outcomes compared to urologists. From 2000-2020, there was an increase in annual numbers of DN performed by general and transplant surgeons and no significant differences in complications and length of stay between the surgical specialties. Source of Funding: N/A © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e436 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ilon Weinstein More articles by this author Camilo Arenas-Gallo More articles by this author Stephen Rhodes More articles by this author Jonathan Shoag More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Exploring Views and Expectations of Clinicians, Nurses, and Kidney Transplant Recipients Regarding Protocol Development of a Study to Investigate Feasibility of the Implantable Doppler Probe in Kidney Transplantation: Patient-Public Involvement Consultations.

The shortage of donor organs is the most limiting factor in kidney transplant practice today. New monitoring technologies are being investigated to reduce graft loss due to vascular complications. We assessed the feasibility of a novel blood flow monitoring device, the implantable Doppler probe, in kidney transplant surgery. This patient-public involvement consultation explored the views and expectations of the stakeholders (kidney transplant recipients, surgeons, clinicians, and nurses with direct experience of the implantable Doppler probe) on the protocol development of our feasibility study. Our objective was to improve the protocol, understand stakeholder perceptions regarding research in postoperative graft surveillance, and identify potential confounding factors to the research and challenges to implementation of implantable Doppler probe in clinical practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews containing open-ended questions with 12 stakeholders. We performed thematic analysis of the data at the latent level by an inductive approach according to a 6-phase guide by Braun and Clarke using NVivo 12 software. Three key themes emerged. (1) Experiences with the implantable Doppler probe as a monitoring device showed that it was well received by the patients; however, there was a clinical equipoise among the health care professionals. (2) Recognition of the need for research in the early postoperative graft monitoring displayed stakeholder understanding regarding the role of a blood flow monitoring device to improve surgical outcomes. (3) Recommendations for smooth conduct of the proposed study include suggestions for improvement of the study protocol, informative sessions for the patients and nurses, and innovative ideas to improve the monitoring device. Patient-public involvement consultation was crucial for the research design of our proposed feasibility study. Useful strategies and a patient- centered approach were incorporated to mitigate the potential challenges to the conduct of the research.

Women in Transplant Surgery in Italy.

Women in Transplant Surgery in Italy.

An experiment on the impact of predictive analytics on kidney offers acceptance decisions

Because of the breadth of factors that might affect kidney transplant decisions to accept an organ or wait for another, presumably “better” offer, a high degree of heterogeneity in decision making exists among transplant surgeons and hospitals. These decisions do not typically include objective predictions regarding the future availability of equivalent or better-quality organs or the likelihood of patient death while waiting for another organ. To investigate the impact of displaying such predictions on organ donation decision making, we conducted a statistically designed experiment involving 53 kidney transplant professionals, in which kidney offers were presented via an online application and systematically altered to observe the effects on decision making. We found that providing predictive analytics for time-to-better offers and patient mortality improved decision consensus and decision-maker confidence in their decisions. Providing a visual display of the patient’s mortality slope under accept/reject conditions shortened the time-to-decide but did not have an impact on the decision itself. Presenting the risk of death in a loss frame as opposed to a gain frame improved decision consensus and decision confidence. Patient-specific predictions surrounding future organ offers and mortality may improve decision quality, confidence, and expediency while improving organ utilization and patient outcomes.

Declining Medicare reimbursement in abdominal transplantation from 2000 to 2021

BackgroundThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is a major payer for abdominal transplant services. Reimbursement reductions could have a major impact on the transplant surgical workforce and hospitals. Yet government reimbursement trends in abdominal transplantation have not been fully characterized. MethodsWe performed an economic analysis to characterize changes in inflation-adjusted trends in Medicare surgical reimbursement for abdominal transplant procedures. Using the Medicare Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool, we performed a procedure code–based surgical reimbursement rate analysis. Reimbursement rates were adjusted for inflation to calculate overall changes in reimbursement, overall year-over-year, 5-year year-over-year, and compound annual growth rate from 2000 to 2021. ResultsWe observed declines in adjusted reimbursement of common abdominal transplant procedures, including liver (-32.4%), kidney with and without nephrectomy (-24.2% and -24.1%, respectively), and pancreas transplant (-15.2%) (all, P < .05). Overall, the yearly average change for liver, kidney with and without nephrectomy, and pancreas transplant were -1.54%, -1.15%, -1.15%, and -0.72%. Five-year annual change averaged -2.69%, -2.35%, -2.64%, and -2.43%, respectively. The overall average compound annual growth rate was -1.27%. ConclusionThis analysis depicts a worrisome reimbursement pattern for abdominal transplant procedures. Transplant surgeons, centers, and professional organizations should note these trends to advocate sustainable reimbursement policy and to preserve continued access to transplant services.

Critical Evaluation of Discarded Donor Livers in the Eurotransplant Region: Potential Implications for Machine Perfusion.

BACKGROUND There are still many offered donor livers that are declined during the allocation process. Machine perfusion offers the option to evaluate (especially marginal) donor organs and to better decide whether a graft has the potential of being transplanted or not. There is a lack of clear detailed data on why organs are declined and how many donor livers would have the potential of being evaluated in the machine. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1356 donor livers between 2016 and 2018, which were offered by Eurotransplant and were declined during the allocation process; 284 grafts were from donor after cardiac death (DCD) and 1072 donations were from after brain death (DBD). The analysis was performed independently and blinded by senior transplant surgeons. RESULTS There were 904 (66.6%) donor livers with potential to be evaluated as suitable grafts in machine perfusion, whereas 417 (30.8%) organs were definitely not-transplantable, mainly due to liver cirrhosis, (untreated) donor malignancy, cardiac diseases of the donor leading to a hepatic congestion, and/or systemic infections in the donor. Donors in blood group "AB" were disproportionally often rejected. Due to missing data, 35 (2.6%) organs could not be sufficiently evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that many declined donor livers have potential of being evaluated by machine perfusion. Comprehensive use of machine perfusion is necessary and useful to improve the current organ shortage.

The unmet need of organ transplantation in Africa.

The unmet need of organ transplantation in Africa.

Ascending aorta cannulation for isolated liver procurement in extended criteria donors: a safe option in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis.

The chronic organ shortage and the increased number of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation have led to a progressive increase in the use of extended criteria donors. Nowadays more and more overweight donors with several comorbidities are selected for donation providing acceptable patient and liver graft survival. These donors have often aortic atherosclerosis which can spare the hepatic artery making suitable the liver for procurement. Massive aortic atherosclerosis localized to infrarenal aorta can challenge aortic cannulation for organ cooling. We herein describe in a stepwise approach the aortic cannulation realized at the ascending aorta level in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis in ECD donors. This technique represents a safe option when abdominal aorta is not suitable for cannulation and it should be included into the surgical armamentarium of liver transplant surgeon.

Pre-Treatment of Transplant Donors with Hydrogen Sulfide to Protect against Warm and Cold Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Kidney and Other Transplantable Solid Organs

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), a pathological condition resulting from prolonged cessation and subsequent restoration of blood flow to a tissue, is an inevitable consequence of solid organ transplantation. Current organ preservation strategies, such as static cold storage (SCS), are aimed at reducing IRI. However, prolonged SCS exacerbates IRI. Recent research has examined pre-treatment approaches to more effectively attenuate IRI. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), the third established member of a family of gaseous signaling molecules, has been shown to target the pathophysiology of IRI and thus appears to be a viable candidate that can overcome the transplant surgeon's enemy. This review discusses pre-treatment of renal grafts and other transplantable organs with H2S to mitigate transplantation-induced IRI in animal models of transplantation. In addition, ethical principles of pre-treatment and potential applications of H2S pre-treatment in the prevention of other IRI-associated conditions are discussed.

Combined transarterial chemoembolization and external beam radiotherapy for identifying surgical candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic vascular invasion: A propensity score-weighted analysis.

562 Background: To evaluate the role of hepatic resection in patients with objective responses after combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiotherapy (RT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients treated with combined TACE and RT as a first-line treatment for HCC with MVI between 2010 and 2015. Some patients with objective responses underwent hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Surgical resectability was determined by the hepatobiliary and transplant surgeons of the multidisciplinary team for liver cancer. To investigate the role of surgery, patients with objective responses who did not undergo surgery were selected as a control group. The survival outcomes between the patients who received surgery and those who did not were compared using a propensity score-based stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting method to minimize selection bias. Time-dependent survival analysis by surgery was performed. Results: Of the 170 patients with objective responses after combined TACE and RT, surgery was performed for 41 patients, including 8 liver transplantations. The unweighted surgery group was younger and had a higher proportion of solitary tumor and unilateral vascular involvement. After adjustment, the overall survival rates at 3 years were 61.0% and 28.6% in surgery and non-surgery groups, respectively. The most important prognostic factor for overall survival was surgery (adjusted Cox hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.46; p-value &lt; 0.001). Complete response after TACE and RT was also a significant prognostic indicator for overall survival (adjusted HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27–0.61; p-value &lt; 0.001). There was no surgical mortality. Four patients (9.8%) required additional surgery for postoperative bleeding or graft failure. Conclusions: Hepatic resection was significantly associated with improved overall survival in patients with objective responses after combined TACE and RT for HCC with MVI.

American Society of Transplant Surgeons recommendations on best practices in donation after circulatory death organ procurement.

The American Society of Transplant Surgeons supports efforts to increase the number of organs that are critically needed for patients desperately awaiting transplantation. In the United States, transplantation using organs procured from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has continued to increase in number. Despite these increases, substantial variability in the utilization and practices of DCD transplantation still exists. To improve DCD organ utilization, it is important to create a set of best practices for DCD recovery. The following recommendations aim to provide guidance on contemporary issues surrounding DCD organ procurement in the United States. A work group was composed of members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeon Scientific Studies Committee and the Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee. The following topics were identified by the group either as controversial or lacking standardization: prewithdrawal preparation, definition of donor warm ischemia time, DCD surgical technique, combined thoracic and abdominal procurements, and normothermic regional perfusion. The proposed recommendations were classified on the basis of the grade of available evidence and the strength of the recommendation. This information should be valuable for transplant programs as well as for organ procurement organizations and donor hospitals as they develop robust DCD donor procurement protocols.

Evaluation of pediatric renal transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study

Background/Aim: The best course of treatment for children with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is renal transplantation (RT), but some pediatric RT recipients are admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) post-transplant. In the early and late post-operative phases, clinical data about pediatric RT recipients who are admitted to ICU are available. In this study, we aimed to evaluate demographic features, main reasons, and outcomes of pediatric RT patients admitted to the ICU during the early and late post-operative phases. Methods: This study was a cohort study. We analyzed the medical records of pediatric RT recipients (&lt;18 years of age) who were admitted to the ICU between May 30, 2011, and October 16, 2021, at our center, retrospectively. Patients ≥18 years of age and those without available data were excluded. We obtained the following data from ICU follow-up records and hospital medical records. The median (minimum-maximum) for continuous variables, frequencies, and percentages for categorical variables were used. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. We created graphs using percentages and frequencies to summarize the results. Results: Nineteen (16.5%) of the 115 pediatric patients who underwent RT were admitted to the ICU during the study period. Thirteen patients (68.4%) were male, and the mean age was 10.2 (4.9) years. Hypertension (21.2%) was the most common comorbidity. Eighteen (94.7%) received transplants from living donors. Cystic-hereditary-congenital disorders (42.1%, n=8) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (26.3%, n=5) were among the etiologies of ESKD. Ten patients (52.6%) were admitted to the ICU &gt;6 months after transplantation. Epileptic seizure (n=6, 31.6%), respiratory failure (n=4, 21.1%), and cardiac diseases (n=2, 10.5%) were among the main reasons for ICU admission. During ICU follow-up, invasive mechanical ventilation was needed for five patients (26.3%), and renal replacement treatment was needed for four patients (21.1%). The mean length of ICU was 12.4 (28.5), and the mean hospital stay was 25.8 (29.4) days. The ICU and hospital survival rates were 78.9% and 97%, respectively, while 3.5% was the hospital mortality rate. Hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease, acute hepatic failure, and cardiogenic shock secondary to pericardiocentesis were the causes of death in the ICU. Conclusion: Patients mostly had ICU admissions because of epileptic seizures and acute respiratory failure. A multidisciplinary approach involving pediatric nephrologists, transplant surgeons, and an intensive care team successfully manages pediatric RT recipients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Overcoming Challenges of Deceased Organ Donation in Indian Private Hospitals.

Overcoming Challenges of Deceased Organ Donation in Indian Private Hospitals.

The 3-Step Model of informed consent for living kidney donation: a proposal on behalf of the DESCaRTES Working Group of the European Renal Association.

Living donation challenges the ethical principle of non-maleficence in that it exposes healthy persons to risks for the benefit of someone else. This makes safety, informed consent (IC) and education a priority. Living kidney donation has multiple benefits for the potential donor, but there are also several known short- and long-term risks. Although complete standardization of IC is likely to be unattainable, studies have emphasized the need for a standardized IC process to enable equitable educational and decision-making prospects for the prevention of inequities across transplant centers. Based on the Three-Talk Model of shared decision-making by Elwyn et al., we propose a model, named 3-Step (S) Model, where each step coincides with the three ideal timings of the process leading the living donor to the decision to pursue living donation: prior to the need for kidney replacement therapy (team talk); at the local nephrology unit or transplant center, with transplant clinicians and surgeons prior to evaluations start (option talk); and throughout evaluation, after having learned about the different aspects of donation, especially if there are second thoughts or doubts (decision talk). Based on the 3-S Model, to deliver conceptual and practical guidance to nephrologists and transplant clinicians, we provide recommendations for standardization of the timing, content, modalities for communicating risks and assessment of understanding prior to donation. The 3-S Model successfully allows an integration between standardization and individualization of IC, enabling a person-centered approach to potential donors. Studies will assess the effectiveness of the 3-S Model in kidney transplant clinical practice.

Use of organs from increased infectious risk deceased donors in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Living donors are the main source of transplanted kidneys for children and young people in many countries, but there still remains a significant need for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Given the waiting times associated with deceased donor kidney transplantation and the morbidity or mortality that can occur in those on the waiting list, it is essential that the utilization of kidneys from deceased donors is optimized. The use of organs from deceased donors at increased risk of transmitting human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus is relatively common in adults, but far less so in children. The risks and benefits of the use of kidneys from increased infectious risk donors (IIRD) are discussed. The variation of definitions of IIRD between countries is explored as is the need for pediatric nephrologists and transplant surgeons to have an understanding of the prevalence of viral diseases within the country in which they work. The role of screening tests such as nucleic acid tests is examined, along with the concept of residual risk. Finally, considerations in acquiring informed consent in the use of kidneys from IIRDs in children and young people are discussed.

Patients are pragmatic and physicians are perfectionists? Comparing success after liver transplantation among patients and physicians.

Although both patients and physicians are key stakeholders in health care outcomes, patients and physicians often define success differently. The purpose of this study was to compare patient and physician perceptions of success 1 year after liver transplantation. This was a single-institution, qualitative study. We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with liver transplant recipients 1 year after transplantation and virtual interviews with transplant surgeons and hepatologists. Transcripts were coded and iteratively analyzed for themes using the principles of phenomenology. Twenty patients, 8 caregivers, 5 transplant surgeons, and 4 hepatologists were interviewed. Subject interviews averaged 57 (patient) and 27 (physician) minutes. Overall, patients and physicians had significant agreement in their definitions of success, which included avoidance of death, restoration of physical and mental function, return to society, acquisition of new health care knowledge, and open communication between the patient and the physician. Patients highlighted relief from worry about their future health status, and physicians highlighted decreased health care costs. Patients noted that a liver transplant did not have to be perfect, that is free from complications, to be successful. Physicians had a more stringent view and felt that any deviation from an ideal course reduced the relative success of a transplant. Detailed assessment of patient and physician responses reveals similar overall goals of regaining physical, mental, and emotional function. Complications are perceived differently by patients and physicians. Awareness of this discordance may serve to enhance relationships between transplant patients and their providers.

Disparities in Deceased Donor Kidney Offer Acceptance: A Survey of Canadian Transplant Nephrologists, General Surgeons and Urologists.

Significant variability in organ acceptance thresholds have been demonstrated across the United States, but data regarding the rate and rationale for kidney donor organ decline in Canada are lacking. To examine decision making regarding deceased kidney donor acceptance and non-acceptance in a population of Canadian transplant professionals. A survey study of theoretical deceased donor kidney cases of increasing complexity. Canadian transplant nephrologists, urologists, and surgeons making donor call decisions responding to an electronic survey between July 22 and October 4, 2022. Invitations to participate were distributed to 179 Canadian transplant nephrologists, surgeons, and urologists through e-mail. Participants were identified by contacting each transplant program and requesting a list of physicians who take donor call. Survey respondents were asked whether they would accept or decline a given donor, assuming there was a suitable recipient. They were also asked to cite reasons for donor non-acceptance. Donor scenario-specific acceptance rates (total acceptance divided by total number of respondents for a given scenario and overall) and reasons for decline were determined and presented as a percentage of the total cases declined. In all, 72 respondents from 7 provinces completed at least one question of the survey, with considerable variability between acceptance rates for centers; the most conservative center declined 60.9% of donor cases, whereas the most aggressive center declined only 28.1%, P-value < .001. There was an increased risk of non-acceptance with advancing age, donation after cardiac death, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and comorbidities. As with any survey, there is the potential for participation bias. In addition, this study examines donor characteristics in isolation, however, asks respondent to assume there is a suitable candidate available. In reality, whenever donor quality is considered, it should be considered in the context of the intended recipient. In a survey of increasingly medically complex deceased kidney donor cases, there was significant variability in donor decline among Canadian transplant specialists. Given relatively high rates of donor decline and apparent heterogeneity in acceptance decisions, Canadian transplant specialists may benefit from additional education regarding the benefits achieved from even medically complex kidney donors for appropriate candidates relative to remaining on dialysis on the transplant waitlist.