Outcome Of Transplantation Research Articles

P.367: Outcomes of liver transplantation: A single-center experience. (First Central Hospital of Mongolia).

P.367: Outcomes of liver transplantation: A single-center experience. (First Central Hospital of Mongolia).

P.254: Outcomes of liver transplantations in patients with alagille syndrome with high pulmonary arterial pressure performed in our center.

P.254: Outcomes of liver transplantations in patients with alagille syndrome with high pulmonary arterial pressure performed in our center.

Outcomes of controlled DCDD lung transplantation after thoraco-abdominal vs abdominal normothermic regional perfusion: The Spanish experience

ObjectiveThoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a strategy for evaluating and recovering the heart in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD). However, its impact on lung grafts remains largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of TA-NRP on the outcomes of recipients of cDCDD lungs. MethodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study describing the outcomes of cDCDD lung transplants (LTs) performed in Spain from January 2021 to November 2023. Patients were divided in two groups based on the recovery technique: TA-NRP with the simultaneous recovery of the heart versus abdominal NRP (A-NRP) without simultaneous heart recovery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 at 72 hours. Secondary endpoints included the overall incidence of PGD, days on mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, early survival rates, and mid-term outcomes. Results283 cDCDD LTs were performed during the study period, 28 (10%) using TA-NRP and 255 (90%) using A-NRP. No differences were observed in the incidence of PGD grade 3 at 72 hours between the TA-NRP and the A-NRP group (0% vs. 7.6%; p=0.231), though the overall incidence of PGD was significantly lower with TA-NRP (14.3%% vs. 41.5%; p=0.005). We found no significant differences between the groups regarding other post-transplant outcome variables. ConclusionsTA-NRP allows the simultaneous recovery of both the heart and the lungs in the cDCDD scenario with appropriate LT outcomes comparable to those observed with the A-NRP approach.

223.2: Outcomes of redo-liver transplantation using hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion: A multicentre cohort study (REDO-HOPE).

223.2: Outcomes of redo-liver transplantation using hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion: A multicentre cohort study (REDO-HOPE).

Early outcomes in heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death donors in patients bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices

ObjectiveDonation after circulatory death heart transplantation potentially increases donor allografts, especially for patients with lower listing status. We assessed the outcomes of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation in patients bridged with durable left ventricular assist devices. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult heart transplants using donation after circulatory death donors from 2019 to 2022. Patients were stratified between those with durable left ventricular assist devices and those with intra-aortic balloon pump, inotropic, or no bridging support (control group). Primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary end points were hospital length of stay, stroke, pacemaker implantation, dialysis, and acute rejection before discharge. ResultsA total of 160 left ventricular assist device recipients and 311 control recipients met study inclusion criteria. Recipients bridged with left ventricular assist devices were younger (55 vs 58 years, P < .001) with lower body mass index (28.3 vs 30.3, P < .001), longer waitlist times (112 vs 34 days, P < .001), longer out of body times (5.7 vs 4.6 hours, P < .001), and less frequent normothermic regional perfusion (31% vs 40%, P = .049). Patients with left ventricular assist devices commonly underwent transplantation at United Network for Organ Sharing status 3 and 4 (92%), whereas control patients underwent transplantation at status 2 (27%), status 3 (10%), status 4 (30%), or status 6 (30%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in 1-year mortality between groups (P = .34). However, acute rejection was higher in the unadjusted left ventricular assist device cohort (26% vs 13%, P < .001). On multivariable logistic regression, left ventricular assist device was an independent predictor of acute rejection (odds ratio, 2.21, 95% CI, 1.32-3.69, P = .002). ConclusionsDurable left ventricular assist devices may be associated with a higher risk of developing an early inflammatory response in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation; however, 1-year survival was similar between groups.

V-311.2: Perfusion techniques and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

V-311.2: Perfusion techniques and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

P.166: Outcomes of kidney transplantation in older recipients: Is age just a number?

P.166: Outcomes of kidney transplantation in older recipients: Is age just a number?

Impact of Donor Obesity on Graft and Recipient Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The effect of donor body mass index (BMI) on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes remains unclear. A systematic search of the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and bibliographic reference lists was conducted. All comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of LT in obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) and nonobese donors (BMI < 30 kg/m2) were included, and their risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I assessment tool. Patient and graft survival, acute rejection, and graft failure requiring retransplantation were evaluated as outcome parameters. A random-effects model was used for outcome synthesis. We included 6 comparative studies reporting a total of 5071 liver transplant recipients from 708 obese and 4363 nonobese donors. There was no significant difference in 1-y (89.1% versus 84.0%, odds ratio [OR] 1.58; 95% CI 0.63-3.94, P = 0.33), 5-y (74.2%% versus 73.5%, OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.45-2.80, P = 0.81) graft survival, and 1-y (87.1% versus 90.3%, OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.15, P = 0.17) and 5-y (64.5% versus 71.6%, OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49-1.05, P = 0.08) patient survival between 2 groups. Furthermore, recipients from obese and nonobese donors had a comparable risk of graft failure requiring retransplantation (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.33-2.60, P = 0.88) or acute graft rejection (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.45-1.11, P = 0.13). A meta-analysis of the best available evidence (level 2a) demonstrates that donor obesity does not seem to have a negative impact on graft or patient outcomes. The available studies might be subject to selection bias as the grafts from obese donors are usually subject to biopsy to exclude steatosis and the recipients usually belong to the low-risk group. Future research is needed to evaluate the impact of donors subgrouped by various higher BMI on graft and patient-related outcomes as well as to capture data of the discarded grafts from obese donors; hence, selection criteria for the grafts that could be used for transplantation from obese donors is identified.

415.1: Improving outcomes of transplants using high kidney donor profile index kidneys through donor-recipient matching.

415.1: Improving outcomes of transplants using high kidney donor profile index kidneys through donor-recipient matching.

Evaluation of Virtual Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Early Posttransplant Period.

Though virtual care was widely adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence to support its use in kidney transplant recipients early after transplantation is limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing post kidney transplant outcomes in patients who received in-person transplant care before the COVID-19 pandemic with those who received mainly virtual transplant care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The usual-care group included 69 patients who received a kidney transplant from March 1, 2019 to September 1, 2019, and the virtual-care group included 64 patients who received a kidney transplant from September 1, 2020 to March 1, 2021. At 6 months, five patients in the usual-care group and three patients in the virtual-care group died. There was one graft loss and one episode of acute rejection in the usual-care group, and two episodes of acute rejection in the virtual-care group (p = 0.60). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was higher for patients in the virtual-care group (59mL/min/1.73m2 vs. 52mL/min/1.73m2, p = 0.046) and serum creatinine was not different (138 µmol/L vs. 127µmol/L, p = 0.27). There was no difference in mean blood pressure or hospitalizations. Outcomes were similar among recipients of a kidney transplant prior to the COVID-19 pandemic when care was mainly in person and during the pandemic when care was mainly virtual, without a signal of harm. Patient and donor selection may have led to unmeasured differences between groups.

201.6: Pre-transplant transitional B cell cytokines and renal transplant outcomes.

201.6: Pre-transplant transitional B cell cytokines and renal transplant outcomes.

The current landscape of in situ and ex situ machine perfusion utilization for liver grafts from cardiac donation after circulatory death donors in the US

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is driving the increase in deceased organ donors in the United States. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and ex situ machine perfusion (es-MP) have been instrumental in improving liver transplant outcomes and graft utilization. This study examines the current landscape of liver utilization from cardiac DCD donors in the United States. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, all adult (≥18 years old) DCD donors in the United States from which the heart was used for transplantation from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2023, were compared by procurement technique (NRP versus super rapid recovery [SRR]) and storage strategy (es-MP versus static cold storage). One hundred eighty-eight livers were transplanted from 309 thoracoabdominal NRP donors (61% utilization) versus 305 (56%) liver transplants from 544 SRR donors. es-MP was used in 20% (n = 38) of NRP cases versus 32% (98) of SRR cases. Of the liver grafts, 281 (59%) were exposed to NRP, es-MP, or both. While there is widespread utilization of machine perfusion, more research is needed to determine optimal graft management strategies, particularly concerning the use of multiple technologies in complementary ways. More complete data collection is necessary at a national level to address these important research questions.

P.016: A comparative analysis of kidney transplantation outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with disease flare vs. non-flare groups.

P.016: A comparative analysis of kidney transplantation outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with disease flare vs. non-flare groups.

341.5: Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: A UK live-donor kidney transplant outcome prediction (UK-LTOP) tool.

341.5: Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: A UK live-donor kidney transplant outcome prediction (UK-LTOP) tool.

P.492: Liver transplantation outcomes in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC): A single center experience.

P.492: Liver transplantation outcomes in children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC): A single center experience.

325.7: Development of a novel immunosuppressive method using simultaneous administration of SHED to improve islet transplantation outcomes.

325.7: Development of a novel immunosuppressive method using simultaneous administration of SHED to improve islet transplantation outcomes.

A Multicenter Analysis of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Adults with Philadelphia-Like B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk subset of B-cell ALL with a poor prognosis with conventional therapies. Diagnostic challenges and lack of standardized treatment protocols contribute to suboptimal outcomes. Additionally, while allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is frequently recommended in adults with Ph-like ALL given its high-risk nature, data supporting its role remains limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study evaluating outcomes of adult patients undergoing HCT in first complete remission (CR1) for Ph-like ALL compared to Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (Ph-pos) and other B-cell Philadelphia negative (Ph-neg) ALL. Data was collected from five academic centers across the US, focusing on HCT outcomes for patients with ALL. Patients undergoing HCT in CR1 between 2006 and 2021 were included. Among 673 patients, 83 (12.3%) had Ph-like ALL, while 271 (40.3%) had Ph-pos and 319 (47.4%) had Ph-neg ALL. Outcomes following HCT in CR1 for Ph-like ALL were comparable to Ph-neg ALL, with no significant differences in 3-year overall survival (66% vs. 59%, P = .1), progression-free survival (59% and 54%, P = .1), or relapse rates (22% vs. 20%, P = .7). In contrast, Ph-pos ALL had superior outcomes; 3-year OS (75%, P < .001), PFS (70%, P = .001) and relapse (12%, P = .003), this is likely attributed to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Our study suggests that HCT, coupled with effective 2nd line therapies can possibly mitigate the poor prognosis associated with Ph-like ALL and offers promising outcomes for patients with Ph-like ALL.

P.183: Comparison of kidney transplantation outcomes from deceased kidney donors with and without history of cardiac arrest.

P.183: Comparison of kidney transplantation outcomes from deceased kidney donors with and without history of cardiac arrest.

P.398: Evaluating post-liver transplantation outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome: Insights from a small volume center study.

P.398: Evaluating post-liver transplantation outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome: Insights from a small volume center study.

402.2: Association of macrovascular invasion and poor tumor differentiation on post-liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

402.2: Association of macrovascular invasion and poor tumor differentiation on post-liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.