Transplant Clinicians Research Articles

Cytomegalovirus Infection After Solid Organ Transplantation: How I Use Cell-Mediated Immune Assays for Management

Introduction: The pathogenesis and outcome of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) reflects the interplay between viral replication and CMV-specific immunity. Despite advances in its diagnosis and treatment, CMV continues to cause significant morbidity after SOT. Since CMV is an opportunistic pathogen that occurs as a result of impaired pathogen-specific immunity, laboratory assays that measure CMV-specific immune responses may be useful in assisting clinicians in its management. Methods and Results: The author summarizes the evolving and emerging data on the clinical utility of assays that quantify cell-mediated immune responses to CMV in SOT recipients. The majority of publications are observational studies that demonstrate that a lack or deficiency in CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity is correlated with a heightened risk of primary, reactivation, or recurrent CMV after transplantation. A few prospective interventional studies have utilized CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays in guiding the duration of antiviral prophylaxis among CMV-seropositive SOT recipients. Likewise, CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity assays have been suggested to inform the need for secondary antiviral prophylaxis and immunologic optimization to prevent CMV relapse after treatment. Conclusions: CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays are emerging to assist transplant clinicians in predicting a patient’s risk of CMV after transplantation, and these assays have been utilized to individualize the approach to CMV prevention and treatment. The author suggests the conduct of more interventional studies to further solidify the role of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays in routine clinical practice.

Preferences in treating polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: A discrete choice experiment with patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Treatment strategies for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in kidney transplant recipients are heterogeneous among clinicians. We aimed to identify the treatment preferences of key stakeholders for BKPyV infection and measure the trade-offs between treatment outcomes. Adult kidney transplant recipients, caregivers, and clinicians were eligible to participate in a discrete choice experiment between February 2021 and June 2022. The five treatment-related attributes were achieving viral clearance and optimal graft function, as well as reducing the risk of graft loss, acute rejection, and complications. Results were analyzed using multinomial logistic models. In total, 109 participants (57 kidney transplant recipients, 10 caregivers, and 42 health professionals) were included. The most important attribute was the risk of graft loss, followed by side effects and acute rejection. As the risk of graft loss increased, all participants were less inclined to accept an assigned treatment strategy. For instance, if graft loss risk was increased from 1% to 50%, the probability of uptake of a treatment strategy for BKPyV infection was reduced from 87% to 3%. Graft loss is the predominant concern for patients, caregivers, and health professionals when deciding on the treatment for BKPyV infection, and should be included in intervention trials of BKPyV infection.

“My feelings and my thoughts are my lived experience, not the numbers they show me on a piece of paper”: Indigenous experiences of liver transplantation in British Columbia, Canada

ABSTRACT Indigenous Peoples in Canada face healthcare inequities impacting access to solid organ transplantation. The experiences of Indigenous patients during the liver transplant process, and how transplant professionals perceive challenges faced by Indigenous Peoples, has not been studied. Thirteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted via telehealth with Indigenous liver transplant patients (n = 7) and transplant care providers (n = 6) across British Columbia, Canada between April 2021—May 2022. Themes were identified to inform clinical approaches and transplant care planning and validated by Indigenous health experts. Among patient participants: transplants occurred between 1992–2020; all were women; and the mean age at the time of interview was 60 years. Among transplant care provider participants: roles included nursing, social work, and surgery; 83% were women; and the median number of years in transplant care was ten. Three broad themes were identified: Indigenous strengths and resources, systemic and structural barriers, and inconsistent care and cultural safety across health professions impact Indigenous patient care during liver transplantation. This study contributes insights into systemic barriers and Indigenous resilience in the liver transplant journey. Dismantling structural barriers to early linkage to care is needed, and training for transplant clinicians on Indigenous histories, cultural protocols, and cultural safety is strongly recommended.

Strategies for choosing the best living donor: A review of the literature and a proposal of a decision-making paradigm.

Transplantation remains the gold-standard treatment for pediatric end-stage kidney disease. While living donor transplant is the preferred option for most pediatric patients, it is not the right choice for all. For those who have the option to choose between deceased donor and living donor transplantation, or from among multiple potential living donors, the transplant clinician must weigh multiple dynamic factors to identify the most optimal donor. This review will cover the key considerations when choosing between potential living donors and will propose a decision-making algorithm.

Role of HLA in cardiothoracic transplantation.

In current clinical practice, transplant clinicians create collaborative working relationships with histocompatibility laboratory scientists to identify the risk of long-term graft failure, which may assist in establishing strategies for treatment and surveillance. Transplant immunology research also focuses on optimizing human leukocyte antibody tissue typing and defines the most effective test for detecting the presence of donor-specific antibodies. Although several studies have been conducted, data on pediatric heart transplant recipients are limited. Epitope load information may be utilized to identify donors with permissible human leukocyte antibody mismatches to increase transplant success. Although current guidelines do not consider human leukocyte antibody epitope-based matching tools, these guidelines could be useful for identifying recipients at a high risk of donor-specific antibody production, which would be appropriate for routine donor-specific antibody screening to initiate early interventions to prevent antibody-mediated rejection. Human leukocyte antibody matching at the epitope level offers an effective approach for identifying acceptable mismatches in sensitized patients and provides information about epitope loads. In the future, eplet matching may be used to define the best immunosuppressive therapy protocol for cardiothoracic organ transplantation. This report provides an overview of the role of human leukocyte antibodies in heart and lung transplantation.

Neuropsychological and biopsychosocial evolution, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs during paediatric transplantation: study protocol of a mixed-methods design (observational cohort study and focus groups) - the TransplantKIDS mental health project.

The present article describes the protocol of a mixed-methods study (an observational cohort design and focus groups), aimed to examine neuropsychological functioning and other biopsychosocial outcomes, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs in paediatric population undergoing solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic transplant during the pre- and post-transplant phases. Following a multi-method/multi-source approach, neuropsychological domains will be comprehensively measured with objective tests (SDMT, K-CPT 2/CPT 3, TAVECI/TAVEC, WISC-V/WAIS-IV Vocabulary and Digit Span subtests, Verbal Fluency tests, Stroop, ROCF, and TONI-4); ecological executive functioning, affective and behavioral domains, pain intensity/interference, sleep quality and therapeutic adherence will be assessed through questionnaires (parent/legal guardians-reported: BRIEF-2 and BASC-3; and self-reported: BASC-3, BPI, PROMIS, AIQ and SMAQ); and blood levels of prescribed drugs will be taken from each patient's medical history. These outcomes will be measured at pre-transplant and at 4-weeks and 6-months post-transplant phases. The estimated sample size was 60 patients (any type of transplant, solid organ, or hematopoietic) from La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Finally, three focus group sessions will be organized with patients, parents/guardians, and transplant clinicians (n = 15, with 5 participants per group), in order to qualitatively identify unmet care needs during the pre-, and post-transplant stages of the process. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05441436).

Intragraft regulatory T cells in the modern era: what can high-dimensional methods tell us about pathways to allograft acceptance?

Replacement of diseased organs with transplanted healthy donor ones remains the best and often only treatment option for end-stage organ disease. Immunosuppressants have decreased the incidence of acute rejection, but long-term survival remains limited. The broad action of current immunosuppressive drugs results in global immune impairment, increasing the risk of cancer and infections. Hence, achievement of allograft tolerance, in which graft function is maintained in the absence of global immunosuppression, has long been the aim of transplant clinicians and scientists. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are a specialized subset of immune cells that control a diverse array of immune responses, can prevent allograft rejection in animals, and have recently been explored in early phase clinical trials as an adoptive cellular therapy in transplant recipients. It has been established that allograft residency by Tregs can promote graft acceptance, but whether intragraft Treg functional diversification and spatial organization contribute to this process is largely unknown. In this review, we will explore what is known regarding the properties of intragraft Tregs during allograft acceptance and rejection. We will summarize recent advances in understanding Treg tissue residency through spatial, transcriptomic and high-dimensional cytometric methods in both animal and human studies. Our discussion will explore properties of intragraft Tregs in mediating operational tolerance to commonly transplanted solid organs. Finally, given recent developments in Treg cellular therapy, we will review emerging knowledge of whether and how these adoptively transferred cells enter allografts in humans. An understanding of the properties of intragraft Tregs will help lay the foundation for future therapies that will promote immune tolerance.

Utility of preoperative troponin I to predict mortality in adult liver transplant recipients: Revisiting pretransplant cardiac risk in the current MELD-allocation era.

Preoperative risk assessment in liver transplant (LT) candidates, particularly related to cardiac risk, is an area of intense interest for transplant clinicians. Various cardiac testing methods are employed by transplant centers to characterize cardiac risk. Serum troponin is an established method for the detection of myocardial injury in a wide variety of clinical settings. Preoperative troponin screening has been reported to predict postoperative cardiac events and mortality in various surgical patient populations, however, the utility of preoperative troponin to predict posttransplant outcomes in current LT candidate populations requires further investigation. We performed a prospective blinded study in a cohort of 275 consecutive LT recipients at a single transplant center to determine if preoperative serum troponin I (TnI) was predictive for postoperative 1-year mortality. Abnormal preoperative TnI levels (>.1ng/mL) were found in 38 patients (14%). One-year mortality occurred in 19 patients (7%). There was no significant difference in mortality between patients with normal and abnormal troponin levels. Additionally, we found that there was no significant difference in early postoperative major adverse cardiac events between patient groups. Contrary to previous reports, elevated preoperative TnI was not significantly predictive of posttransplant mortality in LT recipients at our institution.

Transplant recipient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of medication adherence monitoring technology: A mixed methods study

Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies—reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills—may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.

A Comprehensive Review of Liver Allograft Fibrosis and Steatosis: From Cause to Diagnosis.

Despite advances in posttransplant care, long-term outcomes for liver transplant recipients remain unchanged. Approximately 25% of recipients will advance to graft cirrhosis and require retransplantation. Graft fibrosis progresses in the context of de novo or recurrent disease. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was previously the most important cause of graft failure but is now curable in the majority of patients. However, with an increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation, metabolic dysfunction-associated liver injury is anticipated to become an important cause of graft fibrosis alongside alloimmune hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. To better understand the landscape of the graft fibrosis literature, we summarize the associated epidemiology, cause, potential mechanisms, diagnosis, and complications. We additionally highlight the need for better noninvasive methods to ameliorate the management of graft fibrosis. Some examples include leveraging the microbiome, genetic, and machine learning methods to address these limitations. Overall, graft fibrosis is routinely seen by transplant clinicians, but it requires a better understanding of its underlying biology and contributors that can help inform diagnostic and therapeutic practices.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Kidney Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Clinical Management Approaches.

Inflammatory bowel disease is not uncommon among kidney transplant recipients. In transplant patients with chronic diarrhea and abdominal pain, de novo inflammatory bowel disease can be considered among differential diagnoses, after exclusion of infectious causes and drug-induced diarrhea. Inflammatory bowel disease, in the cnnnontext of organ transplant, is associated with a higherrisk of morbidity, increased rate of hospitalization, and higher mortality.Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, before and after transplant, among a gastroenterologist specialized in inflammatory bowel disease, a gastrointestinal surgeon, and a transplant clinician is essential, given the higher clinical complexity for this subgroup of patients. Limited data are available on management of inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients, although the concurrent use of immunosuppressive therapy can mitigate flare-ups but with increased infection risks. Colorectal cancer can be a serious complication of inflammatory bowel disease; hence, patient compliance with regular colonoscopy surveillance programs is crucial. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are undergoing kidney transplant have a shorter overall survival rate compared with matched control groups. However, inferences based on studies involving inflammatory bowel disease in kidney transplant recipients are blighted by small sample sizes,thus making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions. Our review was undertaken to comprehensively report the clinical approaches to kidney transplant recipients with inflammatory bowel disease, describing their clinical course, outcomes, and management plan.

Kidney Transplant Clinicians’ Perceptions of Palliative Care for Patients With Failing Allografts in the US: A Mixed Methods Study

Kidney transplant patients with failing allografts have a physical and psychological symptom burden as well as high morbidity and mortality. Palliative care is underutilized in this vulnerable population. We described kidney transplant clinicians' perceptions of palliative care to delineate their perceived barriers to and facilitators of providing palliative care to this population. National explanatory sequential mixed methods study including an online survey and semistructured interviews. Kidney transplant clinicians in the United States surveyed and interviewed from October 2021 to March2022. Descriptive summary of survey responses, thematic analysis of qualitative interviews, and mixed methods integration of data. A total of 149 clinicians completed the survey, and 19 completed the subsequent interviews. Over 90% of respondents agreed that palliative care can be helpful for patients with a failing kidney allograft. However, 46% of respondents disagreed that all patients with failing allografts benefit from palliative care, and two-thirds thought that patients would not want serious illness conversations. More than 90% of clinicians expressed concern that transplant patients and caregivers would feel scared or anxious if offered palliative care. The interviews identified three main themes: (1) transplant clinicians' unique sense of personal and professional responsibility was a barrier to palliative care engagement, (2) clinicians' uncertainty regarding the timing of palliative care collaboration would lead to delayed referral, and (3) clinicians felt challenged by factors related to patients' cultural backgrounds and identities, such as language differences. Many comments reflected an unfamiliarity with the broad scope of palliative care beyond end-of-life care. Potential selection bias. Our study suggests that multiple barriers related to patients, clinicians, health systems, and health policies may pose challenges to the delivery of palliative care for patients with failing kidney transplants. This study illustrates the urgent need for ongoing efforts to optimize palliative care delivery models dedicated to kidney transplant patients, their families, and the clinicians who serve them. Kidney transplant patients experience physical and psychological suffering in the context of their illnesses that may be amenable to palliative care. However, palliative care is often underutilized in this population. In this mixed-methods study, we surveyed 149 clinicians across the United States, and 19 of them completed semistructured interviews. Our study results demonstrate that several patient, clinician, system, and policy factors need to be addressed to improve palliative care delivery to this vulnerable population.

International consensus recommendations on face transplantation: A 2-step Delphi study

Face transplantation is a viable reconstructive approach for severe craniofacial defects. Despite the evolution witnessed in the field, ethical aspects, clinical and psychosocial implications, public perception, and economic sustainability remain the subject of debate and unanswered questions. Furthermore, poor data reporting and sharing, the absence of standardized metrics for outcome evaluation, and the lack of consensus definitions of success and failure have hampered the development of a “transplantation culture” on a global scale. We completed a 2-round online modified Delphi process with 35 international face transplant stakeholders, including surgeons, clinicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, ethicists, policymakers, and researchers, with a representation of 10 of the 19 face transplant teams that had already performed the procedure and 73% of face transplants. Themes addressed included patient assessment and selection, indications, social support networks, clinical framework, surgical considerations, data on patient progress and outcomes, definitions of success and failure, public image and perception, and financial sustainability. The presented recommendations are the product of a shared commitment of face transplant teams to foster the development of face transplantation and are aimed at providing a gold standard of practice and policy.

Considerable Variability Among Transplant Nephrologists in Judging Deceased Donor Kidney Offers

Transplant clinicians may disagree on whether or not to accept a deceased donor kidney offer. We investigated the interobserver variability between transplant nephrologists regarding organ acceptance and whether the use of a prediction model impacted their decisions. We developed an observational online survey with 6 real-life cases of deceased donor kidneys offered to a waitlisted recipient. Per case, nephrologists were asked to estimate the risk of adverse outcome and whether they would accept the offer for this patient, or for a patient of their own choice, and how certain they felt. These questions were repeated after revealing the risk of adverse outcome, calculated by a validated prediction model. Sixty Dutch nephrologists completed the survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient of their estimated risk of adverse outcome was poor (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.62). Interobserver agreement of the decision on whether or not to accept the kidney offer was also poor (Fleiss kappa 0.13, 95% CI 0.129-0.130). The acceptance rate before and after providing the outcome of the prediction model was significantly influenced in 2 of 6 cases. Acceptance rates varied considerably among transplant centers. In this study, the estimated risk of adverse outcome and subsequent decision to accept a suboptimal donor kidney varied greatly among transplant nephrologists. The use of a prediction model could influence this decision and may enhance nephrologists' certainty about their decision.

#6073 MAGNETIC RESONANCE RADIOMIC ANALYSIS FOR THE PREDICTION OF GRAFT FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Abstract Background and Aims Prediction of future graft failure with non-invasive investigations is a relevant objective for transplant clinicians. We previously demonstrated a promising discrimination capacity for interstitial fibrosis / tubular atrophy (IFTA) >50% in kidney biopsy of a machine learning (ML) based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic algorithm. Aim of the present study is to evaluate accuracy of MRI radiomic-based ML algorithms in predicting future graft failure. Method Single-center retrospective observational cohort study on a previously characterized cohort of kidney transplant recipients who underwent graft biopsy and graft MRI imaging within 6 months from biopsy, both on clinical indication, at the “Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena”, Italy, from 1/1/2012 to 1/3/2021. The primary outcome was to identify the best combination of MRI radiomic features for the prediction of graft failure during follow-up. Segmentation of renal parenchyma, cortex and medulla on MRI sequences was performed using the 3DSlicer software. Radiomic features were then extracted using an in-house software based on pyradiomics applying Wavelet and Gaussian filters. LASSO algorithm was employed to select correlated features with outcome and summarize them in a radiomic signature. Using radiomic signature alone and then merged with meaningful clinical data we trained ML-algorithms using 70% of cases for training/validation, with a 10-fold internal cross-validation, and 30% for model testing. Model performance was assessed using AUC with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Seventy coupled tests (63 patients) were included and randomly subdivided into a training/validation cohort (n = 50) and a test cohort (n = 20). Median follow-up was 24.73 months (interquartile range 13.64-46.57). Radiomic model had an AUC of 0.88 (95%_CI 0.70-0.97) in training and 0.57 (95%_CI 0.23-0.86) in test cohort. Radiomic-clinical mixed model had an AUC of 0.90 (95%_CI 0.73-0.98) in training and 0.66 (95%_CI 0.33-0.88) in test cohort. Conclusion We produced an MRI radiomic-based ML algorithm with good prediction ability for future graft failure in patients with kidney transplant. Given the limited number of enrolled patients, validation in larger (and ideally prospective) cohorts is required to confirm our findings. Comparison of radiomic-based ML with histological parameters (i.e., IFTA) for the prediction of graft failure in our cohort is currently under assessment.

Anything But a Biopsy: The Quest for Noninvasive Alternatives in Heart Transplantation.

Anything But a Biopsy: The Quest for Noninvasive Alternatives in Heart Transplantation.

Using Behavior Change Theory to Identify Drivers and Barriers for Antifungal Treatment Decisions: A CaseStudy in a Large Teaching Hospital in the East of England, UK.

Antifungal stewardship (AFS) programs are recognized to contribute to optimizing antifungal prescribing for treatment and prophylaxis. However, only a small number of such programs are implemented. Consequently, evidence on behavioral drivers and barriers of such programs and learnings from existing successful AFS programs is limited. This study aimed to leverage a large AFS program in the UK and derive learnings from it. The objective was to (a) investigate the impact of the AFS program on prescribing habits, (a) use a Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) based on the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Behavior) to qualitatively identify drivers and barriers for antifungal prescribing behaviors across multiple specialties, and (c) semiquantitatively investigate trends in antifungal prescribing habits over the last 5years. Qualitative interviews and a semiquantitative online survey were conducted across hematology, intensive care, respiratory, and solid organ transplant clinicians at Cambridge University Hospital. The discussion guide and survey used were developed to identify drivers of prescribing behavior, based on the TDF. Responses were received from 21/25 clinicians. Qualitative outcomes demonstrated that the AFS program was effective in supporting optimal antifungal prescribing practices. We found seven TDF domains influencing antifungal prescribing decisions-five drivers and two barriers. The key driver was collective decision-making among the multidisciplinary team (MDT) while key barriers were lack of access to certain therapies and fungal diagnostic capabilities. Furthermore, over the last 5years and across specialties, we observed an increasing tendency for prescribing to focus on more targeted rather than broad-spectrum antifungals. Understanding the basis for linked clinicians' prescribing behaviors for identified drivers and barriers may inform interventions on AFS programs and contribute to consistently improving antifungal prescribing. Collective decision-making among the MDT may be leveraged to improve clinicians' antifungal prescribing. These findings may be generalized across specialty care settings.

Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: still an open problem.

In the last two decades, the optimization of organ preservation and surgical techniques, and the personalized immunosuppression have reduced the rate of acute rejections and early post-transplant complications. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and evidence suggest a role of chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in this failure. Solid organ transplant recipients may develop chronic dysfunction/damage and several comorbidities, including post-transplant malignancies. Skin cancers, mostly non-melanoma skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma), are the most common malignancies in Caucasian solid organ transplant recipients. Several factors, together with immunosuppression, may contribute to the susceptibility for skin cancers which, although often treatable, could be associated with a much higher mortality rate than in the general population. The rapid identification and treatment (including reduction of immunosuppression and early surgical treatments) have an important role to avoid an aggressive behavior of these malignancies. Organ transplant recipients with a history of skin cancer should be followed closely for developing new and metastatic lesions. Additionally, patient education on the daily use of sun-protective measures and the recognition of the early signs (self-diagnosis) of coetaneous malignancies are useful preventive measures. Finally, clinicians should make themselves aware of the problem and build, in every clinical follow-up center, collaborative network involving transplant clinicians, dermatologists and surgeons who should work together to easily identify and rapidly treat these complications. In this review, we discuss the current literature regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, preventive strategies and treatments of skin cancer in organ transplantation.

Beyond donation to organ utilization in the UK.

Optimizing deceased donor organ utilization is gaining recognition as a topical and important issue, both in the United Kingdom (UK) and globally. This review discusses pertinent issues in the field of organ utilization, with specific reference to UK data and recent developments within the UK. A multifaceted approach is likely required in order to improve organ utilization. Having a solid evidence-base upon which transplant clinicians and patients on national waiting lists can base decisions regarding organ utilization is imperative in order to bridge gaps in knowledge regarding the optimal use of each donated organ. A better understanding of the risks and benefits of the uses of higher risk organs, along with innovations such as novel machine perfusion technologies, can help clinician decision-making and may ultimately reduce the unnecessary discard of precious deceased donor organs. The issues facing the UK with regards to organ utilization are likely to be similar to those in many other developed countries. Discussions around these issues within organ donation and transplantation communities may help facilitate shared learning, lead to improvements in the usage of scarce deceased donor organs, and enable better outcomes for patients waiting for transplants.

Exploring Views and Expectations of Clinicians, Nurses, and Kidney Transplant Recipients Regarding Protocol Development of a Study to Investigate Feasibility of the Implantable Doppler Probe in Kidney Transplantation: Patient-Public Involvement Consultations.

The shortage of donor organs is the most limiting factor in kidney transplant practice today. New monitoring technologies are being investigated to reduce graft loss due to vascular complications. We assessed the feasibility of a novel blood flow monitoring device, the implantable Doppler probe, in kidney transplant surgery. This patient-public involvement consultation explored the views and expectations of the stakeholders (kidney transplant recipients, surgeons, clinicians, and nurses with direct experience of the implantable Doppler probe) on the protocol development of our feasibility study. Our objective was to improve the protocol, understand stakeholder perceptions regarding research in postoperative graft surveillance, and identify potential confounding factors to the research and challenges to implementation of implantable Doppler probe in clinical practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews containing open-ended questions with 12 stakeholders. We performed thematic analysis of the data at the latent level by an inductive approach according to a 6-phase guide by Braun and Clarke using NVivo 12 software. Three key themes emerged. (1) Experiences with the implantable Doppler probe as a monitoring device showed that it was well received by the patients; however, there was a clinical equipoise among the health care professionals. (2) Recognition of the need for research in the early postoperative graft monitoring displayed stakeholder understanding regarding the role of a blood flow monitoring device to improve surgical outcomes. (3) Recommendations for smooth conduct of the proposed study include suggestions for improvement of the study protocol, informative sessions for the patients and nurses, and innovative ideas to improve the monitoring device. Patient-public involvement consultation was crucial for the research design of our proposed feasibility study. Useful strategies and a patient- centered approach were incorporated to mitigate the potential challenges to the conduct of the research.