ion, such as bodily fluids, alienation can be banished. Shapiro's (mis)appropriation of Goux's analysis of exchange is instructive here. For Goux, exchange value is absolutely alienating, regardless of concrete form it takes, because of tyrant,... a frozen mediation, in [exchange] relation, which alienates subjects as it dominates relations (163). In a familiar poststructuralist move, Goux argues that coherence of universal value form is governed by an excluded other, a controlling trope that is able to guarantee consistency of system only by remaining its substitutive logic. The commitment underlying Shapiro's claim that alienation is a local and relative effect of a particular form of exchange value-legal tender-rather than a property of exchange itself, is articulated by Hayek, for whom equilibrium of catallaxy is an emergent property of exchange not given in advance. Goux's structural third entity governing exchange corresponds, in Hayek, to an actual governor, Federal Reserve. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.192 on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 04:26:01 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 494 C O N T E M PO RA RY L IT E RAT U R E between immediacy of tribal exchange and universal value form of free market exchange, enabling Acker to imagine social world as a market without an outside, organized solely by desire of individuals. For Acker, as for Hayek, value is always entirely subjective, attaining stability through spontaneous order of catallaxy, which both writers describe in metaphors drawn from nature and biology. Individual exchanges are microeconomic cells of catallaxy; subject's desire funds vast war of private mirror of our sexuality (26). Interference with functioning of this market, any attempt to institute an outside to administer market relations, is for Acker, as it is for Hayek, a transparent effort to transform social life into an authoritarian organization (Gray 36). The authoritarian impulse takes many forms in her late novels: traditional morality, nuclear family, gender identity, police. But form of control most feared by Acker, and most revealing of her commitments, is represented as attempt of a government agency to pollute bloodstream and disrupt exchange and flow of blood by introducing an alien code, a virus, into it. In Empire of Senseless, once Algerians turn themselves into pirates, establishing a society where there is limit but economic, they tell deposed rulers, no longer will you work ... creating AIDS, by doing so controlling all (71). Of course, in real world, AIDS can be seen as corrupting or preventing union, but special horror of virus as a governmental instrument of controlling union depends on a fictional context where blood is money. In this image of legal tender as conspiracy, Hayek's concern with private money is reproduced by Acker's concern with pure blood. What is at stake is possibility of a radically free market, the anarchy of private enterprise, where universal values and undistorted forms of exchange are founded within rather than without body, and where free individuals encounter limit but economic.
Read full abstract