Transonic Airflow Research Articles

Transonic Performance of an Auxiliary Airflow System for Axisymmetric Inlets

A large-scale model of an axisymmetric inlet with a centerbody auxiliary airflow system has been tested in the wind tunnel at transonic speeds. The auxiliary system allows additional airflow (other than in the main duct formed by the cowl and translating centerbody) to pass through the centerbody of the inlet and combine with the main duct airflow on its way to the engine face. The results of the tests are presented, and the inlet performance is compared to a closely related alternative inlet with a ''traveling boundary-layer bleed system that precludes the use of a centerbody auxiliary airflow system. The comparison shows that the auxiliary airflow inlet can supply 7.7% more engine face airflow at Mach number 1.0 and is 26% shorter than the traveling bleed inlet. Even though maximum transonic airflow was not achieved at a comparable engine face mass-flow ratio of 0.580, a total-pressure distortion of 0.10, and a total-pressure recovery of 0.985 were achieved for the auxiliary airflow inlet, whereas a recovery of only 0.965 was achieved for the traveling bleed inlet. Nomenclature A aux = area of auxiliary airflow entrance annulus Ac = cowl-lip area (capture area) A 0 = freestream tube area entering the inlet D = cowl lip diameter Mdes = design Mach number A/th = throat Mach number

Study of Two Axisymmetric Inlets Designed for Mach 3.5

Results from wind-tunnel tests of two large-scale models of axisymmetric mixed-compression inlet systems designed for Mach number 3.5 are compared. One inlet incorporated a 'traveling'-bleed system in an effort to achieve maximum transonic engine airflow supply. The other inlet required only a 'fixed'-bleed system, but had 21 percent less transonic airflow supply. The inlet with fixed bleed appears more attractive, if auxiliary airflow systems are used to increase the transonic airflow supply, because it can be 45 percent shorter and would be considerably lighter than the traveling-bleed inlet. In addition, the fixed-bleed inlet offers more operating-control margin at supersonic Mach numbers when the inlet is started. Further, its off-design performance is higher because separation of the flow in the subsonic diffuser can be avoided - something that apparently cannot be done with a traveling-bleed inlet without reducing the transonic airflow supply. Finally, it appears that the management and efficiency of bleed airflow for the fixed-bleed inlet can be improved using analytical methods verified by the tests.

Variable Geometry for Supersonic Mixed-Compression Inlets

Study of two-dimension al and axisymmetric supersonic mixed-compression inlet systems has shown that the geometry of both systems can be varied to provide adequate transonic airflow to satisfy the airflow demand of most jet engines. Collapsing geometry systems for both types of inlet systems provide a generous amount of transonic airflow for any design Mach number inlet system. However, the mechnaical practicality of collapsing centerbodies for axisymmetric inlet systems is doubtful. Therefore, translating centerbody axisymmetric inlets with auxiliary airflow systems to augment the transonic airflow capability are an attractive alternative. Estimates show that the capture mass-flow ratio at Mach number 1.0 can be increased approximately 0.20 for a very short axisymmetric inlet system designed for Mach number 2.37. With this increase in mass-flow ratio, even variablecycle engine transonic airflow demand can be matched without oversizing the inlet at the design Mach number.

Recent Advances in the Knowledge of Transonic Air Flow

The most powerful theoretical tool in the solution of the aerodynamic problems of aircraft is the theory of small perturbations, which states that if a wing is thin (or a body slender), and if the incidence is small, then in inviscid flow the fluid velocity at any point can be treated as a small perturbation from the stream velocity. The backbone of our knowledge of the aerodynamics of aircraft is provided by this theory, to which the effects of thick wings and large incidences, and the effect of viscosity, introducing as it does the concept of boundary layers, can be added as additional or correction effects. It is known that at subsonic and again at supersonic speeds, the theory of small perturbations is a linear theory; that is, the assumptions implicit in it lead to a linear partial differential equation for the velocity potential, with linear boundary conditions.