BackgroundThe prognosis among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in the contemporary Asian population remains unclear. Additionally, there is a lack of research examining the disparities in management patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost among these patients. Methods and resultsThis retrospective cohort study assessed patients diagnosed with NVAF between January 2018 and July 2022. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts by CHA2DS2-VASc scores: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk. One-year incidence rates and cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes (including ischemic stroke [IS], transient ischemic attack [TIA], arterial embolism [AE], and major bleeding [MB]) were calculated. Management patterns, HCRU, and cost were analyzed descriptively. Among 419,490 NVAF patients (mean age: 75.2 years, 45.1 % female), 16,541 (3.9 %) were classified as low-risk, 38,494 (9.2 %) as intermediate-risk, and 364,455 (86.9 %) as high-risk. The one-year incidence rates for IS, TIA, AE, and MB were 12.4 (95 % CI, 12.3–12.5), 1.1 (95 % CI, 1.0–1.1), 0.5 (95 % CI, 0.5–0.5), and 3.1 per 100 person-years (95 % CI, 3.1–3.2), with an increasing trend from the low-risk to the high-risk group, respectively. During follow-up, 16.4 % and 11.1 % of patients in the low-risk and high-risk cohorts received oral anticoagulants (OACs), respectively. In addition, significant differences in HCRU and cost were observed in these three cohorts. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that contemporary Asian NVAF patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores experience higher incidence of adverse outcomes and increased hospital resource consumption. Additionally, suboptimal management was present across all CHA2DS2-VASc score groups.