Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) originating from the posterior superior process (PSP) are infrequent and challenging to treat with catheter ablation due to their location in the highest portion of the inferior left ventricular (LV) septum , proximity to the conduction system and origin between LV and right atrium. The incidence of conduction system abnormality from ablation in this area is ill-defined. To describe procedural approach and outcome of PSP ablation including conduction system effect. We reviewed our institutional VA ablation database between 1/2019-11/2022 to identify patients (pts) who underwent PSP ablation. Incidence, procedural technique, and outcomes (including conduction abnormalities and procedural success) are evaluated. Among 556 pts who underwent VA ablation during this period, nine patients (1.6%) underwent PSP ablation. Sustained VT was present in 1 and the remainder had ablation for PVCs. Three patients (33%) were female, 3 pts had prior VA ablation. Mean LVEF was 50.6% +/-7 %, and two patients had structural heart disease with scar on cardiac MRI. The VA morphology had some variance but shared common characteristics including leftward axis, rs in II, negative (QS or rS) in III, and predominantly positive concordance in precordial leads, similar to previously reported series (Figure 1). During ablation, five pts (55.5%) had fast junctional rhythm, and one (11.1%) had transient complete heart block. No one had HV or QRS prolongation post procedure. Two (22.2%) patients had >30 msec AH prolongation, and four (44.4%) patients had >30 msec PR prolongation. Ablation from the right atrium (RA) in 2, coronary sinus (CS) in 3, and from the left ventricular (LV) septum in 8 patients. The patient who had transient complete heart block had full recovery and did not require pacemaker (PPM) implant, and one patient with post procedure AH and PR prolongation required PPM ten months after the procedure. During mean follow-up of 13.8 +/- 10.5 months, 83.3% patients had <3% PVC burden, and there were 92% absolute reduction in PVC burden (P<0.05). Ablation for VA originating from the PSP is associated with a risk of damage to the upper AV conduction, predominantly manifesting as AH prolongation. Care should be taken to monitor conduction during ablation to avoid permanent damage to the conduction system. Despite this, successful ablation can be achieved from the RA, CS or the LV septum.Tabled 1Table 1VA ablation at PSPN=9Age66.4 +/- 16.4Female3 (33%)LVEF (%)50.6 +/-7 %Prior VA ablation0.78 +/- 1.5Abnormal imaging with scar2 (22%)Conduction system disturbance during procedureFast junctional rhythm during ablation5 (55.5%)Transient heart block during ablation1 (11.1%)AH prolongation > 30msec post procedure2 (22.2%)HV prolongation > 30msec post procedure0PR prolongation > 30msec post procedure4 (44.4%)QRS prolongation > 10msec post procedure0Procedure detailAblation form the RA2 (22.2%)Ablation from the CS3 (33.3%)Ablation from the LV8 (88.8%)Ablation with RF energy9 (100%)Ablation with cryo energy0Procedure outcomeMean follow up (months)13.8 +/- 10.5Pre procedure PVC burden (%) *14.8+/- 11.5Post procedure PVC burden (%) **1.32 +/- 1.9VT recurrence ***0Required pacemaker implant1 (11.1%)* Seven patients had information on pre-procedure PVC burden. ** Six patients had information on post-procedure PVC burden. *** One patient had VT ablation. VA: Ventricular arrhythmia, PSP: posterior superior process, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, RA: right atrium, CS: coronary sinus, LV: left ventricle, RF: radiofrequency. Open table in a new tab
Read full abstract