Previous articleNext article No AccessBook ReviewsThe Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Anthony Giddens Carolyn J. DeanCarolyn J. Dean Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 99, Number 3Nov., 1993 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/230354 Views: 21Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1993 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Konstantin S. Sharov Gender Extimity as a Psychological Technique of EU’s Democratizing Its Population: Efforts and Reaction of Diasporas, (Mar 2022): 55–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0695-4_4Detlev Lück, Kerstin Ruckdeschel, Anna Dechant, Norbert F. Schneider Family Demography and Values in Europe: Continuity and Change, (Jun 2021): 85–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73306-3_5, Konstantin S. Sharov, Lucille Dupont, Europeanising Eurasia beyond the Boundaries of European Union: Extimity in Gender as an Export Product, Eurasian Crossroads 1, no.11 (Jun 2020): 010510013.https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010510013Maren Sand Helland, Linda Larsen, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad, Michael Gähler, Tonje Holt Foreldrekonflikter: Mønstre innenfor og på tvers av familieform når familiesystemet utfordres, Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift 4, no.33 (Jun 2020): 131–150.https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2020-03-02Petr Fučík Gender Aspects of Divorce: How the Study of Divorce Can Contribute to Theoretical Approaches to the Sociology of the Family, Czech Sociological Review 52, no.44 (Aug 2016): 557–580.https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2016.52.4.272Rannveig Kaldager Hart, Torkild Hovde Lyngstad Individualiserte livsløp? - Et sekvensanalytisk blikk på samlivene til norske menn og kvinner født 1927–1966, Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 57, no.22 (May 2016): 135–166.https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2016-02-02Emma E. Cook Intimate expectations and practices: freeter relationships and marriage in contemporary Japan, Asian Anthropology 13, no.11 (Mar 2014): 36–51.https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2014.883120Petr Fučík, Beatrice Elena Chromková Manea Rodičovské dráhy. Dvacet let vývoje české porodnosti v sociologické perspektivě, (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7688-2014Sofia Aboim Family and gender values in contemporary Europe: The attitudinal gender gap from a cross-national perspective, Portugese Journal of Social Sciences 9, no.11 (Jul 2010): 33–58.https://doi.org/10.1386/pjss.9.1.33_1Denyse Côté Transformations contemporaines de la paternité : la fin du patriarcat?, Reflets 15, no.11 (Mar 2009): 60–78.https://doi.org/10.7202/029587arPetr Fučík he Age Homogamy of Czech Marriages, 1920-2000, Czech Sociological Review 42, no.44 (Aug 2006): 719–740.https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2006.42.4.06Tomáš Katrňák Modern Partner Relationships and their Transformation in the Age of Late Modernity, Czech Sociological Review 36, no.33 (Jun 2000): 307–316.https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2000.36.3.05Lawrence Knopp SOCIAL JUSTICE, SEXUALITY , AND THE CITY, Urban Geography 15, no.77 (May 2013): 644–660.https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.15.7.644