Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy Research Articles

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy, Chemonucleolysis, Microdiscectomy, and Microendoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: One-year Follow-up Clinical Results and Disc Degeneration.

This study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes and disc degeneration rates after transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TF-FED), condoliase injection, open discectomy (OD), and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In total, 279 patients with LDH were divided into four treatment groups: TF-FED, OD, MED, and condoliase injection. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the complication rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria. Surgical and hospital costs were assessed. Disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema were evaluated using magnetic resonance images. The mean postoperative JOABPEQ, VAS, or modified MacNab scores among the four groups had no significant differences. Additionally, the nerve injury or reoperation rate among the TF-FED, OD, and MED groups had no significant difference. However, the reoperation rate with condoliase injection was high because of residual disc herniation. Surgical and hospital costs were lower with condoliase injection and higher with OD and MED than those with TF-FED. With TF-FED and condoliase injection, the Pfirrmann grade progressed, and the disc height was significantly smaller than that with OD and MED. Endplate bone marrow edema was more common with condoliase injection and TF-FED. All groups had good outcomes. TF-FED and condoliase injection may reduce the burden of surgery because they can be performed under local anesthesia with little blood loss and low medical costs but tend to be associated with disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema. A randomized controlled study with a larger sample is needed.

Determining the Maximum Tolerable Concentration of Ropivacaine to Maintain Sensation of the Nerve Root in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy: Can Epidural Anaesthesia Achieve Pain-Tactile Separation Block to Avoid Nerve Injury?

Nerve injury is a serious complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy due to nerve root contact. The maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) of ropivacaine concentration for epidural anaesthesia, is defined as the concentration that minimises pain while preserving the sensation of the nerve roots. This distinct advantage allows the patient to provide feedback to the surgeon when the nerve roots are contacted. We used a biased-coin design to determine the MTC, which was estimated by the 10% effective concentration (EC10), ie, the concentration at which 10% of patients lost sensation in the nerve roots. The determinant for positive response was lack of sensory feedback upon contact with the nerve root, and the feedback from occurrence of sensations in the innervation area upon contact with the nerve root was defined as a negative response. Primary outcome was the response from contact nerve root. Secondary outcomes were the type and number of statements of negative response and each patient's pain score during surgery. Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The EC10 was 0.434% (95% CI: 0.410%, 0.440%) using isotonic regression in comparison with 0.431% (95% CI: 0.399%, 0.444%) using probit regression. Three type statements of negative response were reported including "tactile sensation", radiculalgia, and numbness. The MTC of ropivacaine used for epidural anaesthesia was 0.434% to avoid nerve injury in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy.

Monocentric experience of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy outcomes: pushing the indications and avoiding failure. Report of 200 cases.

This paper reports the results of the treatment of our first 200 cases of lumbar disc herniation and foraminal stenosis using full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (FETLD). We analyzed outcomes and radiological parameters to overcome failure and inappropriate indications and also highlighted the red flags for surgeons coming to this field as well as the pathways to success. Data on endoscopic procedures were retrospectively analyzed between October 2018 and March 2023. We abstracted sex, age, leg pain by NPRS, postoperative satisfaction according to the MacNaab score, postoperative surgical complications/adverse events (≤30 days), and history of any previous surgery. Furthermore, we measured different radiological parameters to determine the grade of stenosis or discopathy. Once the learning curve was completed, patients' satisfaction increased to 94%, with only a small percentage (6%) of patients unsatisfied 30 days after the operation. Perioperatively, 33.5% of the patients experienced mild to moderate transitory paresthesia. Univariate analysis showed a tendency toward a higher risk of failure in those patients with degenerative listhesis (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% CI 0.97-23.9, P=0.055) as well as those with severely degenerated discs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 0.96-79.4, P=0.054). Conversely, the chances of failure seemed to be lower in patients with severe foraminal stenosis. FETLD proved its efficacy in treating several degenerative spine conditions or was useful for avoiding previous scarring in patients already operated on to the same extent. Therefore, FETLD can be safely used in patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and when the invasiveness of an open technique is not suitable.

Angulation error assessment for the trajectory in the anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views during percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy

BackgroundAnteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopies are often used to evaluate the intraoperative location and angulation of the trajectory in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD). Although the location of the trajectory shown in fluoroscopy is absolutely accurate, the angulation is not always reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views.MethodsA technical study was performed to assess the angulation errors of PETLD trajectories shown in AP and lateral fluoroscopic views. After reconstructing a lumbar CT image, a virtual trajectory was placed into the intervertebral foramen with gradient-changing coronal angulations of the cephalad angle plane (CACAP). For each angulation, virtual AP and lateral fluoroscopies were taken, and the cephalad angles (CA) of the trajectory shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views, which indicated the coronal CA and the sagittal CA, respectively, were measured. The angular relationships among the real CA, CACAP, coronal CA, and sagittal CA were further demonstrated with formulae.ResultsIn PETLD, the coronal CA is approximately equal to the real CA, with a small angle difference and percentage error, whereas the sagittal CA shows a rather large angle difference and percentage error.ConclusionThe AP view is more reliable than the lateral view in determining the CA of the PETLD trajectory.

Risk factors for ninety-day readmissions following full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy for 1542 patients in the biggest spine institutes in Korea.

Endoscopic techniques are becoming popular among spine surgeons because of their advantages. Though the advantages of endoscopic spine surgery are evident and patients can be discharged home within hours of surgery, readmissions can be sought for incomplete relief of leg pain, recurrent disc herniation, and recurrent leg pain. We aim to find out the factors related to the readmission of patients treated for lumbar pathologies. This is a retrospective analysis of the data between the time duration of 2012 and 2022. Patients in the age group of 18-85years, with lumbar disc herniation treated by transforaminal endoscopic lumbar procedures, were included. The patients who were readmitted within 90days were included in the R Group and those who were not were included in the NR group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to find the risk factors for 90-day readmission. There were a total of 1542 patients enrolled in this study. Sex, number of episodes before admission, hypertension, smoking, BMI, migration, disc height, disc height index, spondylolisthesis, instability, pelvic tilt (PT), and disc cross-sectional area (CSA) were found significant on univariable analysis. Age, spondylolisthesis, instability and muscle CSA were the only variables that were found to be statistically significant on multivariable analysis. This study shows that the elderly age group, presence of spondylolisthesis, segmental instability and decreased muscle cross-sectional area are independent risk factors for 90-day hospital readmissions. Patients having the above risk factors should be carefully counseled regarding the possibility of readmission in the future.

362 Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic lumbar discectomy can be divided into two main approaches, transforaminal (TELD) and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD). However, results of comparative studies between these techniques have been inconsistent, and consensus on the decision making to select which approach has not been reached. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched for reported outcomes following TELD and IELD. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale of back (VASB) and leg pain (VASL), and MacNab criteria were evaluated. Operative time, hospital stays, radiation exposure, and complications were investigated. Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random and fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Total of 1,948 patients from 18 studies were included, consisting of 1,006 patients (51.6%) in TELD group and 942 (48.4%) patients in IELD group. TELD had slightly better improvement of postoperative ODI (MD = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.07–2.16; P = 0.04), postoperative VASB (MD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.05; P = 0.01) and last follow-up VASB (MD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.09; P = 0.002), but with longer operative time (MD = 10.1 mins; 95% CI: 1.925–18.77; P < 0.00001) and more fluoroscopic time (SMD = 4.12; 95% CI: 3.22–5.03; P < 0.00001), especially in L5-S1 operation. Postoperative bed rest time was significantly longer in IELD. However, there was no difference in VASL, hospital stays, or complication. CONCLUSIONS: We found comparable clinical outcomes in terms of ODI, VAS, patient satisfaction, hospital stays, and complication between both techniques. TELD required more radiation exposure and longer operative time at L5-S1 level than IELD. Our study provided helpful results to consider which approach is suitable for selected patients and informed consent of benefits from each approach.

EFFICACY OF FULL-ENDOSCOPIC INTERLAMINAR AND TRANSFORAMINAL DISCECTOMY FOR LUMBER DISC HERNIATION.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy to treat LDH. A total of 93 patients with LDH who underwent fully-endoscopic lumbar interlaminar/transforaminal discectomy were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a Transforaminal group (n=41) and an Interlaminar group (n=52). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab scoring system. Of the 93 patients, involving segments in LDH referred to L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1. The fluoroscopy times in the Interlaminar group were smaller than that of the Transforaminal group. We found no obvious significances between the Transforaminal and Interlaminar groups regarding operation time, incision length, postoperative landing time, hospitalization, and incision healing time. Postoperative VAS and ODI scores notably improved at follow-up. Besides, almost 90% LDH patients achieved excellent/good outcomes. The full-endoscopic visualization technique via interlaminar and transforaminal approaches safely and effectively treat LDH. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Study.

Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meta-analysis and systematic review. This study aims to investigate and compare patient-reported outcomes, perioperative data, and complications between 2 common endoscopic approaches for lumbar disc herniation: transforaminal and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, by published high-quality evidence. Electronic databases were searched for reported outcomes following TELD and IELD. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale of back (VASB) and leg pain (VASL), and MacNab criteria were evaluated. Operative time, hospital stays, blood loss, radiation exposure, and complications were investigated. Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random and fixed-effect models. Total of 1948 patients from 18 studies were included, consisting of 1006 patients (51.6%) in TELD group and 942 (48.4%) patients in IELD group. TELD had better improvement of postoperative ODI (MD = 1.26; 95% CI: .07-2.16; P = .04), postoperative VASB (MD = -.23; 95% CI: -.40 to -.05; P = .01) and last follow-up VASB (MD = -.25; 95% CI: -.41 to -.09; P = .002), but with longer operative time (MD = 10.1min; 95% CI: 1.925-18.77; P < .00001) and more fluoroscopic time (SMD = 4.12; 95% CI: 3.22-5.03; P < .00001), especially in L5-S1 operation. Bed rest time was significantly longer following IELD, with no difference in VASL, hospital stays, or complication. We found comparable clinical outcomes in terms of ODI, VAS, patient satisfaction, hospital stays, and complication between both techniques. TELD required more radiation exposure and longer operative time at L5-S1 level than IELD. Our study provided results to help consider appropriate approaches for selected patients and informed consent of benefits from each approach.

Comparison of the efficacy of fully endoscopic spine surgery using transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in the treatment of prolapsed lumbar 4/5 disc herniation

BackgroundThere is still much controversy about whether transforaminal or interlaminar fully endoscopic spine surgery can better treat lumbar 4/5 disc herniation. Therefore, this study intends to compare the clinical efficacy of fully endoscopic spine surgery through transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in the treatment of lumbar 4/5 disc herniation.MethodsSeventy-six patients with lumbar 4/5 disc herniation admitted from March 2019 to June 2020 were divided into the transforaminal approach group (endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy, ETLD; 54 cases) and the interlaminar approach group (endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy, EILD; 22 cases) according to different surgical methods. The general clinical data and clinical evaluation scale of the patients were compared.ResultsThe post-operative ODI and VAS scores were significantly better in the EILD group (P < 0.05). The VAS and ODI scores of patients with upper-shoulder and sub-axillary types in the EILD group were superior to those in the ETLD group (P < 0.05), while the VAS and ODI scores of patients with the pre-radicular type were better when they underwent ETLD rather than EILD (P < 0.05). Patients with Lee zone III type in the EILD group had better post-operative ODI scores than those in the ETLD group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS scores (P > 0.05). Patients with Lee zone IV type who underwent EILD had better VAS and ODI scores than those who underwent ETLD (P < 0.05).ConclusionsFor patients with a prolapsed intervertebral disc that belongs to the upper-shoulder type, sub-axillary type, or Lee III or IV type, EILD can achieve better outcomes.

Radiologic Analysis of Causes of Early Recurrence After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy.

Retrospective study. To analyze the causes of and factors influencing early recurrence after TELD performed in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. We included 285 patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation treated using transforaminal endoscopy lumbar discectomy TELD from January 2017 to December 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China. Patients were classified into early recurrence and non-early recurrence groups based on clinical symptoms and MRI reexamination. Imaging data (eg, disc height index (DHI), Pfirrman grades, base width, postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, cross-sectional area of the foramen (CSAF), etc.)were analyzed, and multivariate, binomial logistic regression was utilized to determine which factors were associated with early recurrence after TELD. A total of 285 patients completed surgery and clinical follow-up, during which 19 patients relapsed within 6 months postsurgery, for an early recurrence rate of 6.7%. There were statistically significant differences between DHI, Pfirrman grades, base width, postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, herniation sites, CSAF and Modic changes between the early recurrence and non-early recurrence groups (P < .05). On multivariate logistic regression,the degree of disc degeneration (OR = .747, P = .037), CSAF (OR = 5.255, P = .006), degree of Modic change (OR = 1.831, P = .018) and base width of the herniation (OR = 4.942, P = .003) were significantly correlated with early recurrence after TELD. Postoperative annulus-fibrosus tear size, DHI, and location of the disc herniation were associated with early recurrence after TELD. Increased base width of the herniation, severe disc degeneration, decreased CSAF and Modic change were risk factors for early recurrence after TELD.

Traumatic Bilateral Pars Fracture with Grade-I Spondylolisthesis Treated by Transforaminal (Trans Kambian) Endo Fusion under Epidural Analgesia: A Special Case Report

Traumatic spine injuries are common in young and adult population with worlds incidence estimated annual rate in 10.4–130.6 cases per million [1]. We are presenting a case of traumatic bilateral pars fracture with Grade-I spondylolisthesis treated by Endoscopic Transforaminal (Trans Kambian) spine fusion, under epidural analgesia and neuromonitoring. To the best of our knowledge this is a unique scenario reported for the first time in literature. Lumbar fusion although considered as the gold standard for the degenerative spine disease and Spondylolisthesis, Endoscopic Transforaminal (Trans Kambian) lumbar fusion popularly known as Endofusion/Endo-TLIF (Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) is a recent and effective minimally invasive option for certain cases. A 30-year male presented with severe low back pain and decreased sensations over dorsum of right foot after a fall of heavy metal pipe on his lower back. (VAS score 9/10). After thorough preop evaluation patient underwent Endoscopic Transforaminal (Trans Kambian) lumbar discectomy and fusion under epidural analgesia, with visualized endplate preparation. Specially designed Titanium Endo-bullet cage was inserted after percutaneous pedicle screw placement under neuromonitoring. Complete reduction of listhesis was achieved with near total relief in pain. Endoscopic TLIF ensures minimal tissue retraction and minimal alteration of the normal anatomy aiding in faster recovery and minimal blood loss. Patient was mobilized and discharged within 24 hours of surgery. We suggest Endo fusion is a safe and effective day care procedure for cases with traumatic bilateral pars fractures.

A comparative study of conventional microlumbar discectomy and endoscopic lumbar discectomies

Background: Low back pain is fairly common in India and lumbar disc herniation is its most common specific cause. In the present study we compared three minimally invasive surgical modalities for treating lumbar disc herniation.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on patients who presented to our department with low back pain with radicular symptoms. Twenty-five patients who underwent either microlumbar disectomy (MLD), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PELD) or microendoscopic lumbar discectomies (MED) were compared.Results: Of the total sample of 75 cases, it was found that male population was affected more and the degenerative disc process was more prevalent among those over 40 years of age. The MED had the shortest operative time while MLD had the longest mean duration. A comparison of the intraoperative blood loss was negligible in PELD group and 42.80 ml in MED and 63.20 ml in MLD which was strongly significant with a p&lt;0.001. Pain scores were comparable between the patients in the three surgery groups. We observed significantly higher ODI score for patients in MLD group at in the immediate post-operative, 3 months and 6 months post-operative period.Conclusions: MLD is the gold standard for treatment for lumbar disc disease even today due to its familiarity among neurosurgeons; however, reduced tissue destruction and cosmetic demand with equally good results if not better, endoscopy could replace MLD as the first-line treatment for LDH until lesser invasive modality comes to light.

Risk Factor for Additional Intravenous Medication during Transforaminal Full-endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy under Local Anesthesia.

Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) can be performed under local anesthesia. However, there have been no reports on risk factors for a change in vital signs or the need for additional medications to maintain adequate analgesia during this procedure. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for additional intravenous medication during TELD under local anesthesia. The following factors were retrospectively evaluated in 113 consecutive patients who underwent TELD under local anesthesia at our institution: demographic characteristics, radiological features at the intervertebral disc level, distance between the superior articular process and the exiting nerve root, height of the intervertebral disc, height of the bulging disc, height of the intervertebral foramen, and distance from the insertion site to the spinous process on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans of the lumbar spine. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with the need for additional drugs. In all, 23 cases (20.4%) required additional intraoperative medications because of hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, or pain. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age (partial regression coefficient 0.05, p = 0.02) and bulging disc height (partial regression coefficient −0.7, p = 0.003) influenced the need for additional drugs. There were significant associations of need for additional intravenous medication with older age (>62 years) and a smaller bulging disc height (<8.2 mm). Patients with these factors require close monitoring for changes in vital signs or increasing pain when performing TELD under local anesthesia and may need additional intravenous medication.

A Pilot Study of Radiculopathy Following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture in Elderly Patients: An Algorithmic Approach to Surgical Management.

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) due to severe and refractory back pain or neurological complications require surgical treatment. In this study, patients with radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis following OVCF were surgically managed by performing transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and/or discectomy (FELFD). Methods: From May 2015 to November 2019, fifteen patients underwent transforaminal FELFD. Patient data, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were collected. Clinical outcomes, including pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and MacNab criteria of response to surgical treatment, were evaluated. Results: Mean of age, bone mineral density (T-score), CCI, ASA, and follow-up duration were 69.5 ± 6.6 years, −2.6 ± 0.8, 5.2 ± 2.3, 2.4 ± 0.5, and 24.5 ± 8.8 months, respectively. Mean VAS for leg pain significantly decreased from 6.9 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 2.9 ± 1.1 (P < .05). Mean ODI decreased from 39.9 ± 3.2 preoperatively to 19.3 ± 4.6 postoperatively (P < .05). The satisfaction rate is 86.7% (based on Macnab criteria), showed six patients had excellent outcomes and seven had good outcomes. Conclusions: Transforaminal FELFD is an effective treatment option for patients with radiculopathy due to lumbar OVCF, including those with severe osteoporosis and elderly patients.

The Trans-Superior Articular Process Approach Utilizing Visual Trephine: A More Time-Saving and Effective Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy for Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.

To introduce, and to evaluate the efficacy of the trans-superior articular process (trans-SAP) approach utilizing visual trephine in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) for migrated lumbar disc herniation. This study included 98 patients, 50 patients were in trans-SAP PETLD group and 48 patients were in conventional PETLD group. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), gender, age, blood loss, operation time, the frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy and the percentage of highly migrated herniation were evaluated and compared between the trans-SAP PETLD and conventional PETLD group. In both trans-SAP PETLD and conventional PETLD group, VAS and ODI were decreased at postoperative 1 day and 3 months compared with preoperative (p < 0.001). What's more, the VAS and ODI of postoperative 3 months were lower than postoperative 1 day (p < 0.001). There was no difference in gender, age, blood loss after the operation, and VAS during operation between trans-SAP group and conventional group (p > 0.05). The blood loss during the operation of trans-SAP group was higher (p < 0.05), but the operation time and frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy were lower than conventional group (p < 0.001). Last, trans-SAP group had a higher percentage of highly migrated herniation (p < 0.001). Both the conventional way and trans-SAP approach can achieve excellent surgical results. But, in trans-SAP group, the operation time is shorter, and X-ray fluoroscopy is less. PETLD with visual trephine has more advantages in highly migrated herniation and maybe easier to be mastered by young surgeons.

Posterolateral Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniations

Surgical procedures via the posterior median or paramedian approach for lateral lumbar disc herniation require significant bone resection to reach the herniation. In contrast, posterolateral transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) allows direct access to the lateral disc herniation. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of this procedure. A total of 118 patients who underwent posterolateral transforaminal FELD were retrospectively examined. Data on surgical time, perioperative complications, and reoperation rate were reviewed from the medical records. Clinical evaluations were completed in 78 patients using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and numeric rating scale (NRS) for low back pain, lower limb pain, and lower limb numbness obtained at baseline and during a follow-up of more than 12 months. The mean operative time was 33.9 min. Postoperative transient dysesthesia occurred in 11 of 118 patients (9.3%). No other complications were observed. Reoperation was performed in nine patients (5.9%). All domains of JOABPEQ and NRS significantly improved during the follow-up period. The effectiveness rates of the JOABPEQ for measuring low back pain, lumbar function, walking ability, social life function, and mental health were 70.4%, 46.5%, 62.0%, 59.2%, and 32.4%, respectively. Using the Macnab criteria, excellent or good results were achieved in 52 patients (73%). Successful clinical results were obtained with a few complications and improvements inthe domains of JOABPEQ and NRS. Posterolateral transforaminal FELD for lateral lumbar disc herniations is an effective and safe surgical option with minimal invasiveness and sufficient decompression.

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar lumbar discectomy for cranially migrated disc hernia

Objective. To evaluate clinical outcomes, safety, and technical peculiarities of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar removal of the lumber spine cranially migrated disc hernias. Material and Methods. In 2015–2018, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar removal of cranially migrated hernias of the lumbar spine was performed in 53 patients (23 men and 30 women): 2 (3.8 %) at L2–L3 level, 13 (24.5 %) at L3–L4, 18 (34.0 %) at L4–L5, and 20 (37.7 %) at L5–S1. The age of patients ranged from 25 to 76 years and averaged 43.4 ± 11.6 years. Transforaminal approach was performed at the L4–L5 level and higher (62.3 % of cases), and interlaminar approach – at the L5–S1 level (37.7 %). Based on MRI, hernias with cranial migration were divided into zones: zone I – hernias with migration to the lower edge of the superjacent vertebra pedicle – 21 (39.6 %) patients; and zone II – hernias with migration above this border – 32 (60.4 %). Results were evaluated using ODI, VAS, and the McNab scale. Statistical analysis of VAS indicators (leg and back pain) and ODI scores before and after surgery was performed using the R and Microsoft Excel 2007 software. Results. Data collection was carried out using patient questionnaires at in-person examination, telephone interviews and electronic communications. Follow-up data of different terms were monitored in all patients. In one case (when mastering this technology), at the second stage, microdiscectomy was performed at the L4–L5 level for a residual hernia fragment in migration zone II, and in another case, a conversion into microdiscectomy was performed at L3–L4 level with a hernia in zone II due to lack of venous bleeding control in a patient receiving anticoagulants. In other patients, the mean VAS scores of preoperative radicular and axial pain decreased from 7.5 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 1.2 to 1.4 ± 1.2 and 3.5 ± 1.3, respectively, on the next day, to 1.7 ± 1.4 and 3.2 ± 1.1 in 1 month, to 1.5 ± 1.3 and 2.8 ± 1.4 in 6 months, to 1.6 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 1.3 in 12 months, and to 1.6 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 1.3 in 24 months after surgery. In the long-term follow-up period, no radicular leg pain was observed in any patient. According to the McNab scale, up to 6 months treatment results were assessed as excellent by 19 (35.8 %) patients, and as good – by 32 (60.3 %). In the case of lumbar pain in the long term period, blockade of facet joints and radiofrequency ablation of the medial nerve branch were performed. Relapse of hernias and instability of the operated spinal segment were not revealed. The average ODI score improved from 66.4 ± 7.2 to 20.5 ± 3.2 in 1 month, to 13.6 ± 2.1 in 6 months, to 12.4 ± 2.3 in 12 months, and to 12.4 ± 2.3 in 24 months after surgery. Conclusion. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar discectomy for cranially migrated lumbar disc hernia, while adhering the surgical technique target and exclusion criteria, is a safe and effective method, avoids excessive resection of the bone-ligamentous structures of the spine, can prevent iatrogenic instability of the spinal motion segment, and promotes early postoperative activation and recovery of the patient. Cranially migrated disc henias have a low probability of recurrence.

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between patients with positive and negative straight leg raising tests who underwent full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy

Full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (FETD) is increasingly used in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). There is little knowledge on the related factors, including the straight leg raising test (SLR), that influence the operation. Consecutive patients with LDH who came to our hospital from August 2015 to September 2016 and underwent FETD surgery were included. Four kinds of scores, including the VAS (lumbar/leg), ODI and JOA values, were measured and reassessed after FETD to assess the surgical outcomes. There was a statistically significant difference between the scores before surgery and at each postoperative follow-up. In addition, the increase in the JOA score postoperatively was statistically significant compared with that before surgery. There were statistically significant differences among the three subpopulations [patients considered SLR positive (0°–30°), SLR positive (31°–60°) and SLR negative (61°–)] in the changes in the VAS (leg), ODI and JOA values. However, there were no statistically significant differences among the three subpopulations [patients considered SLR positive (0°–30°), SLR positive (31°–60°) and SLR negative (61°–)] in the changes in VAS score (lumbar). FETD showed great effectiveness in treating patients with lumbar disc herniation. Patients who were SLR negative may receive greater benefit from FETD.

腰部脊柱管狭窄を合併した腰椎椎間板ヘルニア症例に対する全脊椎内視鏡治療．後方除圧併用でのヘルニア摘出術（FEL）と前方除圧術（FELD TF）の比較

腰部脊柱管狭窄を合併した腰椎椎間板ヘルニア症例に対する全脊椎内視鏡治療．後方除圧併用でのヘルニア摘出術（FEL）と前方除圧術（FELD TF）の比較

Suprapedicular Retrocorporeal Technique of Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Highly Downward-Migrated Disc Herniation

Anatomical barriers (e.g., pedicles, narrow foramina) can hinder direct access to, and removal of, disc fragments that have migrated far downward. Using transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD), we devised a modified technique, the suprapedicular retrocorporeal approach, for herniations in which the disc has migrated to the axilla of the traversing nerve roots. In the present report, we have described our preliminary results. Soft, highly downward-migrated disc herniation was treated with transforaminal FELD through the suprapedicular retrocorporeal approach in 22 patients from June 2017 to May 2019. The clinical outcomes were evaluated, including the preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores for the back and leg, Oswestry disability index, and MacNab criteria for surgical success. The affected discs were at L4-L5 in 14 patients, L3-L4 in 6 patients, and L5-S1 in 2 patients. In each case, the affected disc was successfully removed using the suprapedicular retrocorporeal approach. The mean follow-up was 18.1 ± 5.7 months. The mean visual analog scale scores for back and leg pain improved significantly (P < 0.05 for both). The mean Oswestry disability index had decreased from 62.5 ± 14.2 preoperatively to 10.5 ± 5.9 postoperatively (P < 0.05). Using the MacNab criteria, 13 patients reported excellent outcomes and 9, good outcomes. No complications or recurrence developed during follow-up. The suprapedicular retrocorporeal technique is a feasible and effective surgical option in transforaminal FELD for the treatment of herniation in which the disc has migrated to the axilla of the traversing nerve roots.