Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Research Articles

Finite element analysis of implanted lumbar spine: Effects of open laminectomy plus PLF and open laminectomy plus TLIF surgical approaches on L3-L4 FSU

Several finite element (FE) studies reported performances of various lumbar fusion surgical approaches. However, comparative studies on the performance of Open Laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) surgical approaches are rare. In the current FE study, the variation in ranges of motions (ROM), stress-strain distributions in an implanted functional spinal unit (FSU) and caudal adjacent soft structures between OL-PLF and OL-TLIF virtual models were investigated. The implanted lumbar spine FE models were developed from subject-specific computed tomography images of an intact spine and solved for physiological loadings such as compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. Reductions in the ROMs of L1-L5 (49 % to 59 %) and L3-L4 implanted FSUs (91 % to 96 %) were observed for both models. Under all the loading cases, the maximum von Mises strain observed in the implanted segment of both models exceeds the mean compressive yield strain for the vertebra. The maximum von Mises stress and strain observed on the caudal adjacent soft structures of both the implanted models are at least 22 % higher than the natural spine model. The findings indicate the risk of failure in the implanted FSUs and higher chances of adjacent segment degeneration for both models.

Modified S1 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.

Surgical technique video. To report a surgical technique to revise patients with previous fusions at L4-S1 leading to an iatrogenic flat back and sagittal imbalance using L5-S1 transforaminal interbody fusion combined with a small S1 corner osteotomy. This is a case of a woman (51 y old) with a history of multiple lumbar surgeries, severe back pain, sagittal imbalance, and loss of lordosis. We describe a feasible revision technique in a complex patient with the goal of attaining optimal distribution of lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance through a modified S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and the use of an interbody cage to enhance the fusion rate and facilitate closure of the 3-column osteotomy. The preoperative patient lordosis angle of 31 degrees at L1-L4 and 16 degrees at L4-S1 became 12 degrees at L1-L4 and 44 degrees at L4-S1 postoperatively. The combination of L5-S1 transforaminal interbody fusion and S1 corner osteotomy is a feasible technique for the restoration of lumbar lordosis in patients with previous fusion and consequent loss of lordosis.

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion for the treatment of thoracic myelopathy.

Biportal endoscopic spine surgery independently controls two hands, similar to microscopic surgery, and utilizes a broader working space that is not disturbed by retractors under clear-magnified endoscopic vision. These advantages facilitate successful neural decompression and safe transforaminal interbody fusion, even in patients with thoracic spondylotic myelopathy. A wide laminectomy and precise total facetectomy, in conjunction with partial pediculotomy, establish a secure transforaminal space for cage insertion. Endplate preparation and cage insertion were performed without retracting the spinal cord under direct endoscopic vision. Biportal endoscopic transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion can be a feasible technique for treating thoracic spondylotic myelopathy at the thoracolumbar junction levels.

Commentary: Novel Use of Bilateral Prone Transpsoas Approach for the Treatment of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Pseudarthrosis and Interbody Cage Subsidence.

Commentary: Novel Use of Bilateral Prone Transpsoas Approach for the Treatment of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Pseudarthrosis and Interbody Cage Subsidence.

Novel Use of Bilateral Prone Transpsoas Approach for the Treatment of Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Pseudarthrosis and Interbody Cage Subsidence.

Pseudarthrosis is a complication after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) that leads to recurrent symptoms and potential revision surgery. Subsidence of the interbody adds to the complexity of surgical revision. In addition, we report a novel technique for the treatment of TLIF pseudarthrosis with subsidence and propose an approach algorithm for TLIF cage removal. Cases of reoperation for TLIF pseudarthrosis were reviewed. We report a novel technique using a bilateral prone transpsoas (PTP) approach to remove a subsided TLIF cage and place a new lateral cage. An approach algorithm was developed based on the experience of TLIF cage removal. The patient was placed in the prone position with somatosensory evoked potential and electromyography monitoring. A PTP retractor was placed using standard techniques on the ipsilateral side of the previous TLIF. After the discectomy, the subsided TLIF cage was visualized but unable to be removed. The initial dilator was closed, and a second PTP retractor was placed on the contralateral side. After annulotomy and discectomy to circumferentially isolate the subsided cage, a box cutter was used to push and mobilize the TLIF cage from this contralateral side, which could then be pulled out from the ipsilateral side. A standard lateral interbody cage was then placed. Retractor time was less than 10 minutes on each side. The patient's symptoms resolved postoperatively. We review illustrative cases of various approaches for TLIF cage removal spanning the lumbosacral spine and recommend an operative approach based on the lumbar level, degree of subsidence, and mobility of the interbody. Bilateral PTP retractors for TLIF cage removal may be effectively used in cases of pseudarthrosis with severe cage subsidence. Careful consideration of various factors, including patient surgical history, body habitus, and intraoperative findings, is essential in determining the appropriate treatment for these complex cases.

Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Umbrella review of meta-analyses. To compile existing meta-analyses to provide analysis of the multiple postoperative outcomes in a comparison of open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (O-TLIFs) versus minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusions (MI-TLIFs). TLIF is the standard surgical intervention for spinal fusion in degenerative spinal diseases. The comparative effectiveness of MI-TLIFs and O-TLIFs remains controversial. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Titles and abstracts were initially screened, followed by a full-text review based on the inclusion criteria. Twenty articles were deemed eligible for the umbrella review. Data extraction and quality assessment using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews were performed. Effect sizes of the outcomes of interest from primary studies included in the meta-analyses were repooled. Repooling and stratification of the credibility of the evidence were performed using the R package metaumbrella. The pooled effect sizes were compared and interpreted using equivalent Hedges' g values. When the meta-analyses were pooled, MI-TLIF was found to have a shorter length of stay, less blood loss, and a higher radiation exposure time, with a highly suggestive level of evidence. Data regarding less postoperative drainage, infections, and Oswestry disability index for MI-TLIF were supported by weak evidence. Conversely, data regarding other postoperative outcomes were nonsignificant to draw any conclusions. Our umbrella review provides a comprehensive overview of the relevant strengths and weaknesses of each surgical technique. This overview revealed that MI-TLIF had better outcomes in terms of length of stay, blood loss, postoperative drainage, infections, and Oswestry disability index when compared with those of O-TLIF. However, O-TLIF had a better outcome for radiation exposure when compared with MI-TLIF.

Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-reported Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Retrospective cohort study. To assess the impact of preoperative symptom duration (PSD) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSpond). A prolonged duration of preoperative symptoms may implicate inferior long-term outcomes postsurgery. Prior studies of lumbar fusion recipients are limited by the inclusion of heterogeneous populations. A single-surgeon registry was retrospectively queried for privately insured patients who had undergone primary, elective, single-level MIS-TLIF for DSpond with a recorded symptom start date. Cohorts were formed by PSD: shorter duration (PSD <1 y) or greater duration (GD; PSD ≥1 y). PROMs evaluated included Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale-Back, Visual Analog Scale-Leg, and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The magnitude of PROM (∆PROM) improvement from preoperative baseline to 6 weeks and final follow-up (∆PROM-FF) were compared between cohorts. Intercohort achievement rates of a minimum clinically important difference in each PROM were compared. A total of 133 patients included 85 patients with GD cohort. There were no significant differences in pre hoc demographics and perioperative characteristics between cohorts, as well as preoperative, 6-week, or final follow-up PROMs between cohorts. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in all PROMs at 6 weeks and final follow-up (P ≤ 0.049, all). There were no significant intercohort differences demonstrated in minimum clinically important difference achievement rates, ∆PROM-6W, or ∆PROM-FF in any PROM. Regardless of the symptom duration before MIS-TLIF for DSpond, patients demonstrate significant improvement in physical function, pain, disability, and mental health. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not report inferior scores in any PROM domain. Patients with a GD of preoperative symptoms did not suffer inferior rates of clinically meaningful improvement after surgical intervention. These findings should be considered when counseling patients before surgical intervention for DSpond.

Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Anterior-Posterior Combined Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.

Background and Objectives: Although adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery brought about improvement in the quality of life of patients, it is accompanied by high invasiveness and several complications. Specifically, mechanical complications of rod fracture, instrumentation failures, and pseudarthrosis are still unsolved issues. To better improve these problems, oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) was introduced in 2015 at my institution. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of anterior-posterior combined surgery for ASD between the use of OLIF51 and transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) at L5/S1. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 ASD patients received anterior-posterior correction surgeries either with the use of OLIF51 (35 patients) or L5/S1 TLIF (82 patients). In both groups, L1-5 OLIF and minimally invasive posterior procedures of hybrid or circumferential MIS were employed. The sagittal and coronal spinal alignment and spino-pelvic parameters were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. The quality-of-life parameters and visual analogue scale were evaluated, as well as surgical complications at follow-up. Results: The average follow-up period was thirty months (13-84). The number of average fused segments was eight (4-12). The operation time and estimated blood loss were significantly lower in OLIF51 than in TLIF. The PI-LL mismatch, LLL, L5/S1 segmental lordosis, and L5 coronal tilt were significantly better in OLIF51 than TLIF. The complication rate was statistically equivalent between the two groups. Conclusions: The introduction of OLIF51 for adult spine deformity surgery led to a decrease in operation time and estimated blood loss, as well as improvement in sagittal and coronal correction compared to TLIF. The circumferential MIS correction and fusion with OLIF51 serve as an effective surgical modality which can be applied to many cases of adult spinal deformity.

Radiologic and Clinical Evaluation of Posterolateral Versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Retrospective cohort study. The primary objective is to compare foraminal height (FH) and disk height (DH) differences in posterolateral (PLF) and transforaminal interbody fusions (TLIFs) and secondarily correlate these measurements with patient-reported outcomes. The impact FH has on patient outcomes in degenerative lumbar spinal fusion surgery is unknown. Postoperative FH change and how it relates to patient-reported outcomes in posteriorly based procedures has not been well evaluated. A retrospective review of a subset of patients from a prospective cohort from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network was undertaken. Radiographic assessment preoperatively, at 3 months and 1 year, with standing lumbar spine radiographs were completed. FH and DH were recorded at each time interval, differences between groups were compared, and correlations with patient-reported outcomes were assessed. One hundred nine patients were included (23 PLF and 86 TLIF). At 3-month follow-up, the change in FH was greater in the TLIF group (mean difference =2.3; 95% CI: 0.8-3.5, P=0.002). The change in FH remained significantly different at 12 months (mean difference=1.6, 95% CI: 0.2, 3.0mm, P=0.028). The change in DH was greater in the TLIF group, with a mean difference between groups of 4.1mm (95% CI: 2.5, 5.7, P<0.001) and 3.6mm (95% CI: 2.0, 5.3, P<0.001). A positive change in FH correlated with less back pain, less disability, and improved physical function in the TLIF group (P<0.05). Patients treated with PLF lost FH over time. An increased difference in FH at 1 year was associated with improved function and less back pain in the TLIF group.

Comparative cohort study of paraspinal muscle volume change between uniportal full endoscopic and mini open posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundRecent literature of uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes with minimally invasive benefits of potentially preserving paraspinal muscle. There is no literature on paraspinal muscle volume change between the endoscopic and microscopic mini open interbody fusion. MethodsWe included patients who met the indication criteria for lumbar fusion and underwent either uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical parameters of visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index were measured at preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 3 months postoperative and final follow up. Magnetic Resonance Imaging measurement of preoperative and postoperative Kjaer grade, right and left psoas muscle mass area, right and left paraspinal muscle mass area were performed. Results74 levels of Endo-TLIF and 42 patients with mini open TLIF (MIS-TLIF) were included. There was statistically significant greater improvement in VAS and ODI in Endo-TLIF cohort at 1 week significant improvement of Kjaer grade at postoperative 1 year in Endo-TLIF compared to MIS-TLIF. There is statistically significant improvement in paraspinal muscle mass area in Endo-TLIF (104.83 ± 316.45) mm2 compared to MIS-TLIF (89.88 ± 185.14) mm2 ConclusionUniportal Endoscopic Posterolateral Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion achieved improved paraspinal and psoas muscle bulk and less fatty infiltration in the operated level as compared to mini open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion while both cohorts achieved equivalent positive clinical outcomes.

Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as an Information Source for Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.

This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of the information for patients from YouTube videos on transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). One hundred videos were listed by inputting "TLIF," "TLIF surgery," and "transforaminal interbody fusion" in the YouTube search engine. The top 50 most popular videos based on video power index (VPI), view ratio, and exclusion criteria were selected for review. One orthopedic consultant surgeon and one neurosurgeon consultant analyzed the videos together. The modified DISCERN score, the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and a novel interbody fusion score were used to evaluate videos. Data of video length, view count, number of likes and dislikes, like ratio (like x 100/(like+dislike)), video source, and comment rate were collected. The quality of the videos could have been better according to all scoring systems, regardless of the video source. The scores of the videos published by patients and commercials were significantly lower than those of physicians and allied professionals (p <0.05). VPI and view ratios were similar in all sources. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that YouTube videos providing information related to TLIF surgery are available and accessed by the public. The results of this study would suggest that YouTube is not currently an appropriate source of information on TLIF surgery for patients. Most of the YouTube videos about TLIF surgery contain information about the surgical technique and have limited information about the post-operative condition of the patients.

Comparison of Intraoperative Endplate Injury between Mini-Open Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Analysis of Risk Factors: A Retrospective Study

Objective The study aimed to compare the incidence of intraoperative endplate injury in patients who underwent Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and mini-open lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. The independent risk factors related to endplate injury in LLIF procedure were analyzed. Methods A total of 199 patients who underwent LLIF (n = 106) or TLIF (n = 93) surgery from June 2019 to September 2021 were reviewed. The endplate injury was assessed by postoperative sagittal CT scan. A binary logistic analysis model were used to identify independent risk factors related to LLIF endplate injury based on univariate analysis. Results There was an obvious difference in the occurrence of intraoperative endplate injury between LLIF (42/106, 39.6%) and TLIF group (26/93, 28%), although it did not reach the significant level. L1 CT value (OR = 0.985, 95% CI = 0.972–0.998), cage position (OR = 3.881, 95% CI = 1.398–10.771) and height variance (OR = 1.263, 95% CI = 1.013–1.575) were independent risk factors for endplate injury in LLIF procedure. According to the cage settlement patterns, there 5 types of A to E. The severity of the facet joint degeneration was positively related to the occurrence of endplate injury. Conclusions The incidence of intraoperative endplate injury is higher in LLIF than in TLIF procedures. Low bone quantity, cage posterior position and larger height variance are risk factors to induce endplate injury in LLIF surgery. The facet joint degeneration may be related to severe endplate injuries and even fractures.

Patient-reported outcomes 1 and 2years after transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF).

Retrospective Cohort Study with prospectively collected data. Transforaminal interbody fusion was initially designed for the lumbar spine. A similar approach was later introduced for the thoracic spine (TTIF). Here we report the surgical technique and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, as well as the sagittal radiographic kyphosis correction of TTIF, achieved at 1year and the latest follow-up. All TTIF procedures from 2012 to 2020 were included. COMI scores were collected preoperatively and at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. The sagittal angle between the upper and lower endplates at the segment where TTIF was performed was measured on preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and last available radiographs. Seventy-nine TTIF procedures were performed for 64 patients (36% males; mean age 67.5 (SD 15.3) years). COMI score reduced from a mean value of 8.1 (SD 1.4) preoperatively to 4.7 (SD 2.7) at 1-year follow-up and 4.7 (SD 2.7) at 2-year follow-up. The mean correction of segmental kyphosis was 10.8 (SD 7.3, p < 0.0001) degrees at 1-year follow-up and 9.3 (SD 7.0, p < 0.0001) degrees at the final follow-up 3.4 (SD 1.4) years after the operation. Kaplan-Meier analysis for reoperations showed a 5-year survival of 91% (95% CI 0.795-1) for primary TTIF operations and survival of 77% (95% CI 0.651-0.899) for TTIFs performed after earlier fusion operations. TTIF is a feasible procedure in the thoracic spine. Kyphosis correction of approximately 10° was maintained at 1-year and final follow-up. Over 69% at 1-year and 61% at 2-year follow-up achieved MCID for COMI.

Impact of metabolic syndrome on morbidity and mortality following transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF)

Study designRetrospective Multi-Institutional Database Study. ObjectiveInvestigate the effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) Summary of background dataTLIF procedures in lumbar spine pathology are common. MetS is a combination of conditions, including medication required hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2s or more. The prevalence of MetS has increased drastically over the past two decades. Our study aimed to understand the effect of MetS on morbidity and mortality of TLIF postoperatively. MethodsOur study used American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data from 2006 to 2019 to find all patients who underwent TLIF. Patients with MetS were compared to those without MetS. Fisher's test identified univariate relationships between MetS and preoperative/postoperative variables. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to analyze the association between MetS and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results54,980 patients were identified who received TLIF. 10.7 % had MetS preoperatively. Patients with and without MetS showed statistically significant univariate differences in most preoperative and postoperative variables. After adjusting for preoperative comorbidities, patients with MetS had greater multivariate-adjusted odds of wound infections (aOR = 1.5889, CI 1.1952–2.112, p = 0.00144), pulmonary events (aOR = 1.5517, CI 1.1207–2.1485, p = 0.00813), renal events (aOR = 2.8685, CI 1.5511–5.3045, p = 0.00078), sepsis (aOR = 1.6773, CI 1.1647–2.4155, p = 5.44E-03), and return to OR (aOR = 1.4764, CI 1.2201–1.7866, p = 6.19E-05) ConclusionsPatients with MetS are at elevated risk for various morbidity and mortality markers after TLIF. Surgeons performing TLIFs on these patients should be aware of the increased potential for postoperative events that may complicate the patient's recovery. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Fusion's Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).

Transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) has gained increased popularity over recent decades and is being employed as an established surgical treatment for several lumbar spine pathologies, including degenerative spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor and some cases of recurrent disc herniation. Despite the seemingly acceptable fusion rates after TLIF (up to 94%), the literature is still limited regarding the specific location and quality of fusion inside the fixated segment. In this single-institution, retrospective population-based study, we evaluated all post-operative computed tomography (CT) of patients who underwent TLIF surgery at a medium-sized medical center between 2010 and 2020. All CT studies were performed at a minimum of 1 year following the surgery, with a median of 2 years. Each CT study was evaluated for post-operative fusion, specifically in the posterolateral and intervertebral body areas. The fusion's quality was determined and classified in each area according to Lee's criteria, as follows: (1) definitive fusion: definitive bony trabecular bridging across the graft host interface; (2) probable fusion: no definitive bony trabecular crossing but with no gap at the graft host interface; (3) possible arthrosis: no bony trabecular crossing with identifiable gap at the graft host interface; (4) definite pseudarthrosis: no traversing trabecular bone with definitive gap. A total of 48 patients were included in this study. The median age was 55.6 years (SD ± 15.4). The median time from surgery to post-operative CT was 2 years (range: 1-10). Full definitive fusion in both posterolateral and intervertebral areas was observed in 48% of patients, and 92% showed definitive fusion in at least one area (either posterolateral or intervertebral body area). When comparing the posterolateral and the intervertebral area fusion rates, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate was observed in the posterolateral area as compared to the intervertebral body area in the long term follow-up (92% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, accounting for several confounding factors, including the number of fixated segments and cage size, the results remained statistically significant (p = 0.048). In conclusion, a significantly higher definitive fusion rate at the posterolateral area compared to the intervertebral body area following TLIF surgery was found. Surgeons are encouraged to employ bone augmentation material in the posterolateral area (as the primary site of fusion) when performing TLIF surgery.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILF): outcomes at 7years.

To assess clinical, functional and radiographical results of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF) in the treatment of stable lumbar degenerative diseases with a minimum of 5years of follow-up. From January 2012 to December 2016, clinical and radiological data of patients with degenerative lumbar disease managed by UNILIF were prospectively collected. Patients with a follow-up that ended before 5years were excluded. SF-12, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were collected preoperatively, at 2 years and at the last follow-up. A full-spine standing radiograph was performed at each follow-up appointment. Mean operative time was 74.7 (± 19) minutes, mean blood loss was 131.1 (± 207) ml and mean follow-up was 7.5 (± 1.7) years. All functional scores and VAS were significantly improved between the preoperative and the 2 years postoperative. Between the 2 years postoperative and the last follow-up ODI and VAS continued to significantly improved. Fusion rate was 98.6% on radiographic analysis at follow-up. UNILIF method is a safe and effective surgical strategy. It provides a durable improvement in functional score over 7years of follow-up with a stable radiological correction over time.

Postoperative cage migration and subsidence following TLIF surgery is not associated with bony fusion

Pseudarthrosis following transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) is not infrequent. Although cage migration and subsidence are commonly regarded as evidence of the absence of solid fusion, there is still no evidence of the influence of cage migration and subsidence on fusion. This study aimed to evaluate cage migration and subsidence using computed tomography (CT) DICOM data following lumbar interbody fusion. The effects of cage migration and subsidence on fusion and clinical outcomes were also assessed. A postoperative CT data set of 67 patients treated with monosegmental TLIF was analyzed in terms of cage position. To assess the effects of cage migration and subsidence on fusion, 12-month postoperative CT scans were used to assess fusion status. Clinical evaluation included the visual analog scale for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index. Postoperative cage migration occurred in 85.1% of all patients, and cage subsidence was observed in 58.2%. Radiological signs of pseudarthrosis was observed in 7.5% of the patients Neither cage migration nor subsidence affected the clinical or radiographic outcomes. No correlation was found between clinical and radiographic outcomes. The incidence of cage migration was considerable. However, as cage migration and subsidence were not associated with bony fusion, their clinical significance was considered limited.

Necessity of fusion following decompression surgery in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis: study protocol for an open-label multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundThe necessity of spinal segment fusion after decompression is one of the most controversial and unresolved issues in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. To date, only one trial carried out 15 years ago focused on this problem. The key purpose of the current trial is to compare the long-term clinical results of the two surgical methods (decompression vs. decompression and fusion) in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis.MethodsThis study is focused on the non-inferior clinical results of decompression compared with the standard fusion procedure. In the decompression group, the spinous process, the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, part of the facet joints, and corresponding parts of the vertebral arch are to be preserved intact. In the fusion group, decompression is to be supplemented with transforaminal interbody fusion. Participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two equal groups (1:1), depending on the surgical method. The final analysis will include 86 patients (43 per group). The primary endpoint is Oswestry Disability Index dynamics at the end of the 24-month follow-up compared to the baseline level. Secondary outcomes included those estimated using the SF-36 scale, EQ-5D-5L, and psychological scales. Additional parameters will include sagittal balance of the spine, fusion results, total cost of surgery, and hospital stay followed by two-year treatment. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 monthsDiscussionAuthors suggest that this study will improve the evidence for application of various surgical techniques for lumbar spine stenosis surgery and verify the existing protocol for surgical management.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273879. Registered on March 10, 2022.

INVESTIGATION OF BACTERIAL AND VIRAL SLOW INTERVERTEBRAL DISC INFECTIONS

Objective. Currently, few publications have been available regarding an effect of level, type of intrusion, and viral infections on spinal disc degeneration. The study was aimed to evaluate an incidence of indolent bacterial and viral intervertebral disc infections in unstratified group of patients operated on for spinal degenerative pathologies.&#x0D; Material and methods. For the study, intraoperative disc samples were collected from patients who underwent discectomy and total spinal fusion surgery for degenerative pathologies between the years December, 2018 to January, 2020. 447 samples were examined obtained from 392 patients (189 women and 203 men) with a mean age of 58.1 years.&#x0D; The following epidemiological and clinical data were collected: gender, age, spinal segments affected, type of surgical approach, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP; reference range 0.00.5 mg/dL), and preoperative as well as 6-month postoperative ODI and NDI, both expressed as a percentage. The incidence of postoperative infections within six months after surgery as well as MI for each operated segment was assessed. Only patients with ventral cervical or dorsal thoracic access were enrolled in the study. In the lumbar region, the ventral assess was chosen for anterior lumbar interbody fusion, the lateral approach for oblique or extreme lateral interbody fusion, and the dorsal approach in case of standard microdiscectomy of posterior transforaminal interbody fusion or transforaminal interbody fusion.&#x0D; A logistic regression analysis was performed to model a risk of positive microbiological culture and a risk of emerging modal changes by using a set of independent variables selected in a stepwise manner by using the Akaike information criterion as a measure of quality of select procedure.&#x0D; Results. MRI for modal analysis was available for all 447 segments. MRI revealed 45 type 1 SCs (10.07% of all segments), 118 type 2 SCs (26.4%), and 5 type 3 SCs (1.12%). Microbiological culture was available in 410 segments. In these 410 segments, 39 type 1 MCs, 113 type 2 MCs, and 5 type 3 MCs were found. A statistically significant relationship was found between SC type 2 and a positive microbiological result (p = 0.0127). In contrast, there were no statistically significant associations for type 1 and type 3 SCs (p=0.3052 and p=0.0767, respectively).&#x0D; Conclusion. A relation between disc degeneration and infections seems unlikely. Histopathological evidence of inflammation in degenerated discs is rare and unrelated to microbiological findings.

Minimally invasive LLIF surgery to decrease the occurrence of adjacent-segment disease compared to conventional open TLIF.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Mis-LLIF) can establish indirect decompression by lifting the vertebra with a large intervertebral cage, which causes less damage to the posterior elements. Thus, Mis-LLIF is expected to reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of ASD between Mis-LLIF and conventional open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF). A total of 156 patients (TLIF group = 88, Mis-LLIF group = 68) who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion (L2/3, L3/4, or L4/5) at a single institution between 2003 and 2018 with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of symptomatic ASD requiring reoperation (S-ASD) and radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) 2years postoperatively were investigated between 51 paired patients from both groups who were propensity score (PS) matched by demographic and baseline clinical data. The effect of characteristics arising from differences in surgical methods between Mis-LLIF and TLIF, such as the amount of distraction of the index fused level (∆H), on S-ASD and R-ASD was also examined. There were no significant differences in the incidence of S-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups (adjusted OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.41-3.9). There was no significant difference in the incidence of R-ASD between the Mis-LLIF and TLIF groups both at the cranial (adjusted OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.22-4.5) and caudal level (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.44-5.3). On the other hand, ∆H was significantly higher in the Mis-LLIF group than in the TLIF group (3.6mm vs. 1.7mm, respectively, P < 0.0001), and was extracted as a significant independent risk factor for S-ASD (adjusted HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.3) and R-ASD at the cranial side (adjusted HR 6.4; 95% CI 1.7-24) in multivariable analysis with PS adjustment. The incidence of R-ASD or S-ASD was not significantly reduced in the Mis-LLIF group compared to the TLIF group, with greater ∆H potentially being a contributing factor. Using a thin cage in both TLIF and Mis-LLIF may decrease the occurrence of ASD.