The thesis puts at the spotlight the issue of having state aid which is incompatible with the EU law, in so far as it stems from a selective advantage granted to multinational enterprises through the means of advance pricing arrangements.It is submitted that advance pricing arrangements have a special position in the context of constant interaction between direct taxation, state aid and harmful tax competition, and in particular, a very specific position in the area of overlap between state aid and harmful tax competition.Against this background, this contribution upholds the position that such a selective advantage can derive from a non-compliant with the internationally recognized principle of the arm’s length application of transfer pricing methods. In particular, the advantages take the form of either reductions in the tax base or consolidation of the market positions of the multinational enterprises as result of profit shifting.The advantages are most commonly solicited ones as the multinational enterprises are approaching the tax authorities with the aim of getting an approval on tailor-made application of certain specific transfer pricing methods, all on the basis of their aggressive tax planning approaches.In order to substantiate these submissions, the current contribution aims at showing that advance pricing arrangements are a specific type of tax measures different from advance tax rulings and as such can be de facto selective depending on the legislative structure of their system, the presence of margin of discretion of the tax authorities and their inherent opacity.It is therefore argued that the thin redline of unlawful state aid is crossed the moment there is a selective advantage for the multinational enterprises, resulting from misapplication of transfer pricing methods, approved through an advance pricing arrangement, and that affects the trade between member states, while it is imputable to the state. In any such cases, EU state aid rules act as the necessary emergency break, as the tool that fights back against unlawful state aid measures and harmful tax competition.
Read full abstract