Transfer Of Land Rights Research Articles

Akibat Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Waris Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman

This study aims to identify and describe the transfer of land rights due to inheritance that is not registered. To analyse and describe the reasons for heirs with inheritance rights but opted not to register their rights in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. The research method uses qualitative with empirical characteristics. The subjects in this study were people who received inheritance and chose not to register, the registration of the transfer of rights officer, Mr. Carik in Margomulyo Village, Head of Sleman BPN land registration The approach method used in this study is a sociological juridical approach. Retrieval of data using the Interview method. Technical data analysis using qualitative juridical analysis. The results of the study concluded that the legal consequences if the transfer of land rights is due to inheritance that is not registered according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, namely the heirs as the holders of inherited land rights will not be guaranteed legal certainty because of the absence of proof of certificate of land ownership considering a certificate serves as a written proof of rights on behalf of the heirs, and due to the failure to register their land to the Sleman Regency BPN, the heirs are unable carry out legal actions such as sale and purchase, grants, exchanges, distribution of joint rights and entry into the company. The reason for the heirs who received inheritance rights but chose not to register their rights in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, are due to the land registration process which according to residents, has been complicated and required a lenghty process. Lack of knowledge from residents also prevents them from immediate registeration hence conflicts arise over inheritance between families. The other reason is that the community tends not register their land by considering the members of their family or relatives who have not agreed on the distribution of the land, thus the process of registering inherited land cannot be carried out as it requires the signature of the relatives to the heir

The Role of Notary in Making the Deed on Inheritance of Land Rights

This writing aims to determine the process of dividing the inheritance of land rights by a notary and theoretical analysis of the role of a notary in making a deed of inheritance of land rights. The role of a Notary in the transfer of land rights based on inheritance is very large, where every transfer of land rights must be proven by a deed made by and before a Notary so that the deed he makes has binding legal force. The researcher used a legal research method with a normative juridical approach, the research specifications used were descriptive analysis, the data source came from secondary data. Methods of data collection were conducted through interviews, library research, and document studies. This writing was analyzed qualitatively by using the analytical knife of legal certainty theory and Islamic justice theory. The results showed that the process of distributing inheritance rights to land carried out by a Notary, namely the parties (heirs) together faced the Notary in the presence of 2 (two) witnesses. Both parties bring the files that are the formal requirements and the material requirements that have been determined. Theoretical analysis of the role of the notary in making the deed of distribution of inheritance rights to land is carried out with justice, so it is fair not justice. This is similar to Islamic justice theory. Basically the concept of justice in Islam is not "equality" but "comparability".

Improving Farmer Willingness to Participate in the Transfer of Land Rights in Rural China: A Preference-Based Income Distribution Scheme

Promoting the transfer of rural land is an important way for many developing countries to improve the efficiency of rural land use and develop the rural economy. A reasonable income distribution scheme (IDS) is the key to enhancing farmer willingness to participate in the transfer of rural construction land use rights. However, little attention has been paid to farmers’ preference for the IDS of the transfer of rural collective construction land use rights. This research aims to detect the farmers’ preference for IDS in the process of rural collective land rights transfer. Based on the survey data of 489 farmers in Liuyang City, Hunan Province and Deqing County, Zhejiang Province, China, a random parameter Logit model is used to explore their preference for the IDS of the transfer of rural collective construction land use rights. The results show that, in general, the farmers focus on the income distribution ratio and pension in the IDS, which will significantly improve their utility. There are obvious regional differences in their preference for IDSs. For example, farmers in Liuyang prefer payment in shares, while those in Deqing prefer cash. Thus, the IDS for the transfer of rural collective construction land use rights should be based on the basic principle of ensuring fair land value-added income for the farmers, increased payment forms with social security functions, and reasonable IDSs in accord with the preferences of farmers in different regions, so as to enhance farmer willingness to participate.

PENDAFTARAN PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH KARENA PEWARISAN

This study aims to determine the implementation of PP 24/1997 in the process of registering the transfer of land rights due to inheritance based on the statement of heirs, and to find out the process of registering the transfer of rights due to inheritance at the Makassar City Land Office not using the Deed of Sharing Joint Rights as stipulated in PP 24 /1997, but using a statement letter based on heirs. The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling, namely the purposeful sampling, which is carried out by taking subjects based on a specific purpose, citing limited time, effort and cost, so it cannot be obtained. taking samples that are large in number and far apart.1 Especially PPAT, the main criterion in determining the sample is PPAT who has been in contact with the Makassar City Land Office in relation to land registration. The results showed that the registration of the transfer of land rights due to inheritance applied by the Makassar City Land Office could be carried out only by making a statement of heirs on the basis of a statement of heirs whose contents designate one of the heirs as the right holder, the registration of the transfer of rights can be directly carried out. without any legal action before the authorized official, namely PPAT, by making a deed of sharing rights together. The process of registering the transfer of rights due to inheritance at the Makassar City Land Office does not use the Deed of Sharing Joint Rights due to strong customary influence so that there are still many community members who transfer land rights under their hands.
 Keywords: transfer of rights, inheritance, heirs, PPAT

Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Menjadi Objek Sengketa Dalam Perspektif Penegakan Hukum

Dispute land cases in Indonesia in 2019 reached 30,817 cases, which was dominated by the typology of registration of conveyance of land rights. This shows that the reconstruction of the transfer of rights is not being perfectly understood by society, authority and others. The essence of this particular problem is in physical and juridical data on land rights which frequently shifts due to unqualified of deep land subject obligations in maintaining physical and juridical data its self. The purpose of this research is to figure out the legal consequences of rights conveyance to dispute lands and what are the prospects of law enforcement on future transfer of land rights disputes. The type of this research is juridical normative research which uses the statutory and conceptual approach method by using the theory of authority and law enforcement. The results show that the legal consequences of the transfer of rights over land that becomes the object of dispute, namely freehold and deed of transfer of land rights could be cancelled and declared null and void. This is because it is not fulfilled the subjective and objective requirements of the validity of an agreement and obligations land subject to safeguard physical data and juridical data which are an important part of a proof of ownership of land rights. Law enforcement perspective on the transfer of land rights disputes based on Government Regulation 24 of 1997 relies on the subject of land rights and deeds of stipulation of transfer of rights and other parties which are the basis for this transfer of rights to the land.

Legal Protection for Auction Winners of Liability against Transition of Land Rights Certificates

In this journal the author has two objectives in this research, first, To find out and analyze the legal protection of the auction winner of mortgage rights in the transfer of land rights certificates and To find out and analyze the legal position of the transfer of land rights certificates for the auction winners in the construction of legal certainty. The approach method in this research is normative juridical where this research provides a detailed, systematic and comprehensive description in which the author examines and studies the norms contained in the legislation. The research specification is a descriptive analysis that is limited to efforts to reveal a problem or situation or event as it is, so that it is merely revealing facts. The data required includes primary data, secondary data, and tertiary data. Taken by data collection method, data analysis method using qualitative approach, namely understanding the data through collecting, filtering, analyzing and making conclusions on the data obtained throughout the research systematically. Based on the research, it can be concluded that legal protection for legitimate auction winners is still difficult in practice. The existence of disputes and lawsuits from land owners does not provide legal certainty of the status of the auction object being sold where buyers who have good intentions participate in the auction process and have fulfilled their obligations but sometimes cannot immediately enjoy the goods purchased. Although the acquisition of the object of the auction in the form of a Mortgage object is in accordance with the procedural and legally valid, however, the administrative requirements at the Land Office cannot be carried out due to the status quo.

Sale & Purchase of Land Under Hand With Testimony Sign by Village Head or Customary Head

Land has a very important relationship and meaning for human life. Land is an immovable object or a fixed object whose ownership is regulated by the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Including the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, the transfer of land from the seller to the buyer must use a valid or authentic proof of transfer made by the official making the land deed. In accordance with the laws and regulations. This study uses sociological juridical research methods, descriptive research specifications, aims to describe a problem in a certain area or at a certain time. This study uses secondary data sources which are divided into primary law, secondary law and tertiary law. The research results that have been collected are then analyzed qualitatively. The formulation of the problem was analyzed using the theory of legal certainty, the theory of usefulness or legal expediency, and the theory of legal justice. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded, buying and selling land under the hands is still often done because people are not aware of the law of buying and selling land and the importance of proof of the transfer of land rights. The process of implementing the sale and purchase of land in the presence of the Village Head or Customary Head in Seruyan Regency is the parties coming to the village head's office and requesting a transfer of sale and purchase letter or proof of transfer of land rights to the village head and bring the conditions determined by the Village Head. The solution so that land registration can be carried out is that the process of buying and selling land must be carried out again in the presence of PPAT.

Analysis of the Dispute of Unlawful Acts in the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement

The sale and purchase of land in this study leads to the rights of a land. From a legal point of view, buying and selling land is not about the land being traded, but the right to use the land. Regulations regarding the transfer of land rights are regulated in PP No. 34 of 1997 Article 32 paragraph (2) which reads: “Under certain conditions as determined by the Minister, the Head of the Defense Agency can register the transfer of ownership rights to a parcel of land, which is carried out between Indonesian citizens individually with evidence of a deed not made. This study aims to analyze the dispute of unlawful acts in the land sale and purchase agreement. This type of research is normative legal research that focuses on applicable legal norms and the study of legal norms is carried out by examining secondary data as the main data, while primary data as supporting data. This normative legal research is viewed from several aspects, such as aspects of theory, philosophy, comparison, general explanation, composition, and so on. The UUPA does not clearly explain what is meant by buying and selling land, but agrarian law uses a system and legal principles. The customary law used is the customary law that applies ndi s adapted nationally and follows modern developments. In essence, buying and selling land is the transfer of land rights from the seller to the buyer, so that the buyer can use the land according to its function. According to the UUPA, there are various types of land rights that can be transferred, namely property rights, use rights and building rights.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Atas Kelalaian yang Dilakukan oleh PPAT dalam Jual Beli Tanah Warisan

Land Deed Making Officials (henceforth referred to as PPAT) is the public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds concerning certain legal action regarding land or property rights over flat units. PPAT is demanded to work carefully, thoroughly and responsibly because the PPAT deed is used as evidence for the transfer of land rights. When PPAT is negligent in making the deed then it may result in loss for others. As in the Supreme Court verdict No.156K/Pdt/2020, where PPAT has been negligent in making the deed and resulted loss experienced by the buyer due to the loss payment and the land he had purchased. Even though the buyer has made sale and purchase clearly before the PPAT, that PPAT deed should be able to provide legal certainty. Therefore, this research is trying to analyze and answer the problems on to what extend is the legal accountability of PPAT when the sale and purchase deed of inherited land that made before him is cancelled by the Supreme Court, to what extend is the legal protection for buyer against the negligence committed by PPAT in making the sale and purchase deed of inherited land that has not been divided and whether judge’s decision in the Supreme Court verdict No.156K/Pdt/2020 has accommodated protection for the buyer.

Proof Power of Authentic Deed Transfer of Land Rights in Legal Perspective of Civil Procedures

Introduction to The Problem: Evidence is a process carried out by the parties in resolving disputes to prove the arguments presented before the judge who decides the legal dispute so that the judge can decide as fairly as possible. Evidence under the civil procedure law is regulated in Article 164 HIR. Supreme Court decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018 discusses documentary evidence in the form of an agreement to transfer and transfer land rights and states that the deed has no legal force. Purpose/Objective Study: The purpose of the study was to determine the legal considerations for the strength of authentic deed evidence in the Supreme Court Decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018, connected with civil procedural law. The research method used is a normative juridical approach to the research specification in descriptive-analytical analysis and qualitative normative. Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this research is normative juridical research which focuses on the applicable legal provisions. Findings: The research results that the authentic deed submitted by the Defendants in the Reconvention as evidence has external and formal evidentiary power. However, authentic deeds that are perfect and binding do not have a coercive or decisive character. Authentic deed evidence can be invalidated if there is evidence of the opponent which can prove otherwise. Based on the decision of the Supreme Court number 3591K/Pdt/2018, the Notarial Deed of the Transfer of Land Rights Agreement has no legal force because land rights have been transferred and building use rights are attached. Paper Type: Research ArticleÂ

The Legal Strength of the Deed of Power to Sell as the Basis for Transfer of Land Rights

In practice, the granting of a power of attorney to sell as above has caused the power to sell to be used as the basis for the process of making an AJB behind the name and at the same time being used as a registration tool for the transfer of land rights at the Land Office where the land is located. Meanwhile, the power of attorney to sell is accompanied by a statement from a notary that explains that the deed of power of attorney to sell is not an absolute power of attorney prohibited by law or that land and buildings as objects in the deed of power of attorney to sell have been paid in full. The procedure used to collect data in this study is in the form of documentation, namely the guidelines used in the form of notes or quotes, searching for legal literature, books and others related to the identification of problems in this study both offline and online. Analysis of legal materials is carried out using the content analysis method which is carried out by describing the material of legal events or legal products in detail in order to facilitate interpretation in the discussion. The granting of power of attorney is specifically regulated in Chapter XVI, book III of the Civil Code where Article 1792 states: "The grant of power of attorney is an agreement that contains the granting of power to another person who accepts it to carry out something on behalf of the person giving the power of attorney". Furthermore, Article 1793 of the Civil Code states: "Power can be given and received by a general deed, by a letter under the hand even by a letter or by word of mouth. The acceptance of a power of attorney can also occur secretly and is concluded from the exercise of that power by the authorized person. The process of transferring land rights based on the Selling Power of Attorney has a strong legal basis because there are no legal rules that are violated as argued and proven above. So it is correct to say that the Deed of Authorization to Sell has transitional power as well as in the process of transferring land rights through the Deed of Sale and Purchase, as long as no rules are violated in the transition process. The legal protection provided by PPJB is paid off and the power to sell to the buyer if the seller dies is very strong and perfect because of the evidentiary nature of PPJB and the power to sell made before a public official in this case a notary. This is a form of guarantee of legal certainty and as a form of legal protection for buyers who have paid the full price they have paid but have not been able to make AJB and reverse registration because one way or another there are conditions that have not been fulfilled

Legal Responsibility for The Notary in Creating The Coppie Collationee for Sale and Purchase Deals Before The Officer of Land Asset Concerning Land Registration Land with Notary Office and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registrati

Notary or Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) is a public official who has an important role in ensuring legal certainty, order and legal protection through authentic deeds drawn up by and before him. In practice, there is a problem, namely the existence of a dispute over the transfer of land rights, where there are two parties claiming to be the owner of the same land object. Each party claims to be the owner because they have bought from the heirs of the original owner of the land. One party bases ownership because it has proof of the Sale and Purchase Deed that has been made by PPAT, while the other party bases it on the proof of the Coppie Collationnee Sale and Purchase Deed. Based on these problems, it is necessary to conduct research regarding the legal position of the Copie Collationnee made by the Notary on the Sale and Purchase Deed which is used as proof of ownership of land rights and what is the legal responsibility for the Notary who has made the Copie Collationnee on the Sale and Purchase Deed made before PPAT. The method used is descriptive analysis with a normative juridical approach. The research stage uses library research with secondary data and field studies with primary data. This data collection is obtained by means of document study and also interviews obtained by means of field studies. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using the juridical-qualitative method. The Notary Deed in the form of a Coppie Collationnee made on the Land Sale and Purchase Deed made by PPAT is a form of negligence from the Notary in making the deed, because it is not in accordance with Article 15 paragraph 2 letter c UUJN, so the position of the deed in the agreement is limited to a copy and is degraded into an agreement. under hand. As for the legal consequences of a notary's negligence in drawing up a deed, it may be subject to sanctions in accordance with Article 16 of the UUJN, namely in the form of written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal, or dishonorable discharge.

TINDAK PIDANA PENYEROBATAN TANAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA

Land grabbing is an act of taking rights or assets arbitrarily or by ignoring the laws and regulations, such as occupying land or other people's houses that are not their rights. Illegal land grabbing is an act that is against the law, which can be classified as a crime. The formulation of the problem studied in this thesis is how to regulate the crime of land grabbing, how are the factors causing the crime of land grabbing, how to enforce the law against the crime of land grabbing. The research method used in this research is using normative juridical research sourced from library research using secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the regulation of criminal acts of land grabbing is regulated in several provisions for the regulation of criminal acts of land grabbing regulated in several statutory provisions, including Law Number 51 PRP of 1960 which states that land use without a rightful permit or legal proxy is an act that is illegal. prohibited and threatened with criminal penalties (Article 2 and Article 6) and regulated in the Criminal Code in several articles, namely Article 167, Article 242, Article 263, Article 264, Article 266, Article 274, and Article 385 of the Criminal Code. The factors causing the crime of land grabbing are the land owner's indifference to the assets he owns, the victim's ignorance about the ownership of the land having been sold or given to someone else by the victim's parents, the high price of land which causes people to start looking for their land and also resulting in difficulty in obtaining land for cultivation, the sale of parents' land first using a belief system so that there is no evidence related to the transfer of land rights. Law enforcement against land grabbing is subject to Article 385 of the Criminal Code which is the only article directly related to land grabbing and is categorized as a criminal offense. Especially in Article 385 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code which reads: Whoever with the intention of unlawfully benefiting himself or others, sells, exchanges or burdens with credit verband a right to Indonesian land, a building, building, planting or seeding, even though it is known that another person owns or also has rights to it.

PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) DALAM TRANSAKSI PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN ATAU BANGUNAN

The process of transferring land rights based on the power of attorney to sell made by a notary is 3 months until the expiration of the principal credit agreement. In general, if the SKMHT is not upgraded to APHT within a certain time, then the SKMHT becomes null and void within 1 month after it is given. This research uses normative juridical, namely reviewing the laws and regulations. The conclusion is that a power of attorney to impose Mortgage is not immediately followed up with the making of a Deed of Granting Mortgage by the bank within a certain period of time specified in the Mortgage Law. If there are signs that the debtor will default, the position of SKMHT is changed to APHT and registered at the National Land Office so that it meets the requirements for the principles of speciality and publicity. This condition makes SKMHT in Article 15 UUHT upgraded to APHT in order to have executorial power over the objects guaranteed by the debtor.

Pеndaftaran tanah sistеmatis terhadap akta tеrutang pajak

This article has the intent and purpose to find out the implementation of PRONA systematic land registration for the deed of transfer of land rights that are tax payable, specifically related to Income Tax (PPh) and Land Acquisition Fees (BPHTB) which are the obligations of the parties and are registered through systematic land registration was carried out in Ternyang Village, Sumberpucung District in 2009. However, the obstacles that occurred in the field were different from the turus hamlet, the village community was more cooperative regarding physical data. Nature in Ternyang village is indeed a lot of uneven shape, so it takes more time, to determine the appropriate land boundaries. Bookkeeping of rights or storage of documents constituting evidence shall be marked with identification and kept at the Land Office as an integral part of the general register. In accordance with the provisions of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, article 39 paragraph (1) point g, PPAT/PPATS may not sign the deed before the tax obligations are fulfilled and the official who gives the land rights before the tax obligations are fulfilled.How to cite item: Crisantika, Y., Koeswahyono, I., Supriyadi, S. (2021). Pеndaftaran tanah sistеmatis terhadap akta tеrutang pajak. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(2), 168-177. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i2.5810

The Implementation of Land Rights Certification Linked to Implementation of Law Number 28 Year 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Levies in Medan

Requests for land registration for the first time, t are subject to PPh F PHTB and BPHTB. Specifically in the Systematic and Complete Land Registration program (PTSL) calculation of BPHTB in is important, because it becomes the basis for other provisions such as the end of the BPHTB payment period, sanctions, etc. Notary as PPAT, as the maker of the deed also plays a role when dealing with the PTSL applicant who bases his application with the deed transfer of land rights. The results of this study indicate that the Mayor can grant BPHTB reduction requests submitted by PTSL applicants based on propriety, fairness and fairness. PTSL applicants who are not or have not been able to pay BPHTB for the land concerned can still be issued a Land Rights Certificate which must make the statement of BPHTB owed. Constraints related to the collection of BPHTB in the PTSL program, the society did not get socialization about BPHTB from the Tax Officer, the information was actually conveyed by the Land Officer. This made many residents disappointed because the initial counseling was conveyed that the PTSL program was free, but in fact there was a payment so that many applicants did not participate the PTSL program.

Juridical Analysis of Implementation of Rights Transfer to Land & Buildings with Sale and Purchase Deed

The purpose of this research is to analyze and find out: 1). Implementation of the transfer of rights to land and buildings with a deed of sale and purchase at the Land Office of Grobogan Regency. 2). Obstacles and solutions in the implementation of the transfer of rights to land and buildings with a deed of sale and purchase at the Land Office of Grobogan Regency. The approach method in this research is normative juridical. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature study, data analysis was carried out by analytical descriptive. The results of the research concluded: 1) The implementation of the transfer of rights to land and buildings with a deed of sale and purchase at the Land Office of Grobogan Regency, which starts with a sale and purchase transaction, after the sale and purchase is achieved, it must be AJB by PPAT and witnessed by the parties. PPAT must check the completeness of data such as certificates, proof of tax payments and complete identity of the parties. Furthermore, the PPAT Deed along with other files such as a registration application letter, land certificate or letter D, girik or other proof of ownership, identity of the parties, NPWP, marriage certificate and proof of payment of PBB tax payments are brought to the Land Office to be registered as a certificate of ownership for new land rights holders. After the registration process, the next step is to wait for data verification from the Land Office for the issuance of certificates. 2) Obstacles in the implementation of the transfer of rights to land and buildings with a deed of sale and purchase at the Land Office of Grobogan Regency, namely there are still many low levels of education, people are reluctant to take care of the transfer of land rights due to the costs which they think are quite high and will only take time. The length of the SOP (Standard Operational Procedure) for the Transfer of Name Certificate process, the lack of counseling given to the community regarding the importance of registering the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, and land certificates. Solutions that can be done are to provide socialization or publish brochures, improve the performance of the Land Office through courses/training and improve administration because it is an organization of human resources.

Settlement of Disputes Between Buyers of Moi Ulayat Land in Sorong District

Based on this perspective, the type of legal research is carried out through Empirical Legal Research. In fact, a lot is done in the life of the Moi Tribe. It’s carried out by buying and selling which is accompanied by a letter of land release with a compensation fee given as proof that the land has been released or transferred to the party in need. In other words, the four things above are done by buying and selling land, so it must be done in cash where the transfer of land rights by the land owner (the seller) is carried out together with the payment by another party (the buyer).

Jurisdiction Overview Implementation of Rights Transfer to Land & Building Registration with Selling-Buying Deed

The purposes of this study are to: 1) Analyze the implementation of the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office. 2) Analyzing obstacles and solutions in the implementation of the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office. This research is a normative juridical approach, with descriptive analysis research specifications. Primary and secondary data collection was obtained by interview and literature study. The results of the research are: 1) The registration of the transfer of land and building rights with the Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office begins with the stage of implementing the sale and purchase transaction between the seller and the buyer. After that the sale and purchase transaction must be made a deed of sale and purchase by the PPAT, then by the PPAT it is brought to the Land Office to be registered as a certificate of ownership for the new land title holder. After the registration process, the next step is to wait for data verification from the Land Office for the issuance of certificates. 2). The obstacle in implementing the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office is that there are still many low levels of education resulting in a lack of public legal awareness, the length of the SOP for the Transfer of Name Certificates whose proof of ownership is still in the form of a Sub-district Register C (Letter C), and the lack of counseling provided to the community regarding the importance of registering the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, and land certificates. 3). The solution to overcome obstacles in implementing the registration of the transfer of land and or building rights with the Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office is to provide or publish brochures about the importance of registering the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, conducting counseling, improving human resources through courses/training and fixing the administration of the organization.

Jurisdiction Overview Implementation of Rights Transfer to Land & Building Registration with Selling-Buying Deed

The purposes of this study are to: 1) Analyze the implementation of the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office. 2) Analyzing obstacles and solutions in the implementation of the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office. This research is a normative juridical approach, with descriptive analysis research specifications. Primary and secondary data collection was obtained by interview and literature study. The results of the research are: 1) The registration of the transfer of land and building rights with the Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office begins with the stage of implementing the sale and purchase transaction between the seller and the buyer. After that the sale and purchase transaction must be made a deed of sale and purchase by the PPAT, then by the PPAT it is brought to the Land Office to be registered as a certificate of ownership for the new land title holder. After the registration process, the next step is to wait for data verification from the Land Office for the issuance of certificates. 2). The obstacle in implementing the registration of the transfer of rights to land and or buildings with a Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office is that there are still many low levels of education resulting in a lack of public legal awareness, the length of the SOP for the Transfer of Name Certificates whose proof of ownership is still in the form of a Sub-district Register C (Letter C), and the lack of counseling provided to the community regarding the importance of registering the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, and land certificates. 3). The solution to overcome obstacles in implementing the registration of the transfer of land and or building rights with the Sale and Purchase Deed at the Surakarta City Land Office is to provide or publish brochures about the importance of registering the transfer of land rights due to buying and selling, conducting counseling, improving human resources through courses/training and fixing the administration of the organization.