Transcription-mediated Amplification Assay Research Articles

Vaginal dysbiosis seems associated with hrHPV infection in women attending the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus, which infects approximately 80% of all men and women at some time in their lives. Usually, the infection is resolved successfully by the body's immune system. Persistent infection with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) is necessary but not sufficient for cervical cancer development, and additional factors, such as the vaginal microbiome (vaginome), are thought to be involved. The aim of this study is to investigate whether either vaginal dysbiosis (imbalance in vaginal bacterial composition) or sexually transmitted pathogens, e.g., Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), are possible cofactors for hrHPV infection and HPV-induced cervical dysplasia in asymptomatic women attending the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Program. In this study, 492 hrHPV-positive and 500 hrHPV-negative cervical smears from women attending the Screening Program were included. Age and cytology were known for the hrHPV-positive samples. All cervical smears were diluted in Aptima® specimen transfer medium and tested with Aptima® transcription-mediated amplification assays targeting CT, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), Candida spp. (CS), C. glabrata (CG), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and bacterial vaginosis (BV). The prevalences of CT, NG, MG, CS, CG, TV, and BV in this cohort were found to be 1.9%, 0.0%, 1.7%, 5.4%, 1.4%, 0.1%, and 27.2%, respectively. When comparing HPV groups, it was found that CT, MG, and BV had a significantly higher prevalence in hrHPV-positive smears as compared with hrHPV-negative samples (for all p < 0.001). No significant differences were found when comparing different age groups and cytology outcomes. In conclusion, vaginal dysbiosis seems associated with hrHPV infection in women attending the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Molecular diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus infection: clinical performance of the Aptima transcription-mediated amplification assay toward conventional qPCR chemistry on whole blood samples.

In this paper, we describe the clinical performance of a novel transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay for the detection and quantification of human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA from whole blood samples. This is a pivotal analysis in immunocompromised patients [transplanted, HIV-positive, and Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) recipients], and molecular tests with high sensitivity and specificity are necessary to evaluate the HCMV viral load in these patients. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth evaluation of TMA chemistry for HCMV diagnosis on whole blood samples. Moreover, also technical aspects of this assay make it suitable for clinical diagnostics.

Evaluation of an automated real-time transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay for detection and quantification of cytomegalovirus DNA in different clinical specimens

BackgroundReliable and fast detection and quantification of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in various diagnostic specimens is essential for care of immunocompromised or congenitally infected individuals. ObjectivesTo evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Panther Aptima® CMV (Hologic) quantitative real-time transcription mediated amplification (TMA) assay. Study designPerformance of the TMA assay run on the Hologic Panther Fusion was analysed for 32 proficiency testing samples and 21 quantitative reproducibility panel samples; additionally, we compared results of TMA assay and routine quantitative real-time PCR assays ("PCR-A"= Biomérieux CMV R-gene® or "PCR-B"= Laboratory-developed CMV-PCR) in 518 diagnostic specimens (254 plasma, 120 EDTA whole blood, 43 urine, 45 amniotic fluid and 56 breast milk) at two university hospital laboratories. ResultsAll proficiency panel samples were correctly identified and quantified by the TMA assay; replicate testing of the reproducibility panel samples showed good reproducibility within and between the two laboratories. Sensitivity in plasma and WB was higher for the TMA assay detecting low-level CMV-DNAemia in samples tested negative by routine PCR. Quantitative CMV-DNAemia values correlated well between TMA and real-time PCR. Similarly, urine, AF and BM specimens showed a high rate of concordant results (91%, 98% and 98%, respectively) among TMA and PCR with good correlation of quantitative values. ConclusionThe performance of the Aptima® CMV TMA assay for viral blood load testing compared well to established real-time PCRs. In addition, it can be useful for diagnostics in urine, amniotic fluid and breast milk specimens.

The diagnostic accuracy of the ID NOW COVID-19 point of care test in acute hospital admissions

BackgroundPrompt identification of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on admission to hospital is crucial to ensuring initiation of appropriate treatment, optimising infection control and maintaining patient flow. The Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 assay (ID NOW) is a point-of-care, isothermal nucleic acid amplification test, capable of producing a result within minutes, potentially placing it as an invaluable tool in helping to control the coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ID NOW in acute hospital admissions. Study designA prospective approach to data collection was undertaken in consecutive patients with ID NOW and Hologic Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay (Aptima TMA) results, across three hospitals in the south-west of England between 1st March and 30th September 2021. A nasal swab was taken for ID NOW and a combined nose and throat swab for Aptima TMA. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for ID NOW against Aptima TMA. This study was conducted during a period of alpha and delta strain predominance. Results19,698 ID NOW assays were performed, of which 12,821 had an Aptima TMA assay performed within 24 hours. ID NOW had sensitivity of 85.2 % (95 % CI, 82.2–87.9) and specificity of 99.6 % (95 % CI, 99.4–99.7) compared with the reference assay. The overall PPV was 91.0 % (95 % CI, 88.5–93.0) and the overall NPV was 99.3 % (95 % CI, 99.1–99.4). ConclusionsID NOW offers a valid diagnostic tool to detect SARS-CoV-2, performing comparably to a reference laboratory-based assay which takes longer to provide results.

A novel mitigation strategy for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria.

Malaria is caused by protozoa of the genus Plasmodium and transmitted by Anopheles mosquitos. In the US, blood donors are assessed for malaria risk, including donor travel or previous residence in endemic areas and history of malaria by questionnaire and deferred for three months or three years, respectively. The Procleix Plasmodium Assay is a qualitative nucleic acid test based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) for the detection of 18S ribosomal RNA of P. falciparum, P. ovale, P. vivax, P. malariae, and P. knowlesi for use on the Procleix Panther system. Analytical sensitivity was evaluated with in vitro transcripts and infected red blood cells. For clinical specificity, 12,800 individual donations and 283 pools of 16 samples from routine US donors were screened. Malaria risk was evaluated by testing 862 donors deferred for 3 years. Reactive results were confirmed with in-house real-time TMA assay and serology. Assay sensitivity was 8.47-11.89 RNA copies/mL and 2.10-6.82 infected red cells/mL. Specificity was 99.99% in 12,800 individual donations and 100% in 283 pools of 16. Of 862 tested deferred donor samples, one donor (0.12%) confirmed positive individually and in pools; he remained confirmed positive for 13 months. The infected donor was a prior resident of a malaria-endemic area in West Africa. The Procleix Plasmodium Assay showed high sensitivity and specificity and detected Plasmodium RNA in an asymptomatic presenting donor. This assay may prove helpful as a screening test versus the use of risk questions to reduce the number of donors deferred for malaria risk.

A-244 Performance Comparison of the Alinity i Hepatitis C Core Antigen Assay in Routine Laboratory Testing vs HCV RNA Testing

Abstract Background The elimination of Hepatitis C by 2030 is a goal established by the WHO and other country specific health organizations worldwide. This goal is enabled by the availability of effective treatment regimens. A recent surprise in the US has been the increase in HCV infections during the COVID 19 pandemic, which may be caused by increased needle sharing. HCV Antibody assays have been used to screen for HCV, but confirmation of acute infection is relegated in the current US guidelines to PCR which often takes multiple days and may result in a loss to follow up and treatment, especially in high prevalence populations. HCV Core Antigen is a new immunoassay on the Alinity i system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the precision, linearity, and sensitivity of this research use assay in a US-based population. Methods Alinity i assay HCV Ab is an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay built to measure total antibody to the virus. Similarly, the Alinity i HCV Core Ag is a research use only automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for detection of HCV Core antigen in human plasma and serum. Precision (repeatability, and reproducibility) was determined over 3 days (4–10 replicates/day) using control material consisting of a negative human plasma control, and positive controls made with recombinant core Ag in buffer. Linearity was evaluated by preparing 4 dilutions of a remnant specimen with detectable HCV RNA viral load. Clinical sensitivity was determined using 90 remnant specimens with positive HCV Ab results. Specimens were confirmed positive for Hepatitis C via HCV RNA quantitation using the Aptima HCV Quant Dx transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay on the Panther System. Correlation between the HCV Ag assay and TMA was evaluated using specimens submitted for either Hepatitis C infection screening and monitoring of known infection. Results The repeatability of the HCV Ag assay ranged between 3.7% and 11.1% CV depending on the sample S/CO level tested. Dilution recovery averaged 98.2% (range 90.2%–107.3%) and a plot of HCV Ag concentration vs dilution factor showed a correlation coefficient R = 0.998 The Hepatitis C core antigen assay had a correlation coefficient R = 0.92 with the TMA. The HCV assay demonstrated a clinical sensitivity of 96.7% vs TMA. Conclusion The performance characteristics of the Alinity i HCV Core Ag assay highlight an opportunity to speed time to treatment by reflexing on the same instrument from HCV Ab to Ag and confirming effectiveness of treatment.

Enhanced detection rate of Mycoplasma genitalium in urine overtime by transcription-mediated amplification in comparison to real-time PCR

BackgroundDiagnosis of infected individuals with Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is often performed by real-time PCR or transcription-mediated amplification (TMA). A limitation of the MG-TMA assay is the relatively short time span of 24 h in which the collected urine is required to be transferred into a Urine Specimen Transport Tube, according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. If not transferred within 24 h, the manufacturer’s claimed sensitivity cannot be guaranteed anymore, and samples may instead be tested with an in-house validated real-time PCR, despite its recognized lower sensitivity. This study aimed to validate an exception to the sample transport and storage conditions of the MG-TMA assay as set by the manufacturer, being the prolongation of the acceptable testing time limit of 24 h.MethodsFrom June to December 2022, first-void urines were collected from clients attending the clinic for sexual health in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Urine samples that tested positive for MG by TMA assay at the day of collection were concomitantly stored at room (18–24 °C) and refrigerator temperature (4–8 °C) for 15 days. The stored urine samples were tested with both an in-house validated real-time PCR and MG-TMA assay after transfer of the original urine samples to the respective test tubes at 3, 7, 12 and 15 days post collection.ResultsIn total, 47 MG-positive urine samples were collected, stored and tested for MG by real-time PCR and TMA assays. After storage at room temperature, the MG-detection rate by TMA was significantly higher compared to real-time PCR, at days 0 (p ≤ 0.001), 7 (p ≤ 0.001) and 12 (p < 0.05). After storage at refrigerator temperature, the MG-detection rate determined by TMA assay was significantly enhanced in comparison with real-time PCR at days 3 (p < 0.01), 7 (p ≤ 0.001) and 15 (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThis validation study showed that the MG-TMA assay has a superior detection rate in urine compared to real-time PCR, up to 15 days post sample collection and irrespective of storage temperature. Accepting urines older than 24 h to be tested by TMA will improve clinical diagnosis of MG infections.

Timely Diagnosis of Incubating Syphilis Infections Using Treponema pallidum Transcription-Mediated Amplification Assay.

Syphilis is a complex, multistage, sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum (TP). New diagnostic tools are needed to minimize transmission. In this study, we aimed to assess the additional value of an investigational transcription-mediated amplification test for TP (TP-TMA) for routine diagnostics. Between September 2021 and August 2022, visits by all participants of the national preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) program at the sexual health center (SHC) in Amsterdam were included. Anal, pharyngeal, vaginal, and urine samples collected for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening were additionally tested with the TP-TMA assay based on detection of 23S rRNA of TP. In total, 9974 SHC visits by 3283 participants were included. There were 191 infectious syphilis cases diagnosed: 26 (14%) primary syphilis, 54 (29%) secondary syphilis, and 111 (58%) early latent syphilis. In 79 of the 191 (41%) syphilis cases, at least 1 sample was TP-TMA-positive. For 16 participants, the positive TP-TMA result was not concordant with routine diagnostics. Of those, 2 participants were treated for syphilis within a week before the visit. Eight participants were treated for a syphilis notification at the visit or for another STI. Five participants were diagnosed with syphilis at the following visit, and 1 participant was lost to follow-up. By adding the TP-TMA assay to routine diagnostics, we identified 14 of 191 (7%) additional syphilis infections among participants of the national PrEP program. The TP-TMA assay is a useful diagnostic tool to increase syphilis case finding and thus limit the transmission of syphilis.

Role of Hologic® Panther AptimaTM SARS-CoV-2 assay in the detection of SARS-CoV-2: screening or diagnostic technique?

During the multiple waves of COVID-19 suffered all over the world, having a rapid and sensitive diagnostic test has become a priority for microbiology laboratories. The AptimaTM SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay running on the Panther system (Hologic) was presented as a very good option to cover this need. To evaluate this system, 570 respiratory samples were included in the study and were processed both by the Panther (Hologic) system and by qRT-PCR (Thermo Fisher Science, Waltham, USA), current assay for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A high number of false positives (n=76) was obtained with Panther system (Hologic), but the number of false positives decreases as the relative light units (RLU) value increases. These results show that this technique can be a good option for sample screening but checking for positive results should be mandatory, especially those with low RLU values.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of a novel transcription-mediated amplification assay for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing

IntroductionThe onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. MethodsBetween November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed. ResultsOverall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis. ConclusionIn conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions.

Similar Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Oropharyngeal/Nasopharyngeal and Saliva Samples on the Hologic Panther Platform.

Oropharyngeal (OP) and nasopharyngeal (NP) sampling has historically been considered the reference specimen type used for respiratory virus detection. Saliva could be a less invasive alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection, but limited evidence is available. The technical and clinical performance of saliva was compared to OP/NP on the Hologic Panther platform with two Aptima assays, the End-Point Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (EP-TMA) and Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA). The samples were collected at the Public Health Service Testing Site XL location in Schiphol Amsterdam Airport. At the site, the Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland (RPHLK) has a fully equipped laboratory facility. A total of 374 samples (187 OP/NP swabs and 187 saliva samples) were collected from 187 unique patients. The Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA) resulted in comparable sensitivities for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both the OP/NP swabs (88.3%; 113/128) and saliva samples (87.5%; 112/128). The End-Point Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (EP-TMA) analyses showed a similar sensitivity (86.7%; 111/128) in the OP/NP swabs but a lower sensitivity in the saliva samples (80.5%; 103/128). Within the discordant analyses, we found no associations in the symptoms, earlier SARS-CoV-2 infections and eating, smoking, drinking and tooth brushing habits within one hour before testing. The Hologic Panther platform Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA) yields a sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva that is comparable to the OP/NP swabs derived from participants presenting themselves at a public health testing facility with minimal or mild symptoms.

Detection and quantification of HBV and HCV in plasma samples by means of different molecular assays: Comparative study

IntroductionViral load is a very useful marker for monitoring patients infected with HBV and HCV. This work compares assays based on transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) and on real-time PCR (RT-PCR) to verify whether they can be interchangeable. Material and methodsA bicentric study, in which 147 plasma samples from patients infected with HBV and 229 with HCV were analyzed, was carried out. TMA-based assays (Aptima® HBV Quant and Aptima® HCV Quant Dx, employing Panther system (Hologic®)) and RT-PCR (COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® and COBAS® 6800) were used and the degree of concordance between them was calculated. ResultsViral load was detected in both systems in 60 (40.82%) HBV samples (median log viral load: COBAS: 2.51IU/mL (IQR 2.20–3.17), Panther: 2.71IU/mL (IQR 2.21–3.22)) and in 39 (16.96%) HCV samples (median log viral load: COBAS: 3.93IU/mL (IQR 2.24–6.01), Panther: 3.80IU/mL (IQR 1.99–6.14)). The agreement between both systems was κ=0.943 for HBV and κ=0.925 for HCV. Comparison of viral load samples detected by both assays showed a hight correlation for HBV (R2=0.86) and for HCV (R2=0.97). ConclusionsBoth TMA and RT-PCR based assays may be interchangeable for the management of patients infected with HBV and HCV.

A risk assessment model for transfusion transmission of dengue.

Dengue virus (DENV) is a disease-causing agent normally transmitted from person to person through the bite of an infected mosquito. In addition to mosquito-borne cases of dengue, there are instances of transmission of dengue after receipt of blood products or donor organs or tissue. To improve blood safety, we developed a quantitative risk assessment model to estimate the dengue risk of transmission to blood transfusion recipients from preclinical and subclinical blood donors. We derived predictive coefficients from model simulations for predicting the risk outcomes such as monthly infectious blood units and transfusion-transmitted DENV cases based on the rate of reported clinical cases. The model was validated with a previous study where donor blood samples from the 2012 dengue transmission season in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil were tested for DENV RNA by a transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay. In that study, about 69·4% of donations were tested by the TMA assay and 78 samples were found positive, indicating that 112 DENV RNA-positive donations would have been detected if testing screening had been performed on all donations. Our model estimated a mean of 93 (2.5-97.5th%ile: 47-186) infected units among the donations, which was consistent with the reported numbers.

Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant Assay Compared to Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant Assay and Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV Assay in Plasma Samples.

ABSTRACTAnalytical performance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitative assay is critical for screening infection and initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. In this study, the limit of detection (LoD) and linearity of Aptima HBV Quant assay were evaluated, and analytical performance was compared with that of the Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay and the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay in plasma samples. The LoDs for genotypes B, C, and D plasma samples were 2.139 (1.531, 4.520), 3.120 (2.140, 7.373), and 3.330 (2.589, 4.907) IU/mL, respectively. The R2 value fitted by linear regression of serially diluted samples less than 2,000 IU/mL was above 0.9. There was no difference in positive rate between Aptima and Abbott or between Aptima and Procleix. Quantitative results of Aptima and Abbott showed good correlation with an r of >0.9 using Spearman analysis, while the quantitative results of Aptima were slightly lower than those of Abbott. Usual mutations in the HBV S region had no impact on Aptima assay. This study showed that Aptima is a dual-targeted transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay suitable for HBV DNA detection in clinical practice, with quantitative performance comparable to that of the Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay and qualitative performance comparable to that of the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV assay.IMPORTANCE The Aptima HBV Quant assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) is a dual-target real-time transcription-mediated amplification (RT-TMA) assay. This study aims to evaluate whether this assay is suitable for HBV DNA detection. As a result, the assay showed high sensitivity with LoDs below 3.5 IU/mL. The amplification efficiency of Aptima for samples below 2,000 IU/mL is adequate for clinical practice, with an R2 of >0.9 fitted by linear regression. Usual mutations in the HBV S region did not affect the performance of Aptima. Moreover, its performance was comparable to the widely used Abbott RealTime M2000 HBV Quant assay for detecting HBV DNA in plasma specimens. Although not indicated for use as a diagnostic or blood screening assay, the Aptima HBV Quant assay demonstrated comparable qualitative performance to the Procleix Ultrio Plus dHBV system.

Surveillance for Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Virus Incidence and RNAemia in Blood Donors at 4 Brazilian Blood Centers During 2016-2019.

Except for public health case reports, the incidence of Zika virus (ZIKV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV), and dengue virus (DENV) infection are not available to assess the potential blood transfusion safety threat in Brazil. Pools of 6 donation samples (MP6) left over from human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus nucleic acid testing were combined to create MP18 pools (3 MP6 pools). Samples were tested using the Grifols triplex ZIKV, CHIKV, and DENV real-time transcription mediated amplification assay to estimate prevalence of RNAemia and incidence, and to compare these results to case reports in São Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Recife, and Rio de Janeiro, from April 2016 through June 2019. ZIKV, CHIKV, and DENV RNAemia were found from donors who donated without overt symptoms of infection that would have led to deferral. The highest RNAemic donation prevalence was 1.2% (95% CI, .8%-1.9%) for DENV in Belo Horizonte in May 2019. Arbovirus infections varied by location and time of year, and were not always aligned with annual arbovirus outbreak seasons in different regions of the country. Testing donations for arboviruses in Brazil can contribute to public health. Transfusion recipients were likely exposed to ZIKV, CHIKV, and DENV viremic blood components during the study period.

Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 both in plasma pools for fractionation and in commercial intravenous immunoglobulins produced from plasma collected in Italy during the pandemic.

We investigated the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Italian plasma pools and intravenous immunoglobulins sent to our Institute (Italian National Institute of Health - Istituto Superiore di Sanità) in the context of the Official Control Authority Batch Release. The plasma pools were made up from donations collected in several different Italian regions from May 2017 to October 2020, i.e. in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. All plasma pools were initially tested for the qualitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein using the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test kit. Plasma pools positive for these antibodies were further tested using the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S test kit for the quantitative detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain. All plasma pools showing reactivity to these antibodies were tested undiluted for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using the Grifols Procleix SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay. Intravenous immunoglobulins were tested using both test kits to determine the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. All plasma pools made up from donations collected in the pre-pandemic period were negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein. Of the plasma pools made up from donations collected from December 2018 to March 2020, only 1 pool out of 68 (1.4%), that was made up from donations from the Lombardy region, was reactive for these antibodies. Interestingly, 105 out of 174 (60.3%) of the plasma pools made up from donations collected from November 2018 to October 2020 showed the presence of these antibodies. All plasma pools positive for these antibodies were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and were confirmed positive. None of these plasma pools tested were reactive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In the case of intravenous immunoglobulins, 20 out of 25 (80%) batches showed the presence of both anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, reflecting the concentration in the plasma pools used for their production.

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Mycoplasma genitalium Infection in At-risk Adolescent Females

Background: Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has been associated with poor reproductive health outcomes in women. The prevalence of M.genitalium is unknown as screening of asymptomatic individuals is not recommended, and until 2019 the available tests lacked sensitivity. We aimed to use the Aptima/Hologic transcription mediated amplification assay (MG-TMA), with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% or higher for urine and endocervical samples, to diagnose M.genitalium infection in a clinical sample of sexually active adolescent females and to describe associated symptoms and risk factors.

The impact of nucleic acid testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus yields\xa0from a single blood center in China with 10-years review

BackgroundSince 2010, the Blood Center of Zhejiang province, China, has conducted a pilot nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) screening of blood donors for Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), and Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study aims to assess the results of NAT testing over 10 years to establish the effects and factors influencing NAT yields of HBV, HCV, and HIV.MethodsBlood donations from seven different blood services were screened for HBV DNA, HCV RNA, and HIV RNA using 6 mini pools (6MP) or individual donation (ID)-NAT method between August 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, at the NAT centralized screening center. We compared 3 transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assays and 2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Further, HBV, HCV, and HIV NAT yields were calculated and donor characteristics and prevalence of HBV NAT yields analyzed. Donors with HCV and HIV NAT yield were also followed up.Results1916.31 per million donations were NAT screening positive overall. The NAT yields for HBV, HCV, HIV and non-discriminating reactive were 1062.90 per million, 0.97 per million, 1.45 per million, and 850.99 per million, respectively, which varied in the seven blood services and different years. HBV NAT yields were higher than those of HCV and HIV and varied across demographic groups. Risk factors included being male, old age, low education level, and first-time donors. We found no differences in NAT yields of HBV, HCV, and HIV between the 3 TMA and 2 PCR assays; nonetheless, statistically, significant differences were noted between the five assays.ConclusionIn summary, NAT screening in blood donations reduces the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections and shortens the window period for serological marker screening. Therefore, a sensitive NAT screening method, ID-NAT workflow, and recruitment of regular low-risk donors are critical for blood safety.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of a novel transcription-mediated amplification assay for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing

IntroductionThe onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. MethodsBetween November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed. ResultsOverall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis. ConclusionIn conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions.

Dengue Virus Ribonucleic Acid Detection Rates in Blood Donors Correlate With Local Infection Incidences During a Dengue Outbreak in Taiwan.

Evidence for mitigation of transfusion-transmitted dengue informed by surveillance data is lacking. In this study, we evaluated the risk of positive dengue viral (DENV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) from blood transfusions during a large outbreak in Taiwan. Serum collected from blood donors living in districts experiencing the dengue epidemic were tested for DENV RNA using a qualitative transcription-mediated nucleic acid amplification assay (TMA). The TMA-reactive specimens were further tested for immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG antibodies, nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) antigen, and viral RNA by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. We estimated DENV RNA prevalence and the number of DENV infections among blood donors. A total of 4976 specimens were tested for DENV RNA, and 21 were TMA-reactive. The detection rate was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-4.73), 3.36 (95% CI, 1.31-8.60), and 6.19 (95% CI, 3.14-12.17) per 1000 donors in districts where the weekly dengue incidence was 5-50, 50-200, and 200 or more per 100000 residents, respectively. Alanine aminotransferase screening only detected 4.4% of TMA-reactive donations. A total of 143 transfusion-transmitted DENV infections probably occurred during this outbreak, accounting for 9.2 in 10000 dengue infections. Approximately 0.5%-1% of blood donations were DENV RNA positive in epidemic districts. The correlation of DENV RNA rates with dengue incidence may inform the design of effective control measures.