Mechanism Of Transcription Initiation Research Articles

The Nucleoprotein and Phosphoprotein of Measles Virus.

Measles virus is a negative strand virus and the genomic and antigenomic RNA binds to the nucleoprotein (N), assembling into a helical nucleocapsid. The polymerase complex comprises two proteins, the Large protein (L), that both polymerizes RNA and caps the mRNA, and the phosphoprotein (P) that co-localizes with L on the nucleocapsid. This review presents recent results about N and P, in particular concerning their intrinsically disordered domains. N is a protein of 525 residues with a 120 amino acid disordered C-terminal domain, Ntail. The first 50 residues of Ntail extricate the disordered chain from the nucleocapsid, thereby loosening the otherwise rigid structure, and the C-terminus contains a linear motif that binds P. Recent results show how the 5′ end of the viral RNA binds to N within the nucleocapsid and also show that the bases at the 3′ end of the RNA are rather accessible to the viral polymerase. P is a tetramer and most of the protein is disordered; comprising 507 residues of which around 380 are disordered. The first 37 residues of P bind N, chaperoning against non-specific interaction with cellular RNA, while a second interaction site, around residue 200 also binds N. In addition, there is another interaction between C-terminal domain of P (XD) and Ntail. These results allow us to propose a new model of how the polymerase binds to the nucleocapsid and suggests a mechanism for initiation of transcription.

A 14-bp stretch plays a critical role in regulating gene expression from β1-tubulin promoters of basidiomycetes.

Cis-acting elements play a vital role in regulation of transcription initiation. Several cis-acting elements have been identified in filamentous fungi; however, the fundamental requirements for basic promoter function in basidiomycetes are obscure. In this study, core elements in β1-tubulin promoters of basidiomycetes were functionally characterized. Using transient transformation in Ceriporiopsis subvermispora as a promoter assay, we found that a 14-bp region (β1-tubulin core promoter element, BCE), as well as CT-rich stretch, in the β1-tubulin promoter of the species played a critical role in the expression of a recombinant hph as a reporter gene. In addition, in silico analysis revealed other members of basidiomycetes also harboured the BCE motif as well as CT-rich stretch in the β1-tubulin promoter region, suggesting their functional conservation among the species of basidiomycetes. To confirm the function of BCE, we investigated the effects of BCE motif deletion in the Pleurotus ostreatus β1-tubulin promoter on expression levels of a recombinant luminous shrimp luciferase reporter gene, which was targeted into the Pofcy1 locus. Intriguingly, luciferase activity was abolished when the BCE motif was deleted in the β1-tubulin promoter, strongly demonstrating its essential function in transcription from this promoter on the chromosome. This study clearly demonstrates the crucial role of the BCE as well as the CT-rich stretch regions in the β1-tubulin promoter among basidiomycetes and provides new insights into the fundamental mechanism of transcription initiation in this group.

Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors.

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms distinct holoenzymes with extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to initiate specific gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 4.0 Å of Escherichia coli transcription initiation complex comprising σE—the most-studied bacterial ECF σ factor (Ec σE-RPo), and a crystal structure at 3.1 Å of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription initiation complex with a chimeric σH/E (Mtb σH/E-RPo). The structure of Ec σE-RPo reveals key interactions essential for assembly of E. coli σE-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by E. coli σE. Moreover, both structures show that the non-conserved linkers (σ2/σ4 linker) of the two ECF σ factors are inserted into the active-center cleft and exit through the RNA-exit channel. We performed secondary-structure prediction of 27,670 ECF σ factors and find that their non-conserved linkers probably reach into and exit from RNAP active-center cleft in a similar manner. Further biochemical results suggest that such σ2/σ4 linker plays an important role in RPo formation, abortive production and promoter escape during ECF σ factors-mediated transcription initiation.

RNA Polymerase: Step-by-Step Kinetics and Mechanism of Transcription Initiation.

To determine the step-by-step kinetics and mechanism of transcription initiation and escape by E. coli RNA polymerase from the λPR promoter, we quantify the accumulation and decay of transient short RNA intermediates on the pathway to promoter escape and full-length (FL) RNA synthesis over a wide range of NTP concentrations by rapid-quench mixing and phosphorimager analysis of gel separations. Experiments are performed at 19 °C, where almost all short RNAs detected are intermediates in FL-RNA synthesis by productive complexes or end-products in nonproductive (stalled) initiation complexes and not from abortive initiation. Analysis of productive-initiation kinetic data yields composite second-order rate constants for all steps of NTP binding and hybrid extension up to the escape point (11-mer). The largest of these rate constants is for incorporation of UTP into the dinucleotide pppApU in a step which does not involve DNA opening or translocation. Subsequent steps, each of which begins with reversible translocation and DNA opening, are slower with rate constants that vary more than 10-fold, interpreted as effects of translocation stress on the translocation equilibrium constant. Rate constants for synthesis of 4- and 5-mer, 7-mer to 9-mer, and 11-mer are particularly small, indicating that RNAP-promoter interactions are disrupted in these steps. These reductions in rate constants are consistent with the previously determined ∼9 kcal cost of escape from λPR. Structural modeling and previous results indicate that the three groups of small rate constants correspond to sequential disruption of in-cleft, -10, and -35 interactions. Parallels to escape by T7 RNAP are discussed.

Two Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms of Transcriptional Initiation in Response to Nutrient Signaling

SAGA (Spt‐Ada‐Gcn5‐Acetyltransferase) and TFIID (transcription factor IID) promote the formation of the PIC (pre‐initiation complex) at the promoters of two distinct sets of genes for transcriptional initiation. However, it is unknown whether SAGA and TFIID are involved in the PIC formation at the same gene. Interestingly, we find that TFIID and SAGA differentially participate in the stimulation of PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at the promoter of PHO84, a gene for the high‐affinity inorganic phosphate (Pi) transporter for crucial cellular functions, in response to nutrient signaling. Thus, a gene can be regulated by both TFIID and SAGA. We show that transcriptional initiation of PHO84 occurs predominantly in a TFIID‐dependent manner in the absence of Pi in the growth medium. Such TFIID dependency is mediated via the NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) histone acetyltransferase (HAT). Intriguingly, transcriptional initiation of PHO84 also occurs in the presence of Pi in the growth medium, predominantly via the SAGA complex, but independently of NuA4 HAT. Thus, Pi in the growth medium switches transcriptional initiation of PHO84 from NuA4‐TFIID to SAGA dependency. Further, we find that both NuA4‐TFIID‐ and SAGA‐dependent transcriptional initiations of PHO84 are facilitated by the 19S proteasome subcomplex or regulatory particle (RP) via enhanced recruitment of the coactivators SAGA and NuA4 HAT, which promote TFIID‐independent and ‐dependent PIC formation for transcriptional initiation, respectively. NuA4 HAT does not regulate activator binding to PHO84, but rather facilitates PIC formation for transcriptional initiation in the absence of Pi in the growth medium. On the other hand, SAGA promotes activator recruitment to PHO84 for transcriptional initiation in the growth medium containing Pi. Collectively, our results demonstrate two distinct stimulatory pathways for PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at PHO84 by TFIID, SAGA, NuA4, and 19S RP in the presence and absence of an essential nutrient, Pi, in the growth media, thus providing new regulatory mechanisms of transcriptional initiation in response to nutrient signaling. Further, we find that proteolytic function of the proteasome is also involved in transcriptional regulation of PHO84.Support or Funding InformationNIH 2R15GM088798‐01, NIH 2R15GM088798‐02 and NIH 2R15GM088798‐03This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Mechanisms of Antisense Transcription Initiation with Implications in Gene Expression, Genomic Integrity and Disease Pathogenesis.

Non-coding antisense transcripts arise from the strand opposite the sense strand. Over 70% of the human genome generates non-coding antisense transcripts while less than 2% of the genome codes for proteins. Antisense transcripts and/or the act of antisense transcription regulate gene expression and genome integrity by interfering with sense transcription and modulating histone modifications or DNA methylation. Hence, they have significant pathological and physiological relevance. Indeed, antisense transcripts were found to be associated with various diseases including cancer, diabetes, cardiac and neurodegenerative disorders, and, thus, have promising potentials for prognostic and diagnostic markers and therapeutic development. However, it is not clearly understood how antisense transcription is initiated and epigenetically regulated. Such knowledge would provide new insights into the regulation of antisense transcription, and hence disease pathogenesis with therapeutic development. The recent studies on antisense transcription initiation and its epigenetic regulation, which are limited, are discussed here. Furthermore, we concisely describe how antisense transcription/transcripts regulate gene expression and genome integrity with implications in disease pathogenesis and therapeutic development.

YeasTSS: an integrative web database of yeast transcription start sites.

The transcription initiation landscape of eukaryotic genes is complex and highly dynamic. In eukaryotes, genes can generate multiple transcript variants that differ in 5′ boundaries due to usages of alternative transcription start sites (TSSs), and the abundance of transcript isoforms are highly variable. Due to a large number and complexity of the TSSs, it is not feasible to depict details of transcript initiation landscape of all genes using text-format genome annotation files. Therefore, it is necessary to provide data visualization of TSSs to represent quantitative TSS maps and the core promoters (CPs). In addition, the selection and activity of TSSs are influenced by various factors, such as transcription factors, chromatin remodeling and histone modifications. Thus, integration and visualization of functional genomic data related to these features could provide a better understanding of the gene promoter architecture and regulatory mechanism of transcription initiation. Yeast species play important roles for the research and human society, yet no database provides visualization and integration of functional genomic data in yeast. Here, we generated quantitative TSS maps for 12 important yeast species, inferred their CPs and built a public database, YeasTSS (www.yeastss.org). YeasTSS was designed as a central portal for visualization and integration of the TSS maps, CPs and functional genomic data related to transcription initiation in yeast. YeasTSS is expected to benefit the research community and public education for improving genome annotation, studies of promoter structure, regulated control of transcription initiation and inferring gene regulatory network.

General Regulatory Factors Control the Fidelity of Transcription by Restricting Non-coding and Ectopic Initiation

The fidelity of transcription initiation is essential for accurate gene expression, but the determinants of start site selection are not fully understood. Rap1 and other general regulatory factors (GRFs) control the expression of many genes in yeast. We show that depletion of these factors induces widespread ectopic transcription initiation within promoters. This generates many novel non-coding RNAs and transcript isoforms with diverse stability, drastically altering the coding potential of the transcriptome. Ectopic transcription initiation strongly correlates with altered nucleosome positioning. We provide evidence that Rap1 can suppress ectopic initiation by a "place-holder" mechanism whereby it physically occludes inappropriate sites for pre-initiation complex formation. These results reveal an essential role for GRFs in the fidelity of transcription initiation and in the suppression of pervasive transcription, profoundly redefining current models for their function. They have important implications for the mechanism of transcription initiation and the control of gene expression.

Minimalism and functionality: Structural lessons from the heterodimeric N4 bacteriophage RNA polymerase II

Genomes of phages, mitochondria, and chloroplasts are transcribed by a diverse group of transcriptional machineries with structurally related single-subunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs). Our understanding of transcription mechanisms of these enzymes is predominantly based on biochemical and structural studies of three most-studied members, transcription factor-independent phage T7 RNAP, transcription factor-dependent phage N4 virion-encapsidated RNAP, and transcription factor-dependent mitochondrial RNAPs (mtRNAP). Although these RNAPs employ completely different mechanisms for promoter recognition and transcription termination, these enzymes are relatively large and formed by single polypeptides. Historically being a model enzyme for studying the mechanisms of transcription by T7-like RNAPs, however, T7 RNAP represents only a small group of RNAPs in this family. The vast majority of T7-like RNAPs are transcription factor-dependent, and several of them are heterodimeric enzymes. Here, we report X-ray crystal structures of transcription complexes of the smallest and heterodimeric form of T7-like RNAP, bacteriophage N4 RNAPII, providing insights into the structural organization of a minimum RNAP in this family. We analyze structural and functional aspects of heterodimeric architecture of N4 RNAPII concerning the mechanisms of transcription initiation and transition to processive RNA elongation. Interestingly, N4 RNAPII maintains the same conformation in promoter-bound and elongation transcription complexes, revealing a novel transcription mechanism for single-subunit RNAPs. This work establishes a structural basis for studying mechanistic aspects of transcription by factor-dependent minimum RNAP.

Structures and mechanisms of transcription initiation and its regulation

Structures and mechanisms of transcription initiation and its regulation

Structures of Bacterial RNA Polymerase Complexes Reveal the Mechanism of DNA Loading and Transcription Initiation

SummaryGene transcription is carried out by multi-subunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs). Transcription initiation is a dynamic multi-step process that involves the opening of the double-stranded DNA to form a transcription bubble and delivery of the template strand deep into the RNAP for RNA synthesis. Applying cryoelectron microscopy to a unique transcription system using σ54 (σN), the major bacterial variant sigma factor, we capture a new intermediate state at 4.1 Å where promoter DNA is caught at the entrance of the RNAP cleft. Combining with new structures of the open promoter complex and an initial de novo transcribing complex at 3.4 and 3.7 Å, respectively, our studies reveal the dynamics of DNA loading and mechanism of transcription bubble stabilization that involves coordinated, large-scale conformational changes of the universally conserved features within RNAP and DNA. In addition, our studies reveal a novel mechanism of strand separation by σ54.

Distinct Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation by RNA Polymerases I and II.

RNA polymerases I and II (Pol I and Pol II) are the eukaryotic enzymes that catalyze DNA-dependent synthesis of ribosomal RNA and messenger RNA, respectively. Recent work shows that the transcribing forms of both enzymes are similar and the fundamental mechanisms of RNA chain elongation are conserved. However, the mechanisms of transcription initiation and its regulation differ between Pol I and Pol II. Recent structural studies of Pol I complexes with transcription initiation factors provided insights into how the polymerase recognizes its specific promoter DNA, how it may open DNA, and how initiation may be regulated. Comparison with the well-studied Pol II initiation system reveals a distinct architecture of the initiation complex and visualizes promoter- and gene-class-specific aspects of transcription initiation. On the basis of new structural studies, we derive a model of the Pol I transcription cycle and provide a molecular movie of Pol I transcription that can be used for teaching.

Distribution of Initiation Times Reveals Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation in Single Cells

Transcription is the dominant point of control of gene expression. Biochemical studies have revealed key molecular components of transcription and their interactions, but the dynamics of transcription initiation in cells is still poorly understood. This state of affairs is being remedied with experiments that observe transcriptional dynamics in single cells using fluorescent reporters. Quantitative information about transcription initiation dynamics can also be extracted from experiments that use electron micrographs of RNA polymerases caught in the act of transcribing a gene (Miller spreads). Inspired by these data, we analyze a general stochastic model of transcription initiation and elongation and compute the distribution of transcription initiation times. We show that different mechanisms of initiation leave distinct signatures in the distribution of initiation times that can be compared to experiments. We analyze published data from micrographs of RNA polymerases transcribing ribosomal RNA genes in Escherichia coli and compare the observed distributions of interpolymerase distances with the predictions from previously hypothesized mechanisms for the regulation of these genes. Our analysis demonstrates the potential of measuring the distribution of time intervals between initiation events as a probe for dissecting mechanisms of transcription initiation in live cells.

Nascent RNA kinetics: Transient and steady state behavior of models of transcription.

Regulation of transcription is a vital process in cells, but mechanistic details of this regulation still remain elusive. The dominant approach to unravel the dynamics of transcriptional regulation is to first develop mathematical models of transcription and then experimentally test the predictions these models make for the distribution of mRNA and protein molecules at the individual cell level. However, these measurements are affected by a multitude of downstream processes which make it difficult to interpret the measurements. Recent experimental advancements allow for counting the nascent mRNA number of a gene as a function of time at the single-cell level. These measurements closely reflect the dynamics of transcription. In this paper, we consider a general mechanism of transcription with stochastic initiation and deterministic elongation and probe its impact on the temporal behavior of nascent RNA levels. Using techniques from queueing theory, we deriveexact analytical expressions for the mean and variance of the nascent RNA distribution as functions of time. We apply these analytical results to obtain the mean and variance of nascent RNA distribution for specific models of transcription. These models of initiation exhibit qualitatively distinct transient behaviors for both the mean and variance which further allows us to discriminate between them. Stochastic simulations confirm these results. Overall the analytical results presented here provide the necessary tools to connect mechanisms of transcription initiation to single-cell measurements of nascent RNA.

Electron Microscopy and Integrative Modeling Shed Light on the Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation

Electron Microscopy and Integrative Modeling Shed Light on the Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation

Structural basis of RNA polymerase III transcription initiation.

RNA polymerase (Pol) III transcribes essential non-coding RNAs, including the entire pool of transfer RNAs, the 5S ribosomal RNA and the U6 spliceosomal RNA, and is often deregulated in cancer cells. The initiation of gene transcription by Pol III requires the activity of the transcription factor TFIIIB to form a transcriptionally active Pol III preinitiation complex (PIC). Here we present electron microscopy reconstructions of Pol III PICs at 3.4-4.0 Å and a reconstruction of unbound apo-Pol III at 3.1 Å. TFIIIB fully encircles the DNA and restructures Pol III. In particular, binding of the TFIIIB subunit Bdp1 rearranges the Pol III-specific subunits C37 and C34, thereby promoting DNA opening. The unwound DNA directly contacts both sides of the Pol III cleft. Topologically, the Pol III PIC resembles the Pol II PIC, whereas the Pol I PIC is more divergent. The structures presented unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the first steps of Pol III transcription and also the general conserved mechanisms of gene transcription initiation.

Two Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms of Transcriptional Initiation in Response to Nutrient Signaling.

SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase) and TFIID (transcription factor IID) have been previously shown to facilitate the formation of the PIC (pre-initiation complex) at the promoters of two distinct sets of genes. Here, we demonstrate that TFIID and SAGA differentially participate in the stimulation of PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at the promoter of PHO84, a gene for the high-affinity inorganic phosphate (Pi) transporter for crucial cellular functions, in response to nutrient signaling. We show that transcriptional initiation of PHO84 occurs predominantly in a TFIID-dependent manner in the absence of Pi in the growth medium. Such TFIID dependency is mediated via the NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) histone acetyltransferase (HAT). Intriguingly, transcriptional initiation of PHO84 also occurs in the presence of Pi in the growth medium, predominantly via the SAGA complex, but independently of NuA4 HAT. Thus, Pi in the growth medium switches transcriptional initiation of PHO84 from NuA4-TFIID to SAGA dependency. Further, we find that both NuA4-TFIID- and SAGA-dependent transcriptional initiations of PHO84 are facilitated by the 19S proteasome subcomplex or regulatory particle (RP) via enhanced recruitment of the coactivators SAGA and NuA4 HAT, which promote TFIID-independent and -dependent PIC formation for transcriptional initiation, respectively. NuA4 HAT does not regulate activator binding to PHO84, but rather facilitates PIC formation for transcriptional initiation in the absence of Pi in the growth medium. On the other hand, SAGA promotes activator recruitment to PHO84 for transcriptional initiation in the growth medium containing Pi. Collectively, our results demonstrate two distinct stimulatory pathways for PIC formation (and hence transcriptional initiation) at PHO84 by TFIID, SAGA, NuA4, and 19S RP in the presence and absence of an essential nutrient, Pi, in the growth media, thus providing new regulatory mechanisms of transcriptional initiation in response to nutrient signaling.

Abstract 3522: Structural characterization of androgen receptor variant 7 in prostate cancer

Abstract Prostate cancer is an extremely common disease that affects one in every seven men in their lifetime. The standard care for late-stage cancer is designed to inhibit the activation of androgen receptor (AR). While this therapeutic approach is initially efficient, the cancer almost always develops resistance and gives rise to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When therapy fails, the median survival of patients who suffer from CRPC is 12-16 months. It is critical to understand the mechanism of CRPC better to ameliorate the outcome of late-stage prostate cancer patients. AR is a transcription factor that consists of an N-terminal domain (NTD), a DNA binding domain (DBD) and a ligand binding domain (LBD). Upon activation by androgen, an intramolecular interaction between NTD and LBD occurs. The AR translocates into the nucleus where it forms a homodimer. It binds to the promoter and enhancer elements of the AR target genes and triggers gene transcription. It has been demonstrated in many clinical studies that AR is important for the progression of prostate cancer including CRPC. In CRPC, although androgen production and binding is inhibited, how the AR can still be activated is a fundamental question to be answered. One of the several different mechanisms proposed is the alternative splicing of the AR generating truncated AR variants that lack LBD. These variants do not require androgens to be activated and they are intrinsically resistant to clinically approved therapeutics. Despite the fact that the AR variants have been shown to be critical in late-stage prostate cancer, the mechanism of gene transcription initiation by the AR variants is not well-known. We propose to characterize the mechanism of the AR variant activation. Since ARV7 is the most commonly observed variant, we utilize ARV7. We develop a FRET based methodology to identify how ARV7 dimers form and to test if full-length AR is necessary for transcriptional activation mediated by ARV7. We are able to demonstrate possible intermolecular interaction between the full length AR and ARV7 measuring the FRET intensity between the fluorophores attached to the N and C terminus of two proteins. FRET measurements are analyzed by tracking single cells and recording the FRET intensities during the process. Our preliminary data suggest that the full-length AR and ARV7 may interact in the presence of androgen. ARV7 is always localized in the nucleus whereas the AR requires androgen to be activated and translocates into the nucleus. Being in close proximity, putative interaction between the AR and ARV7 occurs in the nucleus. Additionally, we use NTD and DBD point mutants to determine critical positions of intermolecular interaction between them. Supporting the significance of ARV7 in prostate cancer, our results clarify the dimerization process. It gives an opportunity to test clinical drugs currently in development to effectively inhibit ARV7 activation. Citation Format: Fatma Özgün, Zeynep Kaya, Halil Bayraktar, Selen Manioğlu, Doğancan Özturan, Nathan Lack. Structural characterization of androgen receptor variant 7 in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3522. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3522

Evolutionary Origins of Two-Barrel RNA Polymerases and Site-Specific Transcription Initiation.

Evolution-related multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) carry out RNA synthesis in all domains life. Although their catalytic cores and fundamental mechanisms of transcription elongation are conserved, the initiation stage of the transcription cycle differs substantially in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes in terms of the requirements for accessory factors and details of the molecular mechanisms. This review focuses on recent insights into the evolution of the transcription apparatus with regard to (a) the surprisingly pervasive double-Ψ β-barrel active-site configuration among different nucleic acid polymerase families, (b) the origin and phylogenetic distribution of TBP, TFB, and TFE transcription factors, and

Structural mechanism of ATP-independent transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I.

Transcription initiation by RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) depends on the Core Factor (CF) complex to recognize the upstream promoter and assemble into a Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC). Here, we solve a structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol I-CF-DNA to 3.8 Å resolution using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The structure reveals a bipartite architecture of Core Factor and its recognition of the promoter from -27 to -16. Core Factor's intrinsic mobility correlates well with different conformational states of the Pol I cleft, in addition to the stabilization of either Rrn7 N-terminal domain near Pol I wall or the tandem winged helix domain of A49 at a partially overlapping location. Comparison of the three states in this study with the Pol II system suggests that a ratchet motion of the Core Factor-DNA sub-complex at upstream facilitates promoter melting in an ATP-independent manner, distinct from a DNA translocase actively threading the downstream DNA in the Pol II PIC.