Mechanism Of Transcription Initiation Research Articles

Discovery of baloxavir sodium as a novel anti-CCHFV inhibitor: Biological evaluation of in vitro and in vivo

Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is a highly pathogenic bunyavirus with a fatality rate of up to 40%. Currently, there are no licensed antiviral drugs for the treatment of CCHF; thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed the disease as a priority. A unique viral transcription initiation mechanism called “cap-snatching” is shared by influenza viruses and bunyaviruses. Thus, we tested whether baloxavir (an FDA-approved anti-influenza drug that targets the “cap-snatching” mechanism) could inhibit CCHFV infection. In cell culture, baloxavir acid effectively inhibited CCHFV infection and targeted CCHFV RNA transcription/replication. However, it has weak oral bioavailability. Baloxavir marboxil (the oral prodrug of baloxavir) failed to protect mice against a lethal dose challenge of CCHFV. To solve this problem, baloxavir sodium was synthesized owing to its enhanced aqueous solubility and pharmacokinetic properties. It consistently and significantly improved survival rates and decreased tissue viral loads. This study identified baloxavir sodium as a novel scaffold structure and mechanism of anti-CCHF compound, providing a promising new strategy for clinical treatment of CCHF after further optimization.

ElemeNT 2023: an enhanced tool for detection and curation of core promoter elements.

Prediction and identification of core promoter elements and transcription factor binding sites is essential for understanding the mechanism of transcription initiation and deciphering the biological activity of a specific locus. Thus, there is a need for an up-to-date tool to detect and curate core promoter elements/motifs in any provided nucleotide sequences. Here, we introduce ElemeNT 2023-a new and enhanced version of the Elements Navigation Tool, which provides novel capabilities for assessing evolutionary conservation and for readily evaluating the quality of high-throughput transcription start site (TSS) datasets, leveraging preferential motif positioning. ElemeNT 2023 is accessible both as a fast web-based tool and via command line (no coding skills are required to run the tool). While this tool is focused on core promoter elements, it can also be used for searching any user-defined motif, including sequence-specific DNA binding sites. Furthermore, ElemeNT's CORE database, which contains predicted core promoter elements around annotated TSSs, is now expanded to cover 10 species, ranging from worms to human. In this applications note, we describe the new workflow and demonstrate a case study using ElemeNT 2023 for core promoter composition analysis of diverse species, revealing motif prevalence and highlighting evolutionary insights. We discuss how this tool facilitates the exploration of uncharted transcriptomic data, appraises TSS quality, and aids in designing synthetic promoters for gene expression optimization. Taken together, ElemeNT 2023 empowers researchers with comprehensive tools for meticulous analysis of sequence elements and gene expression strategies. ElemeNT 2023 is freely available at https://www.juven-gershonlab.org/resources/element-v2023/. The source code and command line version of ElemeNT 2023 are available at https://github.com/OritAdato/ElemeNT. No coding skills are required to run the tool.

Structures illustrate step-by-step mitochondrial transcription initiation

Transcription initiation is a key regulatory step in gene expression during which RNA polymerase (RNAP) initiates RNA synthesis de novo, and the synthesized RNA at a specific length triggers the transition to the elongation phase. Mitochondria recruit a single-subunit RNAP and one or two auxiliary factors to initiate transcription. Previous studies have revealed the molecular architectures of yeast1 and human2 mitochondrial RNAP initiation complexes (ICs). Here we provide a comprehensive, stepwise mechanism of transcription initiation by solving high-resolution cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of yeast mitochondrial RNAP and the transcription factor Mtf1 catalysing two- to eight-nucleotide RNA synthesis at single-nucleotide addition steps. The growing RNA–DNA is accommodated in the polymerase cleft by template scrunching and non-template reorganization, creating stressed intermediates. During early initiation, non-template strand scrunching and unscrunching destabilize the short two- and three-nucleotide RNAs, triggering abortive synthesis. Subsequently, the non-template reorganizes into a base-stacked staircase-like structure supporting processive five- to eight-nucleotide RNA synthesis. The expanded non-template staircase and highly scrunched template in IC8 destabilize the promoter interactions with Mtf1 to facilitate initiation bubble collapse and promoter escape for the transition from initiation to the elongation complex (EC). The series of transcription initiation steps, each guided by the interplay of multiple structural components, reveal a finely tuned mechanism for potential regulatory control.

Structural Insight into the Mechanism of σ32-Mediated Transcription Initiation of Bacterial RNA Polymerase.

Bacterial RNA polymerases (RNAP) form distinct holoenzymes with different σ factors to initiate diverse gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 2.49 Å of RNA polymerase transcription complex containing a temperature-sensitive bacterial σ factor, σ32 (σ32-RPo). The structure of σ32-RPo reveals key interactions essential for the assembly of E. coli σ32-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by σ32. Specifically, a weak interaction between σ32 and -35/-10 spacer is mediated by T128 and K130 in σ32. A histidine in σ32, rather than a tryptophan in σ70, acts as a wedge to separate the base pair at the upstream junction of the transcription bubble, highlighting the differential promoter-melting capability of different residue combinations. Structure superimposition revealed relatively different orientations between βFTH and σ4 from other σ-engaged RNAPs and biochemical data suggest that a biased σ4-βFTH configuration may be adopted to modulate binding affinity to promoter so as to orchestrate the recognition and regulation of different promoters. Collectively, these unique structural features advance our understanding of the mechanism of transcription initiation mediated by different σ factors.

Functionally distinct promoter classes initiate transcription via different mechanisms reflected in focused versus dispersed initiation patterns

Recruitment of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to promoters is essential for transcription. Despite conflicting evidence, the Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) is often thought to have a uniform composition and to assemble at all promoters via an identical mechanism. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells as a model, we demonstrate that different promoter classes function via distinct PICs. Promoter DNA of developmentally regulated genes readily associates with the canonical Pol II PIC, whereas housekeeping promoters do not, and instead recruit other factors such as DREF. Consistently, TBP and DREF are differentially required by distinct promoter types. TBP and its paralog TRF2 also function at different promoter types in a partially redundant manner. In contrast, TFIIA is required at all promoters, and we identify factors that can recruit and/or stabilize TFIIA at housekeeping promoters and activate transcription. Promoter activation by tethering these factors is sufficient to induce the dispersed transcription initiation patterns characteristic of housekeeping promoters. Thus, different promoter classes utilize distinct mechanisms of transcription initiation, which translate into different focused versus dispersed initiation patterns.

Asymmetric reconstruction of the aquareovirus core at near-atomic resolution and mechanism of transcription initiation.

Asymmetric reconstruction of the aquareovirus core at near-atomic resolution and mechanism of transcription initiation.

The miR-430 locus with extreme promoter density forms a transcription body during the minor wave of zygotic genome activation.

In anamniote embryos, the major wave of zygotic genome activation starts during the mid-blastula transition. However, some genes escape global genome repression, are activated substantially earlier, and contribute to the minor wave of genome activation. The mechanisms underlying the minor wave of genome activation are little understood. We explored the genomic organization and cis-regulatory mechanisms of a transcription body, in which the minor wave of genome activation is first detected in zebrafish. We identified the miR-430 cluster as having excessive copy number and the highest density of Pol-II-transcribed promoters in the genome, and this is required for forming the transcription body. However, this transcription body is not essential for, nor does it encompasse, minor wave transcription globally. Instead, distinct minor-wave-specificpromoter architecture suggests that promoter-autonomous mechanisms regulate the minor wave of genome activation. The minor-wave-specific features also suggest distinct transcription initiation mechanisms between the minor and major waves of genome activation.

IE1 of Autographa californica Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus Activates Low Levels of Late Gene Expression in the Absence of Virus RNA Polymerase.

Early and late gene expressions of baculoviruses have been known to rely on host RNA polymerase II and a virus-encoded RNA polymerase, separately. In this study, we found that Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) recombinant bacmids with the individual RNA polymerase subunit genes deleted could support low levels of expression of a reporter gene under the control of the promoter of a typical late gene, vp39, in transfected Sf9 cells. Through multistep subcloning of a genomic library of the virus and transient expression assay analysis, ie1 was identified to be the only viral gene that was responsible for activation of late gene expression in the absence of the viral RNA polymerase. Furthermore, IE1 was found to be capable of activating reporter gene expression from the promoters of additional late genes polh, p6.9, odv-e18, odv-e25, and gp41, independent of any additional viral factors. Deletion of ie1 from the virus genome eliminated late gene expression. The IE1-activated late gene expression was enhanced by the viral hr4b. It was shown to be insensitive to inhibition of α-amanitin and did not appear to have stable transcription start sites. It is proposed that IE1 may serve to recruit newly synthesized viral RNA polymerase to viral DNA by activating low levels of pretranscription of the late genes to create an appropriate DNA conformation. IMPORTANCE The late gene expression of baculovirus has been known to depend on the virus-encoded RNA polymerase, which consists of four subunits. The immediate-early gene ie1 was found to be required for viral early gene expression, late gene expression, and DNA replication. How it functions in late gene expression remains unclear. In this study, we found that AcMNPV IE1 could activate low levels of gene expression from late gene promoters independently of any additional viral factors, with nonspecific transcription start sites. This new finding will shed light on the role of IE1 in the regulation of late gene expression and the understanding of the mechanism of late gene transcription initiation.

Epigenetic malleability at core promoter initiates tobacco PR-1a expression post salicylic acid treatment.

Tobacco's PR-1a gene is induced by pathogen attack or exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA). Nucleosome mapping and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay were used to delineate the histone modifications on the PR-1a promoter. However, the epigenetic modifications of the inducible promoter of the PR-1a gene are not fully understood yet. Southern approach was used to scan the promoter of PR-1a to identify presence of nucleosomes, ChIP assays were performed using anti-histones antibodies of repressive chromatin by di- methylated at H3K9 and H4K20 or active chromatin by acetylated H3K9/14 and H4K16 to find epigenetic malleability of nucleosome over core promoter in uninduced or induced state post SA treatment. Class I and II mammalian histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor TSA treatment was used to enhance the expression of PR-1a by facilitating the histone acetylation post SA treatment. Here, we report correlated consequences of the epigenetic modifications correspond to disassembly of the nucleosome (spans from -102 to + 55bp, masks TATA and transcription initiation) and repressor complex from core promoter, eventually initiates the transcription of PR-1a gene post SA treatment. While active chromatin marks di and trimethylation of H3K4, acetylation of H3K9 and H4K16 are increased which are associated to the transcription initiation of PR-1a following SA treatment. However, in uninduced state constitutive expression of a negative regulator (SNI1) of AtPR1, suppresses AtPR1 expression by six-fold in Arabidopsis thaliana. Further, we report 50-to-1000-fold increased expression of AtPR1 in uninduced lsd1 mutant plants, up to threefold increased expression of AtPR1 in uninduced histone acetyl transferases (HATs) mutant plants, SNI1 dependent negative regulation of AtPR1, all together our results suggest that inactive state of PR-1a is indeed maintained by a repressive complex. The study aimed to reveal the mechanism of transcription initiation of tobacco PR-1a gene in presence or absence of SA. This is the first study that reports nucleosome and repressor complex over core promoter region maintains the inactivation of gene in uninduced state, and upon induction disassembling of both initiates the downstream gene activation process.

Structural basis of three different transcription activation strategies adopted by a single regulator SoxS.

Transcription activation is established through extensive protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that allow an activator to engage and remodel RNA polymerase. SoxS, a global transcription activator, diversely regulates subsets of stress response genes with different promoters, but the detailed SoxS-dependent transcription initiation mechanisms remain obscure. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of three SoxS-dependent transcription activation complexes (SoxS-TACI, SoxS-TACIIand SoxS-TACIII) comprising of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), SoxS proteinand three representative classes of SoxS-regulated promoters. The structures reveal that SoxS monomer orchestrates transcription initiation through specific interactions with the promoter DNA and different conserved domains of RNAP. In particular, SoxS is positioned in the opposite orientation in SoxS-TACIII to that in SoxS-TACI and SoxS-TACII, unveiling a novel mode of transcription activation. Strikingly, two universally conserved C-terminal domains of alpha subunit (αCTD) of RNAP associate with each other, bridging SoxS and region 4 of σ70. We show that SoxS interacts with RNAP directly and independently from DNA, remodeling the enzyme to activate transcription from cognate SoxS promoters while repressing transcription from UP-element containing promoters. Our data provide a comprehensive summary of SoxS-dependent promoter architectures and offer new insights into the αCTD contribution to transcription control in bacteria.

Molecular biology of the cell

Molecular biology of the cell

Step-by-Step Regulation of Productive and Abortive Transcription Initiation by Pyrophosphorolysis

An understanding of the kinetics and mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation is needed to understand regulation of gene expression and advance fields from antibiotic discovery to promoter design. The step-by-step forward kinetics and mechanism of initiation and RNA-DNA hybrid growth, made irreversible by omitting pyrophosphate (PPi) byproduct, were determined recently for E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP)-λPR promoter complexes. Strong position-dependences of overall rate constants (kcat/Km analogs) for each nucleotide-addition step were observed because of coupling of hybrid growth to disruption of promoter contacts, bubble closing, and RNAP escape. Here we investigate reversal of these steps (pyrophosphorolysis) at PPi concentrations ([PPi]) found in exponentially-growing cells. We quantify [PPi] effects on the amount and rate of synthesis of long (>10-mer, post-escape) and short (stalled, abortive) RNA to determine how PPi regulates initiation. Physiological [PPi] makes uridine incorporation and some other initiation steps significantly reversible. Physiological [PPi] reduces the fraction of RNAP-promoter complexes that productively initiate and the rate of RNA synthesis per productive complex, while increasing the fraction of complexes that abortively initiate, affecting abortive rates, and shifting the abortive-product distribution to shorter RNAs. Pyrophosphorolysis rates for some initiation complexes are orders of magnitude larger than for removal of the same nucleotide from elongation complexes because of the strong bias toward the pre-translocated state in initiation, and exhibit even stronger dependences on nucleotide identity (pyrimidine ≫ purine). Because cytoplasmic [PPi] is much higher in exponential-phase than stationary-phase cells, these [PPi] effects on initiation rates and amounts of RNA synthesis must be physiologically-relevant.

Modeling DNA Opening in the Eukaryotic Transcription Initiation Complexes via Coarse-Grained Models.

Recently, the molecular mechanisms of transcription initiation have been intensively studied. Especially, the cryo-electron microscopy revealed atomic structure details in key states in the eukaryotic transcription initiation. Yet, the dynamic processes of the promoter DNA opening in the pre-initiation complex remain obscured. In this study, based on the three cryo-electron microscopic yeast structures for the closed, open, and initially transcribing complexes, we performed multiscale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to model structures and dynamic processes of DNA opening. Combining coarse-grained and all-atom MD simulations, we first obtained the atomic model for the DNA bubble in the open complexes. Then, in the MD simulation from the open to the initially transcribing complexes, we found a previously unidentified intermediate state which is formed by the bottleneck in the fork loop 1 of Pol II: The loop opening triggered the escape from the intermediate, serving as a gatekeeper of the promoter DNA opening. In the initially transcribing complex, the non-template DNA strand passes a groove made of the protrusion, the lobe, and the fork of Rpb2 subunit of Pol II, in which several positively charged and highly conserved residues exhibit key interactions to the non-template DNA strand. The back-mapped all-atom models provided further insights on atomistic interactions such as hydrogen bonding and can be used for future simulations.

Profile of Patrick Cramer

Patrick Cramer’s interest in the scientific method may have been sparked by a childhood gift. While growing up, his parents gave him a kit to try little experiments at home that inspired him to become a scientist. Patrick Cramer. Image credit: Patrick Cramer. Cramer studied chemistry, first at the University of Stuttgart and later at Heidelberg University in Germany. “I was in love with the beauty of biological molecules, so I moved into biochemistry and then into structural biology,” says Cramer. This move was facilitated by stints at the University of Bristol and Cambridge University. “At Cambridge I really fell in love with structural biology, and so I chose that as a subject for my PhD studies at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory,” he says. At the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Grenoble, France, Cramer began to study gene transcription, launching a career unraveling the mysteries of this fundamental biological process. Cramer has determined the three-dimensional (3D) structure of transcription complexes, providing numerous insights into the mechanisms of transcription initiation, elongation, and regulation. He has also contributed to the development of functional genomics and computational biology to study how the genome is transcribed and regulated in living cells and understand how gene activity is controlled. Now director at the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry in Gottingen, Germany, Cramer was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2020. In his Inaugural Article (1), his team describes the first structures of the highly conserved transcription factor TATA-box binding protein (TBP) in complex with a nucleosome. When Cramer received his doctorate in 1998, a major question about transcription was the structure of RNA polymerase II, the central enzyme that makes messenger RNA. To work on this problem, he joined Roger Kornberg’s laboratory at Stanford University as a postdoctoral researcher, funded by …

The Long Road to Understanding RNAPII Transcription Initiation and Related Syndromes.

In eukaryotes, transcription of protein-coding genes requires the assembly at core promoters of a large preinitiation machinery containing RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and general transcription factors (GTFs). Transcription is potentiated by regulatory elements called enhancers, which are recognized by specific DNA-binding transcription factors that recruit cofactors and convey, following chromatin remodeling, the activating cues to the preinitiation complex. This review summarizes nearly five decades of work on transcription initiation by describing the sequential recruitment of diverse molecular players including the GTFs, the Mediator complex, and DNA repair factors that support RNAPII to enable RNA synthesis. The elucidation of the transcription initiation mechanism has greatly benefited from the study of altered transcription components associated with human diseases that could be considered transcription syndromes.

The origin and evolution of a distinct mechanism of transcription initiation in yeasts.

The molecular process of transcription by RNA Polymerase II is highly conserved among eukaryotes (“classic model”). A distinct way of locating transcription start sites (TSSs) has been identified in a budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (“scanning model”). Herein, we applied genomic approaches to elucidate the origin of the scanning model and its underlying genetic mechanisms. We first identified TSSs at single-nucleotide resolution for 12 yeast species using the nAnT-iCAGE technique, which significantly improved the annotations of these genomes by providing accurate 5′ boundaries for protein-coding genes. We then inferred the initiation mechanism of each species based on its TSS maps and genome sequences. We discovered that the scanning model likely originated after the split of Yarrowia lipolytica and the other budding yeasts. Species that use the scanning model showed an adenine-rich region immediately upstream of the TSS that might facilitate TSS selection. Both initiation mechanisms share a strong preference for pyrimidine–purine dinucleotides surrounding the TSS. Our results suggest that the purine is required to accurately recruit the first nucleotide, thereby increasing the chances of a messenger RNA of being capped during mRNA maturation, which is critical for efficient translation initiation during protein biosynthesis. Based on our findings, we propose a model for TSS selection in the scanning-model species, as well as a model for the stepwise process responsible for the origin and evolution of the scanning model.

Diverse and unified mechanisms of transcription initiation in bacteria.

Transcription of DNA is a fundamental process in all cellular organisms. The enzyme responsible for transcription, RNA polymerase, is conserved in general architecture and catalytic function across the three domains of life. Diverse mechanisms are used among and within the different branches to regulate transcription initiation. Mechanistic studies of transcription initiation in bacteria are especially amenable because the promoter recognition and melting steps are much less complicated than in eukaryotes or archaea. Also, bacteria have critical roles in human health as pathogens and commensals, and the bacterial RNA polymerase is a proven target for antibiotics. Recent biophysical studies of RNA polymerases and their inhibition, as well as transcription initiation and transcription factors, have detailed the mechanisms of transcription initiation in phylogenetically diverse bacteria, inspiring this Review to examine unifying and diverse themes in this process.

Control of Transcription Initiation by Biased Thermal Fluctuations on Repetitive Genomic Sequences.

In the process of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase, promoter DNA sequences affect multiple reaction pathways determining the productivity of transcription. However, the question of how the molecular mechanism of transcription initiation depends on the sequence properties of promoter DNA remains poorly understood. Here, combining the statistical mechanical approach with high-throughput sequencing results, we characterize abortive transcription and pausing during transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at a genome-wide level. Our results suggest that initially transcribed sequences, when enriched with thymine bases, contain the signal for inducing abortive transcription, whereas certain repetitive sequence elements embedded in promoter regions constitute the signal for inducing pausing. Both signals decrease the productivity of transcription initiation. Based on solution NMR and in vitro transcription measurements, we suggest that repetitive sequence elements within the promoter DNA modulate the nonlocal base pair stability of its double-stranded form. This stability profoundly influences the reaction coordinates of the productive initiation via pausing.

Structure of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus L protein elucidates the mechanisms of viral transcription initiation.

Segmented negative-sense RNA viruses (sNSRVs) encode a single-polypeptide polymerase (L protein) or a heterotrimeric polymerase complex to cannibalize host messenger RNA cap structures serving as primers of transcription, and catalyse RNA synthesis. Here, we report the full-length structure of the severe fever with thrombocytopaenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) L protein, as determined by cryogenic electron microscopy at 3.4 Å, leading to an atomic model harbouring three functional parts (an endonuclease, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and a cap-binding domain) and two structural domains (an arm domain with a blocker motif and a carboxy-terminal lariat domain). The SFTSV L protein has a compact architecture in which its cap-binding pocket is surprisingly occupied by an Arg finger of the blocker motif, and the endonuclease active centre faces back towards the cap-binding pocket, suggesting that domain rearrangements are necessary to acquire the pre-initiation state of the active site. Our results provide insight into the complete architecture of sNSRV-encoded L protein and further the understanding of sNSRV transcription initiation.

Differential Effects of Physiological Pyrophosphate on the Kinetics of Productive and Abortive Transcription Initiation

Transcription initiation is the first and most highly regulated step of gene expression, and a biophysical characterization of its mechanism is needed. Previous studies found two, roughly equal populations of DNA‐RNA open complexes (OCs) in transcription initiation: productive OC that escape from the promoter to make full length (FL) RNA and nonproductive OC that stall after synthesis of a short RNA, slowly release that RNA, and reinitiate (abortive initiation). The kinetics and mechanism of productive transcription initiation by E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) at the λPR promoter were recently determined without added pyrophosphate (PPi).1 Because each polymerization step of transcription releases PPi and total PPi concentrations in the cell are in the low mM range, it is important to determine the effects (e.g. product inhibition) of PPi on the catalytic and translocation steps of initiation, and compare with recent results for PPi effects on elongation.2 In the research reported here, we extend existing quantitative 32P‐detected initiation kinetic assays to physiological concentrations of PPi and assess PPi effects on both the amounts and rates of the steps of productive and abortive initiation. Using phosphorimager analysis of gel separations and one‐dimensional thin layer chromatography, we study single‐round initiation of FL RNA synthesis at RNAP‐λPR open complexes under conditions where overall forward rate constants for each step of NTP incorporation in hybrid extension up to and beyond the escape point (11bp for initiation from λPR promoter) were previously determined.1 This will allow determination of PPi effects on each step, and potentially a dissection into effects on translocation and catalytic steps. Results to date show distinct PPi effects on productive and nonproductive initiation. The level of FL RNA synthesis by productive complexes is significantly reduced, but the level of abortive initiation is increased, indicating that previously‐productive OC are stalled by PPi. An understanding of PPi effects on productive and abortive initiation is critical to future assessments of the regulation and fidelity of bacterial transcription initiation in vivo, and the in vivo significance of short abortive RNAs as regulators.