Transcription Initiation In Cells Research Articles

Comparative transcriptomics analysis on Senecavirus A-infected and non-infected cells.

Senecavirus A (SVA) is an emerging virus that causes the vesicular disease in pigs, clinically indistinguishable from other high consequence vesicular diseases. This virus belongs to the genus Senecavirus in the family Picornaviridae. Its genome is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA, approximately 7,300 nt in length, with a 3' poly(A) tail but without 5'-end capped structure. SVA can efficiently propagate in different cells, including some non-pig-derived cell lines. A wild-type SVA was previously rescued from its cDNA clone using reverse genetics in our laboratory. In the present study, the BSR-T7/5 cell line was inoculated with the passage-5 SVA. At 12 h post-inoculation, SVA-infected and non-infected cells were independently collected for the analysis on comparative transcriptomics. The results totally showed 628 differentially expressed genes, including 565 upregulated and 63 downregulated ones, suggesting that SVA infection significantly stimulated the transcription initiation in cells. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses demonstrated that SVA exerted multiple effects on immunity-related pathways in cells. Furthermore, the RNA sequencing data were subjected to other in-depth analyses, such as the single-nucleotide polymorphism, transcription factors, and protein-protein interactions. The present study, along with our previous proteomics and metabolomics researches, provides a multi-omics insight into the interaction between SVA and its hosts.

Distribution of Initiation Times Reveals Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation in Single Cells

Transcription is the dominant point of control of gene expression. Biochemical studies have revealed key molecular components of transcription and their interactions, but the dynamics of transcription initiation in cells is still poorly understood. This state of affairs is being remedied with experiments that observe transcriptional dynamics in single cells using fluorescent reporters. Quantitative information about transcription initiation dynamics can also be extracted from experiments that use electron micrographs of RNA polymerases caught in the act of transcribing a gene (Miller spreads). Inspired by these data, we analyze a general stochastic model of transcription initiation and elongation and compute the distribution of transcription initiation times. We show that different mechanisms of initiation leave distinct signatures in the distribution of initiation times that can be compared to experiments. We analyze published data from micrographs of RNA polymerases transcribing ribosomal RNA genes in Escherichia coli and compare the observed distributions of interpolymerase distances with the predictions from previously hypothesized mechanisms for the regulation of these genes. Our analysis demonstrates the potential of measuring the distribution of time intervals between initiation events as a probe for dissecting mechanisms of transcription initiation in live cells.

Deciphering Transcriptional Dynamics In Vivo by Counting Nascent RNA Molecules

Deciphering how the regulatory DNA sequence of a gene dictates its expression in response to intra and extracellular cues is one of the leading challenges in modern genomics. The development of novel single-cell sequencing and imaging techniques, as well as a better exploitation of currently available single-molecule imaging techniques, provides an avenue to interrogate the process of transcription and its dynamics in cells by quantifying the number of RNA polymerases engaged in the transcription of a gene (or equivalently the number of nascent RNAs) at a given moment in time. In this paper, we propose that measurements of the cell-to-cell variability in the number of nascent RNAs provide a mostly unexplored method for deciphering mechanisms of transcription initiation in cells. We propose a simple kinetic model of transcription initiation and elongation from which we calculate nascent RNA copy-number fluctuations. To demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, we test our theory against published nascent RNA data for twelve constitutively expressed yeast genes. Rather than transcription being initiated through a single rate limiting step, as it had been previously proposed, our single-cell analysis reveals the presence of at least two rate limiting steps. Surprisingly, half of the genes analyzed have nearly identical rates of transcription initiation, suggesting a common mechanism. Our analytical framework can be used to extract quantitative information about dynamics of transcription from single-cell sequencing data, as well as from single-molecule imaging and electron micrographs of fixed cells, and provides the mathematical means to exploit the quantitative power of these technologies.

Mechanisms of triplex DNA-mediated inhibition of transcription initiation in cells

Triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) are attractive tools to control gene expression at the transcriptional level. This anti-gene approach has proven to be successful in various experimental settings. However, the mechanisms leading to transcriptional repression in cells have not been fully investigated yet. Here, we examined the consequence of triplex DNA formation on the binding of transcriptional activators, co-activators and RNA Polymerase II to the ets2 gene promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. The triplex target sequence was located approximately 40-bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) and overlapped an Sp1 binding site relevant for ets2 transcription. We found that the ets2-TFO prevented binding of Sp1, TAF II130 and TAF II250 to the ets2 promoter, while binding of RNA polymerase II and TBP were not affected. The effects were both sequence and target specific, since the TFO had no effect on the c-myc promoter and a mutated ets2 promoter construct. Thus, triplex DNA formation near a TSS leads to formation of a non-functional pre-initiation complex (PIC) by blocking binding of transcriptional activators and co-activator molecules. This is the first direct demonstration of interference with PIC assembly at the TSS by oligonucleotide-triplex DNA formation in cells.