Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures Research Articles

The Corticospinal Excitability Can Be Predicted by Spontaneous Electroencephalography Oscillations.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has a wide range of clinical applications, and there is growing interest in neural oscillations and corticospinal excitability determined by TMS. Previous studies have shown that corticospinal excitability is influenced by fluctuations of brain oscillations in the sensorimotor region, but it is unclear whether brain network activity modulates corticospinal excitability. Here, we addressed this question by recording electroencephalography (EEG) and TMS measurements in 32 healthy individuals. The resting motor threshold (RMT) and active motor threshold (AMT) were determined as markers of corticospinal excitability. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to identify significant EEG metrics and then correlation analysis was performed. The analysis revealed that alpha2 power in the sensorimotor region was inversely correlated with RMT and AMT. Innovatively, graph theory was used to construct a brain network, and the relationship between the brain network and corticospinal excitability was explored. It was found that the global efficiency in the theta band was positively correlated with RMT. Additionally, the global efficiency in the alpha2 band was negatively correlated with RMT and AMT. These findings indicated that corticospinal excitability can be modulated by the power spectrum in sensorimotor regions and the global efficiency of functional networks. EEG network analysis can provide a useful supplement for studying the association between EEG oscillations and corticospinal excitability.

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation.

Most single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters (e.g., motor threshold, stimulus-response function, cortical silent period) are used to examine corticospinal excitability. Paired-pulse TMS paradigms (e.g., short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI/LICI), short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), and short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (SAI/LAI)) provide information about intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory networks. This has long been done by the conventional TMS method of measuring changes in the size of the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to stimuli of constant intensity. An alternative threshold-tracking approach has recently been introduced whereby the stimulus intensity for a target amplitude is tracked. The diagnostic utility of threshold-tracking SICI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been shown in previous studies. However, threshold-tracking TMS has only been used in a few centers, in part due to the lack of readily available software but also perhaps due to uncertainty over its relationship to conventional single- and paired-pulse TMS measurements. A menu-driven suite of semi-automatic programs has been developed to facilitate the broader use of threshold-tracking TMS techniques and to enable direct comparisons with conventional amplitude measurements. These have been designed to control three types of magnetic stimulators and allow recording by a single operator of the common single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols. This paper shows how to record a number of single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols on healthy subjects and analyze the recordings. These TMS protocols are fast and easy to perform and can provide useful biomarkers in different neurological disorders, particularly neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS.

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

Most single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters (e.g., motor threshold, stimulus-response function, cortical silent period) are used to examine corticospinal excitability. Paired-pulse TMS paradigms (e.g., short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI/LICI), short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), and short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (SAI/LAI)) provide information about intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory networks. This has long been done by the conventional TMS method of measuring changes in the size of the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to stimuli of constant intensity. An alternative threshold-tracking approach has recently been introduced whereby the stimulus intensity for a target amplitude is tracked. The diagnostic utility of threshold-tracking SICI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been shown in previous studies. However, threshold-tracking TMS has only been used in a few centers, in part due to the lack of readily available software but also perhaps due to uncertainty over its relationship to conventional single- and paired-pulse TMS measurements. A menu-driven suite of semi-automatic programs has been developed to facilitate the broader use of threshold-tracking TMS techniques and to enable direct comparisons with conventional amplitude measurements. These have been designed to control three types of magnetic stimulators and allow recording by a single operator of the common single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols. This paper shows how to record a number of single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols on healthy subjects and analyze the recordings. These TMS protocols are fast and easy to perform and can provide useful biomarkers in different neurological disorders, particularly neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS.

Biomarkers Obtained by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a method for focal brain stimulation that is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction where small intracranial electric currents are generated by a powerful fluctuating magnetic field. Over the past three decades, TMS has shown promise in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders in adults. However, the use of TMS in children has been more limited. We provide a brief introduction to the TMS technique; common TMS protocols including single-pulse TMS, paired-pulse TMS, paired associative stimulation, and repetitive TMS; and relevant TMS-derived neurophysiological measurements including resting and active motor threshold, cortical silent period, paired-pulse TMS measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation, and plasticity metrics after repetitive TMS. We then discuss the biomarker applications of TMS in a few representative neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, fragile X syndrome, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, and developmental stuttering.

Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements of maximum activation of the knee extensors in young adult males.

METHODS: RESULTS: CONCLUSION.

Test Re-test Reliability of Dual-site TMS Measures of SMA-M1 Connectivity Differs Across Inter-stimulus Intervals in Younger and Older Adults

Dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising tool to measure supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex (SMA-M1) connectivity in younger and older adults, and could be used to understand the pathophysiology of movement disorders. However, test re-test reliability of dual-site TMS measures of SMA-M1 connectivity has not been established. We examined the reliability of SMA-M1 connectivity using dual-site TMS in two sessions in 30 younger and 30 older adults. For dual-site TMS, a conditioning pulse delivered to SMA (140% of active motor threshold) preceded a test pulse delivered to M1 (intensity that elicited MEPs of ~1 mV) by inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) of 6 ms, 7 ms, and 8 ms. Moderate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were found for SMA-M1 connectivity at an ISI of 7 ms in younger (ICC: 0.69) and older adults (ICC: 0.68). Poor ICCs were found for SMA-M1 connectivity at ISIs of 6 ms and 8 ms in both age groups (ICC range: 0.01–0.40). We report evidence for stable measures of SMA-M1 connectivity at an ISI of 7 ms in both age groups. These findings are foundational for future research developing evidence-based interventions to strengthen SMA-M1 connectivity to improve bilateral motor control in older adults and populations with movement disorders.

Cortical excitability signatures for the degree of sleepiness in human.

Sleep is essential in maintaining physiological homeostasis in the brain. While the underlying mechanism is not fully understood, a 'synaptic homeostasis' theory has been proposed that synapses continue to strengthen during awake and undergo downscaling during sleep. This theory predicts that brain excitability increases with sleepiness. Here, we collected transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements in 38 subjects in a 34 hr program and decoded the relationship between cortical excitability and self-report sleepiness using advanced statistical methods. By utilizing a combination of partial least squares regression and mixed-effect models, we identified a robust pattern of excitability changes, which can quantitatively predict the degree of sleepiness. Moreover, we found that synaptic strengthen occurred in both excitatory and inhibitory connections after sleep deprivation. In sum, our study provides supportive evidence for the synaptic homeostasis theory in human sleep and clarifies the process of synaptic strength modulation during sleepiness.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Indices of Cortical Excitability Enhance the Prediction of Response to Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Depression

BackgroundOlder adults with late-life depression (LLD) often experience incomplete or lack of response to first-line pharmacotherapy. The treatment of LLD could be improved using objective biological measures to predict response. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to measure cortical excitability, inhibition, and plasticity, which have been implicated in LLD pathophysiology and associated with brain stimulation treatment outcomes in younger adults with depression. TMS measures have not yet been investigated as predictors of treatment outcomes in LLD or pharmacotherapy outcomes in adults of any age with depression. MethodsWe assessed whether pretreatment single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS measures, combined with clinical and demographic measures, predict venlafaxine treatment response in 76 outpatients with LLD. We compared the predictive performance of machine learning models including or excluding TMS predictors. ResultsTwo single-pulse TMS measures predicted venlafaxine response: cortical excitability (neuronal membrane excitability) and the variability of cortical excitability (dynamic fluctuations in excitability levels). In cross-validation, models using a combination of these TMS predictors, clinical markers of treatment resistance, and age classified patients with 73% ± 11% balanced accuracy (average correct classification rate of responders and nonresponders; permutation testing, p < .005); these models significantly outperformed (corrected t test, p = .025) models using clinical and demographic predictors alone (60% ± 10% balanced accuracy). ConclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that single-pulse TMS measures of cortical excitability may be useful predictors of response to pharmacotherapy in LLD. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine whether combining TMS predictors with other biomarkers further improves the accuracy of predicting LLD treatment outcome.

WS2.2. Parameters of TMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive painless technique to stimulate the human brain. This presentation will introduce basic physiological principles of how TMS excites human motor cortex. In addition, the following single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS measures of corticospinal and motor cortical excitability will be presented and discussed with respect to underpinning physiological mechanisms: motor threshold, motor evoked potential recruitment curve, cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, long- interval intracortical inhibition, short-interval intracortical facilitation, short-latency afferent inhibition. Pharmacological evidence will be summarized to explain the physiology of these measures. In addition, clinical utility will be exemplarily discussed by demonstrating abnormal TMS measures of corticospinal and motor cortical excitability in patients with epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease.

SY1.3. Probing the pathophysiology of movement disorders with transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a widely-used noninvasive brain stimulation method for research in the field of neurology, psychiatry, and rehabilitation. TMS can be used to study connectivity and therefore help to shed light on brain networks. This mode of noninvasive brain stimulation is particularly useful to study brain regions relevant to movement, as stimulating the primary motor cortex results in motor-evoked potential (MEP)s, which can be useful for interpreting the effects of various brain regions on the motor cortex. Connectivity among the primary motor cortex and other movement-relevant regions can be studied by using a paired- or multiple-pulse technique. This is possible by assessing the effects of a pre- conditioning stimulus on the conditioning-test pair or a conditioning stimulus on the test pulse. TMS can also be used in conjunction with electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG) or imaging tools such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) to further assess TMS-induced changes. Combining these techniques can enable researchers to obtain spatial or temporal information of the effects of TMS on the brain. Movement in healthy human subjects has been studied using TMS, and information obtained from these studies has been useful in understanding which brain regions are relevant in producing movement. Furthermore, there are various TMS measures of the motor cortex that reflect different aspects of cortical excitability. Some examples are short and long intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short- and long- afferent inhibition (SAI and LAI), transcallosal inhibition, premotor cortex inhibition, etc. TMS has also been used to study movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremor, and Huntington’s disease. While TMS still has limited use in the clinical realm, it has provided a wealth of data in our understanding of movement disorders. In this talk, I will give an overview of TMS studies that probe the physiology of normal human movement and also discuss those focusing on movement disorders. I will also review limitations of TMS and the findings of TMS studies to date, and briefly discuss the need for future studies.

Associations between Task-Related Modulation of Motor-Evoked Potentials and EEG Event-Related Desynchronization in Children with ADHD.

Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have previously shown a decreased magnitude of event-related desynchronization (ERD) during a finger-tapping task, with a large between-group effect. Because the neurobiology underlying several transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures have been studied in multiple contexts, we compared ERD and 3 TMS measures (resting motor threshold [RMT], short-interval cortical inhibition [SICI], and task-related up-modulation [TRUM]) within 14 participants with ADHD (ages 8-12years) and 17 control children. The typically developing (TD) group showed a correlation between greater RMT and greater magnitude of alpha (10-13Hz, here) ERD, and there was no diagnostic interaction effect, consistent with a rudimentary model of greater needed energy input to stimulate movement. Similarly, inhibition measured by SICI was also greater in the TD group when the magnitude of movement-related ERD was higher; there was a miniscule diagnostic interaction effect. Finally, TRUM during a response-inhibition task showed an unanticipated pattern: in TD children, the greater TMS task modulation (TRUM) was associated with a smaller magnitude of ERD during finger-tapping. The ADHD group showed the opposite direction of association: Greater TRUM was associated with larger magnitude of ERD. Prior EEG results have demonstrated specific alterations of task-related modulation of cortical physiology, and the current results provide a fulcrum for multimodal study.

Higher motor cortical excitability linked to greater cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: results from two independent cohorts

Prior studies have reported increased cortical excitability in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but findings have been inconsistent, and how excitability relates to dementia severity remains incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measure of motor cortical excitability and measures of cognition in AD. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis tested the relationship between resting motor threshold (RMT) and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) across two independent samples of AD participants (a discovery cohort, n=22 and a larger validation cohort, n=129) and a control cohort of cognitively normal adults (n=26). RMT was correlated with ADAS-Cog in the discovery-AD cohort (n=22, β=-.70, p<0.001) but not in the control cohort (n=26, β=-0.13, p=0.513). This relationship was confirmed in the validation-AD cohort (n=129, β=-.35, p<0.001). RMT can be a useful neurophysiological marker of progressive global cognitive dysfunction in AD. Future translational research should focus on the potential of RMT to predict and track individual pathophysiological trajectories of aging.

The effect of acute and chronic nicotine consumption on intra-cortical inhibition and facilitation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to explore the impact of acute and chronic nicotine consumption on measures of intracortical inhibition and facilitation. MethodsThis study involved 50 chronic heavy cigarette smokers and 40 healthy subjects matched for age, sex and educational level, with no history of chronic nicotine intake. Intracortical inhibition and facilitation were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of motor threshold (MT), short- and long-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI, LICI), cortical silent period (CSP) and intra-cortical facilitation (ICF). Basal serum levels of cotinine were measured in the healthy group and at ½ and 2 h after smoking a single cigarette in the chronic smokers. ResultsThere was enhanced SICI and reduced ICF in smokers (independent of time after smoking) compared with non-smokers. The former suggests a chronic effect of increased nicotine levels on GABA-A neurotransmission whereas the latter suggests an additional effect on glutamatergic transmission. There were no significant differences between smokers and non-smokers in other TMS parameters. There was a significant negative correlation between cotinine levels at ½ h after smoking and SICI at 3 ms ISI (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in any of the neurophysiological measures between smokers at ½ h versus 2 h after smoking a single cigarette. ConclusionChronic nicotine consumption enhances SICI, and reduces ICF, supporting the hypothesis that nicotine acts as a neuromodulator of GABA-A and glutamate neurotransmission.

The Signature of Primary Writing Tremor Is Dystonic.

It has been debated for decades whether primary writing tremor is a form of dystonic tremor, a variant of essential tremor, or a separate entity. We wished to test the hypothesis that primary writing tremor and dystonia share a common pathophysiology. The objective of the present study was to investigate the pathophysiological hallmarks of dystonia in patients affected by primary writing tremor. Ten patients with idiopathic dystonic tremor syndrome, 7 with primary writing tremor, 10 with essential tremor, and 10 healthy subjects were recruited. They underwent eyeblink classic conditioning, blink recovery cycle, and transcranial magnetic stimulation assessment, including motor-evoked potentials and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition at baseline. Transcranial magnetic stimulation measures were also recorded after paired-associative plasticity protocol. Primary writing tremor and dystonic tremor syndrome had a similar pattern of electrophysiological abnormalities, consisting of reduced eyeblink classic conditioning learning, reduced blink recovery cycle inhibition, and a lack of effect of paired-associative plasticity on long-interval intracortical inhibition. The latter 2 differ from those obtained in essential tremor and healthy subjects. Although not significant, slightly reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and a larger effect of paired-associative plasticity in primary writing tremor and dystonic tremor syndrome, compared with essential tremor and healthy subjects, was observed. Our initial hypothesis of a common pathophysiology between dystonia and primary writing tremor has been confirmed. Primary writing tremor might be considered a form of dystonic tremor. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

A novel glasses-free virtual reality rehabilitation system on improving upper limb motor function among patients with stroke: A feasibility pilot study

BackgroundVirtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly used in stroke rehabilitation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of using the glasses-free VR training to improve motor function of upper limb in patients with stroke. MethodsTwelve patients with stroke were recruited to participate in the intervention of 3 weeks. At the baseline and post intervention, two times of evaluation including Fugl-Meyer upper-extremity scale (FMS-UE), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measurement and motion evaluation were performed. ResultsNo significant difference was observed between two groups at baseline evaluation. After the intervention, the FMS-UE scores presented a greater improvement in the VR group compared with the control group. TMS measurement showed that there was significant difference in cortex latency and central motor conduction time between two groups after the intervention, but no significant difference in the amplitude of motor event potential was observed. In addition, there was a significant correlation between game scores and FMS-UE scores. ConclusionsThe novel glasses-free VR training was at least as effective as conventional occupational therapy in upper limb motor function, improving nerve conduction time and corticospinal excitability in patient with stroke.

Chronic Neurophysiological Effects of Repeated Head Trauma in Retired Australian Male Sport Athletes.

Aim: This study investigated the somatosensory and corticomotor physiology of retired contact sport athletes with a history of repeated concussion/subconcussion head trauma.Methods: Retired male athletes with a history of playing contact sports and repeated head trauma (n = 122) were divided into two groups: those who expressed concerns regarding their mental and cognitive health (“symptomatic”: n = 83), and those who did not express any ongoing concerns (“asymptomatic”: n = 39). Both groups were compared to age-matched male controls (n = 50) with no history of concussions or participation in contact sports, an absence of self-reported cognitive, or mood impairments. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and vibrotactile stimulation were used to assess corticomotor and somatosensory pathways respectively. TMS and vibrotactile stimulation were correlated to self-reported responses using the Fatigue and Related Symptom Survey. Linear regression was used to associate concussion history with TMS, somatosensory variables.Results: Significant differences were found in symptom survey scores between all groups (p < 0.001). TMS showed significant differences between the “symptomatic” and control groups for intracortical inhibition and paired pulse TMS measures. Somatosensory measures showed significant differences for reaction time (p < 0.01) and reaction time variability (p < 0.01) between the “symptomatic” group to the “asymptomatic” and control groups. For other somatosensory measures, the “symptomatic” measures showed differences to the “control” group. Correlations showed significant associations between severity of symptom reporting with TMS and somatosensory measure, and regression revealed the number of concussions reported was shown to have significant relationships to increased intracortical inhibition and poorer somatosensory performance.Conclusion: This study shows that retired contact sport athletes expressing chronic symptoms showed significant pathophysiology compared to those with no ongoing concerns and non-concussed controls. Further, there is a linear dose-response relationship between number of reported concussions and abnormal neurophysiology. Neurophysiological assessments such as TMS and somatosensory measures represent useful and objective biomarkers to assess cortical impairments and progression of neuropsychological impairment in individuals with a history of repeated head trauma.

Acute gabapentin administration in healthy adults. A double-blind placebo-controlled study using transcranial magnetic stimulation and 7T 1H-MRS

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate are the primary neurotransmitters responsible for modulating excitatory and inhibitory signalling within the human brain. Dysfunctional GABAergic and glutamatergic signalling has been identified as a key factor in a range of neuropsychiatric conditions; hence measurement and modulation of these neurometabolites is important for improving our understanding of neuropsychiatric conditions and treatment options. Gabapentin (GBP) is one of several drugs developed to increase GABA levels and is routinely prescribed for conditions such as epilepsy and neuralgia. While animal and human studies indicate that GBP can elevate GABA levels, its exact mechanisms of action are not fully understood, although animal studies indicate that GBP does not have a direct effect upon GABAergic receptors.To investigate the impact of acute GBP administration in the human motor system we used two complimentary approaches – transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). MRS and TMS measures of GABA have repeatedly been found to be uncorrelated and are likely to reflect different pools of synaptic and extra synaptic GABA, hence, measuring both within the same participants allows for an in-depth assessment of GBP effects.Despite significantly increased ratings of fatigue and tiredness within the GBP group, we failed to find any statistically significant changes in our MRS or TMS measures of GABA. Measures of MRS Glutamate (glu) and glutamine (gln) were also not affected by the administration of GBP. These findings are important as they run counter to previous work, and suggest that the effect of an acute dose of GBP is likely to be subject to substantial individual variation, with timing of measures particularly likely to impact observed effects. These findings have implications for the use of acute GBP dosing as a means to explore GABAergic function in health and disease.

Motor cortical excitability and paired-associative stimulation-induced plasticity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

ObjectiveSynaptopathy including alterations of synaptic plasticity (long-term potentiation, LTP) may precede neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We studied LTP-like corticospinal plasticity induced by paired-associative stimulation (PASLTP) in AD and its prodromal stage, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Methods15 AD and 15 aMCI patients, and 23 demographically matched healthy controls (HC) were included. Resting motor threshold (RMT) and stimulus intensity needed to evoke motor evoked potentials (MEP) of 1 mV (SI1mV) were obtained as single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of corticospinal excitability in a hand muscle at baseline, followed by PASLTP using standard methodology. MEP amplitude change after PASLTP normalized to baseline was defined as plasticity effect. All measures were repeated in two visits for examining test–retest reliability. ResultsSI1mV were lower in aMCI compared to HC, while there was no difference between AD and HC. RMT and SI1mV showed excellent test–retest reliability in all groups. PASLTP indiscriminately did not induce LTP-like plasticity in any of the groups, and expressed poor test–retest reliability. ConclusionsaMCI shows corticospinal hyperexcitability, consistent with glutamatergic excitotoxicity in early-stage AD. Possible abnormalities of LTP-like plasticity could not be reliably tested with the standard PASLTP protocol due to massive inter-subject variability even in HC, and poor test–retest reliability. SignificanceFindings indicate corticospinal hyperexcitability in prodromal AD, and reliability of single-pulse TMS measures for identifying such abnormality. In contrast, the standard PASLTP protocol may not be suitable for assessing LTP-like motor cortical plasticity, given its overall nil effect and poor test–retest reliability.

Comparison of figure-of-8 and circular coils for threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation measurements

ObjectivesThe transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique of threshold-tracking short-interval intracortical inhibition (T-SICI) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Most of these studies have used a circular coil, whereas a figure-of-8 coil is usually recommended for paired-pulse TMS measurements. The aim of this study was to compare figure-of-8 and circular coils for T-SICI in the upper limb, with special attention to reproducibility, and the pain or discomfort experienced by the subjects. MethodsTwenty healthy subjects (aged: 45.5 ± 6.7, mean ± SD, 9 females, 11 males) underwent two examinations with each coil, in morning and afternoon sessions on the same day, with T-SICI measured at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1−7 ms. After each examination the subjects rated degree of pain/discomfort from 0 to 10 using a numerical rating scale (NRS). ResultsMean T-SICI was higher for the figure-of-8 than for the circular coil at ISI of 2 ms (p < 0.05) but did not differ at other ISIs. Intra-subject variability did not differ between coils, but mean inhibition from 1−3.5 ms was less variable between subjects with the figure-of-8 coil (SD 7.2% vs. 11.2% RMT, p < 0.05), and no such recordings were without inhibition (vs. 6 with the circular coil). The subjects experienced less pain/discomfort with the figure-of-8 coil (mean NRS: 1.9 ± 1.28 vs 2.8 ± 1.60, p < 0.005). DiscussionThe figure-of-8 coil may have better applicability in patients, due to the lower incidence of lack of inhibition in healthy subjects, and the lower experience of pain or discomfort.

Classification accuracy of TMS for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment

ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of a Random Forest (RF) classifier on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) measures in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MethodsWe applied a RF classifier on TMS measures obtained from a multicenter cohort of patients with MCI, including MCI-Alzheimer’s Disease (MCI-AD), MCI-frontotemporal dementia (MCI-FTD), MCI-dementia with Lewy bodies (MCI-DLB), and healthy controls (HC). All patients underwent TMS assessment at recruitment (index test), with application of reference clinical criteria, to predict different neurodegenerative disorders. The primary outcome measures were the classification accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of TMS in differentiating each disorder. Results160 participants were included, namely 64 patients diagnosed as MCI-AD, 28 as MCI-FTD, 14 as MCI-DLB, and 47 as healthy controls (HC). A series of 3 binary classifiers was employed, and the prediction model exhibited high classification accuracy (ranging from 0.72 to 0.86), high precision (0.72–0.90), high recall (0.75–0.98), and high F1-scores (0.78–0.92), in differentiating each neurodegenerative disorder. By computing a new classifier, trained and validated on the current cohort of MCI patients, classification indices showed even higher accuracy (ranging from 0.83 to 0.93), precision (0.87–0.89), recall (0.83–1.00), and F1-scores (0.85–0.94). ConclusionsTMS may be considered a useful additional screening tool to be used in clinical practice in the prodromal stages of neurodegenerative dementias.