Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Research Articles

CardioTwins: Case report of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve implantation in one patient

Structured Abstract Background Besides transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) there are new interventional treatment options for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in evaluation, such as a complete replacement of the valve through a prosthesis. Case summary A 78-years-old previous coronary artery bypass graft-operated patient with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation was sequentially treated by a transfemoral transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve prosthesis (Cardiovalve; Cardiovalve Ltd, Israel) due to unfavorable mitral valve anatomy. The transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) was performed first and after progression of the tricuspid regurgitation, a second transcatheter valve prosthesis was implanted in tricuspid position (TTVI) 1.5 years later. Imaging showed a twin look-alike picture of a mitral and tricuspid prosthesis and showing the possibility of a complete transcatheter based replacement of the mitral and tricuspid valve. Discussion This case shows the possibility of a Cardiovalve prosthesis being used for TMVI and TTVI in a single patient. Especially in TEER ineligible patients it might be a good treatment option after device approval. Conclusion A Cardiovalve prothesis can be used for TMVI and TTVI, especially in TEER ineligible patients and with one device for both anatomies, which might be a good treatment option after device approval.

Transcatheter Therapy for the Tricuspid Valve: A Focused Review of Edge-to-Edge Repair and Orthotopic Valve Replacement.

Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are at risk for significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) may offer patients less invasive treatment alternatives to surgery. This review evaluates the most common class of device currently used worldwide to treat TR, tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) andorthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), both of which are now approved in the USA and Europe. The first pivotal randomized clinical trial, TRILUMINATE, demonstrated that T-TEER can safely reduce TR and is associated with improved health status outcomes. However, results of this trial have raised questions about whether this device can provide sufficient TR reduction to impact clinical outcomes. Orthotopic TTVR has recently gained attention with initial data suggesting near-complete TR elimination. The current review examines the technical features and anatomic limitations of the most commonly used devices for T-TEER and orthotopic TTVR, discusses the current clinical data for these devices, and offers a theoretical construct for device selection.

Prognostic Implications of Residual Tricuspid Regurgitation Grading After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair.

The safety profile of transcatheter tricuspid valve (TTV) repair techniques is well established, but residual tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a concern. The authors sought to assess the impact of residual TR severity post-TTV repair on survival. We evaluated the survival rate at 2 years of 613 patients with severe isolated functional TR who underwent TTV repair in TRIGISTRY according to the severity of residual TR at discharge using a 3-grade (mild, moderate, and severe) or 4-grade scheme (mild, mild to moderate, moderate to severe, and severe). Residual TR was none/mild in 33%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 15%. The 2-year adjusted survival rates significantly differed between the 3 groups (85%, 70%, and 44%, respectively; restricted mean survival time [RMST]: P= 0.0001). When the 319 patients with moderate residual TR were subdivided into mild to moderate (n=201, 33%) and moderate to severe (n=118, 19%), the adjusted survival rate was also significantly different between groups (85%, 80%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; RMST: P = 0.001). Survival was significantly lower in patients with moderate to severe residual TR compared to patients with mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.006). No difference in survival rates was observed between patients with no/mild and mild to moderate residual TR (P = 0.67) or between patients with moderate to severe and severe residual TR (P = 0.96). The moderate residual TR group was heterogeneous and encompassed patients with markedly different clinical outcomes. Refining TR grade classification with a more granular 4-grade scheme improved outcome prediction. Our results highlight the importance of achieving a mild to moderate or lower residual TR grade during TTV repair, which could define a successful intervention.

The safety of transesophageal echocardiography to guide transcatheter tricuspid valve edge‐to‐edge repair

AbstractBackgroundTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is primarily used to guide transcatheter structural heart interventions, such as tricuspid transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER). Although TEE has a good safety profile, it is still an invasive imaging technique that may be associated with complications, especially when performed during long transcatheter procedures or on frail patients. The aim of this study was to assess TEE‐related complications during tricuspid TEER.MethodsThis is a prospective study enrolling 53 patients who underwent tricuspid TEER for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). TEE‐related complications were assessed clinically and divided into major (life‐threatening, major bleeding requiring transfusions or surgery, organ perforation, and persistent dysphagia) and minor (perioral hypesthesia, < 24 h dysphagia/odynophagia, minor intraoral bleeding and hematemesis not requiring transfusion)ResultsThe median age of the patient population was 79 years; 43.4% had severe, 39.6% massive, and 17.6% torrential TR. 62.3% of patients suffered from upper gastrointestinal disorders. Acute procedural success (APS) was achieved in 88.7% in a median device time of 36 min. A negative association was shown between APS and lead‐induced etiology (r = ‐.284, p = .040), baseline TR grade (r = ‐.410, p = .002), suboptimal TEE view (r = ‐.349, p = .012), device time (r = ‐.234, p = .043), and leaflet detachment (r = ‐.496, p < .0001). We did not observe any clinical manifest major or minor TEE‐related complications during the hospitalization.ConclusionsOur study reinforces the good safety profile and efficacy of TEE guidance during tricuspid TEER. Adequate preoperative management and intraprocedural precautions are mandatory in order to avoid serious complications. Furthermore, suboptimal intraprocedural TEE views are associated with lower TR reduction rates.Highlights Transesophageal echocardiography is a crucial and safe technique for guiding transcatheter structural heart interventions. A mix of mid/deep esophageal and trans gastric views, as well as real‐time 3D imaging is generally used to guide the procedure. Adequate preoperative management and intraprocedural precautions are mandatory in order to avoid serious problems. A shorter device time is associated with more rarely probe‐related complications. Suboptimal intraprocedural TEE views are associated with lower TR reduction rates.

Transfemoral leadless pacemaker implantation after tricuspid valve surgery and intervention

Abstract Background and Purpose Pacemaker (PM) implantation after surgical or transcatheter tricuspid valve (TV) repair or replacement may be challenging. Transcatheter leadless pacemaker (LPM) implantation has become a routine procedure and is frequently adopted in patients without the need for an atrial lead, in cases with cardiac implantable device infection or in patients with marked comorbidities. The use of LPM in patients with previous TV repair or replacement has only been described in singular cases in literature. We present our single center experience of LPM implantation after TV repair. Methods Patients with a history of TV repair or replacement who underwent LPM in our institution between 01/2020 and 11/2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent routine clinical follow-up investigations including LPM interrogation and transthoracic echocardiography to assess for TV status. For LPM implantation right anterior oblique (RAO) and left anterior oblique (LAO) caudal fluoroscopy projections were utilized to enable LPM device passage across the TV. Results The study population consisted of 10 patients (9 females, mean age 74.0±10.0 years). Two patients had a history of surgical TV annuloplasty repair and two patients a history of surgical valve replacement, four patients of transcatheter TV repair (one through the mitral clip), one patient of transcatheter valve-in-ring bio prosthesis implantation prosthesis after previous surgical ring deployment and one patient transcatheter TV replacement (Figure1). All patients suffered from permanent atrial fibrillation previous to implantation procedures. Three patients were on chronic hemodialysis therapy before LPM implantation. LPM systems were successfully implanted in all cases with a mean procedure time of 43.5±26.5 minutes and a mean fluoroscopy time of 5.9±5.5 minutes and a radiation dose of 1148,7±1424,9 cGy·cm2. For fluoroscopically guided TV crossing a mean LAO angle of 43.6±14.1° (range 22 to 53°) and caudal angle of 8.5±6.9° (range 0 to 20°) was utilized (Figure 2). The LPM device was positioned in the first positioning attempt in a right ventricular high septal localization in 8 cases. Mean pacing threshold was 0.36±0.07 V at 0.25 ms, with a mean sensing amplitude of 10.5±2.9 mV and a mean of 853±324 Ohms pacing impedance. No periprocedural complications occurred. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.1±9.2 months. There were no newly developed TV regurgitations noted. Pacing thresholds (0.37±0.1 V/0.25 ms), sensing amplitude (11.8±4.5 mV) as well as pacing impedances (865±365 Ohms) remained stable until the last follow-up investigation. Conclusion LPM implantation was feasible in patients with a history of TV repair or replacement. LPM implantation was safe and effective in various modalities of TV repair. LPM may be an alternative to conventional pacemaker implantations as well as surgical lead placement in selected patients.Figure 1.Figure 2.

Atrial fibrillation after transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: rhythm control strategies and outcomes

Abstract Background Transcatheter tricuspid valve (TV) repair emerged as a viable treatment option in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and high operative risk. Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in these patients, the prognostic value of maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) after transcatheter TV repair is unknown. Purpose We sought to assess the prevalence and efficacy of rhythm control strategies and impacts of maintenance of sinus rhythm on outcomes after transcatheter TV repair. Methods All patients undergoing transcatheter TV repair in our center between April 2017 and December 2022 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. Patients who maintained SR throughout the follow-up (FU) were compared to patients who did not. The composite study endpoint included death from any cause, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and repeat TV repair. Furthermore, prevalence and efficacy of rhythm control strategies were evaluated. Results A total of 203 patients (mean age 78 ± 7 years, 145 (68 %) female) after transcatheter TV repair was analyzed. After a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 4-20), 21 patients (10 %) did maintain SR. AF was present in 183 patients (90 %), of whom 134 had permanent AF. In the AF group, direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) was performed in 6 patients (3 %). Following DCCV, SR was restored in 4 patients (75 %), of whom 3 patients (75 %) presented in SR 30 days after DCCV. 2 patients (1 %) underwent AF ablation. After a case-control matching including 38 patients (SR vs. AF), during a median follow-up of 8 months (IQR 1-20) the study endpoint occurred in 7 of 19 patients (37 %) in the SR group and 12 of 19 patients (63 %) in the AF group (HR 0.70, p = 0.43). Conclusions The incidence of AF among patients undergoing transcatheter TV repair is high. In the present patient cohort, there was a trend towards a higher likelihood of death from any cause, HF hospitalization and repeat transcatheter TV repair in patients with AF. Further randomized studies are needed to evaluate the impact of rhythm control in patient undergoing TV repair.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with LuX-valve device: Overview of key echocardiographic considerations.

Tricuspid regurgitation is a common valve disease with high incidence and poor prognosis. For elderly patients and those with a history of open heart surgery, second thoracotomy and valve replacement carry a high risk. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has become an alternative treatment for patients with high surgical risk. LuX-Valve is a novel self-expandable valve that does not rely on radial force to anchor the valve annulus. The preliminary results have been satisfactory, and this technology is gradually being adopted in China and around the world. Successful implementation of this technique depends on echocardiographic preoperative screening, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative follow-up. The purpose of this article is to provide a state-of-the-art review of the key points and technical considerations for preoperative screening, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative follow-up for TTVR.

Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.

Over the course of 2023, numerous key clinical trials with valuable contributions to clinical cardiology were published or presented at major international conferences. This review seeks to summarise these trials and reflect on their clinical context. The authors collated and reviewed clinical trials presented at major cardiology conferences during 2023 including the American College of Cardiology (ACC), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EuroPCR), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT), American Heart Association (AHA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), TVT-The Heart Summit (TVT) and Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT). Trials with a broad relevance to the cardiology community and those with potential to change current practice were included. A total of 80 key cardiology clinical trials were identified for inclusion. Key trials in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and antiplatelet management such as HOST-IDEA, T-PASS and STOP-DAPT3 were included in addition to several pivotal interventional trials such as ORBITA 2, MULTISTARS-AMI, ILUMIEN-IV, OCTIVUS and OCTOBER. Additionally, several trials evaluated new stent design and technology such as BIOSTEMI, PARTHENOPE and TRANSFORM. Structural intervention trials included long-term data from PARTNER 3, new data on the durability of transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI), in addition to major new trials regarding transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention from TRISCEND II. Heart failure (HF) and prevention covered several key studies including DAPA-MI, STEP-HF, ADVOR, DICTATE HF and CAMEO-DAPA. In cardiac devices and electrophysiology, several trial exploring novel ablation strategies in atrial fibrillation (AF) such as PULSED AF and ADVENT were presented with further data evaluating the efficacy of anticoagulation in subclinical AF in NOAH-AFNET 6, FRAIL AF and AZALEA-TIMI 71. This article presents a summary of key clinical cardiology trials published and presented during the past year and should be of interest to both practising clinicians and researchers.

Personalized Guidance of Edge-to-Edge Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair by Multimodality Imaging.

Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repair (T-TEER) for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is always guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). As each patient has unique anatomy and acoustic window, adding transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac CT could improve procedural planning and guidance. Objectives: We aimed to assess T-TEER success and outcomes of a personalized guidance approach, based on multimodality imaging (MMI) of patient-tailored four right-sided chamber views (four-right-ch), as depicted by CT, TTE, TEE and fluoroscopy. Methods: Patients were assigned to MMI or classical TEE guidance, depending on TTE acoustic window. In MMI patients, planning included cardiac CT, which determined the fluoroscopic angulations of the specific four-right-ch, while guidance relied heavily on TTE, with minimal intermittent TEE for leaflet grasping and result confirmation. Both TTE and TEE were matched to respective CT and fluoroscopy four-right-ch. TR severity and quality of life (QoL) parameters were assessed from baseline to 12 months. Results: A total of 40 T-TEER patients were included, with 17 procedures guided by MMI and 23 solely by TEE. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, e.g., age (83.1 ± 4.1 vs. 81 ± 5.3, p = 0.182) or STS-Score (11.1 ± 7.4% vs. 10.6 ± 5.9%, p = 0.813). The primary efficacy endpoint of ≥one-grade TR reduction at 30 days was 94% (16/17) in MMI vs. 91% (21/23) in TEE patients, with two or more TR grade reduction in 65% vs. 52% (p = 0.793). Device success was overall 100%, with no device-related complications, but three TEE-associated cases of gastrointestinal bleeding in the TEE-only group. By 12 months, all 15 MMI and 19 TEE survivors improved NYHA functional class and QoL, e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Score Δ29.6 ± 6.7 vs. 21.9 ± 5.8 (p = 0.441) pts., 6-min walk distance Δ101.5 ± 36.4 vs. 85.7 ± 32.1 (p = 0.541) meters. Conclusions: In a subset of patients with good TTE acoustic window, MMI guidance of T-TEER is effective and seems to avoid gastroesophageal injuries caused by TEE probe manipulation. TR reduction, irrespective of guidance method, impacts long-term QoL.

Failed bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement treated with transcatheter valve for valve repair

Tricuspid bioprosthetic valve failure may lead to right-sided heart failure and is traditionally managed with surgical valve replacement. However, the substantial mortality risk associated with reoperation for failed tricuspid bioprosthesis prompts the need for less invasive alternatives. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (TViV) implantation presents a promising minimally invasive option for patients with failing bioprosthetic valves. This case involves a 32-year-old man with a history of recurrent failed bioprosthetic tricuspid valves who underwent successful percutaneous TViV implantation using a 29 mm Edwards Sapien S3 valve, resulting in marked clinical and hemodynamic improvement. This case contributes essential insights to the limited literature on TViV in the tricuspid position, particularly in patients with complex surgical histories. The high procedural success rate and substantial improvement in valve function underscore the potential of TViV as an effective alternative to surgical replacement for failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valves. Keywords: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement; tricuspid valve-in-valve; bioprosthetic tricuspid valve; tricuspid valve stenosis

The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Tricuspid valve disease is an often underrecognized clinical problem that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, patients will often present late in their disease course with severe right-sided heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and life-limiting symptoms that have few durable treatment options. Traditionally, the only treatment for tricuspid valve disease has been medical therapy or surgery; however, there have been increasing interest and success with the use of transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies over the past several years to treat patients with previously limited therapeutic options. The tricuspid valve is complex anatomically, lying adjacent to important anatomic structures such as the right coronary artery and the atrioventricular node, and is the passageway for permanent pacemaker leads into the right ventricle. In addition, the mechanism of tricuspid pathology varies widely between patients, which can be due to primary, secondary, or a combination of causes, meaning that it is not possible for 1 type of device to be suitable for treatment of all cases of tricuspid valve disease. To best visualize the pathology, several modalities of advanced cardiac imaging are often required, including transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, to best visualize the pathology. This detailed imaging provides important information for choosing the ideal transcatheter treatment options for patients with tricuspid valve disease, taking into account the need for the lifetime management of the patient. This review highlights the important background, anatomic considerations, therapeutic options, and future directions with regard to treatment of tricuspid valve disease.

Multimodality imaging for intraprocedural guidance of a transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement

Abstract Intraprocedural multimodality imaging, combining TEE with CT-fluoro fusion and ICE, can promote TTVR procedural success by improved guidance of critical steps of the device implantation.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Failed Screening for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a significant proportion of patients fail screening for TTVI, and little is known about their characteristics and natural history. This study sought to investigate causes of screen failure and outcomes of patients declined for TTVI. This was a retrospective single-center study of 32 patients who were ineligible for participation in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair trials. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the therapy they received: optimized medical therapy (OMT) group or intervention group. The mean age was 82 ± 7.8 years and 68.8% were women. The most common reasons for TTVI exclusion were anatomic/procedural impediment (53.1%), inclusion criteria not met (40.6%), and multivalvular disease (6.3%). Overall, 19 patients (59.4%) did not undergo subsequent tricuspid intervention. The clinical outcomes of these patients who received OMT alone were poor, with a 1-year composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission of 47.4%. These rates were worse than in patients who subsequently underwent an intervention, albeit not statistically significant (OMT: 47.7% vs 23.1% interventions, p = 0.3), and were significantly more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were excluded for anatomic/procedural limitations (OMT: 70% vs 14.3% interventions, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients ineligible for TTVI, particularly, those with anatomic/procedural limitations, and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data underscore the importance of earlier referral and support the need for further transcatheter therapy iterations.

Congestion patterns in severe tricuspid regurgitation and transcatheter treatment: Insights from a multicentre registry.

While invasively determined congestion holds mechanistic and prognostic significance in acute heart failure (HF), its role in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR)-related right- heart failure (HF) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) is less well established. A comprehensive understanding of congestion patterns might aid in procedural planning, risk stratification, and the identification of patients who may benefit from adjunctive therapies before undergoing TTVI. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of congestion patterns in patients with severe TR and its implications for TTVI. Within a multicentre, international TTVI registry, 813 patients underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) prior to TTVI and were followed up to 24 months. The median age was 80 (interquartile range 76-83) years and 54% were women. Both mean right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were associated with 2-year mortality on Cox regression analyses with Youden index-derived cut-offs of 17 mmHg and 19 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.01 for all). However, RAP emerged as an independent predictor of outcomes following multivariable adjustments. Pre-interventionally, 42% of patients were classified as euvolaemic (RAP <17 mmHg, PCWP <19 mmHg), 23% as having left-sided congestion (RAP <17 mmHg, PCWP ≥19 mmHg), 8% as right-sided congestion (RAP ≥17 mmHg, PCWP <19 mmHg), and 27% as bilateral congestion (RAP ≥17 mmHg, PCWP ≥19 mmHg). Patients with right-sided or bilateral congestion had the lowest procedural success rates and shortest survival times. Congestion patterns allowed for discerning specific patient's physiology and specifying prognostic implications of right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling surrogates. In this large cohort of invasively characterized patients undergoing TTVI, congestion patterns involving right-sided congestion were associated with low procedural success and higher mortality rates after TTVI. Whether pre-interventional reduction of right-sided congestion can improve outcomes after TTVI should be established in dedicated studies.

Clinical aspects and treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) leading to right heart failure is prevalent and associated with increased mortality. The significant under-recognition of the disease resulted from insufficient medical therapies and the high associated risk of surgical therapy. Over the last decade there has been a rapid development of interventional treatment options so that the disease has increasingly become the focus of attention of specialists in internal medicine and interventional cardiologists. The etiology of TR is differentiated into primary TR, secondary atrial TR, secondary ventricular TR and TR associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The TR was identified as an independent predictor of mortality, independent of associated diseases such as atrial fibrillation, left-sided heart failure or pulmonary hypertension. Even patients with low to moderate TR have asignificantly increased risk of mortality. Early diagnostics and estimation of the severity by echocardiography as well as timely referral to atertiary heart valve center are decisive in order to evaluate possible treatment options before irreversible right ventricular damage and secondary organ dysfunction occur. For transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement there is now first evidence from randomized controlled studies. While the understanding of TR is continuously improving, new tricuspid valve repair and replacement systems are in a state of steady progress. Whether the treatment has an effect on reduction of the mortality and stabilization of right ventricular failure with a reduction in hospitalization, will first be shown in future studies.

LuX-Valve Plus transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for massive tricuspid flail after lead extraction.

LuX-Valve Plus transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for massive tricuspid flail after lead extraction.

Pacing and Defibrillation Consideration in the Era of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement.

Tricuspid regurgitation is a commonly encountered valvular pathology in patients with trans-tricuspid pacing or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions are increasingly performed in patients at high surgical risk. Implantation of these valves can lead to the "jailing" of a trans-tricuspid lead. This practice carries both short- and long-term risks of lead failure and subsequent infection without the ability to perform traditional transvenous lead extraction. Herein, this manuscript reviews available therapeutic options for lead management in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions. The decision to jail a lead may be appropriate in certain high-risk cases, though extraction may be a better option in most cases given the variety of options for re-implant, including leadless pacemakers, valve-sparing systems, epicardial leads, leads placed directly through prosthetic valves, and the completely subcutaneous implantable-defibrillator. A growing number of patients meet the requirement for CIED implantation in the United States. A significant proportion of these patients will have tricuspid valve dysfunction, either related to or independent of their transvenous lead. As with any percutaneous intervention that has shown efficacy, the role of TTVI is also likely to increase as this therapy advances beyond the investigational phase. As such, the role of the heart team in the management of these patients will be increasingly critical in the years to come, and in those patients that have pre-existing CIED leads, we advocate for the involvement of an electrophysiologist in the heart team.

Role of preexisting right ventricular remodeling in symptoms and prognosis after transcatheter tricuspid valve repair.

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with chronic volume overload and right ventricular remodeling (RVR). Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) reduces TR and can improve quality of life (QoL), but the role of preprocedural RVR on TTVr outcomes remains unclear. To investigate the role of RVR on outcomes after TTVr for severe TR. Consecutive patients undergoing TTVr (61% edge-to-edge vs. 39% direct annuloplasty) for severe TR were retrospectively compared by preexisting RVR which was defined as dilation of RV mid-level diameter (> 35mm) according to guidelines. QoL was evaluated using NYHA class, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) 1-month after TTVr. Mid-term mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization were assessed through 1year. RVR was present in 137 of 223 patients (61%). Symptoms and QoL improved equally in both groups: ≥ 1 NYHA class (57% vs. 65% of patients with vs. without RVR, respectively), 6MWD (36% vs. 34%), MLHFQ (81% vs. 69%), and SF-36 (68% vs. 65%) improvement. One-year mortality and HF hospitalization were significantly higher in patients with RVR (24% and 30%, respectively) than in patients without (8% and 13%, both p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, RVR was independently associated with mortality (HR 2.3, 95%CI (1.0-5.0), p = 0.04) and the combined endpoint of mortality or rehospitalization (HR 2.0, 95%CI (1.1-3.8), p = 0.03). TTVr was associated with significant QoL improvement after 1month, irrespective of RVR. Despite increased mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure, TTVr in the presence of RVR still provides substantial symptomatic benefit for patients with severe TR.

Comparison of Tricuspid Annular Dimension Measurements Using Automated Three-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Computed Tomography in Patients Evaluated for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Comparison of Tricuspid Annular Dimension Measurements Using Automated Three-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Computed Tomography in Patients Evaluated for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Etiologies and Impact of Exclusion Rates for Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Structural Heart Clinical Trials at a High-Volume Quaternary Care Hospital

There are various devices under clinical investigation for transcatheter mitral valve intervention (TMVI) and tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), but exclusion rates remain high. We aim to investigate exclusion rates for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) and transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). There were a total of 129 patients who were referred to St. Francis Hospital & Heart Center valve clinic and completed screening between January 2021 and July 2022. Causes for exclusion were classified into 4 categories: patient withdrawal, anatomic unsuitability, clinical criteria and medical futility. Among 129 patients, the exclusion rates for TMVr, TMVR, TTVr and TTVR were 81%, 85%, 91% and 87%, respectively. Patient withdrawal and medical futility were leading etiologies for exclusion, followed by anatomical unsuitability. TMVr had the highest rate of patient withdrawal (64%), the lowest anatomic unsuitability (5%) due to short posterior leaflet length. Replacement interventions have higher anatomic unsuitability (33%) compared to repair interventions (17%) (p=0.04). Most exclusions of anatomic unsuitability was due to mitral stenosis or small annulus size for TMVR and large annulus size for TTVR. Fifty percent of exclusions from TTVr were due to presence of pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Among patients excluded from their respective trials, patients being referred for TMVr had the highest recurrent hospitalization and repair group had a higher mortality (p<0.01 and p=0.01, respectively). In conclusion, exclusion rates for TMVI and TTVI trials remain high due to various reasons, limiting patients’ enrollment and treatment. This supports the need for further device improvement or exploring alternative means of therapy.