You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP41-11 ANALYSIS OF FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC MOTION AND KINEMATIC EFFICIENCY - A SIMULATION-BASED PILOT STUDY Marie-Therese Valovska, Gricelda Gomez, Richard Fineman, William Woltmann, Leia Stirling, and Daniel Wollin Marie-Therese ValovskaMarie-Therese Valovska More articles by this author , Gricelda GomezGricelda Gomez More articles by this author , Richard FinemanRichard Fineman More articles by this author , William WoltmannWilliam Woltmann More articles by this author , Leia StirlingLeia Stirling More articles by this author , and Daniel WollinDaniel Wollin More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002607.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the most common surgical procedure for treatment of urolithiasis. Various surgical disciplines and subspecialties have examined surgeon kinematics to improve assessment and generate measures of skill. Despite frequency of utilization, there is no undisputed method for evaluating fURS skills. Our pilot study utilized kinematic evaluations of fURS simulation to determine whether specific surgeon movements, techniques, and strategies correlate with measures of ureteroscopic efficiency. METHODS: A motion capture system with 41 reflective markers and standard GoPro video camera were employed to characterize surgeon movement variables. A ureteroscopic simulation box was used by practicing urologists at various skill levels to perform a series of simple and complex ureteroscopic movement tasks. Two tasks were chosen for this initial pilot analysis. Body kinematics, time to task completion, and ureteroscopic movements were analyzed. Task efficiency was defined as quicker time to task completion and smaller ureteroscope end effector travel distance. A novel combined performance efficiency score (PES) was calculated using the root sum square of these two measures to characterize efficiency and skill. RESULTS: Twelve practicing urologists were enlisted. Average urologist age was 37 years with an average of 10.1 years of training; 50% were female, 50% were residents; and 33% had completed an Endourology fellowship. For the simple task, no kinematic data correlated with PES; for the complex task, participant head and torso movement correlated with PES (r=0.60, p=0.04 for head; r=0.65, p=0.02 for torso), with decreased body movement associated with higher efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that movement economy measures are associated with efficient ureteroscopic manipulation for complex tasks in a simulated setting. Decreased head and torso movement were associated with higher efficiency, suggesting that excess body movement may signal extraneous or improper ureteroscopic movements. Additional assessment of these variables, including analysis in a clinical setting, is warranted as this may serve as a basis for improvement in endoscopic training and evaluation. Source of Funding: The simulation box and single-use ureteroscopes were provided by Boston Scientific © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e723 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Marie-Therese Valovska More articles by this author Gricelda Gomez More articles by this author Richard Fineman More articles by this author William Woltmann More articles by this author Leia Stirling More articles by this author Daniel Wollin More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract