Training In Echocardiography Research Articles

Impact of simulator-based training on acquisition of transthoracic echocardiography skills in medical students.

Introduction:Due to the expanding role of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in modern medicine, medical schools rapidly include ultrasound training in their curriculum. The objective of this study was to compare simulator-based training along with classical teaching, using human models, to impart focused transthoracic echocardiography examination.Subject and Methods:A total of 22 medical students, with no former transthoracic echocardiography training, undertook a 90-min e-learning module, dealing with focused echocardiography and important echocardiographic pathologies. Subsequently, they had to complete a multiple-choice-questioner, followed by a 120-min practical training session either on the Heartworks™, (Cardiff, UK) and the CAE Vimedix®, (Québec, Canada) simulator (n = 10) or on a live human model (n = 12). Finally, both groups had to complete a post-test consisting of ten video-based multiple-choice-questions and a time-based, focused echocardiography examination on another human model. Two blinded expert observers scored each acquired loop which recorded 2 s of each standard view. Statistical analysis was performed with SPPS 24 (SPSS™ 24, IBM, USA) using the Mann-Whitney-Test to compare both groups.Results:Analysis of measurable outcome skills showed no significant difference between transthoracic echocardiography training on human models and high-fidelity simulators for undergraduate medical students.Conclusions:Both teaching methods are effective and lead to the intended level of knowledge and skills.

P1349 POCUS by general and family physician - advancing physical examination

Abstract BACKGROUND Alongside with the development of hand held equipment, echo is becoming more accessible to nontraditional settings. General and family medicine (GPs) are at the forefront of any health system, but the use of cardiac echo by GPs is still unexplored. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of echocardiography assessment performed as an extension of the physical exam by GPs. METHODS: Two GPs underwent standard echocardiography training for 6 months. Subsequently, patients with diabetes or arterial hypertension were submitted to an echocardiogram performed by their GPs using a pocket ultrasound. Views obtained (with and without color Doppler) were parasternal long and short axis, apical and subcostal, with measurements of the posterior wall (PW), interventricular septum (IVS), left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LA), aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC). Studies were reviewed at the workstation and measured by two experts who classified the exams according to the image quality. RESULTS: Sixty echocardiograms were analyzed (mean age of 61y, 42% females and 58% males). In 50% the image quality was considered sufficient, 42% considered good and 8% considered bad. There were statistically significant differences between the GPs and expert measurements on the sinus of Valsalva (30.3 ± 3 to 28.8 ± 3.1mm, p = 0.001), LV in systole (p < 0.001, 28[24,31] for 31[29,34]mm), IVS (p = 0.001, 10.9 ± 1.7 for 10.1 ± 1.5mm), PW (p = 0.018, 8.7 ± 1.1 to 9.2 ± 1.6mm) and TAPSE (p = 0.021, 20.9 ± 2.3 to 20.1 ± 2.7mm). There were no significate differences in the measurements of the ascending aorta, LA, LV in diastole and IVC. Agreement between the GPs and the experts was moderate for the evaluation of LVH (k = 0.48). The concordance was substantial for evaluation of LV function (k = 0.66) and excellent for evaluation of pericardial effusion (k = 1) and right ventricular function (k = 1). Concordance was excellent for mitral insufficiency (k = 0.83) and substantial for aortic insufficiency (k = 0.68) and tricuspid insufficiency (k = 0.61). A case of mitral stenosis was identified by both. GPs signalized a case of mild aortic stenosis that the expert did not consider. CONCLUSION: GPs trained in echocardiography, using pocket ultrasound, can obtain cardiac images with sufficient quality for interpretation by experts in the majority of cases. In this study, differences in dimensions might be explained by interobserver variability and/or by the performance of measurements in different environments, mobile vs workstation. Overall the differences were minor and clinically meaningless.

Validation of Epworth Richmond's Echocardiography Education Focused Year.

OBJECTIVES: College of Intensive Care Medicine mandatory training in echocardiography requires a minimum 30 echocardiograms. Trainee echocardiography accuracy following mandatory training is unknown. Our objective was to determine the reliability of ICU trainee echocardiography after our yearlong College of Intensive Care Medicine accredited course. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective observational study. Trainee echocardiograms were compared to independent, blindedexpert echocardiograms, with a target of 37 matched scans per trainee. SUBJECTS: Trainees were eligible to participate on completion of our in-house, mandatory echocardiography training. SETTING: Epworth Richmond is in an Australian, private academic hospital with a critical care echocardiography teaching program. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Reliability was assessed on nine measurements. The primary outcome was agreement on left ventricular function; secondary outcomes included qualitative and quantitative assessments. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa, Fleiss-Cohen weighted kappa, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, or calculation of sensitivity and specificity as appropriate. Seven trainees performed a total of 270 matched scans. There was excellent agreement between experts and trainees for left ventricular function (Kappa, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91). Secondary outcome measures (95% CI) were ventricular size ratio Kappa 0.76 (0.58-0.94), sensitivity 92.3% (64.0-99.8%), specificity 97.2% (94.9-99.1%), pericardial effusion Kappa 0.37 (0.13-0.60), sensitivity 33.3% (13.3-59.0%), specificity 97.6% (94.8-99.1%). Concordance coefficients (95% CI) for the remaining outcomes were left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral 0.79 (0.74-0.84), left ventricular internal diameter in diastole 0.82 (0.78-0.86), left ventricular outflow tract diameter 0.61 (0.53-0.69), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion 0.71 (0.64-0.78), tricuspid regurgitation maximum velocity 0.55 (0.44-0.65), and inferior vena cava diameter 0.60 (0.49-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: ICU trainees showed very high overall agreement with experts on left ventricular function and substantial agreement for most secondary outcomes. This is the first study to assess echocardiography accuracy in Australian ICU trainees.

Evaluation of intensivist basic training in transthoracic echocardiography in the postoperative period of heart surgery

BackgroundTransthoracic echocardiography can significantly change the management of many critical patients, and is being incorporated into many Intensive Care Units (ICU). Very few studies have examined the feasibility and impact of intensivists performing basic transthoracic echocardiography upon the management of critical patients after cardiac surgery. The present study therefore evaluates the quality of acquisition and accuracy of intensivist interpretation of basic transthoracic echocardiograms in the postoperative period of heart surgery. MethodsOver an 8-month period we prospectively studied 148 patients within 24h after admission to a university hospital ICU following heart surgery. We performed basic transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate ventricular function, pericardial effusion, hypovolemia and mitral regurgitation. Cohen's Kappa was used to compare transthoracic echocardiograms obtained by intensivists with basic versus advanced training. Concordance on image acquisition and interpretation was evaluated. ResultsWe analyzed data of adequate transthoracic echocardiograms in 148 patients (92.5%). Apical four-chamber view and advanced trainees obtained better quality images. Concordance was good for right and left ventricular function (kappa=0.7±0.14 and 0.87±0.05, respectively), and moderate for the remaining parameters. Interpretation concordance between basic and advanced training intensivists was good (kappa=0.73±0.05). ConclusionsIntensivists with basic training in echocardiography are capable of performing and interpreting echocardiograms in most patients during the postoperative period of heart surgery.

Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum

Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum

Global longitudinal strain is a more reproducible measure of left ventricular function than ejection fraction regardless of echocardiographic training

BackgroundLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reproducibility compared with LVEF. Our aim was to compare reproducibility of GLS and LVEF between an expert and trainee both as echocardiographic examiner and analyst.MethodsForty-seven patients with recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) underwent echocardiographic examination by both an expert echocardiographer and a trainee. Both echocardiographers, blinded for clinical data and each other’s findings, performed image analysis for evaluation of intra- and inter- observer variability. GLS was measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson’s biplane method.ResultsThe trainee measured a GLS of − 19.4% (±3.5%) and expert − 18.7% (±3.2%) with an Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (0.74–0.95). LVEF by trainee was 50.3% (±8.2%) and by expert 53.6% (±8.6%), ICC coefficient was 0.63 (0.32–0.80). For GLS the systematic difference was 0.21% (− 4.58–2.64) vs. 4.08% (− 20.78–12.62) for LVEF.ConclusionGLS is a more reproducible method for evaluation of LV function than LVEF regardless of echocardiographic training.

Resident performance in basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography

Background:Training in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is based on hands-on training in the operating room, which is time consuming and therefore limits its experience among anesthesiologists. Medical simulations have been successfully used for training of invasive procedures in many areas.This paper compares the difference in effectiveness of teaching the 11 basic TEE views using either e-learning, simulation based training or hands-on training in the operating room in 3 groups of residents.Methods:We included 51 anesthesia and intensive care residents of all training levels but no prior training in echocardiography in this prospective randomized single-center study.Residents received a tutorial about theoretical knowledge followed by 2 practical study sessions either by e-learning using an online simulator (www.pie.med.utoronto.ca/TEE), with the simulation mannequin (CAE Vimedix Simulator) or in the operating room. Both, a theoretical multiple choice test (0–50 points) and a practical exam test (0–110 points) on the simulation mannequin had to be completed.The primary endpoint was the post-training scores in the practical and theoretical exams after all training sessions.Results:Residents received significantly higher test scores in both practical and theoretical examinations after training with the simulation mannequin (108.41 ± 2.09, 40.6 ± 5.23, n = 17) compared with e-learning (106.88 ± 4.53, 36 ± 4.76, n = 17) or hands-on training (106.82 ± 2.01, 34.94 ± 4.72, n = 17).Conclusions:Simulation based TEE training provides more effective training than other teaching methods. It is therefore especially suitable for the initial stages of TEE training to acquire psychomotor skills and knowledge of echo-anatomy.

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fetal echocardiography for high-risk pregnancies in a tertiary center in Egypt

BackgroundAdvances in fetal echocardiography training among pediatric cardiologists have led to substantial improvements in prenatal detection of congenital heart diseases (CHDs). Nevertheless, diagnostic accuracy varies among centers. Moreover, this subspecialty continues to evolve in developing countries, with limited studies assessing fetal echocardiography sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in developing countries such as Egypt. Subject and methodsHigh-risk pregnancies referred for fetal echocardiography from January 2011 to January 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All of the cases included had one of the high-risk indications for fetal echocardiography. Maternal age and gestational age at the prenatal diagnosis were determined, and detailed fetal and neonatal echocardiograms were documented. The results of fetal and postnatal echocardiography were compared to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fetal echocardiography. A minor lesion was defined when no postnatal intervention was needed and a major anomaly when postnatal cardiac therapy, surgery, or intervention was required. ResultsOut of 615 pregnant patients referred, comparisons between fetal and neonatal echocardiography were possible in 458 fetuses, with 157 patients excluded from the study. The mean maternal age in the study was 26.97±5.871 years and the mean gestational age at referral was 27.24±5.407 weeks. The most common indication for prenatal echocardiography in this cohort was a family history of CHD (142; 31%) followed by nonimmune hydrops (97; 21.18%) and abnormal obstetrical ultrasound screening (64; 13.97%). We had three false-positive minor diagnoses and four false-negative cases with only one requiring intervention. Prenatal diagnosis in this study was accurate in 98.47% of cases. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the current work were 97.03%, 99.07%, and 98.47, respectively. ConclusionFetal echocardiography is considered a highly sensitive specific tool for prenatal detection of congenital heart diseases in high-risk pregnancies even in developing countries. However, minor fetal cardiac disorders are challenging to diagnose and family counseling should emphasize the difficulty of excluding or confirming such lesions.

Agreement between Emergency Physicians and a Cardiologist on Cardiac Function Evaluation after Short Training

Objective: Delayed diagnosis and treatment of shock patients may lead to multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and death. Volume status assessment in shock patients is crucial for guiding early management. Focused echocardiography has become an important tool for assessing volume status because it is non-invasive and easy to perform. We aimed to ascertain the degree of agreement between emergency medicine (EM) residents and a cardiologist on cardiac function evaluations using echocardiography. We also assessed the extent of agreement on pericardial effusion diagnoses. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Department, Siriraj Hospital. The EM residents who had limited experience in ultrasound examination underwent a 3-hour echocardiography training course consisting of a lecture and a workshop before starting the study. Patients with shock or suspected hypervolemia were included. Echocardiography was performed by EM residents to evaluate ventricular function of each patients. With visual estimation, they classified the left ventricular function (LVF) into 3 categories: good, moderate and poor. The video files were recorded and re-evaluated by a cardiologist offline. The correlation of left ventricular function estimation and the diagnosis of pericardial effusion between the two operators were determined. Results: Ninety-two patients were enrolled between October and December 2014. The overall agreement of ventricular function assessment between the EM residents and the cardiologist was 79.4% (weighted kappa = 0.73). The degree of agreements of LVF classified as poor, moderate and good LVF were 87.5%, 37.5% and 95% respectively. Moreover, the residents diagnosed the pericardial effusion with 100% accuracy, compared to the cardiologist. Conclusion: Following a short educational training, the EM residents efficiently assessed the left ventricular function with a high level of agreement with a cardiologist.

Echocardiography in the Intensive Care Unit

This review illustrates the incremental value of echocardiography as a bedsite tool for diagnosis and monitoring in critically ill patients with cardiopulmonary dysfunction. It provides practical guidance on the use of basic echocardiography in clinical scenarios frequently encountered in the ICU. Echocardiography has become readily accessible to critical care physicians now and equipment is even been designed specifically for use in acute and critical care environments. The most important barrier to a more widespread implementation of this technique today, however, is the lack of training and experience. Indeed, proficiency is an absolute requirement for echo-based decision-making to positively impact on patient outcome. Echocardiography has become an indispensable tool in the management of critically ill patients with severe cardiorespiratory conditions. It has the potential to become a game changer in ICU but current studies do not yet indicate a beneficial effect on outcome. It appears that structured training and certification in basic echocardiography are an absolute necessity to catalyze the widespread adoption and to guarantee the optimal use of ultrasound in the care of critically ill patients.

Functional echocardiography training in the neonatal intensive care unit: comparing measurements and results with the pediatric cardiologist

ObjectivesFunctional echocardiography is a valuable tool in the neonatal intensive care unit, but training programs are not standardized. The aim was to report an functional echocardiography training program for neonatologists and to describe the agreement of their measurements with the pediatric cardiologist. MethodsFunctional echocardiography training lasted 32h. After training program, the neonatologists performed functional echocardiography in the neonatal intensive care unit and were required to measure left cardiac chambers dimensions, left ventricle systolic function, right and left ventricular output, ductus arteriosus diameter, and flow pattern. Images were recorded by the equipment and reviewed offline by the pediatric cardiologist. The Bland–Altman test was used for quantitative variables and the kappa test, for qualitative variables. ResultsTwenty-two trained neonatologists performed 100 functional echocardiography exams. Ductus arteriosus identification and flow pattern had substantial agreement (kappa=0.91 and 0.88, respectively), as well as its diameter (mean difference=0.04mm). The mean difference for the aortic root was −1.2mm; left atrium, 0.60mm; left ventricle diastolic diameter, −0.90mm; left ventricle systolic diameter, −0.30mm. Shortening fraction and ejection fraction correlated well with broad limits of agreement, −2.96% (14.88; −20.82%) and −-3.43% (15.54; −22.40%), respectively. Right and left ventricular output had broad limits of agreement, 16.69mL/kg/min (222.76; −189.37) and 23.57mL/kg/min (157.88; −110), respectively. There was good agreement between interpretations of normal or low cardiac output (76.7% for right ventricular output; 75.7% for left ventricular output). ConclusionThis functional echocardiography training program enabled neonatologists to obtain adequate skills in performing the images, obtaining good agreement with the cardiologist in simple hemodynamic measurements and ductus arteriosus evaluation.

Premature aging following war-induced trauma: Results of a three-decade longitudinal study

Comprehensive educational initiatives in ultrasound for practicing physicians are lacking. We developed a perioperative ultrasound training program for faculty to offer a broad orientation to the principles and clinical applications of ultrasound.The program consisted of two phases. Phase one, which introduced ultrasound via didactic and hands-on components, had six live sessions. At the end of each, participants completed a knowledge quiz. During the sixth session, faculty participated in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). For phase two, faculty attended two to three sessions (8-10 hours each) of in-depth individualized training and demonstrated supervised performance of ultrasound-related procedures of their choice.Participants included Anesthesia faculty at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.On average 30 faculty members attended each live session for phase one; 12 completed phase two. There was a significant difference in quiz scores across the six sessions (p < 0.001) with scores for Session 6 being significantly higher than for Session 1 (p < 0.001). The average mean and median scores on the three OSCE stations were 95.63% and 98.33%, respectively. For phase two, the 8 participants who received training in regional anesthesia each performed > 10 blocks on patients over two days; 5 of the 7 participants who received training in transthoracic echocardiography each completed more than 15 examinations on simulators and 10 examinations on patients.It is possible to implement a departmental educational program for ultrasound to improve ultrasound knowledge and skills in practicing anesthesiologists.

Basic critical care echocardiography training of intensivists allows reproducible and reliable measurements of cardiac output

BackgroundAlthough pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) have been the reference standard for calculating cardiac output, echocardiographic estimation of cardiac output (CO) by cardiologists has shown high accuracy compared to PAC measurements. A few studies have assessed the accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of CO in critically ill patients by intensivists with basic training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CO measurements by intensivists with basic training using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound vs. PACs in critically ill patients.MethodsCritically ill patients who required hemodynamic monitoring with a PAC were eligible for the study. Three different intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training obtained three measurements of CO on each patient. The maximum of three separate left-ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements and the mean of three LVOT velocity time integral measurements were used. The inter-observer reliability and correlation of CO measured by PACs vs. critical care echocardiography were assessed.ResultsA total of 20 patients were included. Data were analyzed comparing the measurements of CO by PAC vs. echocardiography. The inter-observer reliability for measuring CO by echocardiography was good based on a coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.6 (95% CI 0.48–0.86, p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement between the two techniques were acceptable (0.64 ± 1.18 L/min, 95% limits of agreement of − 1.73 to 3.01 L/min). In patients with CO < 6.5 L/min, the agreement between CO measured by PAC vs. echocardiography improved (0.13 ± 0.89 L/min; 95% limits of agreement of − 1.64 to 2.22 L/min). The mean percentage of error between the two methods was 17%.ConclusionsCritical care echocardiography performed at the bedside by intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training is an accurate and reproducible technique to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

WAMAMI: emergency physicians can accurately identify wall motion abnormalities in acute myocardial infarction

ObjectiveThe ability to identify wall motion abnormalities may be useful for emergency clinicians, but is not typically evaluated in point-of-care echocardiograms. We sought to determine if emergency physicians with basic training in emergency echocardiography could identify regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MethodsWe prospectively enrolled patients with admitted with STEMI. Resident physicians with basic training in emergency ultrasound, blinded to other patient data, performed a point-of-care echocardiogram to evaluate for RWMA. If present, they also recorded the suspected territory of the RWMA. We calculated test performance characteristics and compared the agreement between point-of-care and comprehensive echocardiogram for RWMA and territory. Results75 patients with STEMI were enrolled, and 62% had a RMWA. RWMA were identified with excellent test performance characteristics (sensitivity 88% (95% CI 75–96); specificity 92% (95% CI 75–99)). There was substantial agreement between the point-of-care echocardiogram and reference standard (K = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64–0.94). ConclusionsEmergency physicians with core training in point-of-care echocardiography can accurately identify RMWA.

Learning curve-cumulative summation analysis of visual estimation of left ventricular function in novice practitioners: A STROBE-compliant article.

The aim of the present study was to determine the value of cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis in assessing the proficiency of novice practitioners in estimating the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF).Seven novice practitioners with no echocardiography experience were recruited in this observational study. Each practitioner assessed EF from echocardiographic video files of 100 cases, one by one, and received feedback and teaching. We obtained a CUSUM score through comparison of the gold standard values of EF and the EF values determined by the practitioners. Then, the practitioners underwent the same test 4 weeks later, except without feedback and teaching, using echocardiographic video files from 100 other cases.The mean number of visual estimation cases required to pass the learning curve (LC)-CUSUM test was 56.3 ± 9.1 (95% CI 47.8–64.7). The LC-CUSUM average of the 7 novice practitioners showed improvement in visual estimation skill, with an average acceptable level achieved after a mean experience of 55 cases. In the test performed after 4 weeks, 5 of the 7 novice practitioners showed significantly good overall agreement. All novice practitioners had a kappa coefficient greater than .8, and significant and almost perfect agreement was observed. All the participants exhibited a percentage of correct answers greater than 81%.We found that the novice practitioners could acquire an acceptable level of skill for estimating EF with short-term, self-learning-focused echocardiographic training.

Simulator-based training for learning resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a relatively new resuscitation tool in the emergency department. Recent studies have demonstrated that it can impact diagnosis and management of critically ill patients. The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a simulation-based curriculum for teaching emergency medicine residents a five-view TEE protocol. Emergency medicine residents with previous ultrasound experience were invited to attend a 1-hour TEE training session. The training consisted of a didactic lecture followed by guided practice on a simulator. Performance was measured prior to training, after the training session, and by a transfer test 1 to 2 weeks after training. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful image generation using a scoring tool by two blinded reviewers. Twenty-two residents completed the study. The percentage of successful views increased from 44.5% (SD 27.9) at baseline to 98.6% (SD 3.5) after training (p &lt; 0.001), and was 86.8% (SD 12.1) on transfer testing (p &lt; 0.001). A brief simulation-based teaching session was effective for teaching emergency medicine residents a five-view resuscitative TEE protocol. Future studies are needed to determine optimal methods for long-term skill retention.

Critical Care Ultrasound: A Systematic Review of International Training Competencies and Program.

Critical care ultrasonography has become established within ICUs as a diagnostic tool and to guide management strategies and practical procedures. Following an international consensus statement in 2011, various national professional societies and organizations have sought to develop and deliver training program. The aim of this review was to assess the similarities and differences among these postgraduate intensive care/critical care training program. A systematic review was performed in two steps. First, we searched medical databases and national societies' websites for documents meeting predefined inclusion criteria. If not found, professionals related to critical care ultrasonography were contacted. Data were extracted independently by two authors. Analyses were conducted on general training requirements as well as specific competencies defined in the documents. Eight national program from seven countries were identified from a total of 25 countries; all identified program have defined competencies for core critical care ultrasonography. Although there were common themes across these program, significant variations in training requirements and assessments existed, for example, number of scans required for echocardiography training ranged from 10 to 100. Furthermore, the specifics of each ultrasound module varied between program. Despite widespread and increasing use of ultrasound in ICUs, the majority of countries lacked a formal training program and clearly defined competencies. Even among the countries where these are available, there remains variability. There is a need to better define the competencies required in core critical care ultrasonography and standardize the assessment process.

Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion as a predictor of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in mechanically ventilated patients.

The accurate measurement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) requires high-quality images and echocardiography expertise. Critically ill patients can present challenges in obtaining good acoustic windows for ultrasound, particularly for ICU trainees early in their ultrasound learning. Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (MAPSE), a simple measurement, may be useful in this context to estimate LV systolic function. All adult patients admitted to the Alfred ICU between August 2012 and February 2013 who were on mechanical ventilation and needed an echocardiography examination were eligible to be included in the study. An ICU trainee in their first year of echocardiography training performed MAPSE measurements. An advanced echocardiographer classified LV systolic function into normal, mild, moderate or severe categories based on the visual estimation of LVEF. The relationship between the MAPSE measurements and the range of LV systolic function was assessed. Amongst 39 patients, the mean (SD) age was 55 (18.6) years, 20 (50%) were males, 36 (90%) were in sinus rhythm, 19 (48%) were on vasopressors, 12 (30%) were on inotropes and 23 (58%) were on mandatory mode mechanical ventilation. The mean (SD) MAPSE was 12.2 (5.28) mm. 28 (70%) of the patients had normal or mildly reduced LVEF. The ROC analysis showed that a MAPSE cut-off point of ≥12.5mm diagnosed normal or mildly reduced LVEF with 82.14% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity. The area under ROC curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.00). MAPSE is useful as a surrogate for LVEF in mechanically ventilated patients. In early critical care echocardiography training, a novice learner can perform MAPSE easily, accurately, and find it helpful for assessment of LVEF.

Levels of training in critical care echocardiography in adults. Recommendations from the College of Intensive Care Medicine Ultrasound Special Interest Group.

Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is commonly performed in many intensive care units across Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). The scope of practice ranges from Basic CCE through to Advanced CCE and includes the use of transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography. Many training and qualification pathways exist with no standardisation of education goals. This document defines different levels of CCE expertise and recommends minimum training standards for each level of adult CCE in ANZ. Guidelines committee of College of Intensive Care Medicine's Ultrasound Special Interest Group held multiple face to face meetings, organised teleconferences, conducted a survey of the Fellows of the college and reviewed the international CCE training pathways prior to writing these guidelines.

Improving the accuracy of heart failure diagnosis in low-resource settings through task sharing and decentralization

ABSTRACTBackground: Task sharing of TTE may improve capacity for heart failure diagnosis and management in patients in remote, low-resource settings but the impact on diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes has not been studied.Objectives: Determine feasibility and impact of non-expert training in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to improve the diagnosis and outcomes of patients with suspected heart failure in Uganda.Methods: This two-part study examined an innovative training program to develop TTE competency among non-experts and used a pre-post design to determine the impact of decentralized TTE. Four of 8 non-experts (50%) passed a three-part training course. The training comprised of distance learning through a web-based curriculum, a 2-day hands-on workshop with cardiologists, and independent practice with remote mentorship. Continuous measures were compared (pre- vs. post-TTE) using t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as distributionally appropriate and categorical variables assessed through chi-square testing. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to standard methodology comparing diagnosis pre- and post-TTE during phase 2.Results: Performance in the post-training phase showed good agreement with expert categorization (κ = 0.80) with diagnostic concordance in 421 of 454 studies (92.7%). TTE changed the preliminary diagnosis in 81% of patients, showing low specificity of clinical decision-making alone (14.2%; 95% CI 10.1–19.2%). Dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease with preserved systolic function, and right heart failure were the most underdiagnosed conditions prior to TTE while hypertensive heart disease with decreased systolic function was the most over-diagnosed condition.Conclusions: In conclusion, non-expert providers can achieve a high level of proficiency for the categorization of heart failure using handheld TTE in low-resource settings and use of telemedicine and remote mentorship may improve performance and feasibility. The addition of TTE resulted in substantial improvement in etiological specificity. Further study is needed to understand implications of this strategy on healthcare utilization, long-term patient outcomes, and cost.