Reviewed by: Mitzvah Girls: Bringing Up the Next Generation of Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn Leslie Ginsparg Klein (bio) Mitzvah Girls: Bringing Up the Next Generation of Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn. By Ayala Fader. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. xvii+260 pp. In Mitzvah Girls, Ayala Fader provides a fascinating and nuanced view of a little-studied population, Bobover Hasidic women and girls. Fader’s ethnographic study demonstrates that language, including content and syntax, can be rich source material for scholars studying culture and society. Her findings challenge previous scholarship’s conceptions of women in traditional religious communities. Fader conducted fieldwork in Boro Park, Brooklyn, observing Hasidic women and girls at home, school, and informal education classes. While her research is solidly grounded in ethnographic theory, Fader presents her findings in jargon-free language that scholars of any discipline can appreciate. In each one of the thematic chapters, Fader applies a strong gender analysis, a necessity when studying a society in which gender influences almost every aspect of life. Fader discusses how Bobover women, in their roles as teachers and mothers, socialize the next generation of girls into proper Hasidic womanhood. She pays close attention to subtleties in the language women [End Page 375] and children use in their daily activities. In Fader’s estimation, these interactions are important because in Hasidic philosophy, daily actions are ways to uplift the mundane into holy and thereby bring redemption. What could easily be simple exchanges about following rules, eating lunch, or playing games instead become religious lessons. For women and girls who do not participate in the male realm of Hasidic public life, socialization comes in the form of the language of everyday interactions. The study of Hasidic women requires scholars to rethink their paradigms of religious women. Fader states that in stereotypical nonliberal communities, women are less educated and more insulated from the secular world than men. But in the Hasidic community, women generally receive a stronger secular education and are more integrated into the outside world than their male counterparts. Furthermore, she believes that scholars have mistakenly assumed that progress and modernity are inexorably linked to individual freedom, autonomy, and secularization. Fader posits that Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn have constructed an alternate modernity. The Hasidic women she studied do not deny modern conceptions of personal autonomy; rather, they socialize girls to use their autonomy to conform to community norms. Fader shows that Bobover women have created a hybrid language of Yiddish and English that serves their social purpose. Depending on the context, women will alternatively choose an English word, a Yiddish word, an English word with a Yiddish pronunciation or a Yiddish word with an American pronunciation. Through this process, these women attempt to safely mediate the secular world while protecting and ensuring the continuity of their religious society. While to the outsider all Hasidim might look the same, and certainly many commonalities exist, Fader demonstrates great diversity within Hasidic sects’ attitudes toward language, dress, religious practice, and secular knowledge. Fader chose to study Bobover and unaffiliated Hasidim, self-proclaimed “moderates” (11). These women contrast themselves to more insular Satmar Hasidim on the right and to more acculturated, non-Hasidic right-wing Orthodox women on the left. To Fader’s subjects, “modern” means wearing a long wig or sheer stockings as opposed to the Bobover style of short wigs and opaque or seamed stockings. Modern Orthodox women who might wear pants and not cover their hair after marriage are not even on the spectrum. One might assume that in this community, the more traditional women would be the most revered. However, while American Bobover leaders advocate replicating their construction of the European Hasidic past, the women and girls Fader studied sought to achieve what they perceive as a balance between American and European Hasidic culture. [End Page 376] They strive to be, as Fader frames it, “with it,” but not “modern” (121). To be “with it,” a woman needs to have the proper level of fluency in American culture. “Nebby” (nerdy) women dress in styles Fader’s subjects consider too “old world” and speak poor, accented English (131). However, Bobover women do not aspire to the more fashionable dress and articulate...