Despite its potential usage in social and behavioral sciences, there has been limited research on Latent Growth Models (LGM) with categorical indicators. The categorical nature of binary or ordinal variables violates the multivariate normality assumption of the traditional maximum likelihood (ML) estimator. Alternative estimators can be employed, such as marginal maximum likelihood (MML), categorical weighted least squares (c-WLS), and categorical diagonally weighted least squares (c-DWLS). A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the three estimators in the context of categorical LGM. The results revealed that the MML estimator performed the best for the correctly specified linear growth model, whereas the robust c-DWLS or c-WLS estimator excelled in correctly specified quadratic growth model. The robust c-DWLS and c-WLS estimators were more sensitive to model misspecifications. The findings of the present study provide important implications and practical recommendations for empirical researchers using categorical LGM.