What happens when two professors of a Keck-sponsored experimental course in personal and professional responsibility1 borrow ideas from W. Edwards Deming's Continuous Quality Improvement theory,2 Peter Senge's business systems theory,3 Scott Peck's community-building techniques,4 Andrew Watson's pungent criticisms of traditional legal education pedagogy,5 MyersBriggs personality typing,6 Donald Williamson's family systems theory,7 and oldtime story-telling?8 One University of Houston Law Center student assessed such a course offered in spring of 1995 as the most informative, most communal, and most valuable class I have experienced while in law school. Another said, After listening and learning this semester .. ., I know that I am capable of facing clients and handling their problems. I am capable of being a counselor in true sense of word. I can listen, care, and resolve. From another: the most important realization that I have gained from this class-a fountainhead for all other ethics rules-[is] that I have a better understanding of myself. More simply, by looking inward I will learn to act in an ethical way outward. Psychobabble, said most critical student, but then added,