Adjustment For Trabecular Bone Score Research Articles

TBS correlates with bone density and microstructure at trabecular and cortical bone evaluated by HR-pQCT.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) estimates bone microstructure, which is directly measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT). We evaluated the correlation between these methods and TBS influence on fracture risk assessed by FRAX. We evaluated 129 individuals (82 women, 43 postmenopausal) 20 to 82.3 years without prevalent clinical or non-clinical morphometric vertebral fractures, using DXA (spine and hip), HR-pQCT at distal radius (R) and tibia (T) and TBS which classifies bone microarchitecture as normal (TBS ≥ 1.350), partially degraded (1.200 < TBS < 1.350), or degraded (TBS ≤ 1.200). Spine and hip BMD and HR-pQCT parameters at cortical bone: area (T), density (R,T) thickness (T) and trabecular bone: density (R,T), number (T) and thickness (R) were significantly better in the 78 individuals with normal TBS (group 1) versus the 51 classified as partially degraded (n = 42) or degraded microarchitecture (n = 9) altogether (group 2). TBS values correlated with age (r = -0.55), positively with spine and hip BMD and all cortical and trabecular bone density and microstructure parameters evaluated, p < 0.05 all tests. Binary logistic regression defined age (p = 0.008) and cortical thickness (p = 0.018) as main influences on TBS, while ANCOVA demonstrated that HR-pQCT data corrected for age were not different between TBS groups 1 and 2. TBS adjustment increased FRAX risk for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures. We describe significant association between TBS and both trabecular and cortical bone parameters measured by HR-pQCT, consistent with TBS influence on fracture risk estimation by FRAX, including hip fractures, where cortical bone predominates.

Bone quality, mineral density, and fractures in heart failure.

The trabecular bone score (TBS) indirectly estimates bone quality and predicts low-impact fractures independently of bone mineral density (BMD). However, there is still a paucity of data linking bone and heart diseases, mainly with gaps in the TBS analysis. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated TBS, BMD, and fractures in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in sex-, BMI- and age-matched controls, and we assessed the fracture probability using the FRAX tool, considering active search for fractures by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and the adjustment for the TBS. TBS values were 1.296 ± 0.14 in 85 patients (43.5% women; age 65 ± 13 years) and 1.320 ± 0.11 in 142 controls (P = 0.07), being reduced (< 1.31) in 51.8% and 46.1% of them, respectively (P = 0.12). TBS was lower in patients than in the controls when BMD was normal (P = 0.04) and when the BMI was 15-37 kg/m2 (P = 0.03). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; P = 0.026), albumin (OR 0.12; P = 0.046), statin use (OR 0.27; P = 0.03), and energy intake (OR 1.03; P = 0.014) were associated with reduced TBS. Fractures on VFA occurred in 42.4% of the patients, and VFA and TBS adjustment increased the fracture risk by 16%-23%. Patients with HFrEF had poor bone quality, with a better discriminating impact of the TBS assessment when BMD was normal, and BMI was suitable for densitometric analysis. Variables related to the prognosis, severity, and treatment of HFrEF were associated with reduced TBS. VFA and TBS adjustment increased fracture risk.

Trabecular bone score, bone mineral density and fracture risk in women with rheumatoid arthritis (pilot study)

The aim – to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture, as well as the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and methods: 95 postmenopausal women (mean age 62.3±8.1 years) with a confirmed RA were included. All patients underwent a questionnaire, clinical and laboratory examination, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine (L1–L4), proximal femur, and trabecular bone score (TBS) assessment. The 10-year probability of osteoporotic fracture was calculated using the FRAX tool without including femoral neck (FN) BMD (BMD–), with FN BMD (BMD +) and additionally adjustment for TBS (BMD + TBS). Results. Osteoporosis (OP) was found in 41 (43.2%) patients: in L1–L4 – in 26,3%, in FN – in 22.1%, and in the total hip (TH) – in 11.6% persons. Degraded microarchitecture according to TBS was found in 38.9% of patients, partially degraded – in 25.3%, and normal – in 35.8% of women with RA. A high risk of fracture according to FRAX BMD– was detected in 49.5% of patients. TBS correlated with age (r=–0.30; p=0.003), duration of postmenopausal period (r=–0.26; p=0.014), cumulative dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) (r=–0.34; p=0.045), FRAX BMD– (r=–0.24; p&lt;0.05) and FRAX BMD+ (r=–0.21; p&lt;0.05); L1–L4 BMD (r=0.43; p&lt;0.001), FN BMD (r=0.21; p=0.038), TH BMD (r=0.23; p=0.02). Low TBS was significantly more often detected in people with a history of fractures compared to people without them (p&lt;0.05). Among RA patients with normal L1–L4 BMD 9.5% of persons had degraded microarchitecture of bone tissue according to TBS. The inclusion of TBS in FRAX increased the risk of fractures to high in 9.5% of patients and reduced it to low in 7.4% of women, due to which the total number of people with RA who had a high risk of fractures became 54.7%. Conclusion. OP was diagnosed in 43.2%, and degraded microarchitecture of bone tissue according to TBS – in 38.9% of postmenopausal women with RA. A high risk of fractures according to FRAX was found in 49.5%. TBS negatively correlated with age, duration of postmenopause, cumulative GCs dose, FRAX fracture risk, and positively correlated with BMD in all measurement sites. The FRAX adjustment by TBS redistributed patients in risk groups, as a result of which 54.7% of RA patients needed anti-osteoporotic treatment.

FRAX Adjustment by Trabecular Bone Score with or Without Bone Mineral Density: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Trabecular bone score (TBS), a texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a FRAX®-independent risk factor for fracture. The TBS adjustment to FRAX assumes the presence of femoral neck BMD in the calculation. However, there are many individuals in whom hip DXA cannot be acquired. Whether the TBS-adjustment would apply to FRAX probabilities calculated without BMD has not been studied. The current analysis was performed to evaluate major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture risk adjusted for FRAX with and without femoral neck BMD. The study cohort consisted of 71,209 individuals (89.8% female, mean age 64.0 years). During mean follow-up 8.7 years, 6743 (9.5%) individuals sustained one or more incident MOF, of which 2037 (2.9%) sustained a hip fracture. Lower TBS was significantly associated with increased fracture risk when adjusted for FRAX probabilities, with a slightly larger effect when BMD was not included. Inclusion of TBS in the risk calculation gave a small but significant increase in stratification for fracture probabilities estimated with and without BMD. Calibration plots showed very minor deviations from the line of identity, indicating overall good calibration. In conclusion, the existing equations for incorporating TBS in FRAX estimates of fracture probability work similarly when femoral neck BMD is not used in the calculation. This potentially extends the range of situations where TBS can be used clinically to those individuals in whom lumbar spine TBS is available but femoral neck BMD is not available.

Comparison of predictive value of FRAX, trabecular bone score, and bone mineral density for vertebral fractures in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study

Assessing fracture risk is important for managing patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Vertebral fracture (VF) is the most common fracture and is associated with future VF and non-VF. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of FRAX, trabecular bone score (TBS), and bone mineral density (BMD) for VFs, compared to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and postmenopausal women, and to identify risk factors for VFs in SSc. In this cross-sectional study, prevalent VFs, 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture by FRAX (FRAX-MOF), TBS, and BMD were assessed in women with SSc (n = 69) and RA (n = 58), and postmenopausal women (n = 38). Risk factors for osteoporosis, modified Rodnan total skin score (mRSS), organ involvement, and patterns of nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) were also evaluated. The accuracy of BMD (T-score ≤ -2.5), TBS and FRAX-MOF, with and without TBS adjustment, to detect prevalent VF was assessed by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Patients with SSc (14.5%) and RA (17.2%) had significantly more VFs than postmenopausal women (0%) (P = .031). Non-significant differences were observed in TBS and BMD of all groups. The FRAX-MOF were higher in RA (9.2%) than SSc group (6.1%) and postmenopausal women (5.5%) (P < .001). Based on the ROC curve, TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF (0.803) showed largest area under curve (AUC) to detect the prevalent VFs, followed by FRAX-MOF (0.796), TBS (0.765), and BMD (0.588) in the SSc group. In the RA group, FRAX-MOF had the largest AUC (0.896), followed by TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF (0.863), TBS (0.736), and BMD (0.686). The cutoffs for FRAX-MOF and TBS-adjusted FRAX-MOF for detecting VFs were 8.95% and 9.7% for SSc, and 14.5% and 14% for RA. No association between VFs and SSc subtypes, organ involvement, mRSS or NFC patterns was found. FRAX-MOF, with or without TBS, had better predictive value for VFs than BMD and TBS in SSc. However, FRAX-MOF underestimated the probability of VFs in SSc compared with RA.

Degraded Bone Microarchitecture in Women with PHPT–Significant Predictor of Fracture Probability

Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss and trabecular bone score (TBS) alteration, which current guidelines recommend assessing. Considering TBS alongside BMD for a 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) may improve PHPT management. Retrospective, cross-sectional study composed of 49 Caucasian females (62 ± 10.6 years, 27.7 ± 0.87 kg/m2) with PHPT and 132 matched control subjects (61.3 ± 10.5 years, 27.5 ± 0.49 kg/m2) evaluated in 3 years. We assessed lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD, T and Z scores (GE Healthcare Lunar Osteodensitometer) and TBS (iNsight 1.8), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip FRAX. Patients with PHPT had statistically lower mean values for lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01), LS T-scores (-2 ± 0.2 vs -1.4 ± 0.1 SD, P = .009), LS Z scores (-0.9 ± 0.19 vs -0.1 ± 0.11 SD, P = .009), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.83 ± 0.01 g/cm2, P = .02), FN T-scores (-1.8 ± 0.13 vs -1.5 ± 0.07 SD, P = .017), FN Z scores (-0.51 ± 0.87 vs -0.1 ± 0.82 SD, P = .006), and TBS (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01) compared with control subjects. 22.4% of patients with PHPT had degraded microarchitecture (TBS < 1.2) vs. 7.6% in control group (χ2 = 0.008). PHPT proved to be a covariate with unique contribution (P = .031) alongside LS BMD (P = .040) in a linear regression model [R 2 = 0.532, F(4,16) = 4.543] for TBS < 1.2. TBS adjustment elevated MOF FRAX both for PHPT (4.35 ± 0.6% vs 5.25% ± 0.73%, P < .001) and control groups (4.5 ± 0.24% vs 4.7% ± 0.26%, P < .001) compared with BMD-bases FRAX, but also increased differently between the 2 study groups (1.1-folds for PHPT patients and 1.04 for control subjects, P = .034). Compared with control, TBS-adjusted FRAX provides significantly higher MOF risk than BMD-based FRAX in PHPT women.

Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Correlates With Prevalent Fractures, and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates

ObjectiveTo investigate the added value of 1/3 radius (1/3R) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by spine and hip sites and its correlation with prevalent fractures and predicted fracture risk. MethodsFracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores for hip and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) with/without trabecular bone score were considered proxy for fracture risk. The contribution of 1/3R to risk prediction was depicted via linear regression models with FRAX score as the dependent variable—first only with central and then with radius T-score as an additional covariate. Significance of change in the explained variance was compared by F-test. ResultsThe study included 1453 patients, 86% women, aged 66 ± 10 years. A total of 32% (n = 471) were osteoporotic by spine/hip and 8% (n = 115) by radius only, constituting a 24.4% increase in the number of subjects defined as osteoporotic (n = 586, 40%). Prior fracture prevalence was similar among patients with osteoporosis by spine/hip (17.4%) and radius only (19.1%) (P = .77).FRAX prediction by a regression model using spine/hip T-score yielded explained variance of 51.8% and 49.9% for MOF and 39.8% and 36.4% for hip (with/without trabecular bone score adjustment, respectively). The contribution of 1/3R was statistically significant (P < .001) and slightly increased the explained variance to 52.3% and 50.4% for MOF and 40.9% and 37.4% for hip, respectively. ConclusionReclassification of BMD results according to radius measurements results in higher diagnostic output. Prior fractures were equally prevalent among patients with radius-only and classic-site osteoporosis. FRAX tool performance slightly improved by incorporating radius BMD. Whether this approach may lead to a better fracture prediction warrants further prospective evaluation.

TBS in early postmenopausal women with severe vertebral osteoporosis.

Severe vertebral osteoporosis is a rare condition in early postmenopausal women. We seek to determine whether Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), which is a new bone texture measurement, could be of additional value in evaluating trabecular bone properties in this population. Lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral densities (BMDs) and TBS were measured in 105 early postmenopausal women (group 1: "cases", mean age: 53.1±2.6yrs.) with severe vertebral osteoporosis defined as a vertebral BMD T-score≤3, as well as in 105 healthy postmenopausal women matched for age (group 2) and 105 older osteoporotic women matched for vertebral BMD (group 3, mean age: 63.9±4yrs.). None of the women had a secondary cause for osteoporosis. Correlations between TBS values and BMD were calculated after controlling for clinical characteristics. The women in group 1 (cases) were significantly smaller and thinner and had a history of more fractures than the age-matched controls (p<0.05). Mean LS and FN BMD values were significantly lower in the cases than in the age-matched controls (0.770±0.05 vs 1.106±0.11g/cm2 and 0.700±0.07 vs 0.872±0.12g/cm2, for LS and FN, respectively; p<0.001). The mean TBS value was also significantly lower in the cases than in the age-matched controls (1.24±0.08 vs 1.37±0.07, p<0.001) but significantly higher than in the older osteoporotic controls (1.20±0.07, p<0.05). After adjustment for vertebral BMD, the difference in TBS values between the cases and the age-matched controls was no longer significant although it remained significantly higher than in the older osteoporotic controls. This would suggest that in group 1, osteoporosis is rather the consequence of a low peak bone mass than of further bone degradation while the greater decrease in TBS value in elderly osteoporotic controls is more likely to reflect additional damage in bone microarchitecture associated with aging. In a multivariate analysis including age, vertebral and femoral neck BMD, height and weight (R2=0.60, p<0.0001), TBS was found to be negatively and independently associated with age (r=-0.31 p<0.0001) and height (r=-0.20 p<0.001). The FRAX score was significantly higher in group 1 and group 3 women than in the healthy control women (group 2). There were no changes in the results after adjustment for TBS. Women presenting with severe vertebral osteoporosis at the beginning of menopause have TBS values that are, first and foremost, proportional to their BMD. Whether this indicates that osteoporosis in this population is the consequence of a low peak bone mass remains to be determined and further studies are required. Nevertheless, the value of measuring TBS in addition to BMD appears to be relatively negligible in early postmenopausal women with severe vertebral osteoporosis.

Low Predictive Value of FRAX Adjusted by Trabecular Bone Score for Osteoporotic Fractures in Korean Women: A Community-Based Cohort Study.

BackgroundThe value of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and the trabecular bone score (TBS) for assessing osteoporotic fracture risk has not been fully elucidated in Koreans. We conducted this study to clarify the predictive value of FRAX adjusted by TBS for osteoporotic fractures in Korean women.MethodsAfter screening 7,192 eligible subjects from the Ansung cohort, 1,165 women aged 45 to 76 years with available bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS data were enrolled in this study. We assessed their clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures and evaluated the predictive value of FRAX with or without BMD and TBS.ResultsDuring the mean follow-up period of 7.5 years, 99 (8.5%) women suffered major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and 28 (2.4%) experienced hip fractures. FRAX without BMD, BMD-adjusted FRAX, and TBS-adjusted FRAX were significantly associated with the risk of MOFs (hazard ratio [HR] per percent increase, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.14; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.15; and HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.13, respectively). However, BMD-adjusted FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX did not predict MOFs better than FRAX without BMD based on the Harrell’s C statistic. FRAX probabilities showed limited value for predicting hip fractures. The cut-off values of FRAX without BMD, FRAX with BMD, and FRAX with BMD adjusted by TBS for predicting MOFs were 7.2%, 5.0%, and 6.7%, respectively.ConclusionFRAX with BMD and TBS adjustment did not show better predictive value for osteoporotic fractures in this study than FRAX without adjustment. Moreover, the cut-off values of FRAX probabilities for treatment might be lower in Korean women than in other countries.

Chronic hemodialysis is associated with lower trabecular bone score, independent of bone mineral density: a case-control study.

In the general population, trabecular bone score (TBS) was shown to predict fracture independent of bone mineral density (BMD). In end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis (HD), the value of TBS is beyond that of BMD in currently unclear. Our aim was to assess lumbar spine (LS) TBS in HD patients compared with subjects with normal kidney function matched for age, sex, and LS BMD. We assessed TBS and LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD in 98 patient on permanent HD (42.8% males; mean age 57.5 ± 11.3years; dialysis vintage 5.5 ± 3.8years) and 98 control subjects (glomerular filtration rate > 60mL/min) using DXA. We simultaneously controlled for sex, age (± 3years), and LS BMD (± 0.03g/cm2). HD patients had significantly lower LS TBS (0.07 [95% CI 0.03-0.1]; p = 0.0004), TBS T-score (0.83 SD [95% CI 0.42-1.24]; p = 0.0001)) and TBS Z-score (0.81 SD [95% CI 0.41-1.20]; p = 0.0001) than matched controls. TBS significantly correlated with LS BMD in both HD patients (r = 0.382; p = 0.001) and controls (r = 0.36; p = 0.002). The two regression lines had similar slopes (0.3 vs. 0.28; p = 0.84) with different intercepts (0.88 vs. 0.98). TBS adjustment significantly increased the 10-year fracture risk from 3.7 to 5.3 for major osteoporotic fracture and from 0.9 to 1.5 for hip fracture. HD patients have lower TBS than controls matched for LS BMD, indicating altered bone microarchitecture. Also, the magnitude of TBS reduction in HD patients is constant at any LS BMD. Adjustment for TBS partially corrects the absolute 10-year fracture risk.

The utility and limitations of using trabecular bone score with FRAX.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a texture index derived from the lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry which can assess skeletal quality and provide information about fracture risk independent of bone mineral density (BMD). TBS is useful in assessing osteoporotic fracture risk, with lower TBS values associated with increased fracture risk. In this article, we review the current state of TBS, including its utility and limitations in the assessment and management of osteoporosis, with particular emphasis on the recent literature. Ten-year fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool can be improved through the use of a TBS adjustment. The use of TBS-adjusted FRAX can change management in a modest but significant number of patients, particularly in those close to an intervention threshold. Change in lumbar spine TBS for patients undergoing antiresorptive treatment is not a useful indicator of antifracture effect. Lumbar spine TBS provides information complementary to conventional BMD, and has been shown to be clinically useful for enhancing fracture risk prediction.

Trabecular Bone Score in Men and Women with Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes.

Diabetes is associated with increased skeletal fragility, despite higher bone mineral density (BMD). Alternative measures are necessary to more accurately determine fracture risk in individuals with diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to describe the relationship between trabecular bone score (TBS) and normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes and determine whether TBS-adjusted FRAX (Aus) score differed between these groups. This study included 555 men (68.7±12.2years) and 514 women (62.0±12.0years), enrolled in the observational Geelong Osteoporosis Study. IFG was considered as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥5.5mmol/L and diabetes as FPG ≥7.0mmol/L, with the use of antihyperglycaemic medication and/or self-report. Using multivariable regression, the relationship between groups and TBS was determined. Men and women (all ages) with diabetes had lower mean TBS compared to those with normoglycaemia, in models adjusted for age, height and weight/waist circumference (all p<0.05). Men with IFG had lower mean TBS in the age-adjusted models only (all p<0.05). The addition of TBS to the FRAX score improved the discrimination between glycaemia groups, particularly for younger women (<65years). There was no difference in TBS detected between normoglycaemia and IFG; however, those with diabetes had lower TBS. Thus, the increased fracture risk in men and women with diabetes may be a result of BMD-independent bone deterioration. TBS adjustment of FRAX scores may be useful for younger women (<65years) with diabetes. This suggests that halting or reversing progression from IFG to diabetes could be important to prevent skeletal fragility in diabetes.

Clinical Utility of Using Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score to Adjust Fracture Probability: The Manitoba BMD Cohort

Decreased lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS), a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived image texture measurement, is a risk factor for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) independent of 10-year fracture probability estimated using FRAX. We determined how often applying the TBS adjustment to fracture probability altered treatment qualification. Using a population-based registry containing all clinical DXA results for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 34,316 women with baseline spine and hip DXA, FRAX-based fracture probability measurements (computed with femoral neck bone mineral density), lumbar spine TBS, and minimum 5 years of observation (mean 8.7 years). Population-based health services data were used to identify incident non-traumatic MOF and HF in 3503 and 945 women, respectively. Baseline MOF and HF probabilities were estimated using FRAX before and after applying the TBS adjustment. Risk recategorization was assessed using net reclassification improvement (NRI) for individual FRAX-based intervention criteria and three national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) (US National Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, and UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group). Overall, proportions of women reclassified with the TBS adjustment to FRAX were small (less than 5%) with more than 90% of the reclassification occurring close to the intervention threshold. For women close to an intervention cut-off reclassification, rates ranged from 9.0% to 17.9% and were <1% otherwise. There was a small but significant improvement in overall NRI for all individual FRAX-based intervention criteria (range 0.007 to 0.018) and all three national CPGs (range 0.008 to 0.011). NRI was larger in women below age 65 years (up to 0.056 for hip fracture). In summary, a small but significant improvement in MOF and HF risk assessment was found by using lumbar spine TBS to adjust FRAX probability. An improvement in risk reclassification was observed for CPGs from three different countries, with almost all of the benefit found in individuals close to an intervention threshold. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.