Total Wrist Arthroplasty Research Articles

Five- to 10-Year Prospective Follow-Up of Wrist Arthroplasty in 56 Nonrheumatoid Patients

The goal of the study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a cementless wrist arthroplasty with minimum 5-year follow-up in nonrheumatoid patients. Fifty-seven (40 male) patients with end-stage arthritis changes received an uncemented ball-and-socket total wrist arthroplasty (Motec Wrist). Function was evaluated before surgery and at yearly follow-ups. Visual analog scale at rest and activity, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), active range of motion (AROM), and grip-strength were recorded. Standardized radiographs were taken to assess osteolysis, loosening, and subsidence. Fifty-six patients were followed for a mean of 8 years (SD, 2 years). Eight wrists were reoperated with arthrodesis (4) or a new arthroplasty (4) owing to distal component loosening (3), infection (2), pain/fixed malposition (2), or proximal and distal component loosening (1). One radiocarpal dislocation was reduced closed and remained stable. Improved QuickDASH score and visual analog scale pain score both at rest and during activity were found at the last follow-up, as well as increased AROM (97° vs 126°) and grip strength (21 kg vs 24 kg). The radiological follow-up demonstrated loosening in 2 wrists. Thirty-five patients were working at surgery (17manual labor) and 27 (11 manual labor) at follow-up. The 10-year Kaplan-Meyer survival of the implants was 86% for revision for any cause; 2 additional arthroplasties are loose (but not revised), giving a survival rate of 82% if these are revised prior to 10 years of observation. An uncemented total wrist arthroplasty can provide long-lasting unrestricted hand function in young and active patients. Therapeutic IV.

Nonspanning Total Wrist Arthrodesis with a Low-Profile Locking Plate.

Purpose This study aims to compare the outcomes and complications of our technique for nonspanning total wrist arthrodesis using a locking plate with the standard carpometacarpal spanning technique. Methods A retrospective review of charts was performed to identify patients who underwent total wrist arthrodesis by the senior author (S.W.W.). We compared the outcomes of 15 cases of nonspanning wrist fusion with a 2.4/2.7 mm locking T plate to 11 cases of spanning wrist fusion with a 2.7/3.5 mm locking compression plate. Minimum follow-up was 3 months. Indications for fusion included rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, Kienböck's disease, primary osteoarthritis, juvenile inflammatory arthropathy, psoriasis, brachial plexopathy, failed hemi or total wrist arthroplasty, failed four-corner fusion, and failed proximal row carpectomy. The primary outcome was fusion. Secondary outcomes included time to union, patient-rated wrist evaluation score, numerical rating scale pain score, grip strength, and complications. Results All the wrists got fused. There were no significant differences in objective and subjective outcomes between cohorts. There were three complications (27%) in the spanning group, including tendon rupture and peri-implant fracture at the third metacarpal. This was compared with three complications (20%) in the nonspanning group, consisting of hardware removal. Discussion We achieved similar fusion rates employing both spanning and nonspanning total wrist arthrodesis techniques, without necessitating carpometacarpal arthrodesis in the latter. Complications associated with our method were comparably less severe than those reported in the literature. We advocate nonspanning arthrodesis as an alternative method for total wrist fusion with a high union rate and minimal risk of complications at the carpometacarpal joint. Level of Evidence Therapeutic level IV.

Ulna Autograft for Wrist Arthrodesis: A Novel Approach in Failed Wrist Arthoplasty.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a polyarthropathy affecting approximately 1% of the population worldwide. Wrist involvement is observed around 75% of patients, resulting in substantial disability and morbidity. A multidisciplinary approach to management of such patients is undertaken to prevent disease progression, many go on to develop debilitating disease requiring surgical intervention. Total wrist arthroplasty and arthrodesis are the main options available for those with end-stage disease, with arthroplasty preferred due to its ability to preserve a good degree of wrist function. Where complications occur with total wrist arthroplasty, salvage surgery with arthrodesis can be considered, however this requires satisfactory bone stock to enable stable fusion of the joint following arthroplasty. We report our experience of Ulna strut allografts in wrist arthrodesis in the management of failed total wrist arthroplasty.

CORR Insights®: What Are the Risk Factors and Complications Associated With Intraoperative and Postoperative Fractures in Total Wrist Arthroplasty?

CORR Insights®: What Are the Risk Factors and Complications Associated With Intraoperative and Postoperative Fractures in Total Wrist Arthroplasty?

High Survivorship and Few Complications With Cementless Total Wrist Arthroplasty at a Mean Followup of 9 Years.

Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) has been described as traditionally being performed with fixation in the radius and carpus with cement. The TWA implant used in our series has been associated with promising results in studies with up to 6 years followup; however, studies evaluating survivorship, pain, and function with this implant are limited. QUESTION/PURPOSE: (1) To report ROM and pain scores after wrist reconstruction with cementless fourth-generation TWA at a mean followup of 9 years (range, 4.8-14.7 years). (2) To report complications of a cementless fourth-generation TWA and the cumulative probability of not undergoing a revision at a mean followup of 9 years. This is a retrospective case series of 69 patients who were treated for pancarpal wrist arthritis between 2002 and 2014. Of those, 31 had inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis [n = 29], juvenile rheumatoid arthritis [n = 1], and psoriatic arthritis [n = 1]); all of these patients received TWA with the cementless implant studied in this investigation. Another 38 patients had osteoarthritis or posttraumatic arthritis; in this subgroup, 28 patients were 65 years or younger, and all underwent wrist fusion (none were offered TWA). Ten patients with osteoarthritis were older than 65 years and all were offered TWA; of those, eight underwent TWA, and two declined the procedure and instead preferred and underwent total wrist arthrodesis. The mean age of the 39 patients who had TWA was 56 ± 8.9 years (range, 31-78 years) at the time of surgery; 36 were women and three were men. The patients who underwent TWA were seen at a minimum of 4 years (mean, 9 years; range, 4-15 years), and all had been examined in 2016 as part of this study except for one patient who died 9 years after surgery. The dominant wrist was involved in 60% (25) of the patients. All patients were immobilized for 4 weeks postoperatively and then underwent hand therapy for 4 to 6 weeks. Pain and ROM were gathered before surgery as part of clinical care, and were measured again at latest followup; at latest followup, radiographs were analyzed (by the senior author) for evidence of loosening, defined as any implant migration compared with any previous radiograph with evidence of periimplant osteolysis and bone resorption. Subjective pain score was assessed by a verbal pain scale (0-10) and ROM was measured with a goniometer. Complications were determined by chart review and final examination. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative probability of not undergoing a revision. The mean preoperative active ROM was 34o ± 18° flexion and 36° ± 18° extension. Postoperatively, the mean active ROM was 37° ± 14° flexion and 29° ± 13° extension. The mean difference between the preoperative pain score (8.6 ± 1.2) and postoperative pain score (0.4 ± 0.8) was 8.1 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001). Implant loosening occurred in three (7.7%) patients. No other complications occurred in this series. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis estimated the cumulative probability of remaining free from revision as 78% (95% CI, 62%-91%) at 15 years. Cementless fourth-generation TWA improves pain while generally preserving the preoperative arc of motion. The cumulative probability of remaining free from revision at 14.7 years after the index procedure is 77.7% (95% CI, 62.0%-91.4%). Future studies should compare alternative approaches for patients with endstage wrist arthritis; such evaluations-which might compare TWA implants, or TWAs with arthrodesis-will almost certainly need to be multicenter, as the problem is relatively uncommon. Level IV, therapeutic study.

What Are the Risk Factors and Complications Associated With Intraoperative and Postoperative Fractures in Total Wrist Arthroplasty?

Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) can relieve pain and preserve some wrist motion in patients with advanced wrist arthritis. However, few studies have evaluated the risks and outcomes associated with periprosthetic fractures around TWAs. (1) What is the risk of intraoperative and postoperative fractures after TWAs? (2) What factors are associated with increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative fracture after TWAs? (3) What is the fracture-free and revision-free survivorship of TWAs among patients who sustained an intraoperative fracture during the index TWA? At one institution during a 40-year period, 445 patients underwent primary TWAs. Of those, 15 patients died before 2 years and 5 were lost to followup, leaving 425 patients who underwent primary TWAs with a minimum of 2-year followup. The primary diagnosis for the TWA included osteoarthritis ([OA] 5%), inflammatory arthritis (90%), and posttraumatic arthritis (5%). Indications for TWA included pancarpal arthritis combined with marked pain and loss of wrist function. The mean age of the patients was 57 years, BMI was 26kg/m2, and 73% were females. Six different implants were used during the 40-year period. Mean followup was 10 years (range, 2-18 years). Intraoperative fractures occurred in nine (2%) primary TWAs, while postoperative fractures occurred after eight (2%) TWAs. After analyzing demographics, comorbidities, and surgical factors, intraoperative fractures were found to be associated with only age at surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20; p = 0.006) and use of a bone graft (HR, 5.80; 95% CI, 1.18-23.08; p = 0.03). No factors were found to be associated with increased risk of postoperative fractures; specifically, intraoperative fracture was not associated with subsequent fracture development. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates free of postoperative fracture were 99%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year revision-free survival rates after intraoperative fracture were 88% and 88%, respectively, compared with 84% and 74% without an intraoperative fracture (p = 0.36). Furthermore, the survival-free of revision surgery rates for aseptic distal loosening at 5 and 10 years were 88% and 88%, respectively, compared with 93% and 87% without a fracture (p = 0.85). Intraoperative fractures occur in approximately 2% of TWAs. These fractures do not appear to affect long-term implant survival or risk of fracture. Patient age and the need for bone graft were the only factors in the risk of intraoperative fractures. Postoperative fractures also occur in 2% of TWAs, but often result in revision surgery. Level III, therapeutic study.

Acute scaphoid fractures and non-unions

The diagnosis of scaphoid fractures requires a high index of suspicion, with a focus on the mechanism of injury and careful clinical examination. A scaphoid series of radiographs is required but if negative does not rule out a fracture. If there is clinical suspicion for fracture, one should obtain an MRI scan, which has the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis. The management of acute scaphoid fractures is dependent largely on fracture location and displacement, although there are other factors to consider. On the whole, distal pole fractures can be managed conservatively and proximal pole fractures surgically, as the latter have poorer healing potential with a risk of avascular necrosis, due to a retrograde blood supply. The controversy lies with scaphoid waist fractures. One should consider surgical management for displaced waist fractures. The surgical approach is dependent on the fracture location and the surgeon's individual preference. Scaphoid non-union predictably leads to arthritis of the wrist, and therefore should be managed upon diagnosis. Reconstructive surgery provides the best outcomes, and more research is required into conservative treatments. Recent times have seen an increase in the use of vascularized bone grafts. In cases where there is established arthritis, salvage options include scaphoidectomy with four-corner fusion, proximal row carpectomy, total wrist arthroplasty and arthrodesis.

Biomechanical analysis of the Universal 2 implant in total wrist arthroplasty: a finite element study

Little is known about the mechanics of in vivo loading on total wrist prostheses where many studies have looked at the mechanics of other types of arthroplasty such as for the hip and the knee which has contributed to the overall success of these types of procedures. Currently surgeons would prefer to carry out arthrodesis on the wrist rather than consider arthroplasty as clinical data have shown that the outcome of total wrist arthroplasty is poorer than compared to the hip and knee. More research is needed on the loading mechanisms of the implants in order to enhance the design of future generation implants. This study looks at the load transfer characteristics of the Universal 2 implant using a finite element model of a virtually implanted prosthesis during gripping. The results showed that the loading on the implant is higher on the dorsal and ulnar aspect than on the volar and radial aspect of the implant. The whole load is transmitted through the radius and none through the ulna.

Does Total Wrist Arthroplasty for Treatment of Posttraumatic Wrist Joint Osteoarthritis in Young Patients Always Lead to Restriction of High-demand Activities of Daily Living? Case Report and Brief Review of Recent Literature

Background:Posttraumatic ulnar carpal translocation is a very rare condition that is caused either by fracture-dislocation injury or by purely ligamentous injury of the wrist. Its prognosis is poor and development of posttraumatic pancarpal wrist joint osteoarthritis is inevitable, and options for treatment are total wrist fusion or total wrist arthroplasty.Methods:A 24-year-old male sustained a fracture-related injury in his left wrist that was accompanied with a second ligamentous distorsion-related injury 1 year later in the same wrist. Seven years after first injury, a posttraumatic pancarpal wrist joint osteoarthritis has developed that was caused by posttraumatic ulnar carpal translocation. The patient was treated by total wrist arthroplasty with use of the MaestroTM Wrist Reconstructive System.Results:With our patient, it is unclear whether posttraumatic ulnar carpal translocation occurred either as result of the first fracture-related injury or as result of the second ligamentous distorsion-related injury or as result of both injuries. The 31-year-old patient could be reemployed completely in his original occupation as a mechanic for big agriculture machines and load his wrist with more than 10 pounds. In order to preserve motion, the patient reported that he would undergo the same total wrist arthroplasty a second time were it necessary.Conclusion:We report on a young male receiving total wrist arthroplasty and resulting in good restoration of his high-demand claims in activities of daily living, respectively. However, it cannot be concluded that total wrist arthroplasty is to be preferred generally over total wrist fusion in young patients. Essential prerequisite for this motion-preserving procedure is the compliance of patients.

Update on the operative treatment of scapholunate instability for radiologists. II. Salvage procedures, total wrist arthrodesis, and total wrist arthroplasty.

Scapholunate (SL) instability is the most common form of carpal instability. Imaging (especially radiography) plays an important role in the staging, management, and postoperative follow-up of SL instability. In the final stage of SL instability, known as scapholunate advanced collapse, progressive degenerative changes occur at the carpal level. The goals of this article are to review the surgical options available for addressing the different stages of scapholunate advanced collapse, along with an emphasis on normal postoperative imaging and complications associated with each surgical option.

Universal 2 Wrist Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes and complications in patients affected by rheumatic diseases treated with the Universal 2 (U2) total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Methods We reviewed, in a retrospective, noncontrolled cohort study, 22 patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who underwent U2 total wrist replacement between March 2003 and January 2014 for the treatment of 23 rheumatoid wrists with the aim of obtaining the remission of pain and a range of motion (ROM) useful for daily activities, according to the patients' demands, as an alternative to total wrist arthrodesis. The cohort of patients included 20 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 54.9 years. Residual pain, preoperative ROM, postoperative ROM increases, grip strength, radiographic changes, long-term complications, and reasons for revision or failures were evaluated. Results In this study, 22 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 82.3 months (range: 2-12 years). All patients had good or complete pain relief, the mean visual analogue scale pain score was 0.82. The mean grip strength improved and postoperatively was 11 kg (Jamar). The mean total ROM of flexion-extension was 72.3 degrees; radial-ulnar deviation 24.9 degrees. The mean QuickDASH score of 49 and patient rate wrist/hand evaluation of 41.7 a revision surgical procedure in six cases (26%): in two cases, a carpal component revision procedure and in four cases, total implant failures requiring either conversion to a Swanson spacer or wrist joint fusion. Conclusion TWA provides pain relief, preserves motion, and improves function in severe degenerative RA. Our results at a mid- to long-term follow-up with the U2 prosthesis were encouraging and represent, when indicated, a valid alternative to fusion which is less appealing for RA patients. Level of Evidence Level of evidence is therapeutic IV.

Dynamic assessment of the wrist after total wrist arthroplasty.

Our aim was to assess the outcome in patients with total wrist arthroplasty performed for end stage wrist osteoarthritis. We analysed the ranges of motion of operated and un-operated wrists using a flexible electrogoniometer during the Sollerman hand function test. We assessed grip strength with a digital dynamometer and completed patient reported outcome scores more than one year post-operatively. We reviewed 12 patients with a mean age of 64 (range 48-82) years. The flexion-extension arc was 72% and radioulnar deviation arc was 53% of the un-operated side but the total range of motion (area of circumduction) was 43% of the un-operated side and only 20% of the circumduction in age and gender-matched normal volunteers. Peak grip strength was 68% of the un-operated side. The patients reported good outcome with mean Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) scores of 56 (range 25-84) and mean Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) scores of 39 (range 20-68). Patients completed the activities of Sollerman hand function test in twice the time (6 min) as required for a normal volunteer (2.8 min). The circumduction ellipses were narrow and central with limited radio-ulnar deviation and small mean areas of motion during activities of daily living.

The Role of Wrist Fusion and Wrist Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis with a predilection for the hand and wrist. The aggressive nature of the disease can lead to severe joint destruction causing significant disability. Surgical options for pan-carpal arthritis include total wrist arthroplasty and total wrist fusion both with varying outcomes, yet both have a role in the carefully selected patients. Fusion remains a popular procedure with consistent reliable results with few complications. We present a review of current evidence, indications and guidance for both fusion and arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis.

Total Wrist Arthrodesis: Indications and Clinical Outcomes.

Total wrist arthrodesis remains an important technique in the surgical armamentarium of upper extremity surgeons. The procedure has evolved over time but continues to provide reliable pain relief at the expense of wrist motion. It is indicated for management of a wide variety of upper extremity conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, cerebral palsy, and brachial plexus injuries, and as a salvage technique after failed implant arthroplasty. Recent studies demonstrate high levels of patient satisfaction and good functional outcomes after bilateral wrist fusion. Compared with total wrist arthroplasty, total wrist arthrodesis provides more reliable pain relief with lower rates of complications, but further studies are needed to compare functional outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

RE-MOTIONTM total wrist arthroplasty for treatment of advanced stage of scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. Does excision of the entire scaphoid bone prevent impingement at terminal range of radial deviation?

RE-MOTIONTM total wrist arthroplasty for treatment of advanced stage of scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. Does excision of the entire scaphoid bone prevent impingement at terminal range of radial deviation?

A Literature Review Comparing the Results of Wrist Arthroplasty and Wrist Fusion in Rheumatoid Patients

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the synovium leading to joint damage and bone destruction. Within two years of diagnosis more than half of patients will have wrist pain and more than 90% will have wrist disease by 10 years. The surgical management of the advanced rheumatoid wrist is controversial. A Medline search was performed using the key words ‘rheumatoid arthritis and wrist arthroplasty’ ‘rheumatoid arthritis and wrist arthrodesis’ ‘rheumatoid arthritis and wrist fusion’. Total wrist arthroplasty is a motion preserving alternative which is slowly increasing in popularity. It is however a complex, technically demanding procedure with a high rate of complications. Wrist arthrodesis is currently the most widely used operative management for end stage rheumatoid arthritis. It provides pain relief and stability but there is a compromise of a loss of movement. We conclude that patients with end stage rheumatoid arthritis with good bone stock may have total wrist arthroplasty or wrist arthrodesis. Total wrist arthroplasty should be with the latest generation implants. Those patients with poor bone stock or soft tissues should have wrist arthrodesis.

Total Wrist Arthroplasty Versus Wrist Fusion: Utilization and Complication Rates as Reported by ABOS Part II Candidates.

The aim of this study was to assess national trends in the utilization and complication rates of total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) and total wrist fusion (WF) as identified via review of the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II candidate database. The ABOS Part II candidate database is a collection of cases reported by candidates of the ABOS Part II board certification oral exam. The ABOS database was queried for all TWA and WF cases performed from 2005 to 2014. Linear regression analyses were used to assess trends in procedure utilization. Treatment diagnoses, patient characteristics, and reported complications were also compared between the 2 treatment cohorts. No significant increases in the proportion of candidates performing TWA or WF, number of TWA or WF cases, nor the number of TWA or WF cases performed per candidate performing those procedures were noted during the study period. Significantly less TWA cases were performed when compared with WF cases (68 vs 327; P = .006). Patients undergoing TWA were significantly older ( P = .005), more likely female ( P < .001), and more likely to have a diagnosis of osteoarthritis ( P = .003) than patients undergoing WF. There were no significant differences in complication rates, including postoperative infection, nerve palsy, or rate of secondary surgery, between the TWA and WF cohorts. Utilization of both TWA and WF has remained unchanged among emerging career orthopedic surgeons. Although WF is performed nearly 5 times more frequently than TWA, our short-term findings suggest that TWA compares favorably with WF.

Failure of Wrist Hemiarthroplasty.

Wrist hemiarthroplasty has emerged as a motion-sparing option for severe wrist arthritis. It is technically easy with advantages of limited bone resection and no risk of nonunion. Given the relative infancy of the procedure in clinical practice, there are limited data on patient outcomes. Eleven patients were treated with wrist reconstructive hemiarthroplasty. Indications included 1 patient with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, 9 patients with scapholunate advanced collapse, and 1 patient with capitolunate arthritis. Average age was 63 years; average follow-up was 4 years. Objective parameters included Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), grip strength, and range of motion. Implant failure defined by necessity of revision procedure. DASH scores initially improved postoperatively but were not statistically significant. Grip strength was 60% of contralateral side. Postoperative range of motion at 6 months was flexion 40.3°, extension 39.3°, supination 87.0°, pronation 77.8°, radial deviation 14.5°, and ulnar deviation 13.8°. A 45% failure rate was observed. Complications included failure with conversion to Total Wrist Arthroplasty (TWA; n = 2) or wrist fusion (n = 3) secondary to development of ulnar-sided wrist pain. One additional patient experienced severe wrist pain but declined additional surgery. Wrist hemiarthroplasty in our series had a significant failure rate. In each case of failure, the patient developed ulnar-sided wrist pain. In the presence of more reliable procedures, wrist hemiarthroplasty is not indicated in its current incarnation.

Total wrist arthroplasty: A review

Total wrist arthroplasty was first performed over a hundred years ago. However, it did not prove a viable option until the late 1960s with the advent of the Swanson implant. Since then there have been many advances. The changes in design, and their rationale, are discussed in this article. The latest implants, the advances made and the indications for surgery are addressed.

Patient-Perceived Outcome After Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Purpose: Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is an established surgical treatment for wrist arthritis. The aim of the investigation is to report patient-perceived outcome measures after TWA operated at a single referral center in Sweden. Methods: In a cohort study with prospective collection of data, we evaluated 193 consecutive patients with a TWA (223 wrists) preoperatively, 1 and 5 years postoperatively. The wrists were implanted between 2002 and 2014. Outcome measures studied were range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, hand grip strength, and patient-related outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included implant survivorship, which was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and radiographic loosening 5 years postoperatively. Results: VAS pain scores and patient-related outcome measures improved significantly for all TWAs. Improved hand grip strength was noted for all TWAs except Universal 2. ROM improved somewhat, especially for the Biax and Maestro TWAs. Cumulative implant survival after 5 years was 99% for Remotion, 95% for Maestro, and 84% for Biax. Radiographic loosening was present in 26% of the Biax cases, 18% of the Remotion cases, and 2% of the Maestro cases. Conclusions: All TWA designs in this study offer a high level of patient satisfaction. The design of the implant may affect patient-perceived outcome 5 years postoperatively. Good mid to long-term results can be achieved in patients undergoing TWA.