Total Wrist Arthroplasty Research Articles

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Motion-Preserving Operations for Wrist Arthritis.

The authors conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to answer the question: Which motion-preserving surgical strategy, (1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty, used for the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis, is the most cost-effective? A simulation model was created to model a hypothetical cohort of wrist osteoarthritis patients (mean age, 45 years) presenting with painful wrist and having failed conservative management. Three initial surgical treatment strategies-(1) four-corner fusion, (2) proximal row carpectomy, or (3) total wrist arthroplasty-were compared from a hospital perspective. Outcomes included clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness outcomes (quality-adjusted life-years and cost) over a lifetime. The highest complication rates were seen in the four-corner fusion cohort: 27.1 percent compared to 20.9 percent for total wrist arthroplasty and 17.4 percent for proximal row carpectomy. Secondary surgery was common for all procedures: 87 percent for four-corner fusion, 57 percent for proximal row carpectomy, and 46 percent for total wrist arthroplasty. Proximal row carpectomy generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years (30.5) over the lifetime time horizon, compared to 30.3 quality-adjusted life-years for total wrist arthroplasty and 30.2 quality-adjusted life-years for four-corner fusion. Proximal row carpectomy was the least costly; the mean expected lifetime cost for patients starting with proximal row carpectomy was $6003, compared to $11,033 for total wrist arthroplasty and $13,632 for four-corner fusion. The authors' analysis suggests that proximal row carpectomy was the most cost-effective strategy, regardless of patient and parameter level uncertainties. These are important findings for policy makers and clinicians working within a universal health care system.

Total Wrist Arthroplasty

Surgical management of end stage wrist joint arthropathy includes wrist arthrodesis as well as motion sparing procedures such as partial arthrodesis techniques and total wrist arthroplasty. Total wrist arthroplasty components have evolved in distinct generations since their introduction in the 1970s. More favorable outcomes and survivorship are being reported with the current generation of implants, making this procedure a viable option in a certain subset of patients. As with virtually all arthroplasty procedures, meticulous adherence to good surgical technique is paramount to obtaining satisfactory long-term results.

Assessing Periprosthetic Bone in Total Wrist Arthroplasty: The Validity of DXA

Introduction: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can measure bone mineral density (BMD) around joint arthroplasties. DXA has never been used in total wrist arthroplasties (TWA). We investigated (1) whether BMD differs between 2 TWAs implanted in the same cadaver forearm, (2) the effect of forearm rotation and wrist extension on measured BMD around TWA in a cadaver, and (3) the precision of DXA in a cadaver and patients.Methodology: One ROI around the distal and 1 and 3 ROIs (ROI1-3) around the proximal component were used. Ten DXA scans were performed on forearm and femur mode convertible to orthopedic knee mode without arthroplasty, with ReMotion, and with Motec TWA in one cadaver forearm. Ten scans with 5° increments from 90°–70° pronation and 0°–20° extension, were performed with Motec. Precision was calculated as coefficient of variation (CV%) and least significant change (LSC%) from cadaver scans and double examinations with femur mode converted to orthopedic knee mode in 40 patients (20 ReMotion, 20 Motec).Results: BMD was higher in all Motec than corresponding ReMotion ROIs (p < 0.05). BMD changed with 10° supination in the distal ROI and ROI1, and with 5° extension in the distal ROI (p < 0.05). In the cadaver the orthopedic knee mode was more precise than the forearm mode in 3 Motec ROIs (p < 0.05). In patients CV was 2.21%–3.08% in the distal ROI, 1.66%–2.01% in the proximal ROI, and 1.98%–2.87% with 3 ROIs.Conclusions: DXA is feasible for BMD measurement around the proximal component using the orthopedic knee mode, but not the distal component of TWA.

Declining Trend in Medicare Physician Reimbursements for Hand Surgery From 2002 to 2018

To evaluate trends in Medicare physician reimbursements for 20 common hand procedures/surgeries from 2002 to2018. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool was used to retrieve average reimbursement rates for 20 common hand surgeries/procedures from 2002 to 2018. All reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2018 dollars. After adjusting all data for inflation, the average reimbursement for all included procedures decreased by 20.9% from 2002 to 2018, with a compound annual growth rate of -3.25%. Reimbursement percentage decreases were the greatest prior to 2010 (18.4% decrease), followed by a relative stabilization (0.94% increase) from 2010 to 2014, after which physicians experienced a decrease of 3.9% in reimbursements between 2014 and 2018, following implementation of the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act in 2015. The most significant decreases in reimbursements over time were noted for primary tendon/muscle repair (-49.6%), wrist arthroscopy for triangular fibrocartilage repair/debridement (-44.0%), trigger finger release in facility (-40.1%), excision of extensor tendon sheath (-38.2%), ganglion cyst excision (-36.7%), wrist arthroscopy for diagnostic/synovial biopsy (-35.7%), wrist arthroscopy for drainage/infection/lavage (-35.1%), wrist arthrodesis (-30.6%), endoscopic carpal tunnel release (-27.2%), total wrist arthroplasty (-26.6%), carpometacarpal/basal joint arthroplasty (-25.1%), and open carpal tunnel release (-22.3%). The only procedures with a significant increase in reimbursement over time were trigger finger release in office (+4.2%), open reduction internal fixation distal radius fracture (+2.5%), and cubital tunnel release (+1.5%). After adjusting for inflation, Medicare physician reimbursements for a major proportion of hand surgical procedures have decreased over time. Health-policy makers need to understand the impact of decreasing reimbursements to develop policies of reimbursements that will not only ensure provider satisfaction but also maintain access to care for patients.

Salvage of the Failed Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Background Although the performance of total wrist arthroplasty systems has improved, failure is encountered and is a major challenge to manage. Questions Does physical function improve with surgical management of the failed wrist arthroplasty? Is there an improvement in secondary outcome measures including pain, grip strength, and range of motion? What are the reasons for failure in primary total wrist arthroplasty? What are the complications associated with revision of the failed total wrist arthroplasty? What are the survival profiles of the different revision strategies? Methods A systematic review of available literature was performed. Studies were systematically assessed, and data extracted from suitable studies for review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were adhered to. The study protocol was modified from a previous protocol published on the PROSPERO database. Results Fourteen studies were identified considering 218 patients/214 index operations with a follow-up duration following revision surgery of 2 months to 21 years (silicone wrist arthroplasty-42 cases; nonsilicone wrist arthroplasty-172 cases). The functional outcome of revision surgery was infrequently recorded and documented with only short-term assessments undertaken. Complications were seen in 1:2 revision procedures, with re-revision surgeries required in 21.6% of revised primary nonsilicone arthroplasties. Re-revision rate following a revision arthrodesis was 21.4% (15/70 cases) compared with revision arthroplasty of 34.8% (32/92 cases). Revision arthrodesis nonunion rate was 17.5% (22 cases). Conclusion This review has confirmed the high level of surgical complexity and the likelihood of a complicated postoperative outcome when salvaging a failed wrist replacement. Level of Evidence This is a Level 3, systematic review study.

Resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant after proximal row carpectomy: A litterature review.

Up to a decade ago, to treat patients with chronic wrist pain due to advanced stages of arthritis, surgeons had four main solutions: partial or total wrist arthrodesis, total wrist prosthesis and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Since 2010, a new technique has been described in literature using the Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant (RCPI), combined to PRC. The aim of this article is to review the literature and determine the indications, outcomes and complications associated with RCPI. An electronic literature research was carried out and pertinent articles were selected. Surgical technique, results and complications described in those articles are presented. From this review of the literature, authors conclude that Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant can be considered as a good alternative to arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty, at any ages, when proximal row carpectomy alone would not be indicated.

Ulnar Head or Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement, Isolated and Combined with Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Midterm Results.

Purpose Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36-80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2-15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t -test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p -value of less than 0.05. Results Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16-97) to 16 (mean; range: 0-51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4-22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6-36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36-75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4-47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned. Conclusion Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.

Proximal-distal shift of the center of rotation in a total wrist arthroplasty is more than twice of the healthy wrist.

Reproduction of healthy wrist biomechanics should minimize the abnormal joint forces that could potentially result in the failure of a total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). To date, the in vivo kinematics of TWA have not been measured and it is unknown if TWA preserves healthy wrist kinematics. Therefore, the purpose of this in vivo study was to determine the center of rotation (COR) for a current TWA design and to compare its location to the healthy wrist. The wrist COR for six patients with TWA and 10 healthy subjects were calculated using biplane videoradiography as the subjects performed various range-of-motion and functional tasks that included coupled wrist motions. An open-source registration software, Autoscoper, was used for model-based tracking and kinematics analysis. It was demonstrated that the COR was located near the centers of curvatures of the carpal component for the anatomical motions of flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation. When compared to healthy wrists, the COR of TWAs was located more distal in both pure radial deviation (P < .0001) and pure ulnar deviation (P = .07), while there was no difference in its location in pure flexion or extension (P = .99). Across all coupled motions, the TWA's COR shifted more than two times that of the healthy wrists in the proximal-distal direction (17.1 vs 7.2 mm). We postulate that the mismatch in the COR location and behavior may be associated with increased loading of the TWA components, leading to an increase in the risk of component and/or interface failure.

Satisfactory function 12 years after triscaphoid arthrodesis for chronic scapholunate ligament injury

Scapholunate ligament (SLL) injury represents a hazard to the wrist and the treatment of these injuries has been the focus of much debate. We performed a long-term follow (>10 years) of triscaphoid arthrodesis for symptomatic chronic SLL injuries in 10 (8 men) patients 37 (22–49) years of age. All arthrodesis healed. One patient was converted to total wrist arthrodesis during the follow-up period, and three had minor additional surgeries. At final follow-up, the patients had reduced active range of motion (AROM, 55%) and grip strength (85%) compared to the opposite side, but reported low Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) (11), Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) (25) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0 and 10 at rest and activity). Radiographs found minimal degenerative changes in four patients, while CT scans demonstrated changes in seven patients, in three of these scaphoid was subluxed on the rim of the radius. The patients working prior to surgery were working at follow-up. A triscaphoid arthrodesis for SLL renders a functional wrist function in most patients for many years and has postponed more extensive surgery like total wrist arthrodesis or wrist arthroplasty. The patients are still young, and the degenerative changes seen especially on CT scans warrants attention.

Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Follow-Up

To assess long-term implant survival in total wrist arthroplasty (TWA), comparing 4 different implants. In a prospective cohort of 124 patients, 136 TWAs were evaluated 5 years and 10 years after surgery. The TWAs were implanted between 2005 and 2009. The primary outcome was implant survival. Survival analysis was performed with revision and radiographic loosening as the final end point. Revision was defined as exchange of whole or parts of the prosthesis. Implant loosening was assessed using radiographic examination at the 5-year and 10-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included wrist range of motion, hand grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and patient-related outcome measures, including Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Total cumulative implant survival was 92% with revision as the primary end point. When including a nonrevised radiographic loose implant as a failure, total implant survival was 75%. Radiographic loosening differed significantly between the implants with a range in frequency from 0% to 37.5%. At the 10-year follow-up, assessing the nonrevised TWAs, range of motion was preserved compared with preoperative values. Significant improvement was recorded for hand grip strength, VAS pain scores, and patient-related outcome measures at the 10-year follow-up compared with preovperative values. High 10-year implant survival was found when defining the primary end point as revision of any cause. When including radiographic loosening of the implant in the survival analysis, implant survival was considerably lower. However, radiographic loosening does not seem to correlate with changes in secondary outcome measures, questioning the need for revision surgery in these cases. Therapeutic IV.

Current diagnosis-related group–based bundling for upper-extremity arthroplasty: a case of insufficient risk adjustment and misaligned incentives

The current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servicesdiagnosis-related group (DRG) bundled-payment model for upper-extremity arthroplasty does not differentiate between the type of arthroplasty (anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [ATSA] vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplastyvs. total elbow arthroplasty [TEA] vs. total wrist arthroplasty) or the diagnosis and indication for surgery (fracture vs. degenerative osteoarthritis vs. inflammatory arthritis). The 2011-2014 Medicare 5% Standard Analytical Files (SAF5) database was queried to identify patients undergoing upper-extremity arthroplasty under DRG-483 and -484. Multivariate linear regression modeling was used to assess the marginal cost impact of patient-, procedure-, diagnosis-, and state-level factors on 90-day reimbursements. Of 6101 patients undergoing upper-extremity arthroplasty, 3851 (63.1%) fell under DRG-484 and 2250 (36.9%) were classified under DRG-483. The 90-day risk-adjusted cost of an ATSA for degenerative osteoarthritis was $14,704 ± $655. Patient-level factors associated with higher 90-day reimbursements were male sex (+$777), age 75-79 years (+$740), age 80-84 years (+$1140), and age 85 years or older (+$984). Undergoing a TEA (+$2175) was associated with higher reimbursements, whereas undergoing a shoulder hemiarthroplasty(-$1000) was associated with lower reimbursements. Surgery for a fracture (+$2354) had higher 90-day reimbursements. Malnutrition (+$10,673), alcohol use or dependence (+$6273), Parkinson disease (+$4892), cerebrovascular accident or stroke (+$4637), and hyper-coagulopathy (+$4463) had the highest reimbursements. In general, states in the South and Midwest had lower 90-day reimbursements associated with upper-extremity arthroplasty. Under the DRG-based model piloted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, providers and hospitals would be reimbursed the same amount regardless of the type of surgery (ATSA vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. TEA), patient comorbidity burden, and diagnosis and indication for surgery (fracture vs. degenerative pathology), despite each of these factors having different resource utilization and associated reimbursements. Lack of risk adjustment for fracture indications leads to strong financial disincentives within this model.

Surgical Treatment of Wrist Arthritis in Young Patients.

Surgical treatment of wrist arthritis in the younger patient population remains a challenging issue, and various surgical options need to be carefully considered for each patient. Proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis have proven to be reliable options for reducing pain and restoring adequate function in most young high-demand patients if the lunate facet is spared. Selective neurectomy has proven to be a promising stand-alone or complementary procedure for the treatment of pain that is associated with wrist arthritis in patients of all ages, with spared motion and the opportunity to perform additional procedures if pain continues. Alternative procedures, including capitolunate arthrodesis, total wrist arthrodesis, radial styloidectomy, total wrist arthroplasty, and wrist hemiarthroplasty, have considerable strengths and weaknesses and need to be studied further in younger patients.

Unplanned Reoperation and Implant Revision After Total Wrist Arthroplasty.

Background: Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a treatment option for many debilitating wrist conditions. With recent improvements in implant design, indications for TWA have broadened. However, despite these improvements, there are still complications associated with TWA, such as unplanned reoperation and eventual implant removal. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for an unplanned reoperation or implant revision after a TWA at 2 academic medical centers between 2002 and 2015. Methods: In this retrospective study, 24 consecutive TWAs were identified using CPT codes. Medical records were manually reviewed to identify demographic, patient- or disease-related, and surgery-related risk factors for reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA. Results: Forty-six percent of wrists (11 of 24 TWAs performed) had a reoperation after a median of 3.4 years, while 29% (7 of 24) underwent implant revision after a median of 5 years. Two patients had wrist surgery prior to their TWA, both eventually had their implant removed (P = .08). There were no risk factors associated with reoperation or implant removal. Conclusion: Unplanned reoperation and implant removal after a primary TWA are common. Approximately 1 in 3 wrists are likely to undergo revision surgery. We found no factors associated with reoperation or implant removal; however, prior wrist surgery showed a trend toward risk of implant removal after TWA.

A case report: removal of silicon implants for a patient of rheumatoid arthritis undergoing total wrist arthroplasty thirty two years ago

A case report: removal of silicon implants for a patient of rheumatoid arthritis undergoing total wrist arthroplasty thirty two years ago

Risk Factors for Infection Following Total Wrist Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis: An Analysis of 6641 Patients.

Background: Infection following wrist arthroplasty (WA) or wrist fusion (WF) is an uncommon but difficult complication often resulting in explantation and prolonged courses of antibiotics. The purposes of this study are to: (1) characterize the demographic trends of individuals undergoing WA and WF; (2) determine the incidence of postoperative infection; and (3) identify risk factors for postoperative infection. Methods: The PearlDiver database was used to query 100% Medicare Standard Analytic files from 2005 to 2014. Patients undergoing WA or radiocarpal WF were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Diagnosis for infection within 1 year of operative intervention was assessed by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes or CPT codes related to infection. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative infection. Results: Of the 6641 patients included, 1137 (17.1%) underwent arthroplasty and 5504 (82.9%) underwent arthrodesis. Within 1 year of the index procedure, 3.5% had a diagnosis of, or procedure for, postoperative infection (WA: n = 40 of 1137; WF: n = 192 of 5504). Risk factors for infection following WA include age >85, tobacco use, depression, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Risk factors following radiocarpal WF include male sex, age >85, body mass index <19 kg/m2, depression, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Posttraumatic origin of wrist arthritis was a risk factor for infection following both WA and WF. Conclusions: Infection following WA and WF is relatively uncommon in a nationally representative Medicare database cohort. Risk factors common to both WA and WF include age >85, depression, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and posttraumatic arthritis.

Acute Complications in Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Review.

Background The study sought to assess the patient-based variables, surgical risk factors, and postoperative conditions associated with readmission after total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods All patients undergoing TWA were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2005 to 2016. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were examined to isolate predictors for readmission within 30 days postoperatively. Results A total of 57 patients were identified to have undergone TWA. The average patients were 62.3 (13.8) years old, female (57.7%), and most were treated in the outpatient setting (67.3%). Comorbid conditions included smoking (17.3%), diabetes (15.4%), and chronic steroid therapy (15.4%). No complications were identified in the 30-day postoperative period. There was a trend for increasing utilization of TWA over the years included. Conclusion TWA is a safe procedure with low complication rates in the acute postoperative period. Increasing utilization is likely a result of improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness of TWA. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, prognostic study.

Functional Outcomes After Salvage Procedures for Wrist Trauma and Arthritis (Four-Corner Fusion, Proximal Row Carpectomy, Total Wrist Arthroplasty, Total Wrist Fusion, Wrist Denervation): A Review of Literature

Background: Several salvage procedures for the arthritically destroyed wrist exist. Each of these has advantages as well as disadvantages. Aims: The aim of this article is to give practical insights for the clinician on: (1) biomechanical and clinical fundamentals of normal and impaired wrist motion; (2) difficulties in assessment of postoperative outcome between measured motion by the surgeon and self-reported outcome by the patient; (3) indications for each procedure; and (4) differences in functional outcome between partial and complete motion-preserving as well as complete motion-restricting salvage procedures. Methods: In trend, Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) is slightly superior over four-corner fusion (4CF) in terms of functional outcome, but the methodology-related postoperative motion is decreased for both procedures. Furthermore, PRC is easier to perform, needs lower costs, and has fewer complications than 4CF. Total Wrist Arthroplasty (TWA) has the advantage compared to PRC and 4CF that the preoperative motion values are preserved, but it is limited by decreased load-bearing capacity for the wrist. Total Wrist Fusion (TWF) is associated with a higher load-bearing capacity for the wrist than TWA, but it is limited for carrying out essential activities of daily living. Both PRC and 4CF can be combined primarily by wrist denervation. Wrist denervation alone does not impair the movement of the wrist. Results and Conclusion: Salvage procedures for the arthritically destroyed wrist should be detected regarding patients age- and gender-related claims in work and leisure. Not all of them can be successfully re-employed in their original occupations associated with high load-bearing conditions.

A Minimum 5-Year Longitudinal Study of a New Total Wrist Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

To evaluate the longitudinal clinical outcomes using a new semiconstrained wrist prosthesis for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. Twenty patients with rheumatoid arthritis (20 wrists) underwent total wrist arthroplasty with the prosthesis in a clinical trial. The preoperative Larsen classification was grade IV in 16 wrists and grade V in 4 wrists. Assessments were performed before surgery, 1.5 years after surgery, and at final follow-up (≥ 5 years after surgery) using the visual analog scale for pain, Figgie wrist score, Japanese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and plain radiographs. At final follow-up, no patient had wrist pain. The preoperative flexion-extension arc at final follow-up was similar to the preoperative range. The mean 1.5-year postoperative Figgie score was significantly improved and was unchanged at final follow-up. The DASH score significantly improved from before surgery to 1.5 years after surgery; the DASH score was improved further at final follow-up, but not significantly. Five of the 19 wrists evaluated had radiographic findings indicating carpal component loosening at final follow-up; however, all patients with the loosening were asymptomatic and had not undergone revision surgery. Total wrist arthroplasty using this wrist prosthesis leads to favorable clinical outcomes regarding pain relief and retained range of wrist motion. Therapeutic IV.

Re-motion total wrist arthroplasty: 39 non-rheumatoid cases with a mean follow-up of 7 years.

We evaluated the outcomes of the Re-motion total wrist arthroplasty in 39 non-rheumatoid patients. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range 3-12). Postoperative wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation as well as the scores of the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and the visual analogue scale pain scores improved significantly. Complications occurred in 13 wrists, five of which required further surgery. The most frequent complication was impingement between the scaphoid and the radial implant (n = 5), which can be avoided by complete or almost complete scaphoid resection. Periprosthetic radiolucency developed around the radial component in three cases and three radial screws loosened. Despite the incidence of high implant survival in 38 of 39 wrists over 7 years (97%), the complication rate is not satisfying. Knowledge of the risk of complications and patient selection are essential when making the decision to choose wrist arthroplasty over arthrodesis. Level of evidence: IV.

Bony anatomy of the third metacarpal and relationship with the capitate: a computed tomography study.

The purpose of this study was to accurately establish the anatomical variability of the third metacarpal, its medullary canal, and the relationship with the capitate in the context of high rates of component loosening still seen in total wrist arthroplasty. CT scans of a 100 hands (age: 41 ± 14years (range: 16-71years); male/female ratio: 53/47) were studied to establish the detailed anatomy of the third metacarpal and the capitate. Although the shape of the third metacarpal and the angles formed with the capitate were highly variable, the third metacarpal length was longer in males (p < 0.001), the proximal cortical bone was thicker (p < 0.001) and the sagittal metacarpal-capitate axis offset was greater (p = 0.01). A relationship was found between the total length of the metacarpal and the distance to the isthmus from the base (r = 0.63; p < 0.0001) which was unaffected by gender. No age-related relationships were significant. The anatomy of the third metacarpal and capitate varies considerably more than has been alluded to in current wrist arthroplasty literature. Differences between males and females can likely be attributed to hand size. The distance of the isthmus from the base can be predicted from the total length of the metacarpal with a standard error of 1.9mm.