Total Wrist Arthrodesis Research Articles

Comparative outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis for salvage of failed total wrist arthroplasty and primary wrist arthrodesis.

A retrospective study compared outcomes of total wrist arthrodesis as a salvage for total wrist arthroplasty versus primary total wrist arthrodesis. Seventy-one wrists were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty-two wrists with failed total wrist arthroplasty were converted to a wrist arthrodesis and 39 wrists received a primary wrist arthrodesis. Seven converted wrist arthrodeses and five primary arthrodeses failed to fuse. Mean patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation scores and work-related questionnaire for upper extremity disorders scores were 43 and 39 for converted total wrist arthrodesis and 38 and 33 for the primary total wrist arthrodesis. Overall, there were 25 complications in 15 patients in the converted wrist arthrodesis group and 21 complications in 16 patients after a primary wrist arthrodesis. The results between the two groups were slightly in favour of patients with a primary wrist arthrodesis. Therefore, we conclude that the timing, primary or conversion, of total wrist arthrodesis could influence patient outcomes.Level of evidence: III

Wrist shortening arthrodesis with volar plate in a dorsal position for spastic wrist contracture

Total wrist arthrodesis in severe wrist flexion deformities (greater than 60°) due to spasticity represents a valid therapeutic option. It aims to improve the hand’s appearance, hygiene, function and to prevent the deformity from getting worse. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical and anatomical results of wrist shortening arthrodesis using a classic volar plate in the dorsal position in functional surgery for central spastic hands. We conducted a single-center analysis of a series of patients who underwent this shortening arthrodesis. The review at a minimum 1-year follow-up included a clinical evaluation (House score, INOM score, patient satisfaction and complications), and anatomical evaluation (arthrodesis position, bone healing and carpometacarpal arthropathy). Twenty-eight patients with a mean age of 40.6 years (18–74) were included at a mean follow-up of 30.6 months (12–75). The fusion rate was 100%. No carpometacarpal arthropathy was noted. The mean position of the fused wrist was 11° extension and 15° ulnar tilt. There were two complications (7%): one postoperative hematoma and one case of discomfort due to impingement that required plate removal. The House score was significantly improved postoperatively (2.4 (0–5) versus 1.8 (0–4), p < 0.001), as was the INOM score (45 (12–64) versus 63 (36–84), p < 0.001). The patient satisfaction rate was 93%. The use of a simple and common material (volar plate in dorsal position) during this challenging surgery (spastic wrist contracture), provides good anatomical results and high patient satisfaction. Level of evidenceLevel 4, case series, therapeutic study.

Total wrist arthrodesis with and without arthrodesis of the carpoMetacarpal joint (WAWWAM): study protocol

BackgroundIt is controversial whether or not the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) should be included in total wrist arthrodesis (TWA). Complications commonly occur at this site and studies examining its inclusion and exclusion are conflicting. A randomised clinical trial comparing wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ arthrodesis and spanning plate to wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ preservation and non-CMCJ spanning plate has not been performed.MethodA single centre randomised clinical trial including 120 adults with end-stage isolated wrist arthritis will be performed to compare TWA with and without the CMCJ included in the arthrodesis. The primary outcome is complications in the first post-operative year. Secondary outcomes are Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and grip strength measured at 1, 2 and 5 years. Late complications, return to work and satisfaction will also be recorded.DiscussionIt is unknown whether the CMCJ should be included in TWA. This trial will contribute to an improved understanding of optimal management of the CMCJ in total wrist arthrodesis.Trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry with identifying number ACTRN12621000169842 on the 16th February 2021.WHO: U1111–12626523.ANZCTR: ACTRN12621000169842

Management of the osteoarthritic and rheumatoid wrist

Arthritis of the wrist has multiple causes, with post-traumatic being the most common non-inflammatory cause, and rheumatoid arthritis the most common inflammatory condition. Management starts with detailed history, examination and functional assessment. Surgical options include wrist denervation, correction of carpal deformities (distal radius osteotomy, ligament tenodesis), excision of the affected articulations (scaphoidectomy, styloidectomy, proximal row carpectomy), arthrodesis (four corner fusion, limited carpal fusions, total wrist arthrodesis) and total wrist arthroplasty. Similar procedures can be performed at the distal radioulnar joint. This article reviews the causes of wrist arthritis and evidence behind the management options.

Progressing arthrosis and a high conversion rate 11 (4–19) years after four corner fusion

Four corner fusion (4CF) is a limited wrist arthrodesis offered to patients with painful wrists due to scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) or scapho-lunate advanced collapse (SLAC). A retrospective study of 42 wrists (in 36 patients), operated with 4CF using K-wires and autologous bone graft followed up after 11 (4–19) years was performed, 25 were male and mean age at surgery was 51 (22–71) years. During the follow-up period, 13 wrists were converted to total wrist arthrodesis or wrist arthroplasty, and one is scheduled for conversion (14/42, 33%) due to non-union (3), DISI and progressing arthrosis (7) or progressing arthrosis (4). Non-union was seen in 3/42 (93%) wrists, all were later converted. At the final follow-up, the patients reported residual pain, VAS = 15 and 36 at rest and activity, respectively, and QDASH/PRWHE = 32 and 31, respectively. Active range of motion (AROM) was 38% and grip-strength was 76% compared to the uninjured side. Degenerative changes were seen in 88% on CT scans at follow-up. 4CF renders an acceptable pain reduction and function in the majority of patients, but increased degeneration and a high number of conversions after a longer follow-up time is concerning.

Wrist Arthrodesis in Severe Wrist Arthritis in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Retrospective Study

Objective: Osteoarthritis of wrist is an uncommon disorder but in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), wrist and metacarpophlangeal joint are involved in early stages. RA of wrist leads to severe pain and loss of function in a large number of patients. Conservative treatment is required in early stages, but in severe cases arthroplasty or total wrist arthrodesis is the treatment of choice. Problems in wrist arthroplasty include implant breakage, cystic erosion in the surrounding bone, and marked synovitis, which requires revision in most of cases. Total wrist arthrodesis is treatment of choice in severe wrist arthritis patient, who want to have good grip and wish to do heavy labour.&#x0D; Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 15 patients of RA with severe wrist arthritis, managed by wrist arthrodesis using 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and iliac crest bone graft was done. Patients were evaluated for pain relief, functional improvement and radiographic analysis. Patient function measures included: Visual analog score (VAS), the Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.&#x0D; Result: All 15 cases united well with marked improvement in wrist strength and diminished pain allowing improved function and heavy labor. Mayo wrist scores increased on an average of 37.5 Points (preoperative) 10 to 65 (postoperative). The average DASH score has decreased significantly up to 47 Points.&#x0D; Conclusion: Wrist Arthrodesis provides pain relief and functional hand in sever wrist arthritis in RA cases.

A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis

PurposeThe aims of this systematic review were to examine the use of radiolunate (RL) or radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis as surgical management for patients with advanced radiocarpal arthritis that failed conservative management and to assess postoperative outcomes.MethodsWe reviewed articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception through December 2019. We identified complete manuscripts written in English reporting on RL or RSL arthrodesis for treatment of wrist pathology that included the primary outcomes (pain or grip strength) and at least 2 secondary outcomes (range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or nonunion). Data pooling was used to calculate weighted averages.ResultsWe identified 2,252 articles and selected 13 for inclusion. Across all studies, RSL arthrodesis was performed for 180 patients (49% female; 45 years old) and RL for 94 (87% female; 50 years old). Both procedures exhibited improvements in pain score and grip strength. Both cohorts demonstrated postoperative changes in flexion-extension arc, flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation after data pooling. The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.ConclusionsBoth RL and RSL arthrodesis can be successfully used to manage debilitating radiocarpal arthritis by affording patients with pain reduction. Each has its own benefits, in which RSL arthrodesis provides a total arc of motion within the functional demands of most activities of daily living, and RL arthrodesis has low rates of nonunion and progression to total wrist arthrodesis. Further research is needed to compare the 2 surgeries directly and prospectively in comparable patient groups.Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic III.

Arthroscopic Debridement and Arthrolysis for the Treatment of Advanced Kienböck's Disease: 18-Month and 5-Year Postoperative Results

Background Salvage procedures, such as proximal row carpectomy, limited or total wrist arthrodesis, and wrist replacement, are generally preferred to treat advanced Kienböck's disease. However, these procedures are particularly aggressive and may have unpredictable results and potentially significant complications. Questions/Purpose This study aimed to present the short- to mid-term clinical and functional results of arthroscopic debridement and arthrolysis in the management of advanced Kienböck's disease. Patients and Methods Fifteen patients in whom Lichtman Stages IIIA to IIIC or IV Kienböck's disease was diagnosed and treated by arthroscopic wrist debridement and arthrolysis were included in this retrospective study. The mean age was 30 years (range: 21-45). The mean follow-up period duration was 36 months (range: 18-60). The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, visual analog scale (VAS), wrist range of motion (ROM), and grip strength were measured preoperatively and then again at the final follow-up visit. Results The mean DASH and VAS scores improved from 41 (range: 31-52) and 7.1 (range: 6-8) preoperatively to 13 (range: 8-21) and 2 (range: 0-3; p < 0.001) at the final follow-up visit, respectively. The mean wrist flexion and extension values increased from 32 (range: 20-60 degrees) and 56 degrees (range: 30-70 degrees; p = 0.009) preoperatively to 34 (range: 10-65 degrees; p = 0.218) and 57 degrees (range: 30-70 degrees; p = 0.296) at the final follow-up appointment, respectively, although these findings were statistically insignificant. The mean strength of the hand grip increased from 22.7 (range: 9-33) to 23.3 (range: 10-34; p = 0.372). Conclusion Arthroscopic debridement and arthrolysis may improve wrist function and quality of life due to the preserved ROM and hand grip strength after short- to mid-term follow-up periods despite the radiographic progression of Kienböck's disease. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV, retrospective case series study.

Early Experience With Locked Intramedullary Wrist Arthrodesis

The most common method of total wrist arthrodesis is dorsal compression plating, which can require revision for soft tissue or tendon irritation. A locked intramedullary system was developed to reduce this complication. The goal of this study was to investigate the complication rate of total wrist arthrodesis using this system in our center. A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing intramedullary wrist arthrodesis from January 2016 to February 2018 was performed. Nine wrist arthrodeses were performed with locked intramedullary wrist fusion in 5 women and 4 men. The indications for fusion included posttraumatic arthritis in 7 and inflammatory arthritis in 2. Two patients underwent primary arthrodesis and 7 had revision from prior partial wrist fusions. Local bone graft at the radiocarpal joint was used in all cases. The mean follow-up was 27 weeks. Radiocarpal fusion was achieved in 8 patients after the initial procedure and in the ninth patient after revision. There were 6 complications in 4 patients with revision reoperation required in 3. The complications were metacarpal locking screw migration in 3, metacarpal fracture in 1, radiocarpal nonunion in 1, and symptomatic middle finger carpometacarpal nonunion in 1. The revision surgeries include distal screw removal in 1, distal screw removal with replacement in 1, and bone grafting in the radiocarpal nonunion. Use of the locked intramedullary wrist fusion system yields high fusion rates. However, based on the high complication rate, particularly from distal screw migration, and the high revision rate in this series, we recommend caution with the use of this system. Therapeutic V.

Resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant as salvage procedure in several serious outcomes of carpal injuries. Clinical experience and follow-up.

Background and aim:Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant has been introduced in the surgical practice as an alternative method to restore wrist motion, strength and functions in patients suffering from wrist osteoarthritis. It has already been well described in the literature as a treatment for advanced stages of degenerative wrist diseases which follow scaphoid’s and lunate’s injuries such as scapho-lunate advanced collapse, scaphoid non-union advanced collapse, and advanced stages of Kienbock disease. Authors extended the use of RCPI to other selected cases of complicated wrist injuries, spreading out from the classic indications for which this device was designed.Methods:We discuss 8 cases with serious outcomes of carpal injuries treated with Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant as salvage procedure between 2005 and 2013 by the first author of this paper.Results:Results: Among the eight particular selected cases, at a mean 4.3 years follow-up (range 2-11) only one was considered a failure and underwent a total wrist arthrodesis, resolving pain after all. The seven other cases reported good results. Range of Motion, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, subjective satisfaction and radiographical outcomes are reported.Conclusions:Conclusions: As a result of this heterogeneous clinical experience, validated by long-term follow-ups in most cases, we think that the use of a Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant can be suggested as an option in the outcomes of various carpal injuries.

Technique for Failed Total Wrist Arthroplasty Conversion to a Total Wrist Arthrodesis with Allograft Interposition

The frequency of prosthetic total wrist arthroplasty continues to increase. With this increase comes the expected subsequent increase in need for revision or salvage procedures. The technique presented here involves the use of a cortical allograft interposition graft to restore bone stock and length for failed total wrist arthroplasty.

Modification of matched distal ulnar resection for distal radio-ulnar joint arthropathy: Analysis of distal instability and radio-ulnar convergence

BackgroundIn palliative surgery on the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ), ulnar head resection and the Sauvé–Kapandji procedure are often followed by instability and radio-ulnar convergence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of the DRUJ after modified matched distal ulnar resection performed alone or with partial or complete wrist arthrodesis. HypothesisA modification of matched distal ulnar resection, consisting in reconstruction of the sixth compartment and dorsalisation of the extensor carpi ulnaris, minimises these complications, regardless of the cause and associated procedures. Patients and methodsA single-centre retrospective study was conducted in 46 patients (50 wrists) who underwent modified matched distal ulnar resection. The 50 wrists fell into three groups: total wrist arthrodesis according to Millender, n=21 (TWA group); radius to proximal row arthrodesis, n=17 (RPRA group); and isolated matched distal ulnar resection, n=12 (IMDUR group). Seventy per cent of patients had rheumatoid arthritis. Each patient underwent a clinical and radiographic assessment, with an analysis of radio-ulnar convergence, DRUJ stability, and ulno-carpal impingement, as well as of ulnar translation of the carpus in the IMDUR group. ResultsAfter the mean follow-up of 8.2±5.4 years, 62% of patients were pain-free, with a mean VAS pain score of 1.3±2.1, and 90% of patients said they would have the procedure again. Clinical and radiographic instability due to excessively proximal resection was noted in 2 (4%) wrists, of which 1 required repeat surgery. Ulno-carpal impingement due to excessively distal resection occurred in 2 (4%) wrists. No significant ulnar translation of the carpus was noted in the IMDUR group (DiBenedetto: 0.011±1.9). Range of motion was similar in the three groups (mean pronation=77±17°; and mean supination=79±8°) (p>0.05). Mean grip strength was 85±35% compared to the other side. DiscussionOur modification of matched distal ulnar resection minimises the complications specific of other ulnar head resection techniques or of the Sauvé–Kapandji procedure, namely, radio-ulnar convergence and DRUJ instability. Level of proofIV; retrospective comparative study.

Salvage Procedures for Proximal Carpal Row Arthritidies: Proximal Row Carpectomy and Partial Wrist Fusion

Derangements of the proximal carpal row are a common cause of wrist arthritis. The 2 most common types, Scaphoid Non-Union Advanced Collapse and Scapholunate Advanced Collapse induce flexion of the distal half of the scaphoid either through a fracture or through an incompetent scapholunate ligament. This, in turn leads to arthritis between the scaphoid and the radial styloid. As a secondary consequence, the lunate goes into extension and creates degenerative change between it and the capitate. At this point, there are salvage treatment strategies short of total wrist arthrodesis or arthroplasty that can provide the patient with excellent long-term functional outcomes.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Arthrodesis: A 10-Year Follow-up Study of Complications in 58 Wrists.

Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) arthrodesis is a procedure used for specific degenerative arthritis and instability patterns of the wrist. This study evaluates nonunion rate and risk factors for reoperation after STT arthrodesis in the Veterans Affairs Department patient population. The purpose of our study was to assess the long-term nonunion rate following STT arthrodesis and to identify factors associated with reoperation. The national Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse and Current Procedural Terminology codes identified STT arthrodesis procedures from 1995 to 2016. Frequencies of total wrist arthrodesis (TWA) and secondary operations were determined. Univariate analyses provided odds ratios for risk factors associated with complications. Fifty-eight STT arthrodeses were performed in 54 patients with a mean follow-up of 120 months. Kirschner wires (K-wires) were the most common fixation method (69%). Six wrists (10%) required secondary procedures: 5 TWAs and 1 revision STT arthrodesis. Four patients underwent additional procedures for nonunion (7%). Twenty-four patients required K-wire removal, 8 (14%) of these in the operating room, which were not included in regression analysis. Every increase in 1 year of age resulted in a 15% decrease in likelihood of reoperation (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.93; P < .0001). Opioid use within 90 days before surgery (P = 1.00), positive smoking history (P = 1.00), race (P = .30), comorbidity count (P = .25), and body mass index (P = .19) were not associated with increased risk of reoperation. At a mean follow-up of 10 years, patients undergoing STT arthrodesis have a 10% risk of reoperation, and this risk decreases with older patient age. There was a symptomatic nonunion rate of 7%, similar to prior published rates. Patient demographics, comorbidity, smoking history, and opioid use did not appear to increase risk of reoperation.

Total Wrist Arthrodesis

Total wrist arthrodesis is a reliable procedure for pain relief in arthritic wrists. While it eliminates all motion of the wrist, excellent hand function can be maintained and the stability of the construct allows the patient to return to heavy work including manual labor. Numerous fixation methods have been described and all have satisfactory clinical outcomes. Optimal wrist fusion position, fixation method, concomitant proximal row carpectomy, and inclusion of the third carpometacarpal joint remain controversial.

Resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implant after proximal row carpectomy: A litterature review.

Up to a decade ago, to treat patients with chronic wrist pain due to advanced stages of arthritis, surgeons had four main solutions: partial or total wrist arthrodesis, total wrist prosthesis and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Since 2010, a new technique has been described in literature using the Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant (RCPI), combined to PRC. The aim of this article is to review the literature and determine the indications, outcomes and complications associated with RCPI. An electronic literature research was carried out and pertinent articles were selected. Surgical technique, results and complications described in those articles are presented. From this review of the literature, authors conclude that Resurfacing Capitate Pyrocarbon Implant can be considered as a good alternative to arthrodesis and total wrist arthroplasty, at any ages, when proximal row carpectomy alone would not be indicated.

Salvage of advanced carpal collapse: proximal row carpectomy with pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate versus four-corner arthrodesis.

In this retrospective study we report on two comparable groups of patients with advanced carpal arthritis treated with either proximal row carpectomy combined with a pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate (31 patients) or a four-corner arthrodesis and dorsal plating (26 patients). Follow-up time was 46 months (24-118). Except for a modestly higher radial wrist deviation in the patients treated with four-corner arthrodesis, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Asymptomatic progression of osteoarthritis in the lunate fossa was observed in four cases in both groups. Two cases were converted to a total wrist arthrodesis in the pyrocarbon group compared with one case in the four-corner arthrodesis group. Although four-corner arthrodesis remains the reference standard in the treatment of wrist osteoarthritis with involvement of the midcarpal joint, proximal row carpectomy combined with pyrocarbon resurfacing of the capitate is an alternative option. It can even be used in selected cases with erosion of the lunate fossa.Level of evidence: III.

Satisfactory function 12 years after triscaphoid arthrodesis for chronic scapholunate ligament injury

Scapholunate ligament (SLL) injury represents a hazard to the wrist and the treatment of these injuries has been the focus of much debate. We performed a long-term follow (>10 years) of triscaphoid arthrodesis for symptomatic chronic SLL injuries in 10 (8 men) patients 37 (22–49) years of age. All arthrodesis healed. One patient was converted to total wrist arthrodesis during the follow-up period, and three had minor additional surgeries. At final follow-up, the patients had reduced active range of motion (AROM, 55%) and grip strength (85%) compared to the opposite side, but reported low Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) (11), Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) (25) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0 and 10 at rest and activity). Radiographs found minimal degenerative changes in four patients, while CT scans demonstrated changes in seven patients, in three of these scaphoid was subluxed on the rim of the radius. The patients working prior to surgery were working at follow-up. A triscaphoid arthrodesis for SLL renders a functional wrist function in most patients for many years and has postponed more extensive surgery like total wrist arthrodesis or wrist arthroplasty. The patients are still young, and the degenerative changes seen especially on CT scans warrants attention.

Risk of Total Wrist Arthrodesis or Reoperation Following 4-Corner Arthrodesis or Proximal Row Carpectomy for Stage-II SLAC/SNAC Arthritis: A Propensity Score Analysis of 502 Wrists.

For stage-II scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) patterns of wrist arthritis, the optimal method of surgical treatment remains unclear. Previous literature has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes between proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and 4-corner arthrodesis (FCA), making the risk of reoperation a focus of particular interest. In the present study, the primary null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the rate of conversion to total wrist arthrodesis between PRC and FCA. Additionally, we hypothesized that the rate of secondary surgical procedures would be similar between the 2 procedures. The national Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse was utilized to identify 2,449 patients who underwent either PRC or FCA between 1992 and 2016. With use of operative reports to identify the arthritis pattern, only cases of stage-II SLAC/SNAC were included. All complications and subsequent surgical procedures were confirmed by manual chart review. Propensity score analyses with matching weights were utilized to balance the PRC and FCA cohorts. The rates of conversion to wrist arthrodesis and secondary surgical procedures were calculated. Of the 1,168 patients with stage-II SLAC/SNAC arthritis, 933 wrists underwent PRC and 257 wrists underwent FCA. Ten-year survival free of total wrist arthrodesis in the matching PRC (251 procedures) and FCA (251 procedures) cohorts was 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.3% to 96.3%) and 94.1% (95% CI, 90.8% to 97.4%), respectively. Survival free of a secondary surgical procedure other than wrist arthrodesis was 99.7% (95% CI, 99.3% to 100.0%) for PRC and 83.5% (95% CI, 78.2% to 88.8%) for FCA. PRC and FCA demonstrated similarly low rates of conversion to total wrist arthrodesis. In contrast, the rate of secondary surgical procedures following FCA was significantly higher compared with PRC. Given the historically similar clinical outcomes between PRC and FCA, the results of the present study show that PRC may be a preferable treatment for stage-II SLAC/SNAC wrist arthritis. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical Treatment of Wrist Arthritis in Young Patients.

Surgical treatment of wrist arthritis in the younger patient population remains a challenging issue, and various surgical options need to be carefully considered for each patient. Proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis have proven to be reliable options for reducing pain and restoring adequate function in most young high-demand patients if the lunate facet is spared. Selective neurectomy has proven to be a promising stand-alone or complementary procedure for the treatment of pain that is associated with wrist arthritis in patients of all ages, with spared motion and the opportunity to perform additional procedures if pain continues. Alternative procedures, including capitolunate arthrodesis, total wrist arthrodesis, radial styloidectomy, total wrist arthroplasty, and wrist hemiarthroplasty, have considerable strengths and weaknesses and need to be studied further in younger patients.