Managing surface water quality is a global challenge, and understanding spatial and temporal patterns of water quality is a key component to effective management. However, analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of impaired waters over broad areas is sparse due to disparate water quality data and variable water quality standards. Thus, here we leverage the Alabama 303(d) List of impaired waters to present a new perspective for investigating spatiotemporal water quality patterns. Every two years, each state in the United States is required to assess its surface water quality and compile a list of impaired waterbodies, meaning waters that do not meet water quality standards for their designated usage – referred to as the 303(d) List. The purpose of the 303(d) List is to identify impaired waters so that corrective action can be taken to reduce pollutant loads and, ultimately, improve water quality. Using GIS, a space time cube was created to analyze and visualize spatiotemporal patterns of the impaired rivers added to the Alabama 303(d) Lists from 1996 to 2022. For this analysis, the percentage of river length impaired out of the total river length, and number of times each impairment cause was listed, were summarized within Alabama sub-basins (Hydrologic Unit Code 8) (n = 51). Trend and hot spot analyses were conducted on the river impairment and causes. There was an up trend in river impairment for eight sub-basins across the state and a downtrend in one sub-basin. Over half of the sub-basins with an up trend in impairment also had an up trend in the number of times pathogens was listed as a cause of impairment. Additionally, coastal sub-basins were found to be a hot spot for river impairment. Interestingly, there was a down trend in the number of times nutrients, ammonia, and siltation were listed as a cause of impairment at the state and sub-basin scales of analysis. Altogether, these findings show the use of spatiotemporal pattern analysis of impaired waters and can indicate where, both spatially and by pollutant, management should prioritize water quality improvement efforts.
Read full abstract