Total Patient Satisfaction Research Articles

Effect of Y-shaped Nasal Columella Made of Autologous Cartilage in Secondary Nasal Deformity after Cleft Lip Surgery.

Due to the diversity and complexity of tissues involved in secondary nasal deformities following unilateral cleft lip, secondary nasal deformity correction surgeries are challenging and often yield unsatisfactory results, posing a difficult problem for plastic surgeons. Autologous cartilage, with its low sculpting difficulty, minimal absorption, and stable tissue compatibility, is considered the optimal material for reconstructing the columella, nasal tip, and alar. This study analyzed the clinical outcomes of using autologous cartilage to create a Y-shaped columella to correct secondary nasal deformities after cleft lip surgery. In this retrospective study, 75 patients with secondary nasal deformity after unilateral cleft lip surgery were treated from January 2018 to December 2023. Appropriate costal cartilage, auricular cartilage, and iliac crest cartilage were fashioned into Y-shaped stents and implanted into the nasal columella of the patients to strengthen the tip cartilage. The free alar cartilage was sutured and fixed with a Y-shaped bracket. The wound healing rate, subjective satisfaction evaluation, and complications were analyzed. The nasal appearance, nasal deformity classification, and objective indices of healthy and affected nasal sides, function, and quality of life were compared before and after the operation. All patients healed well during the first stage without related complications, and the average incision healing time was 5.16 ± 1.37 days. The scores of nasal tip position, nasal tip shape, nostril shape, nasal dorsum shape, and nasal floor shape at 6 months post-operation were significantly lower compared to pre-operation (p < 0.001). The grade of nasal deformity at 6 months post-operation was lower than the pre-operation (p < 0.001). Pre-operation, the nasal base and nasal width of the affected side were higher than those of the healthy side, while the nasal columellar and nostril height were lower (p < 0.001). At 6 months post-operation, the nasal base and nasal width decreased, and the nasal columellar and nostril height increased (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the two sides (p > 0.05). The nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory-17 (FROI-17) scores at 6 months post-operation were significantly lower than pre-operation, while the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) score was higher (p < 0.001). The total patient satisfaction was 97.33% (73/75). Y-shaped nasal columella made of autologous cartilage can effectively correct secondary nasal deformity after cleft lip surgery, improve nasal alar collapse, lengthen nasal columella, elevate nasal end, enhance the quality of life, nasal appearance, and nasal ventilation function of patients, with high satisfaction and few complications.

Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery surgery in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy

Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy offers advantages, including minimal invasiveness, precise, and safe procedures. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 62 patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 30 were managed with ERAS principles, while 32 were managed using traditional perioperative management protocols. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative oral intake time, time to return of bowel function, time to ambulation, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, fluid replacement volume, length of hospital stay, total hospital expenses, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded and compared between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up included assessment of postoperative functional scores, reoperation rates, SF-36 quality of life scores, and survival rates. The average follow-up time was 35.6 months (range: 12–56 months). There were no statistically significant differences in general characteristics, including age, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and preoperative medical history between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had an earlier postoperative oral intake time, faster return of bowel function, rapid ambulation, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.05). The intervention group also had lower postoperative VAS scores, lower fluid replacement volume, lower total hospital expenses, and a lower rate of complications (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in two-year functional scores, reoperation rates, quality of life scores, and survival rates (P > 0.05). Implementing ERAS principles in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy substantially expedited postoperative recovery, lowered pain scores, and diminished complications. However, there were no notable differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups.

Use of Lean Management Methodology to Reduce the Rate of Unfinished Nursing Care in the Emergency Observation Room: A Quality Improvement Project.

The integration of lean management in optimizing nursing workflow necessitates the careful examination of several factors, including nurses' work efficiency, patient experience, and health outcomes. To evaluate the extent of unfinished nursing care and patient satisfaction, we have incorporated the lean management approach into our quality improvement efforts. This proactive measure aims to address potential adverse outcomes, such as subpar inpatient experiences, escalated occurrence of adverse events, and decreased job satisfaction among nursing staff. We utilized the lean management methodology of value stream mapping in a specific facility between February and August 2021, aiming to pinpoint the crucial areas for enhancing nurses' workflow. By employing fishbone diagrams, we thoroughly analyzed the underlying causes, and subsequently employed the Plan-Do-Study-Act model to execute interventions devised based on these identified causes. Interventions included: (1) specifying the time of doctors' conventional rounds; (2) changing unreasonable scheduling; (3) employing 5S management to manage nursing supplies; and (4) eliminating duplicate papers and electronic reports. After implementing these interventions, the rate of unfinished nursing reduced from 73.4% to 39.6%, and that of finished nursing care during the shift increased from 38.6% to 71.4%. Overtime was reduced from 37.2 ± 22.4 minutes to 14.1 ± 3.6 minutes. The total patient satisfaction score for the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire short-form increased (P < .05). The lean management of quality improvement methodologies provides effective enhancement to the work efficiency of nurses.

Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block versus Standard Care in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgeries—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background Patients who undergo spine surgery often experience severe pain postoperatively. Multimodal analgesia inclusive of a regional block provides optimal pain relief. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block may provide promising analgesia in these patients. Materials Fifty consenting adults aged between 18 and 60 years undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgeries under balanced general anesthesia were divided into two equal groups (group T: received bilateral TLIP block, and group C: received conventional opioid analgesia). All the patients were taken care of by an independent anesthesiologist unaware of the study protocol in the postanesthesia care unit. The postoperative pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS). Time to first rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption, complications, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Results Postoperative mean VAS scores till 12 hours were significantly higher in the control group. The mean time to the first analgesic requirement among group T and group C patients was 404.4 ± 25.1 and 150.2 ± 12.4 minutes, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). Morphine consumptions in 24 hours were also significantly higher in group C (3.36 ± 1.04 vs. 7.84 ± 1.43; p &lt; 0.001). Mean intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly more in group C (122.4 ± 16.4 µg and 140.4 ± 21.7 µg; p = 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups. However, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in group T (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion TLIP block provided superior analgesia, decreased opioid consumption, and improved patient satisfaction as compared with patients receiving standard general anesthesia with opioid analgesics. Hence, TLIP block could be a component of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries.CTRI No.: CTRI/2021/03/031682

Effects of Continuous Analgesic Titrated Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

Background and Objectives: Anesthetizing elderly patients with hip fractures poses a significant challenge in emergency settings, particularly given the aging population both in Algeria and worldwide. With a high prevalence of comorbidities and polypharmacy, effective anesthetic management becomes paramount. Continuous titrated spinal anesthesia (CTSA) has emerged as a promising technique for addressing these complexities by proposing lower doses of local anesthetic (LA) in this patient population. Methods: This retrospective study involved 40 elderly patients (&gt;65 years) undergoing hip fracture repair. Patients received intermittent dosing of a local anesthetic solution via an intrathecal catheter, utilizing 0.25 ml increments of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.25 ml of fentanyl (12.5 μg). Evaluation criteria included hemodynamic stability, incidence of hypotension, extent of sensory and motor blockade, total ephedrine consumption, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Results: A female predominance was noted, with a mean age of 75 years, and 72% classified as ASA ≥ III. Pertrochanteric fractures accounted for 47% of cases, followed by femoral neck fractures at 53%. Nearly all patients achieved a sensory level ≥ D10, with a failure rate of only 2%. Sedation supplementation was required in 20% of cases, with conversion to general anesthesia in one patient. Complications were minimal, including arterial hypotension (3%), vasoconstrictor use (2%), and bradycardia (0.8%). Overall, both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that CTSA is an effective technique for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair, offering the advantages of reduced LA doses, excellent hemodynamic stability, and minimal side effects. Its simplicity and cost-effectiveness further enhance its appeal in clinical practice.

Ultrasound Guided Maxillary Nerve Block for Perioperative Pain Management for Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Randomized Control Trial

Background: Proper perioperative pain management remains a cornerstone of well-conducted functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). In such a context, proper pain management entails the adequate provision of prolonged postoperative analgesia, the avoidance of overusing opioids, and consequently limiting their unwanted side effects. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of bilateral ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (MNB) on postoperative pain in patients undergoing FESS. Methods: Patients eligible for FESS were randomized into two groups: the MNB group (n = 30), who underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block after induction of anesthesia, and a control group (n = 30), who received multimodal analgesia, including opioids. Postoperatively, patients were observed for 48 hours. Pain scores were evaluated upon arrival to the sPACU and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively, particularly at the time of removal of the hemostatic agent after 36 hours postoperatively. Total rescue analgesia, postoperative complications (including nausea and vomiting [PONV], hypotension, bradycardia, headache), and patient satisfaction were also diligently recorded. Results: Sixty patients who were candidates and underwent FESS surgery were enrolled randomly in both groups. The NRS pain score in the MNB group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P &lt; 0.001), especially the NRS during the removal of the hemostatic agent at T10 was significantly lower in the MNB group (P &lt; 0.001). However, at the 24 - hour point post-surgery, there were no significant differences between both groups (P = 0.568). Total rescue analgesia required was significantly lower in the MNB group compared with the control group (P &lt; 0.001) throughout the first 48 hours postoperatively. The percentage of patients with no postoperative complications (nausea, vomiting, and headache) was higher in the MNB group (76.7 %) compared with the control group (40 %). Patient satisfaction was statistically significantly higher in the MNB group (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Bilateral ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic MNB appeared to be safe and advantageous, as its use was associated with a decrease in total analgesic consumption, a reduction in postoperative morbidities such as pain, nausea, and vomiting, and greater patient satisfaction.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, PATIENT SATISFACTION, SERVICE QUALITY, AND TRUST IN THE HEALTHCARE SECTOR: THE CASE OF ETHIOPIAN PUBLIC HOSPITALS

The aim of this research is to investigate the direct effects of total quality management (TQM) on perceived service quality (SQ) and patient satisfaction (PSAT), the impact of SQ on PSAT and patient trust (TR), and the influence of PSAT on TR among in-patients in selected Public Hospitals in Northern Ethiopia. Employing a quantitative approach, a questionnaire was administered via convenience sampling. The study included a sample of 293 in-patients receiving treatment in selected public hospitals in Ethiopia, with data analysis conducted using Amoss26 and SPSS26. The findings revealed that total quality management positively influenced patient satisfaction and perceived service quality, while SQ also had a positive effect on PSAT and TR. Moreover, PSAT exhibited a positive impact on TR among in-patients in selected public hospitals in Northern Ethiopia. This research significantly contributes to the existing literature and warrants further investigation, as there is a dearth of studies on total quality management in the healthcare sector compared to manufacturing industries. Additionally, this study provides valuable insights for healthcare sector managers in strategic planning and decision- making processes.

Serratus anterior plane block (posterior approach) versus erector spinae plane block in modified radical mastectomy; A randomized comparative trial

ABSTRACT Background Regional analgesia as Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) were used successfully for the control of perioperative pain in females undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods The trial included 56 females aged between 20 and 60 years old who had undergone MRM and were allocated into two groups (28 patients in each), group (I) for SAPB (posterior approach) and group (II) for ESPB. Measurements included demographic data, hemodynamic change, oxygen saturation, pain intensity by the visual analogue scale (VAS), sensory loss including axillary coverage and shoulder pain, incidence of neuropathic pain, total analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction and complications. Results Demographic data, hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation showed statistically insignificant differences. There were insignificant differences in the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at rest and on movement between the two groups on the first postoperative day (p-value >0.278 and 0.111 respectively). ESPB provided significantly more segmental sensory loss than SAPB (posterior approach) (p-value <0.031). We reported statistically insignificant differences in terms of total morphine consumption, the first request for analgesia and total local anaesthetic consumption (p-value = 0.408, 0.916 and 0.574 respectively), axillary sensory loss, inferior shoulder pain (p-value = 0.763), the incidence of neuropathic pain assessed by the Deuleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scale after one week and one month (p-value = 1.000 and 0.554 respectively), Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) score, and patient satisfaction (p-value = 0.887) between the two groups with no documented complications. Conclusion We concluded that SAPB (posterior approach) and ESPB are safe and effective analgesic modalities for MRM with insignificant differences except for the more blocked dermatomes in the ESPB group.

Improving Quality Health Care Services by Implementing DMAIC Approach in Paediatric Cardiology Department of Public Hospital of Sindh, Pakistan: A Case Study

Objectives: The hospital industry has changed its dimension from diagnosis to complete total patient satisfaction. This study aims to identify the critical variables that can enhance overall patient satisfaction in the hospital industry. The study identified three critical factors for any hospital to provide quality service. Methodology: The study adopted the lean Six Sigma process improvement methodology to identify the critical service factors in hospitals. Lean Six Sigma is a flexible problem-solving tool that comprehensively solves any problem. DMAIC process improvement methodology is used to define, measure, analyze, improve, and control the overall experience in the hospital. CTQ (critical to quality) was defined and represented by Kano methodology. After filtration through cause and effect analysis, three core dimensions and 25 sub-dimensions of critical quality were identified. The impacts of these 25 sub-dimensions were evaluated and prioritized using the Kano Model of patient satisfaction. This identifies the most critical service requirement. This study is an initiative for service quality improvement in the hospital industry. In the future, this technique can be modified and adopted by different public and private hospitals to enhance the practical implementation. Results: Findings indicate that healthcare organizations demonstrate enhanced system-wide capabilities, optimizing resource utilization. Understanding patient needs propels satisfaction and delight. Three overarching factors, with 25 sub-factors, significantly impact patient satisfaction, predominantly yielding positive effects across the categories. Conclusion: This research concludes that providing quality service is critical in the hospital industry. Quality service is pivotal in the evolving hospital industry, transitioning from a focus on diagnosis to holistic patient satisfaction. This study aims to identify critical variables essential for enhancing overall patient satisfaction, pinpointing key factors crucial for delivering quality service in any hospital.

Comparison of time courses in postoperative functional outcomes between simultaneous bilateral and unilateral total knee arthroplasty with propensity score matching.

No consensus has been reached on which is better in terms of functional outcomes between simultaneous bilateral and unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As patient characteristics, such as age, sex, and body mass index, have significant effects on functional outcomes after TKA, these factors should be matched before comparisons are made. This study aimed to compare time courses in functional outcomes between simultaneous bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA after matching the patient characteristics. In this retrospective study, the clinical records of patients admitted to a hospital were reviewed. Of 425 patients, 43 underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA, whereas 382 underwent unilateral TKA. Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, and body mass index between simultaneous bilateral and unilateral TKA patients. Therapists measured pain intensity, knee extensor strength, and knee-specific functional outcomes by using the new knee society score, including total score, symptoms, patient satisfaction, patient expectations, and functional activities preoperatively and 3 and 12months postoperatively. Two-way repeated analysis of variance was performed to compare the time courses in functional outcomes between simultaneous bilateral and unilateral TKA. After propensity score matching, 40 patients each for underwent bilateral TKA and unilateral TKA were selected. Knee extensor strength in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients was significantly lower than that in unilateral TKA patients at 3months postoperatively (p = 0.04). A significant interaction was observed between the effects of time and group on knee extensor strength (F [1, 78] = 3.338; interaction: p = 0.042; η2 = 0.052). No significant interactions were found among the other variables measured. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA should undergo postoperative rehabilitation focused on alleviating delayed recovery in knee extensor strength during the acute phase.

Evaluating the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

ABSTRACT Background Although ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have lately been used to control pain, there is not much evidence assessing the outcome of trigeminal nerve block (TNB) in maxillofacial surgery. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of analgesia with an ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block (USGTNB) in patients undergoing unilateral maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia. Methods This single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial included 50 adult patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and were prepared for elective unilateral maxillofacial procedure under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups. In the intervention (TNB) group, 25 patients received USGTNB using 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, while in the control group, 25 patients received only general anesthesia. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the intraoperative hemodynamic parameters besides the postoperative pain, total opioid consumption, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results Compared to general anesthesia, USGTNB significantly reduced the intraoperative fentanyl consumption (2.38 ± 0.62 vs 0.36 ± 0.55, p < 0.001), and the intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at 1, 2, and 3 h (p < 0.001), the numerical rating score during the 24 postoperative hours (p < 0.001), and the postoperative nalbuphine consumption (11.60 ± 4.72 vs 1.92 ± 3.28, p < 0.001). USGTNB had a better safety profile and showed better patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia alone (8.04 ± 0.89 vs 5.84 ± 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion USGTNB can provide an effective, safe approach for controlling pain in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery.

Safety and efficacy of patient controlled epidural analgesia versus conventional epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries: a prospective randomized study

BackgroundOrthopedic surgeries lead to moderate to severe postoperative pain, treating which is a challenge to the anesthesiologist. The present prospective, randomized study was carried out to compare the efficacy of postoperative pain relief between patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and conventional intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (IBEA) \\with very low concentration of bupivacaine plus fentanyl in 60 ASA I and ASA II patients for orthopedic lower limb surgeries. Following variables like heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, total analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction (Likert scale) and side effects were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.ResultsThe hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups at various time intervals. There was a significant decrease in VAS score, less analgesic consumption, less rescue analgesia requirement and more patient satisfaction in PCEA group as compared to IBEA group.ConclusionsPatient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with a combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl has more efficacy and safety than intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (IBEA) so it should be used more often.

A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty

BackgroundIliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty.MethodsWe recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications.ResultsThere was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups.ConclusionIPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB.Trial registrationThe trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html).

Comparison of Patient-Controlled versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia in Adult Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

The advantages of PCEA over CEA have been demonstrated in obstetric patients. Whether a similar benefit applies to surgical patients is unclear. Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched, enabling a systematic review of studies comparing PCEA and CEA in adult surgical patients (PROSPERO: CRD42018106644). The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2). The primary outcome was pain scores on postoperative day one (POD1). Secondary outcomes were 24 or 48 h epidural or intravenous total analgesic dose, systemic analgesics, manual top-ups, side effects, and patient satisfaction. Six randomized controlled trials with high heterogeneity of study characteristics were identified with a moderate risk of bias. Two studies showed significantly reduced resting pain scores on POD1 in PCEA compared with CEA patients (36-44%, p < 0.05). Four studies found comparable pain scores between these groups. PCEA use reduced epidural medication (28% to 40% reduction, p < 0.01) in four studies. One study found a 23% reduction (p < 0.001) of top-ups in PCEA; intravenous morphine use by PCEA patients was reduced (0.16 vs. 3.45 mg per patient, p < 0.05) in one study. PCEA patients were more satisfied with analgesia (p < 0.001) in two studies. Nausea and vomiting were reduced in PCEA (p = 0.01). Regarding the reduction in pain scores, the effects of PCEA were not significant or clinically not relevant. However, regarding the amount of epidural drug use, the amount of required rescue systemic analgesics, patient satisfaction, and the number of required top-ups, PCEA had advantages over CEA in surgical patients.

Relationship between pain, nerve injury and clinical outcomes after flexor tendon injuries in zones 1-2: a retrospective cohort study.

The influence of pain and a concomitant digital nerve injury on the course of rehabilitation after flexor tendon injury remains ambiguous. The objectives of the study were to: i) analyse the evolution of pain spanning one year after a primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1-3; ii) examine the differences in pain levels in patients with and without digital nerve injury; and iii) evaluate the relationship between pain, digital nerve injury and pain medication, total active motion (TAM), DASH scores and patient satisfaction. Data from 189 patients were retrieved from a flexor tendon registry between 2014 and 2020. Differences in pain, TAM, DASH and patient satisfaction were analysed. Multiple linear and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between clinical outcomes. Pain significantly decreased in the course of rehabilitation (p < 0.001 to 0.006). No relationship could be identified between nerve injury and pain (p = 0.21-0.97). In week 6, the presence of pain and a nerve injury were significantly associated with lower TAM scores (p = 0.001). In week 13, pain during motion (p < 0.001) and the presence of a nerve injury (p = 0.036) were significantly associated with worse DASH scores. Patient satisfaction was significantly inversely correlated to pain during motion in weeks 13 and 26 (p < 0.001). We found a significant relationship between pain during motion and pain medication intake, TAM, DASH scores and patient satisfaction. It is therefore advisable to closely monitor this parameter after flexor tendon injuries. This multi-center cohort study is registered under https://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04312412.

Overview of the different personalized total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance, how choosing?

Current limitations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) function and patient satisfaction stimulated us to question our practice. Our understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics has evolved over recent years as we now consider that a more personalized joint reconstruction may be a better-targeted goal for TKA. Implant design and surgical techniques must be advanced to better reproduce the anatomy and kinematics of native knees and ultimately provide a forgotten joint. The availability of precision tools as robotic assistance surgery can help us recreate patient anatomy and ensure components are not implanted in a position that may compromise long-term outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining in popularity and may be the future of orthopedic surgery. However, moving away from the concept of neutrally aligning every TKA dogma opens the door to new techniques emergence based on opinion and experience and leads to a certain amount of uncertainty among knee surgeons. Hence, it is important to clearly describe each technique and analyze their potential impacts and benefits. Personalized TKA techniques may be classified into 2 main families: unrestricted or restricted component orientation. In the restricted group, some will aim to reproduce native ligament laxity versus aiming for ligament isometry. When outside of their boundaries, all restricted techniques will induce anatomical changes. Similarly, most native knee having asymmetric ligaments laxity between compartments and within the same compartment during the arc of flexion; aiming for ligament isometry induces bony anatomy changes. In the current paper, we will summarize and discuss the impacts of the different robotic personalized alignment techniques, including kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA), inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), and functional alignment (FA). With every surgical technique, there are limitations and shortcomings. As our implants are still far from the native knee, it is primordial to understand the impacts and benefits of each technique. Mid to long data will help us in defining the new standards.

Perceived treatment satisfaction in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases treated with biologic therapies: results of a self-reported survey.

Biological agents are widely used for the management of systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) and their therapeutic implications have been expanded beyond inflammatory arthropathies to more complicated autoimmune disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, and systemic sclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate treatment satisfaction and overall experience of SRDs' patients receiving biologics as well as to explore patient's perspectives on the quality of services provided by rheumatology departments and to determine factors related to the level of satisfaction. We performed a synchronous correlation study. Patients with SRDs answered an anonymous questionnaire assessing their satisfaction and how treatment with biologics has affected their quality of life and functionality. Sample consisted by 244 patients (65.2% women), with mean age of 50.4years, and the most common diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (37.3%). Sixty one percentof patients received intravenous therapy and 39% subcutaneously. Overall, 80.5% of the patients reported a positive/very positive effect of their treatment on their life. The average total patient satisfaction from the unit was 79.8%. The presence of mental disease was significantly associated with less positive impact of the treatment on patients' life, worse quality of life, and greater pain. In conclusion, patients with a broad spectrum of SRDs were generally satisfied and treatment with biologic regimens appeared to have a positive impact on several aspects of their life. The majority of patients were at least satisfied with all the characteristics of the unit staff and better quality of life was associated with greater satisfaction about the Unit and more positive affect of the treatment in patients' life.

Patients' Satisfaction, Diabetic Control and Associated Factors at a Tertiary Health Facility in Rivers State, Nigeria.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death globally and diabetes mellitus (DM) is the fourth main contributor. The incidence of its complications could be reduced with high-quality care and good glycaemic control. Treatment satisfaction is an important aspect of quality of care, especially in treating chronic diseases like DM. This study sought to determine the satisfaction of diabetics with their care and to identify the relationship between patients' satisfaction and diabetic control alongside other associated factors. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional, hospital-based study. Respondents were admitted into the study based on inclusion criteria and selected using a systematic random sampling technique. Blood samples for fasting plasma glucose and total cholesterol were collected. Diabetic Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire were used to assess treatment satisfaction. The SPSS version 21.0 was used for data analysis and linear regression was used to determine the factors influencing satisfaction. The level of significance was set at 0.05. The mean total Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction score was 33.8 ± 8.2 and the mean total Short-Form Patient Satisfaction score was found to be 16.8 ± 3.6. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean satisfaction scores with treatment of diabetes mellitus and age groups (p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant association between DM treatment satisfaction with the use of oral antidiabetic agents (p = 0.043) and the presence of complications (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between patient satisfaction scores and other factors like accessibility and convenience, time spent with doctors, and so on. In conclusion, the study identified the use of oral anti-diabetic agents, and the presence of complications, among others as factors affecting patient satisfaction. This study, therefore, suggests improving the practice of patient-centered medicine by increasing patient satisfaction through addressing these factors.

Comparison of subomohyoid plane block and interscalene nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

ABSTRACT Background Ultrasound guided interscalene nerve block (ISB) is a popular procedure for pain relief in shoulder surgery patients. The subomohyoid plane block is a new reliable and technically easy regional technique that can be properly used for pain management with fewer adverse effects. The aim of this study was to validate whether there is a difference in postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption between interscalene and subomohyoid plane blocks. Method Eighty patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were enrolled in this controlled blinded study and randomized to interscalene or subomohyoid plane blocks using 15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine in each group and general anesthesia. The primary outcome was pain severity at rest using VAS. Secondary outcomes were first 24 h total morphine consumption, patient satisfaction and adverse effects. Results All patients completed the study through the primary outcome analysis. VAS scores at PACU 2 h were similar in both groups, and VAS scores at 4, 8, 12,18 and 24 h were statistically lower in the interscalene block group (ISB) than in the subomohyoid group (p < 0.001), with no clinical significance. Total morphine consumption was lower in ISB group than in the subomohyoid group (p < 0.001). Time to the first rescue analgesic request and patients’ satisfaction were similar in both groups. Ipsilateral phrenic nerve was blocked in 37.5% of patients in ISB group vs. 7.5% in the subomohyoid group (p < 0.001). Conclusion Subomohyoid plane block can be considered as an alternative to interscalene block for shoulder arthroscopy surgery.

Impact of postoperative telemedicine visit versus in-person visit on patient satisfaction: A randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAlthough telemedicine use has increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, the impact of telemedicine versus in-person postoperative visits on patient satisfaction has not been studied prospectively. We hypothesized that telemedicine visits would be noninferior to in-person visits in terms of postoperative colorectal surgery patient satisfaction. MethodsWe conducted a randomized trial of consecutive adult patients undergoing transabdominal colorectal surgery from September 2020 to February 2021. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to either receive a telemedicine visit (Arm T) or an in-person visit (Arm I) for their first postoperative appointment. Subsequently, participants in Arm T completed a second postoperative visit in person, and participants in Arm I completed a second postoperative visit via telemedicine. All participants completed a patient satisfaction survey electronically within 24 hours after each postoperative visit. The primary endpoint was total patient satisfaction score. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported safety score, length of visit, and willingness of patients to recommend the practice to their peers. Fisher’s exact test, χ2 analysis, and Student’s t test were used to compare outcomes. ResultsA total of 46 patients were analyzed with 23 each in Arm T and Arm I. The mean age of our study cohort was 50.6 (standard deviation 17.7) years and 52% were female. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of baseline characteristics. With respect to our primary endpoint of total satisfaction score, patient satisfaction scores in Arm T were non-inferior to those in Arm I. Similarly, there was no significant difference in satisfaction scores after the second postoperative visit when the visit types were reversed. We did not find any significant differences between groups in terms of our secondary endpoints. ConclusionPostoperative telemedicine visits were a safe and time-efficient option that maintained high patient satisfaction compared with in-person postoperative visits.