Abstract Study question Does culture in integrated time-lapse systems (TLS) improve embryo development and blastocyst quality compared to conventional benchtop incubators (CI), within the same IVF laboratory? Summary answer Under similar conditions, culture in TLS resulted in a significant increase in blastocyst rate, top quality blastocyst rate and proportion of biopsied embryos per treatment What is known already Integrated TLS have the potential of delivering a stable and undisturbed environment throughout the whole embryo culture, avoiding taking them out for assessment. However, there is still lack of quality evidence of the performance of these incubators compared to CI at supporting embryo culture until blastocyst stage. Studies abording this issue are still scarce, heterogeneous and have a small sample size. Although some authors have reported an improvement in embryo development and quality using TLS, global results are inconsistent. To our knowledge, the present study evaluates the effect of TLS on embryo quality on the largest sample size yet. Study design, size, duration Unicentric retrospective cohort study including 14248 ICSI treatments from 2016 to October 2020, with both autologous and donated oocytes. We compared blastocyst rate (BR) and proportion of top-quality blastocysts (TQB=Morphology ASEBIR score A) per treatment between those using TLS (N = 7500) and CI (N = 6748), and the proportion of embryos biopsied (EB) in cycles with pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT-A; N = 2642). We performed a sub-analysis in treatments using single-step culture medium (N-TLS=4398, N-CI=1140) in both types of incubators. Participants/materials, setting, methods Embryo cohorts were cultured until blastocyst stage in one of 3 TLS: EmbryoScope, EmbryoScope Plus (Vitrolife,) and Geri (Genea Biomedx), or in a CI (ASTEC). Embryo quality was assessed following ASEBIR morphological criteria. Culture protocols and media changed during the included time period. For that reason, we did a sub-study in the treatments performed since the implementation of Gems® (Genea Biomedx) single-step (SS) culture medium in all incubators. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA tests. Main results and the role of chance Treatments were differently distributed and heterogeneous in terms of number of oocytes obtained per patient, so we stratified the analysis according to ovum origin and compared mean rates per cycle instead of total number of embryos per group. BR was statistically higher (P < 0,001) in the TLS group, in both autologous (62,98±29,37% vs 59,49±31,09% in CI) and oocyte donation treatments (69,25±22,07% vs 66,27±23,28% in CI). Proportion of TQB was also significantly higher in the TLS in both types of cycles (P < 0,001): 3,60±12,29% in TLS vs 2,27±9,71% in CI in autologous cycles, 8,68±15,31% in TLS vs 7,32±14,02% CI in ovum donation cycles. Results were corroborated in the SS media sub-study (P < 0,05): BR was 63,87±29,23% in TLS vs 57,53±30,61% in CI with autologous oocytes, and 70,76±21,63% in TLS vs 67,39±22,68% in CI with donated oocytes; TQB rates were 3,66±12,06% in TLS vs 2,05±9,26% in CI in autologous treatments and 8,81±15,21% in TLS vs 6,84±12,91% in CI in ovum donation treatments. Regarding PGT-A treatments, we found no significant difference in the biopsy rate in the total comparison, although the rate significantly increased in the TLS group since the implementation of single-step medium (52,36±24,69% in TLS vs 48,63±22,56% in CI; P = 0,007) Limitations, reasons for caution Not only culture conditions varied over time, but also the number of TLS in the laboratory, which increased lately. Hence, even though the most recent treatments included in the all-SS sub-study are more homogeneous in terms of culture conditions, they are unbalanced regarding the distribution among incubators. Wider implications of the findings: Our results demonstrate the superiority of TLS coupled with single-step culture media against traditional embryo culture systems at supporting embryo development. The optimal environment provided by TLS enhances embryo development until blastocyst stage as well as their quality, increasing the cumulative chances of getting a life-birth for each patien. Trial registration number Not applicable