Results Of Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Predictive Tool Use and Willingness for Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Despite the increasing number of tools available to predict the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the effect of these predictive tools on patient decision-making remains uncertain. To assess the effect of an online predictive tool on patient-reported willingness to undergo TKA. This parallel, double-masked, 2-arm randomized clinical trial compared predictive tool use with treatment as usual (TAU). The study was conducted between June 30, 2022, and July 31, 2023. Participants were followed up for 6 months after enrollment. Participants were recruited from a major Australian private health insurance company and from the surgical waiting list for publicly funded TKA at a tertiary hospital. Eligible participants had unilateral knee osteoarthritis, were contemplating TKA, and had previously tried nonsurgical interventions, such as lifestyle modifications, physiotherapy, and pain medications. The intervention group was provided access to an online predictive tool at the beginning of the study. This tool offered information regarding the likelihood of improvement in quality of life if patients chose to undergo TKA. The predictions were based on the patient's age, sex, and baseline symptoms. Conversely, the control group received TAU without access to the predictive tool. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in participants' willingness to undergo surgery at 6 months after tool use as measured by binomial logistic regression. Secondary outcome measures included participant treatment preference and the quality of their decision-making process as measured by the Knee Decision Quality Instrument. Of 211 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [8.3] years; 118 female [55.9%]), 105 were allocated to the predictive tool group and 106 to the TAU group. After adjusting for baseline differences in willingness for surgery, the predictive tool did not significantly reduce the primary outcome of willingness for surgery at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.42-1.71; P = .64). Despite the absence of treatment effect on willingness for TKA, predictive tools might still enhance health outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additional research is needed to optimize the design and implementation of predictive tools, address limitations, and fully understand their effect on the decision-making process in TKA. ANZCTR.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12622000072718.

Total knee arthroplasty survivorship and outcomes in young patients: a review of the literature and 40-year update to a longitudinal study.

Growing numbers of younger patients are electing to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to compare established literature regarding TKA outcomes in patients under age 55, to data from an ongoing longitudinal young patient cohort curated by our study group. Further, we aimed to provide a novel update on survivorship at 40years post-TKA from our longitudinal cohort. A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, using terms related to TKA, patients under age 55, and osteoarthritis. Demographic and outcome data were extracted from all studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data were divided into the "longitudinal study (LS) group," and the "literature review (LR) group" based on the patient population of the study from which it came. After screening, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria; 6 studies comprised the LR group, and 4 studies comprised the LS group. 2613 TKAs were performed among the LR group, and 114 TKAs were longitudinally followed in the LS group. The mean patient ages of the LR and LS groups were 46.1 and 51, respectively. Mean follow-up was 10.1years for the LR group. Mean postoperative range of motion was 113.6° and 114.5° for the LR and LS groups, respectively. All-cause survivorship reported at 10years or less ranged from 90.6% to 99.0%. The LS cohort studies reported survivorship ranges of 70.1-70.6% and 52.1-65.3% at 30 and 40years, respectively. Young TKA patients demonstrated improved functionality at each follow-up time point assessed. Survivorship decreased with increasing lengths of follow-up, ultimately ranging from 52.1-65.3% at 40years post-TKA. The paucity of literature on long-term TKA outcomes in this patient population reinforces the necessity of further research on this topic.

First long-term analysis of survival and clinical outcome in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: follow-up of a prospective cohort study.

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced to improve post-operative alignment, and consequently the revision rate and clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Short- to mid-term data are conflicting regarding these theoretical advantages of PSI. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the survival rate and clinical outcome in PSI TKA 8.4 years after initial surgery. To our knowledge, no other study investigated long-term follow-up of TKA procedures using PSI. From a total cohort of 184 consecutive patients (200 TKA) 136 patients (144 TKA, 72%) were prospectively analysed at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (±0.4). A survival analysis with all-cause revision of TKA as endpoint was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after 1-, 2-, 5-, and 8.4-years of follow-up. Differences between these moments of follow-up were analysed. At final follow-up, 4 TKAs (2%) had undergone revision, all between 2-4 years after primary surgery. Reasons for revision were late infection, aseptic loosening, instability and polyethylene insert breakage. The median score of certain PROMs (WOMAC, VAS, EQ-index, EQ-VAS) decreased compared to previous follow-up scores but were significantly higher than preoperative scores. After 8.4 years of follow-up, no additional revision surgery was performed compared to 5-years postoperatively. Certain PROMs at 8.4-year follow-up decreased compared to earlier moments of follow-up, but all PROMs improved compared to preoperative PROMs.

Cardiac interventions on total knee arthroplasty: a national inpatient sample-based analysis.

Comorbid cardiovascular diseases have been associated with poor outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, our understanding of TKA with prior cardiac treatment procedures has largely been undocumented. In this study, we examined TKA patients who had undergone different cardiac interventions that addressed their condition. The purpose was to characterize and compare outcomes for a growing patient population not yet analyzed. The 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for 558,256 patients who had TKA (ICD-10CM). Backgrounds significant for pacemaker [PM] (n = 8025), coronary artery bypass [CABG] (n = 12,683), heart valve surgery [HV] (n = 4125), or coronary stent [CS] (n = 19,483) were compared against those without, across demographics, admission information, and various complications. Cardiac interventions were associated with increased age, male gender, length of stay, and cost of care. CABG, and Stent groups had more diabetics, but HV had significantly fewer (p = 0.008). PM and HV had significantly less tobacco use and, in addition to CABG, less obesity. Postoperatively, mortality was elevated in the PM [Odds ratio (OR) 2.89, p = 0.008], CABG (OR 2.53, p = 0.006) and CS group (OR 1.94, p = 0.018), but not HV. Myocardial infarctions were elevated in the CABG (OR 3.874) and CS group (OR 5.11) (p < 0.001). PM, HV, and CS had increased odds of periprosthetic fracture by 2.15-fold (p < 0.001), 2.09-fold (p < 0.001), 1.29-fold (p = 0.011) respectively. HV saw increased periprosthetic mechanical complications (OR 1.48, p = 0.006). CABG increased the odds of deep surgical site infection 14.23-fold and CS 9.22-fold (p < 0.001). Postoperative pneumonia was increased in PM, CABG, and CS groups (OR 2.15,), (OR 2.21,), (OR 1.64,) (p < 0.001). Patients who have undergone cardiac intervention are generally at risk for adverse stays. Furthermore, risk factors and complications vary between the groups. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of individualized medical care and as a basis for electing and informing patients for TKA.

Exercise therapy, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy alone, or in combination with total knee arthroplasty, in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized feasibility study

BackgroundOne in five patients experience chronic pain 1 year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), highlighting the need for enhanced treatment strategies to improve outcomes. This feasibility trial aimed to optimize the content and delivery of a complex intervention tailored to osteoarthritis (OA) patients at risk of poor outcome after TKA and assess the feasibility of initiating a full-scale multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT).MethodsPatients scheduled for TKA were included between August 2019 and June 2020 and block-randomized into one of three groups: (a) 12-week exercise therapy and education (ExE) and 10-module internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), (b) TKA followed by ExE and iCBT and (c) TKA and standard postoperative care. Outcomes were (i) recruitment and retention rate, (ii) compliance to the intervention and follow-up, (iii) crossover, and (iv) adverse events, reported by descriptive statistics.ResultsFifteen patients were included in the study. Only 1 out of 146 patients screened for eligibility was included during the first 4 months. During the next 3 months, 117 patients were not included since they lived too far from the hospital. To increase the recruitment rate, we made three amendments to the inclusion criteria; (1) at-risk screening of poor TKA outcome was removed as an eligibility criterion, (2) patients across the country could be included in the study and (3) physiotherapists without specific certification were included, receiving thorough information and support. No patients withdrew from the study or crossed over to surgery during the first year. Nine out of 10 patients completed the ExE program and six out of 10 completed the iCBT program. Fourteen out of 15 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. One minor adverse event was registered.ConclusionsExcept for recruitment and compliance to iCBT, feasibility was demonstrated. The initial recruitment process was challenging, and necessary changes were made to increase the recruitment rate. The findings informed how a definitive RCT should be undertaken to test the effectiveness of the complex intervention.Trial registrationThe MultiKnee RCT, including the feasibility study, is pre-registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03771430 11/12/2018.

Mid-term outcomes of a kinematically designed cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Advances in implant material and design have allowed for improvements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. A cruciate retaining (CR) TKA provides the least constraint of TKA designs by preserving the native posterior cruciate ligament. Limited research exists that has examined clinical outcomes or patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large cohort of patients undergoing a CR TKA utilizing a kinematically designed implant. It was hypothesized that the studied CR Knee System would demonstrate favorable outcomes and a clinically significant improvement in pain and functional scores. To assess both short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes and PROMs of a novel CR TKA design. A retrospective, multi-surgeon study identified 255 knees undergoing a TKA utilizing a kinematically designed CR Knee System (JOURNEY™ II CR; Smith and Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) at an urban, academic medical institution between March 2015 and July 2021 with a minimum of two-years of clinical follow-up with an orthopedic surgeon. Patient demographics, surgical information, clinical outcomes, and PROMs data were collected via query of electronic medical records. The PROMs collected in the present study included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) scores. The significance of improvements in mean PROM scores from preoperative scores to scores collected at six months and two-years postoperatively was analyzed using Independent Samples t-tests. Of the 255 patients, 65.5% were female, 43.8% were White, and patients had an average age of 60.6 years. Primary osteoarthritis (96.9%) was the most common primary diagnosis. The mean surgical time was 105.3 minutes and mean length of stay was 2.1 d with most patients discharged home (92.5%). There were 18 emergency department (ED) visits within 90 d of surgery resulting in a 90 d ED visit rate of 7.1%, including a 2.4% orthopedic-related ED visit rate and a 4.7% non-orthopedic-related ED visit rate. There were three (1.2%) hospital readmissions within 90 d postoperatively. With a mean time to latest follow-up of 3.3 years, four patients (1.6%) required revision, two for arthrofibrosis, one for aseptic femoral loosening, and one for peri-prosthetic joint infection. There were significant improvements in KOOS JR, PROMIS Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Mobility, and PROMIS Physical Health from preoperative scores to six month and two-year postoperative scores. The evaluated implant is an effective, novel design offering excellent outcomes and low complication rates. At a mean follow up of 3.3 years, four patients required revisions, three aseptic and one septic, resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 98.4% and an aseptic survival rate of 98.8%. The results of our study demonstrate the utility of this kinematically designed implant in the setting of primary TKA.

Development of a Machine-Learning Model for Anterior Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Patellar Preservation Using Radiological Variables

BackgroundAnterior knee pain (AKP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar preservation is a common complication that significantly affects patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict the likelihood of developing AKP after TKA using radiological variables. MethodsA cohort of 131 anterior stabilized TKA cases (105 patients) without patellar resurfacing was included. Patients underwent a follow-up evaluation with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was AKP, and radiological measurements were used as predictor variables. There were 2 observers who made the radiological measurement, which included lower limb dysmetria, joint space, and coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment. Machine-learning models were applied to predict AKP. The best-performing model was selected based on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa statistics. Python 3.11 with Pandas and PyCaret libraries were used for analysis. ResultsA total of 35 TKA had AKP (26.7%). Patient-reported outcomes were significantly better in the patients who did not have AKP. The Gradient Boosting Classifier performed best for both observers, achieving an area under the curve of 0.9261 and 0.9164, respectively. The mechanical tibial slope was the most important variable for predicting AKP. The Shapley test indicated that high/low mechanical tibial slope, a shorter operated leg, a valgus coronal alignment, and excessive patellar tilt increased AKP risk. ConclusionsThe results suggest that global alignment, including sagittal, coronal, and axial alignment, is relevant in predicting AKP after TKA. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing TKA outcomes and reducing the incidence of AKP.

Exploring the information needs of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a content analysis of Facebook group posts

BackgroundEnd-stage osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) is often treated by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This intervention can significantly improve quality of life. However, many patients are dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery. One of the factors related to dissatisfaction is the of lack integration of patients’ preferences, habits and values that are not addressed by physicians. To develop realistic expectations, affected patients need evidence-based information. Our aim was to explore the information needs of patients with OAK to support the development of decision aids and consent forms to promote informed decision-making. Additionally, we investigated whether the information needs during the Covid-19 pandemic differ from those before the pandemic.MethodsThe qualitative research design included a social media analysis of Facebook groups. Facebook groups were selected according to the following criteria: Thematic relevance, English or German language, at least one new post per week, from period before and after the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020. Thematically relevant group posts were analysed according to the content-structuring content analysis of Kuckartz using MaxQDA.ResultsOut of 448 identified Facebook groups, we screened seven for relevant posts and a total of 77 posts out of 6 groups were selected. The following eight categories were derived during the coding process: access to health care, disease information, TKA indication and contraindication, TKA outcome and quality of life, information needs regarding conservative therapy, strain, attitude towards TKA and attitude towards conservative therapy. The analysis showed that patients with OAK need information about the benefits and risks of TKA and conservative therapies.ConclusionThis study provides information on the information needs of patients with OAK in order to decide between TKA or conservative therapy. Patients need information about treatment options in due consideration of their immediate living situation to be reliably able to assess potential outcomes. Such Information about TKA should enable patients to assess the individual prognosis with comprehensible and relevant outcome measures. Also, they should be formulated with the living environment of the patients in mind and be linked to possible fears and negative previous experiences with treatments.

Comparing Common Risk Assessment Tools to Predict Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundA number of tools exist to aid surgeons in risk assessment, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), and various measures of frailty, such as the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFR). While all of these tools have been validated for general use, the best risk assessment tool is still debated. Risk assessment is particularly important in elective surgery, such as total joint arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive power of the CCI, ECI, and HFR in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsAll patients who underwent TKA were identified via International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code from the National Readmissions Database, years 2016 to 2019. Patient demographics, perioperative complications, and hospital-associated outcomes were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created and area under the curves (AUCs) evaluated to gauge the predictive capabilities of each risk assessment tool (CCI, ECI, and HFR) across a range of outcomes. ResultsA total of 1,930,803 patients undergoing TKA were included in our analysis. For mortality, ECI was most predictive (0.95 AUC), while HFR and CCI were 0.75 and 0.74 AUC, respectively. For periprosthetic fractures, ECI was 0.78 AUC, HFR was 0.68 AUC, and CCI was 0.66 AUC. For joint infections, the ECI was 0.78 AUC, the HFR was 0.63 AUC, and the CCI was 0.62 AUC. For 30-day readmission, ECI was 0.79 AUC, while HFR and CCI were 0.6 AUC. For 30-day reoperation, ECI was 0.69 AUC, while HFR was 0.58 AUC and CCI was 0.56 AUC. ConclusionsOur analysis shows that ECI is superior to CCI and HFR for predicting 30-day postoperative outcomes following TKA. Surgeons should consider assessing patients using ECI prior to TKA.

Comparison of accuracy and early outcomes in robotic total knee arthroplasty using NAVIO and ROSA

This study aimed to compare the cutting and component placement accuracies and early outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between an image-free handheld robotic system (NAVIO) and a radiography-based robotic system (ROSA). This retrospective study included 88 patients (88 knees) who underwent TKA using the NAVIO (40 patients) or ROSA (48 patients) robotic systems. The accuracies of the robotic systems were compared. Clinical scores were evaluated using the Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011) and the forgotten joint score (FJS)-12 at 1 year postoperatively. The femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group. The other cutting errors were not statistically different in both groups. Implantation errors did not differ between the groups. Regarding the clinical outcomes of the KSS 2011 subscales, the symptoms score was higher in knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO. The other KSS 2011 subscales and the FJS-12 showed no differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group, and the KSS 2011 symptom score subsection at one year was higher in the knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO.

Does high body mass index affect short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

The purpose of this study was to determine whether high BMI affect short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing the clinical outcomes, radiologic outcomes and complications between high BMI and normal patients. We retrospectively compared the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 424 knees (408 patients). The patients were divided into four groups: BMI < 24.9kg/m2 (normal); BMI between 25.0 and 29.9kg/m2 (overweight); BMI between 30.0 and 34.9kg/m2 (obese class I) and BMI between 35.0 and 39.9kg/m2 (obese class II). Clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated. There was no significant difference in radiologic outcomes between those groups (p > .05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in operation time, drainage volume, fall in hemoglobin, post-operative CRP and complications, including periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), between those groups. High BMI does not affect short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes in robot-assisted TKA.

Improved Clinical Outcomes With Dynamic, Force-Controlled, Gap-Balancing in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundOptimal soft-tissue management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce symptomatic instability. We hypothesized that TKA outcomes using a computer-assisted dynamic ligament balancer that acquires medial and lateral gap sizes throughout the motion arc would show improved Knee Society Scores (KSS) compared to TKAs done with a traditional tensioner at 0 and 90°. We also sought to quantify the degree to which the planned femoral rotation chosen to optimize medio-lateral balance throughout the arc of motion deviated from the femoral rotation needed to achieve a rectangular flexion gap at 90° alone. MethodsBaseline demographics, clinical outcomes, KSSs, and femoral rotations were compared in 100 consecutive, computer-assisted TKAs done with the balancer (balancer group) to the immediately prior 100 consecutive computer-assisted TKAs done without the balancer (control group). Minimum follow-up was 13 months and all patients had osteoarthritis. Mean knee motion did not differ preoperatively (110.1 ± 13.6° balancer, 110.4 ± 12.5° control, P = .44) or postoperatively (119.1 ± 10.3° balancer, 118.8 ± 10.9° control, P = .42). Tourniquet times did not differ (93.1 ± 13.0 minutes balancer, 90.7 ± 13.0 minutes control, P = .13). Postoperative length of stay differed (40.2 ± 20.9 hours balancer, 49.0 ± 18.3 hours control, P = .0009). There were 14 readmissions (7 balancer, 7 control), 11 adverse events (4 balancer, 7 control), and 3 manipulations (1 balancer, 2 control). The cohorts were compared using Student’s t-tests, Shapiro-Wilk normalities, Wilcoxon rank-sums, and multivariable logistic regression analyses. ResultsPostoperative KSS improvements were higher in the balancer group (P < .0001). In multivariable regression analyses, the balancer group experienced 7 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Knee scores (P < .0001) and 4 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Function scores (P = .040) compared to the control group. ConclusionsThe statistically and clinically significant improvements in postoperative KSS demonstrated in the balancer cohort are likely driven by improved stability throughout the motion arc. Further study is warranted to evaluate replicability by non-design surgeons.

The association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: A TriNetX analysis

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure performed to alleviate pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who have failed conservative treatments. Arthrofibrosis has been extensively studied due to its negative impact on TKA outcomes. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), has the potential to improve TKA outcomes by inhibiting TGF-β and decreasing fibrosis. This study aims to analyze a large-scale, real-world healthcare database to investigate the association between losartan potassium prescription and postoperative outcomes such as readmissions, ED visits, and the need for MUA or revision TKA. HypothesisBased on previous literature and the nature of ARBs, it is expected that the addition of losartan will aid in better outcomes for patients following a primary TKA. Patients and methodsIn this retrospective observational study, the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX) database was queried as of June 21, 2023. All patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to June 21, 2022 were included. Patients were then divided into two cohorts by whether they had an active losartan potassium prescription within the year prior to their surgery to within 90days postoperatively. Patients were then propensity-matched to eliminate differences in demographics and comorbidities. ResultsLosartan TKA patients were 1.18 [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79–0.90), p<0.001] times less likely to be readmitted within 90days and were 1.15 (OR: 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79–0.96); p=0.009) times less likely to undergo a manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) within the 1-year postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of emergency department (ED) visits at 90days postoperatively or revision TKAs at 1year postoperatively. DiscussionIn conclusion, patients with an active losartan prescription prior to TKA had a significantly lower likelihood of readmission within 90days and a lower likelihood of undergoing MUA within the 1-year postoperative period compared to patients not taking losartan. This presents an opportunity for further clinical investigation to explore the value of losartan in TKA. Level of evidenceIII; an observational cohort study.

Interpreting the Current Literature on Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Fragility Analysis: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundFragility analysis is a method of further characterizing outcomes in terms of the stability of statistical findings. This study assesses the statistical fragility of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA versus C-TKA). MethodsWe queried PubMed for RCTs comparing alignment, function, and outcomes between RA-TKA and C-TKA. Fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) (collectively, “FI”) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes as the number of outcome reversals needed to change statistical significance. Fragility quotient (FQ) was calculated by dividing the FI by the sample size for that outcome event. Median FI and FQ were calculated for all outcomes collectively as well as for each individual outcome. Subanalyses were performed to assess FI and FQ based on outcome event type and statistical significance, as well as study loss to follow-up and year of publication. ResultsThe overall median FI was 3.0 (interquartile range, [IQR] 1.0 to 6.3) and the median reverse fragility index was 3.0 (IQR 2.0 to 4.0). The overall median FQ was 0.027 (IQR 0.012 to 0.050). Loss to follow-up was greater than FI for 23 of the 38 outcomes assessed. ConclusionsA small number of alternative outcomes is often enough to reverse the statistical significance of findings in RCTs evaluating dichotomous outcomes in RA-TKA versus C-TKA. We recommend reporting FI and FQ alongside P values to improve the interpretability of RCT results.

Influence of patients' preoperative expectations on postoperative outcomes after total knee or hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

The association between preoperative expectations and treatment outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still unclear. Therefore the aim is to examine the association between preoperative outcome expectations, process expectations, and self-efficacy, and the postoperative outcomes overall outcome, pain, function, stiffness, satisfaction, and quality of life following THA/TKA. A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 17, 2022. Included were prospective longitudinal cohort studies published in English, German, or Dutch, with an adult population undergoing THA/TKA, and including at least one measure of preoperative expectations and the postoperative outcomes mentioned earlier. Two independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles for eligibility, a third solved disagreements. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUIPS tool. Of the 50 included studies, 38 had high RoB and 12 moderate RoB. Unadjusted results suggest a positive association between preoperative outcome expectations and overall outcome in the medium and long term, and between self-efficacy and change in 'overall outcome' in the long term. Adjusted results suggest positive associations between outcome expectations and function and between self-efficacy and overall outcome in the medium term, and for outcome expectations with pain and change in pain, respectively, and self-efficacy and stiffness in the long term. Preoperative expectations show a possible positive association with specific outcome measures, such as pain or function. For future research, it is advised to link matching specific expectations with specific outcomes.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics Predict Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Implications for Clinical Kinematic Examinations

BackgroundA core tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is that achieving more natural kinematics will lead to superior patient outcomes. Yet this relationship has not been proven for large representative cohorts of TKA patients because accurately measuring 3-dimensional TKA kinematics is time-consuming and expensive. But advanced imaging systems and machine learning–enhanced analysis software will soon make it practical to measure knee kinematics preoperatively and postoperatively in the clinic using radiographic methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the reported relationships between TKA kinematics and outcomes and distill those findings into a proposal for a clinically practical protocol for a clinical kinematic exam. MethodsThis study reviewed the recent literature relating TKA kinematics to patient outcomes. There were 10 studies that reported statistical associations between TKA kinematics and patient outcome scores utilizing a range of functional activities. We stratified these activities by the complexity of the radiographic examination to create a proposed examination protocol, and we generated a list of requirements and characteristics for a practical TKA clinical kinematic examination. ResultsGiven considerations for a clinically practical kinematic exam, including equipment, time and other resources, we propose 3 exam levels. With basic radiographs, we suggest studying single-leg stance in extension, lunge or squat, and kneeling. For fluoroscopic systems with X-ray pulses up to 20 ms, we propose chair-rise or stair ascent to provide additional dynamic information. For fluoroscopic systems with X-ray pulses of less than 10 ms, we propose rapid open-chain knee flexion-extension to simulate the highly dynamic swing phase of gait. ConclusionsIt is our hope that this proposed examination protocol spurs discussion and debate so that there can be a consensus approach to clinical examination of knee and TKA kinematics when the rapidly advancing hardware and software capabilities are in place to do so.

Effectiveness of Kinematic Alignment-Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Preoperative Varus and Valgus Deformities in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is surgically treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Traditionally, TKA has been performed using a mechanical alignment (MA) philosophy. However, due to significant patient dissatisfaction with surgical outcomes, an alternate alignment approach, kinematic alignment (KA), has gained popularity. KA-TKAs have improved functional patient outcomes by restoring the patient's native joint line orientation and minimizing soft tissue releases compared to neutral alignment in MA-TKAs. This review explores the postoperative effectiveness of utilizing KA-TKA to treat knee OA in patients with preoperative varus and valgus deformities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and Biomed Central databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search focused on studies analyzing the postoperative TKA outcomes in knee OA patients with preoperative varus or valgus deformities whose surgeries followed a KA philosophy and those comparing KA-TKA with MA-TKA. The available clinical evidence indicates that KA-TKA can be a viable treatment option for individuals with knee OA. The alignment of phenotypes has little clinical significance concerning functional outcomes and implant survival rates following KA-TKA. Furthermore, surgery outcomes in patients with preoperative deformities who underwent KA-TKA were similar to those who underwent MA-TKA. KA-TKA produced significantly better functional outcomes than MA-TKA in certain aspects. However, studies with larger sample sizes and more extended follow-up periods that directly compare KA-TKA with MA-TKA in treating knee OA patients are needed to fully demonstrate the efficacy of each technique. Furthermore, further research into the effects of KA-TKA on implant survival rates will provide a better understanding of the benefits of this technique and ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

A key to successful patient outcomes following knee procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is achieving normal knee alignment. Normal mechanical balance in the joints must be restored in order to lessen the failure rate of TKA, and precise assessment of lower extremity alignment and component location is thought to be the primary determinant of a good clinical outcome over the long term. The aim of this study was to assess the early functional and clinical outcomes of TKA by analyzing post-operative mechanical axis and Knee Society Score (KSS) data. The study also aimed to investigate the importance of achieving neutral mechanical alignment in TKA for long-term results. A prospective and retrospective observational study was conducted, involving 40 patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent bilateral or unilateral TKA. Demographic information, pre-operative comorbidities, knee abnormalities, and radiographic assessment were collected. Post-operative mechanical axis and implant placement were evaluated using CT scanograms. Clinical and functional assessments were performed using the Knee Society Score at regular intervals. The KSS scores were obtained at six-month intervals following surgery. The scores were categorized as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor based on predefined criteria. A total of 47 knees from 40 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the study population was 65.6 years. Female patients accounted for 67.5% of the sample. The majority of patients (57.4%) achieved an excellent KSS score, followed by very good (25.5%) and good (17%) scores. The mean KSS score significantly improved from 177 points pre-surgery to 225 points post-surgery. The post-operative mechanical axis ranged from 1.1 degrees valgus to 9 degrees valgus, with a mean value of 3.5 degrees valgus. The range of motion improved from 10 to 90 degrees post-operatively, with a mean range of 0-110 degrees. This study suggests that total knee replacement surgery resulted in positive outcomes, with most patients achieving excellent or very good scores on the Knee Society scale. Proper axial and rotational alignment of the components during TKA enhanced functional outcomes and contributed to long-term clinical success. Restoration of neutral mechanical alignment and optimal component placement may lead to lower revision rates and increased durability after TKA. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.

Increased Rate of Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Polymyositis

BackgroundPolymyositis (PM) is a systemic connective tissue disorder that can lead to early onset degenerative joint disease and a need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Outcomes of TKA in patients who have PM are not well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PM as a risk factor for complications after TKA. MethodsUsing a national private payer insurance database from 2010 to 2022, PM patients undergoing primary TKA were compared to 10:1 matched controls based on age, sex, and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications up to 2 years. 90-day emergency department visits and inpatient readmissions were also documented. A total of 25,039 patients undergoing primary TKA were queried, of which 2,290 had PM. ResultsCompared to the matched controls, patients who had PM demonstrated higher rates of medical and surgical complications, including pulmonary embolism (1.0% versus 0.5%, P = .001), cerebrovascular accident (1.3% versus 0.7%, P = .002), wound complications (3.4% versus 2.1%, P < .001), and periprosthetic joint infection at 1 year (1.7% versus 1.3%, P = .042) and 2 years (2.6% versus 1.9%, P = .006). Patients who had PM displayed elevated 90-day emergency department (14.9% versus 13.3%, P = .032) and hospital readmission rate (7.1% versus 4.8%, P < .001). ConclusionsPatients who have PM are at higher risks of postoperative medical and surgical complications, including pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, wound complication, and periprosthetic joint infection. Given these results, it is helpful for orthopedic surgeons and patients to consider these risks when considering TKA for patients who have PM.

Associations of parecoxib and other variables with recovery and safety outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: insights from a retrospective cohort study.

Early mobilization post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly affects patient outcomes. While parecoxib is known to reduce postoperative pain and morphine use with a favorable safety profile, its impact on mobilization timing post-TKA remains uncertain. This retrospective study aims to assess parecoxib's influence on postoperative mobilization timing in TKA patients without compromising safety. This study included unilateral TKA patients treated for primary knee osteoarthritis under general anesthesia. We divided the study period into two intervals, 2007-2012 and 2013-2018, to evaluate temporal differences. Both the control group and parecoxib group received standard postoperative oral analgesics and as-needed intramuscular morphine. The control group did not receive parecoxib, while the parecoxib group did. Primary outcomes compared postoperative complications and mobilization timing between groups, with secondary outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain, as-needed morphine use, and postoperative nausea/vomiting. Parecoxib did not increase postoperative complications. Unmatched comparison with patients in controlled group found that patients in parecoxib group had significantly shortened mobilization time (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.6 days, P < 0.001) and LOS (6.7 ± 2.5 vs. 7.2 ± 2.1 days, P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis linked parecoxib use with faster mobilization (β = -0.365, P < 0.001) but not LOS. Males showed increased mobilization time and LOS compared to females during the period of 2007-2018, but gender had no significant association with LOS during the period of 2013-2018. The 2013-2018 period saw significant reductions in both mobilization time and LOS. Use of a tourniquet and local infiltration analgesia showed no significant impact. ASA classification 1-2 was positively associated with faster mobilization but not LOS. Longer operation times were linked to delayed mobilization and increased LOS. In this study, intravenous parecoxib injection, female gender, and shorter OP time had consistent positive association with shorter time to mobilization after individual multivariate analysis in 2 different period. The use of parecoxib had consistent no significant association with LOS. Only shorter OP time was consistent positive associated with shorter LOS.