PURPOSE: Because the foot serves as the critical interface between the body and its support, the foot has long been assumed to be optimized for an animal's activities of daily living. Primate quadrupeds, on the one hand, have abducted great toes and mobile feet that bend at the tarso-metatarsal junction, potentially to conform to cylindrical substrates. On the other hand, humans are characterized as having feet with an arch that is rigid at toe-off but more flexible during stance. The human arch creates a footprint shape that is classically depicted as having midfoot contact area only along the lateral border. The G1 footprints from the Laetolil Formation, Tanzania dated at 3.6 million years ago are said to exhibit this modern appearance, supporting the notion that foot shape has remained relatively unchanged since the origins of bipedalism. Recent evidence based on fossilized foot bones calls this assumption into question. Modern human feet, however, do not all exhibit the classic shape so we undertook a study to determine if the shape of the Laetoli footprints fall within the modern human distribution. METHODS: In order to assess quantitatively the variation in modern footprint shape, the footprints of 160 walking adults (115 women and 45 men) with no history of foot and ankle pain were collected using a pressure sensitive mat (RSScan, RSScan International, Olen, Belgium). Nine prints from the Laetoli G1 trail (right G1-26, -34, and -36; left: G1-25, -27, -33, -35, -37 and -39) were digitized using a single topographic line to represent the footprint outline from drawings available in the literature. Footprint shape was assessed using the arch index, the ratio of midfoot to total foot contact area, and the Laetoli prints were compared to the modern distribution. RESULTS: The G1 individual's prints are planus (AI= 0.36 (right) and=0.34 (left)), but they fall within the modern human range (AI range: 0 - 0.38), albeit at the flat-footed margin. CONCLUSIONS: The individual which made the Laetoli G1 trail likely engaged in normal activities similar to modern humans, including habitual bipedal walking.
Read full abstract