Background and aimsA subset of patients experience weight recidivism after primary endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (P-ESG). Available options for management of weight regain include initiation of anti-obesity medications (AOM) or redo ESG (R-ESG). The comparative effectiveness of these options is not clear. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ESG. From 2013 to 2021, 79 patients who were started on AOM, or underwent R-ESG for management of weight recidivisim after P-ESG were included. The primary outcome of this study was final total body weight loss (TBWL) at the end of follow up. ResultsFifty five patients were started on AOM and 24 patients underwent R-ESG. The age, gender distribution and baseline BMI did not differ significantly between groups. The proportion of non-compliant patients (defined as patients who missed their first post ESG follow up visit) was significantly higher in the AOM group compared with R-ESG group (67% versus 35%, p=0.012). The additional TBWL after R-ESG was significantly (both clinically and statistically) better than after initiation of AOM (9.5±7.2% versus 2.1±8.6%, p=0.001). Final TBWL clearly favored R-ESG over AOM for treatment of weight recidivism (19.9±10.4% versus 13.6±9.2%, p=0.028). ConclusionsR-ESG is an effective treatment to induce weight loss after experiencing weight recidivism. These results highlight an important advantage of ESG as a repeatable minimally-invasive procedure.