Total All-cause Costs Research Articles

Healthcare utilization and cost outcomes for a multicenter first seizure and new onset epilepsy clinic

RationaleA First Seizure/New Onset Epilepsy (FS/NOE) protocol was implemented to ensure proper evaluation by an epileptologist and improve overall care for patients. We compared healthcare utilization and cost incurred by patients pre and post protocol implementation. MethodsClinical data were retrospectively collected from the EMR and cost data from the financial database. Patients were identified by FS event and grouped into either the pre-implementation (pre-FSC) or post-implementation cohort (post-FSC). Pre-FSC patients were seen between January 2014–December 2015 and post-FSC between March 2016–January 2018. Utilization outcomes include time from FS to neurology appointment, MRI, and electroencephalogram (EEG). Cost outcomes included the annualized median difference in pre versus post costs for ER, inpatient, outpatient or ambulatory, and total hospital services. Cost and utilization outcomes were collected within 90 days or 6 months post first-seizure event. Pre and post cohorts were compared using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models for time-to-event outcomes, multivariable median regression models for cost differences and negative binomial regression models for utilization analyses. Models were adjusted for age, sex, health insurance, and comorbidities. ResultsOne-hundred and fifty six patients were included with 84 (53.8%) pre- and 72 (46.2%) post-FSC patients. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression results indicated post-FSC patients had significantly faster time-to-first neurology appointment (5.0 vs. 20.9 days, p < .001; Adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) = 5.98, p < .001), time-to-MRI (9.0 vs. 27.0 days; p = 0.005; HR = 1.88, p = .021) and EEG (3.6 vs. 48.6 days, p < .001; HR = 9.01, p < .001). A total of 138 patients had at least one cost in the financial database. For 6-month follow-up period, post-FSC patients had higher adjusted all-cause total median costs (+$830, p = 0.009) and outpatient costs (+$1203, p < .001) but lower ED costs (−245, p = 0.073), not significant. Results were similar for seizure-related costs. Similarly, Post-FSC patients had a significantly higher likelihood of all-cause (Adjusted Rate Ratio (ARR) = 1.41, p = .029) and outpatient utilization (ARR = 1.72, p = .008) but lower ED utilization (ARR = 0.54, p < .001). ConclusionsImplementation of the FSC decreased time to evaluation by a neurologist and time to diagnostic workup. Ultimately, total healthcare costs and ambulatory costs increased but ED costs and utilization were reduced. It is our hypothesis that faster access to initial care and diagnosis would result in better control of seizures and reduce long-term costs and utilization. Further research over a longer duration of time across a broader population is needed to evaluate the full implications of an epilepsy specialist-populated FSC.

Glomerular filtration rate change and outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

To assess the relationship between relative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change and outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This retrospective cohort study utilized administrative claims (Humana Research Database) for patients with T2D aged 65 to 89 years, enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan, with an initial eGFR of 25 to 89 mL/min/1.73m2 in 2008 to 2017, and a second eGFR measurement within 3 to 24 months after the identification date. The primary exposure was relative decline in eGFR of 40% or more in a 2-year period. Outcomes included end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or kidney failure, a composite cardiovascular (CV) outcome, and all-cause mortality assessed with multivariable adjusted survival models. Days out of the home and all-cause total costs were assessed using multivariable adjusted generalized linear models. A total of 288,170 patients were included. The adjusted HR for ESKD or kidney failure was 4.38 (95% CI, 3.99-4.81) in patients with 40% or greater decline versus those with a decline of less than 40%. The adjusted HR was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.53-1.82) for the composite CV outcome and 1.98 (95% CI, 1.87-2.10) for all-cause mortality. Patients with a 40% or greater relative decline had 2.23 times higher all-cause total per patient per month costs ($1910 difference) and 1.82 times higher odds of 7 or more days out of the home versus those with less than 40% relative eGFRdecline. Our results indicate that a relative eGFR decline of 40% or greater is associated with an increased risk of ESKD or kidney failure, CV outcomes and all-cause mortality, and increased health care resource utilization and costs.

Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls.

PurposeTo determine the prevalence, healthcare resource utilization and costs (HCRU&C) of knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients versus controls.Patients and MethodsRetrospective, matched-cohort administrative claims analysis using IBM MarketScan databases (2011–2017). Newly diagnosed, adult (18+ yrs) knee OA patients identified by ICD9/10 code were matched 1:1 to controls by age, sex, payer, and geography; alpha level set to 0.05. Prevalence was estimated for 2017. All-cause and knee OA-related HCRU&C reported per-patient-per-year (PPPY) over follow-up period up to 4 years.ResultsOverall 2017 knee OA prevalence was 4% (615,514 knee OA/15.4M adults). A total of 510,605 patients meeting inclusion criteria were matched 1:1 with controls. The knee OA cohort had mean age 60 years and was 58% female. Versus controls, knee OA patients had significantly more PPPY outpatient (84.5 versus 45.0) and pharmacy (29.8 versus 19.8) claims, and significantly higher PPPY outpatient costs ($12,571 versus $6,465), and pharmacy costs ($3,655 versus $2,038). Knee OA patients incurred $7,707 more PPPY total healthcare costs than controls, of which $4,674 (60.6%) were knee OA-related medical claims and $1,926 (25%) were knee OA-related medications of interest. PPPY costs for nonselective NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, intraarticular hyaluronic acid, non-acute opioids, and knee replacement were higher for knee OA patients than controls. Using median and mean all-cause total cost ($9,330 and $24,550, respectively), the estimated sum cost of knee OA patients in MarketScan ranged from $5.7B to $15B annually.ConclusionThis retrospective analysis demonstrated an annual 2017 prevalence of 4.0% (≥18 years) and 13.2% (≥65 years) for newly diagnosed knee OA patients. Compared with controls, all-cause costs were significantly higher for knee OA patients, nearly double that of matched controls, attributable to increased medical and treatment costs and comorbidity treatment burden. Additionally, the estimated annual cost of knee OA treatment was substantial, ranging between $5.7 billion and $15 billion.

Economic and clinical outcomes of pegfilgrastim via prefilled syringe vs on-body injector: a real-world data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is available as a prefilled syringe (PFS) and an on-body injector (OBI). Whether the administration method of pegfilgrastim affects the effectiveness and health care resources has not been evaluated in the setting of routine care. OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world clinical and economic outcomes between PFS and OBI methods of administration. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study in patients diagnosed with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy and prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim via PFS or OBI between January 1, 2017, and May 31, 2018, according to MarketScan research databases. A propensity score was used to match the PFS cohort 1:1 to the OBI cohort. Outcomes were compared among the matched cohorts using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equations with log-link function. RESULTS: 3,152 patients were identified. After matching, the final sample included 2,170 patients, representing 1,085 in each cohort. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the first chemotherapy cycle was 1.01% for OBI (95% CI = 0.56-1.82) vs 1.48% for PFS (95% CI = 0.91-2.39; P = 0.336). In all chemotherapy cycles (total cycles = 7,467), the FN incidence was 0.91% for OBI (95% CI = 0.64-1.30) vs 1.22% for PFS (95% CI = 0.90-1.64; P = 0.214). There was no statistically significant difference in adjusted per-member per-month all-cause total cost health care resource utilization (HCRU) for hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and pharmacy claims. CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of patients representing real-world utilization, there was no statistically or clinically meaningful difference in FN incidence between OBI and PFS methods of pegfilgrastim administration. There was no difference in total HCRU or total costs. OBI and PFS methods of administration are both indicated for patients requiring prophylactic pegfilgrastim, which is important considering that biosimilar PFS options are now available. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Sandoz, Inc. Wang, Li, and K. Campbell are employees of Sandoz, Inc. Schroader and D. Campbell are employees of Xcenda, which was contracted by Sandoz, Inc., to provide study and manuscript development. McBride reports receiving payment from Sandoz, Inc., as a consultant, unrelated to this study; Coherus for advisory board and speaker engagements; and Pfizer for advisory board participation during the time of this study.

Real-World Outcomes Among US Veterans Health Administration Patients Newly Diagnosed with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Treated with First-Line Monotherapy.

IntroductionSubstantial unmet needs exist among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This retrospective study evaluated treatment patterns as well as clinical and economic outcomes associated with first-line monotherapy among patients with mRCC in the USA.MethodsNewly diagnosed patients with mRCC initiating at least one first-line therapy (1L) from 1 October 2013 to 31 March 2018 (index date = 1L start date) were identified from the US Veterans Health Administration database. Treatment patterns, clinical outcomes (time to next treatment [TNT] defined by earliest of switch to non-index therapy or re-initiation of index therapy after a more than 90-day gap, time to treatment discontinuation [TTD], overall survival [OS]), and costs were evaluated among patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and other monotherapies. Standard descriptive statistics were presented. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate clinical outcomes.ResultsOf 759 patients (median age 68.0 years), 85.0%, 8.0%, 4.3%, and 2.6% were treated with TKI, mTOR, ICI, or other therapy in 1L, respectively. Advancement rates (to second-line [2L] therapy) ranged from 10.0 (ICI) to 45.1 per 100 person years (TKI). The 12-month OS rates ranged from 47.4% (TKI) to 67.7% (mTOR). The median TNT ranged from 3.8 (mTOR) to 9.6 months (ICI), and median TTD ranged from 2.3 (mTOR) to 4.7 months (TKI). Total all-cause mean costs per patient per month ranged from $12,466 (mTOR) to $19,812 (ICI).ConclusionThese results indicate high unmet medical needs among patients with mRCC treated with 1L monotherapies. Novel combination therapies (e.g., ICI + ICI, ICI + TKI) may improve front-line outcomes for patients with poor prognoses.

Healthcare Costs of Not Achieving Remission in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IntroductionTo compare all-cause and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related healthcare costs and resource use in patients with RA who do not achieve remission versus those who achieve remission, using clinical practice data.MethodsData were derived from Optum electronic health records linked to claims from commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans. Two cohorts were created: remission and non-remission. Remission was defined as Disease Activity Score 28-joint count with the C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-CRP/ESR) < 2.6 or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0). Outcomes were all-cause and RA-related costs and resource use during a 1-year follow-up period. A weighted generalized linear regression and negative binomial regression were used to estimate adjusted annual costs and resource use, respectively, controlling for confounding factors, including patient and socio-demographic characteristics.ResultsData from 335 patients (remission: 125; non-remission: 210) were analyzed. Annual all-cause total costs were significantly less in the remission versus non-remission cohort ($30,427 vs. $38,645, respectively; cost ratio [CR] = 0.79; 95% CI 0.63, 0.99). All-cause resource use (mean number of visits) was less in the remission versus non-remission cohort: inpatient (0.23 vs. 0.63; visit ratio [VR] = 0.36; 95% CI 0.19, 0.70), emergency department (0.36 vs. 0.77; VR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.30, 0.74), and outpatient visits (20.7 vs. 28.5; VR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.62, 0.86). Annual RA-related total costs were similar in both cohorts; however, RA-related medical costs were numerically lower in the remission versus non-remission cohort ($8,594 vs. $10,002, respectively; CR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.59, 1.25). RA-related resource use was less in the remission versus non-remission cohort.ConclusionsSignificant economic burden was associated with patients who did not achieve remission compared with those who did achieve remission.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01730-w.

Health care resource utilization and costs of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in the elderly: a real-world claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) affected an estimated 365,000 persons in the United States in 2017. Despite a nationally decreasing trend of CDI cases, the population incidence of recurrent CDI (rCDI) has not improved. Elderly individuals (aged ≥ 65 years) are at higher risk of CDI, rCDI, and complicated CDI compared with younger individuals. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Medicare fee-for-service data for 12 months after an initial CDI episode, in order to obtain real-world data on health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs for elderly patients with CDI and rCDI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who were aged ≥ 65 years and had a first (index) CDI diagnosis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D during the 12-month pre-index and 12-month post-index periods was conducted. A CDI episode was identified by either an inpatient stay with CDI diagnosis code or an outpatient medical claim with a CDI diagnosis code plus a CDI treatment. Each CDI episode was followed by a 14-day CDI claim-free period after the last CDI claim or end of CDI treatment. rCDI was a second or subsequent episode of CDI that occurred within an 8-week window after the 14-day CDI claim-free period. The number of CDI and rCDI episodes, HRU, time to recurrence, and total all-cause direct medical costs were calculated over the 12-month pre-index (baseline) and 12-month follow-up periods and stratified by number of rCDI episodes (No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, 3+ rCDI). RESULTS: A total of 268,762 patients with an index CDI were included. Mean age was 78.3 years, and 69.0% were female. HRU was higher during the 6 months immediately pre-index versus 7-12 months pre-index, including a higher proportion of patients with a hospital admission (55.1% vs. 27.5%) or emergency department visit (41.3% vs. 27.4%), respectively. Moreover, 34.7% of the study population experienced rCDI. Of those who experienced 1 recurrence, 59.1% had a second recurrence, and of those who had 2 recurrences, 58.4% had a third. During the 12-month follow-up, postacute care was used by at least 70% of each rCDI cohort. The proportion of patients with ≥ 4 hospital admissions during follow-up was highest for the 3+ rCDI cohort (24.9% of patients). During the 12-month follow-up, mean total all-cause direct costs were $76,024, $99,348, $96,148, and $96,517 for the No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, and 3+ rCDI cohorts, respectively, largely driven by inpatient costs. Adjusted all-cause total costs were significantly higher for all 3 rCDI cohorts compared with the No rCDI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly individuals experienced high rates of recurrence after their first CDI episode, and especially after a prior recurrence. The intensity of HRU during follow-up was higher for patients who suffered recurrences. Patients with rCDI had the burden of higher costs of care, including the patient out-of-pocket responsibility, versus patients with a single CDI episode. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Nelson is an employee of Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Scott, Boules, and Unni were employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Teigland and Parente are employees of Avalere Health and provided consulting services to Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Feuerstadt has served as a consultant to and on the speakers bureau for Merck and Co. and has served as a consultant for Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Roche Pharmaceuticals. Portions of the data contained in this study appeared as an abstract/ePoster for the AMCP Annual Meeting 2020, April 2020.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with steroid-resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease in the United States: a retrospective claims database analysis

Background Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the most serious non-relapse complication affecting long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors. We describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with steroid-resistant (SR) cGVHD versus no GVHD up to 360 and 720 days post-HCT. Methods Claims from the Optum Research Database were used to identify patients aged ≥12 years who underwent allogeneic HCT (index date) in the United States from 01 January 2010 to 31 August 2016 with diagnosis of cGVHD (within the study period or unspecified GVHD beyond 120 days post-HCT [SR defined as additional therapy ≥7 days after initiation of systemic steroids]) or no GVHD at any time. All-cause HCRU and costs were compared in patients with SR cGVHD (1-year analysis, n = 296; 2-year analysis, n = 178) versus no GVHD (1-year analysis, n = 227; 2-year analysis, n = 158). Results Most patients with SR cGVHD (75%) received ≥4 lines of therapy during follow-up. Patients with SR cGVHD had significantly more median office visits (49 vs. 27), outpatient visits (69 vs. 24), emergency department visits (1 vs. 0), and inpatient admissions (2 vs. 1) within 1 year post-HCT versus patients with no GVHD (all p<.001); HCRU was also higher in the 2-year period. Median total all-cause costs were significantly higher (p<.001) for patients with SR cGVHD versus no GVHD in the 1-year ($372,254 vs. $219,593) and 2-year ($532,673 vs. $252,909) follow-up periods. Conclusions Patients with SR cGVHD required multiple lines of therapy and used significantly more outpatient and inpatient resources resulting in higher costs versus patients with no GVHD.

The Short- and Long-Term Burden of Acute Pancreatitis in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This retrospective cohort study assessed short- and long-term economic, clinical burden, and productivity impacts of acute pancreatitis (AP) in the United States. United States claims data from patients hospitalized for AP (January 1, 2011-September-30, 2016) were sourced from MarketScan databases. Patients were categorized by index AP severity: severe intensive care unit (ICU), severe non-ICU, and other hospitalized patients. During index, 41,946 patients were hospitalized or visited an emergency department for AP. For inpatients, median (interquartile range) AP-related total cost was $13,187 ($12,822) and increased with AP severity (P < 0.0001). During the postindex year, median AP-related costs were higher (P < 0.0001) for severe ICU versus severe non-ICU and other hospitalized patients. Hours lost and costs due to absence and short-term disability were similar between categories. Long-term disability costs were higher (P = 0.005) for severe ICU versus other hospitalized patients. Factors associated with higher total all-cause costs in the year after discharge included AP severity, length of hospitalization, readmission, AP reoccurrence, progression to chronic pancreatitis, or new-onset diabetes (P < 0.0001). An AP event exerts substantial burden during hospitalization and involves long-term clinical and economic consequences, including loss of productivity, which increase with index AP event severity.

Health care resource utilization and costs associated with nonadherence and nonpersistence to antidepressants in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence and nonpersistence to antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD) are common and associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes and increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, contemporary real-world evidence on the economic effect of antidepressant nonadherence and nonpersistence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of nonadherence and nonpersistence to antidepressants on HCRU and costs in adult patients with MDD enrolled in U.S. commercial and Medicare supplemental insurance plans. METHODS: This was a retrospective new-user cohort study using administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. We identified adult patients with MDD aged ≥ 18 years who initiated antidepressant therapy for a new MDD episode between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Twelve-month total all-cause HCRU and costs (2019 U.S. dollars) were characterized for patients who were adherent/nonadherent and persistent/nonpersistent to antidepressants at 6 months. Adherence was defined as having proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%, and persistence was defined as having continuous antidepressant therapy without a ≥ 30-day gap. Multivariable negative binomial regression and 2-part models adjusted for baseline characteristics were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for HCRU and incremental costs of nonadherence and nonpersistence, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 224,645 patients with MDD (commercial: n = 209,422; Medicare supplemental: n = 15,223) met all study inclusion criteria. Approximately half of patients were nonadherent (commercial: 48%; Medicare supplemental: 50%) or nonpersistent (commercial: 49%; Medicare supplemental: 52%) to antidepressants at 6 months. After controlling for baseline characteristics, nonadherent patients experienced significantly more inpatient hospitalizations (commercial, adjusted IRR [95% CI]: 1.34 [1.29 to 1.39]; Medicare supplemental: 1.19 [1.12 to 1.28]) and emergency room (ER) visits (commercial, adjusted IRR [95% CI]: 1.43 [1.40 to 1.45]; Medicare supplemental: 1.28 [1.21 to 1.36]) compared with adherent patients. Similar results were observed in nonpersistent patients. Adjusted mean differences revealed that nonadherent and nonpersistent patients accumulated significantly higher medical costs (commercial: $568 [95% CI: $354 to $764] and $491 [$284 to $703]; Medicare supplemental: $1,621 [$314 to $2,774] and $1,764 [$451 to $2,925]), inpatient costs (commercial: $650 [$490 to $801] and $564 [$417 to $716]; Medicare supplemental: $1,546 [$705 to $2,308] and $1,567 [$778 to $2,331]), and ER costs (commercial: $130 [$115 to $143] and $129 [$115 to $142]; Medicare supplemental: $82 [$23 to $150] and $80 [$18 to $150]), and incurred significantly lower pharmacy costs (commercial: -$561 [-$601 to -$521] and -$576 [-$616 to -$540]; Medicare supplemental: -$510 [-$747 to -$227] and -$596 [-$830 to -$325]) compared with adherent and persistent patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study found more hospitalizations and ER use and higher total medical costs among patients who were nonadherent and nonpersistent to antidepressants at 6 months. Strategies that promote better adherence and persistence may lower HCRU and medical costs in patients with MDD. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Allergan, which was involved in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and decision to present these results. Ta was supported by a training grant provided to the University of Washington by Allergan at the time this study was conducted. Tung and Gillard are employees of Allergan. Oliveri is an employee of Genesis Research. Sullivan and Devine have no financial disclosures. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP 2020 (Virtual Meeting), April 21-24, 2020.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Cell-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines during the 2018-19 Influenza Season in the United States.

Non-egg-based influenza vaccines eliminate the potential for egg-adapted mutations and potentially increase vaccine effectiveness. This retrospective study compared hospitalizations/emergency room (ER) visits and all-cause annualized healthcare costs among subjects aged 4–64 years who received cell-based quadrivalent (QIVc) or standard-dose egg-based quadrivalent (QIVe-SD) influenza vaccine during the 2018–19 influenza season. Administrative claims data (IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus, IQVIA, USA) were utilized to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes. Adjusted relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of QIVc vs. QIVe-SD among overall cohort, as well as for three subgroups (age 4–17 years, age 18–64 years, and high-risk) was evaluated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Poisson regression models. Generalized estimating equation models among the propensity score matched sample were used to estimate annualized all-cause costs. A total of 669,030 recipients of QIVc and 3,062,797 of QIVe-SD were identified after IPTW adjustments. Among the overall cohort, QIVc had higher adjusted rVEs against hospitalizations/ER visits related to influenza, all-cause hospitalizations, and hospitalizations/ER visits associated with any respiratory event compared to QIVe-SD. The adjusted annualized all-cause total costs were higher for QIVe-SD compared to QIVc ((+$461); p < 0.05).

Evaluating Treatment Patterns, Relapses, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in DMT-Naïve Patients.

PurposeEarly diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) can reduce relapse number and severity, which has cost implications. We describe treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and cost among MS patients newly initiating DMTs (index).Patients and MethodsDMT-naïve adults with 12 months’ continuous enrollment pre- and post-index and ≥2 MS claims (2009‒2018) were identified from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. Treatment adherence and persistence were measured as time on index DMT. Relapses were identified using a validated claims-based algorithm. All-cause and MS-related healthcare expenditures and utilization were captured pre- and post-index. Outcomes were stratified by route of administration. Multivariate analyses assessed differences in outcomes and costs.ResultsThe analysis included 5906 MS patients (mean age, 46.6 years). The majority initiated injectable (63.5%) followed by oral (28.8%) and infusion (7.7%) DMTs. Post-index, 45.3% of patients were nonadherent and 39.4% were nonpersistent. Relapse rates decreased from pre- to post-index (oral: 24.3%‒16.1%; injectable: 25.0%‒17.1%; infusion: 29.3%‒15.5%). Post-index mean (SD) all-cause total costs were lowest with oral ($70,970 [$36,681]) vs injectable ($82,521 [$58,569]) and infusion ($80,871 [$49,627]) DMTs. MS-related total costs were lowest with oral ($65,149 [$65,133]) vs injectable ($76,197 [$60,204]) and infusion ($72,703 [$47,287]) DMTs. Multivariate analysis showed no differences between oral and injectable DMTs in adherence, persistence, or relapse rate; however, oral DMTs had significantly lower all-cause and MS-related costs.ConclusionWith similar outcomes across DMT administration routes, initiating the least costly DMT may be warranted for many patients. In newly treated MS patients, the need exists to improve adherence and persistence.

Healthcare costs of patients with cancer stratified by Khorana score risk levels

Aims Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which entails a high economic burden. The risk of cancer-associated VTE can be assessed using the Khorana score (KS), a validated VTE risk prediction algorithm. This study compared healthcare costs associated with different KS in a population of patients newly diagnosed with cancer. Methods The Optum Clinformatics DataMart database (01/01/2012–09/30/2017) was used to select adult patients with ≥1 hospitalization or ≥2 outpatient claims with a cancer diagnosis (index date) initiated on systemic therapy or radiation therapy. Patients were classified in mutually exclusive cohorts based on KS (i.e. KS = 0, 1, 2 or ≥3). The observation period spanned from index to the earliest among the end of data availability, death, end of insurance coverage, or 12 months. Results In total 6,194 patients (KS = 0: 2,488; KS = 1: 2,125; KS = 2: 1,074; KS ≥ 3: 507) were included. On average, patients were aged 68 years, 48–52% were female, and the Quan–Charlson comorbidity index ranged between 1.1 and 1.4. Over the observation period, all-cause total healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were $8,826 (KS = 0), $11,598 (KS = 1), $14,028 (KS = 2), and $16,211 (KS ≥ 3). Using the KS = 0 cohort as a reference, adjusted PPPM costs were $2,506, $4,775, and $6,452 higher in the KS = 1, KS = 2, and KS ≥ 3 cohorts, respectively. Hospitalization and outpatient costs were the main drivers of these differences. Similar results were found for VTE-related costs, which represented 4–11% of the total all-cause cost difference between KS cohorts. Limitations Residual confounders; results may not be generalized to patients with other insurance plans or those who received treatments other than systemic therapy or radiation therapy. Conclusions This real-world analysis found that cancer patients at higher risk of VTE (based on KS) incurred significantly greater all-cause and VTE-related healthcare costs compared with cancer patients at lower risk of VTE.

Quality outcomes, healthcare resource utilization and costs in Medicare patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with and without a worsening event

Aims The study compared quality outcomes, resource utilization, and costs in Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with and without a worsening heart failure event (WHFE). Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated claims data for two cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic HFrEF who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) or Medicare advantage (MA) plans. The index date was the first claim of HFrEF between October 2015 and September 2017. Patients with WHFE were identified if they had IV diuretic use or hospitalization for HF during 12 months after index date; with remaining patients classified as non-WHFE. During follow-up, starting from the 13th month after HFrEF index date to end of follow-up, generalized linear models were used to adjust for patient characteristics to compare mean per patient per year (PPPY) quality outcomes, resource utilization, and costs between HFrEF patients with and without WHFE Results Of the 1,182,509 FFS and 28,645 MA patients with HFrEF, 34.2% and 32.5% developed WHFE, respectively. Compared to patients without WHFE, patients with WHFE had higher rates of all-cause 30-day readmissions (FFS: 42% vs. 31%; MA: 41% vs. 31%), hospitalizations (FFS: 2.27 vs. 1.36; MA: 1.47 vs. 0.78 PPPY) and ED visits (FFS: 1.82 vs. 1.25; MA: 1.43 vs. 0.96 PPPY); all comparisons p < .05. Mortality rates in FFS patients were higher among patients with WHFE (34.3%) compared to those without (23.4%). All-cause total PPPY costs were higher for patients with WHFE compared to those without by $20,825 in FFS and $15,974 in MA. Similar trends were observed for HF-related outcomes. Conclusion Medicare patients with chronic HFrEF experiencing a WHFE had worse quality outcomes as well as higher resource utilization and costs compared to those without WHFE, thus, suggesting the need for better treatments and interventions to manage these patients.

Healthcare costs before and after stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin

Aims Rivaroxaban reduces stroke compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study compared healthcare costs before and after stroke in NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Materials and methods Using de-identified IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases, this retrospective cohort study (from 2011 to 2019) included patients with NVAF who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30 days after initial NVAF diagnosis. Patients who developed stroke were identified, and stroke severity was determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, imputed by a random forest method. Total all-cause per-patient per-year (PPPY) costs of care were determined for patients: (1) who developed stroke during the pre- and post-stroke periods and (2) who remained stroke-free during the follow-up period. Treatment groups were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results A total of 13,599 patients initiated rivaroxaban and 39,861 initiated warfarin, of which 272 (2.0%) and 1,303 (3.3%), respectively, developed stroke during a mean follow-up of 28 months. Among patients who developed stroke, PPPY costs increased from the pre-stroke to post-stroke period, with greater increases in the warfarin cohort relative to the rivaroxaban cohort. Overall, the costs increased by 1.78-fold for rivaroxaban vs 3.07-fold for warfarin; for less severe strokes (NIHSS < 5), costs increased 0.88-fold and 1.05-fold, respectively. Cost increases for more severe strokes (NIHSS ≥ 5) among rivaroxaban patients were half those for warfarin patients (3.19-fold vs 6.37-fold, respectively). Among patients without stroke, costs were similar during the follow-up period between the two treatment groups. Conclusions Total all-cause costs of care increased in the post-stroke period, and particularly in the patients treated with warfarin relative to those treated with rivaroxaban. The lower rate of stroke in the rivaroxaban cohort suggests that greater pre- to post-stroke cost increases result from more strokes occurring in the warfarin cohort.

Antiviral use is associated with a decrease in the rate of influenza-related complications, health care resource utilization, and costs

Aims To determine the effect of antiviral agents on influenza-related complications, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs over three influenza seasons (2014–2016). Methods This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the U.S. MarketScan Research Databases. Patients with a diagnosis code for influenza during the 2014–2016 seasons in an outpatient setting, with continuous enrollment from 1 year before to 91 d after diagnosis, were included. Patients who received an antiviral within 48 h of diagnosis were identified and propensity score–matched to a comparator cohort of untreated patients on baseline demographics, comorbid conditions, and HRU. Outcomes were assessed at days 30 and 90 after diagnosis and included respiratory-related complications (all respiratory-related and selected respiratory-related conditions [influenza, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or infection]), HRU, and costs. Results Treated and matched untreated cohorts each consisted of 362,818 patients. HRU was significantly lower in the treated cohort compared with the untreated cohort at 30 and 90 d after diagnosis, respectively (hospitalizations: 0.6% vs. 0.8% and 1.2% vs. 1.6%; emergency department [ED] visits: 4.1% vs. 4.9% and 7.9% vs. 9.2%; intensive care unit/critical care unit (ICU/CCU) admissions: 0.2% vs. 0.4% and 0.4% vs. 0.6%). Respiratory-related HRU was lower in the treated cohort at both 30 and 90 d after diagnosis (p < .0001 for both periods). Mean all-cause total costs (including prescription costs) were significantly reduced in the treated group (day 30: $633 vs. $778; day 90: $1778 vs. $2119), despite higher prescription costs in the treated group. Limitations The study was retrospective and subject to residual selection bias, despite propensity score matching. Additionally, despite its potential relevance to influenza severity, vaccination status was not available in our data. Conclusions Antiviral influenza treatment is associated with a significant reduction in complications, HRU, and costs at 30 and 90 d after diagnosis.

1019. Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost of People Living with HIV (PLWH) in US Commercial and Medicare Advantage Health Plans

BackgroundThe goal of HIV treatment is to achieve and maintain virologic suppression to prevent disease progression. Patients with uncontrolled HIV and decreasing CD4 counts can experience more health problems and increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost. The objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics, HCRU and cost of PLWH in US Commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans by CD4 count.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of PLWH aged 18+ between 01/01/2014-03/31/2018 in the Optum Research Database was conducted. Patients were continuously enrolled 6 months before (baseline) and 12 months after (unless evidence of death) the first identified antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (follow-up). Patients were classified as heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) if their regimen indicated an ARV therapy used to treat multi-drug resistant (MDR) virus, Non-HTE if treatment did not include an HTE regimen, or Treatment-Naïve if they were not treated with any ARV medication during baseline. All variables were summarized descriptively by the CD4 count closest to the first ARV regimen and compared using chi-square or F-test/ANOVA.Results5,522 patients met the inclusion criteria including 18% with a CD4 count < 200, 70% 200-500, and 12% > 500 cells/mm3. Patients in the lowest CD4 group were more likely to be HTE or Naïve, African-American, female, living in the South, earn less and have at least one AIDS defining condition (Table 1). Patients in the lowest CD4 group also had the highest mortality rate, (6% in the < 200, 2% 200-500, 1% in the > 500 group; p-value < 0.001) and the highest rates of emergency room visits and inpatient stays (Figure 1). All-cause total cost among patients with CD4 counts < 200 was 51% higher than those with CD4 > 500, and medical cost was 207% higher driven primarily by inpatient health care cost. Similar trends were seen for HIV-related care. Among the lowest CD4 group, average total cost was highest in the HTE group followed by Naïve patients.Table 1. Baseline Characteristics by CD4 count group, cells/mm3 Figure 1. Percentage of Patients with All-cause and HIV-related Healthcare Utilization by CD4 Group ConclusionThere are still PLWH with CD4 counts < 200 cells/mm3 which can result in more AIDS defining conditions, higher mortality risk, and higher HCRU and cost. These results suggest interventions may be needed to diagnose and treat patients sooner and closely monitor the health of more advanced patients for worsening outcomes.DisclosuresJulie Priest, MSPH, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Erin Hulbert, MS, Optum (Employee)ViiV (Grant/Research Support) Bruce L. Gilliam, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

24. Economic Burden of Herpes Zoster Among Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundPrevious studies have evaluated the risk of developing herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about the impact of an acute HZ episode on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with COPD in the US.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of individuals ≥50 years of age was conducted using administrative claims data from Optum Clinformatics for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members (01/01/2013 – 12/31/2018). Two cohorts of patients with COPD, with (Cohort A) and without (Cohort B) HZ episodes, were identified (Fig.1). COPD and HZ were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. All-cause HCRU rates were compared between cohorts using adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs), calculated using generalized linear models assuming a negative binomial distribution. Differences in all-cause costs were estimated by fitting a two-part model with a logit model in the first part and a gamma distribution for the second part. Potential differences between cohorts were accounted for by propensity scores, calculated using patients’ demographics and clinical characteristics at baseline and included as a covariate in multivariable regression analyses. ResultsAmong patients with COPD, 3,415 patients with HZ (mean age [standard deviation]=73.2 [9.0] years) and 35,360 without HZ (72.4 [9.4] years) were identified. Compared to patients with COPD but without HZ, patients with COPD and HZ had an increased rate of all-cause outpatient visits (adjusted IRR=1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15–1.22; p< 0.001) and Emergency Department visits (1.28; 1.20–1.35; p< 0.001) as well as higher all-cause total costs (adjusted cost difference, per patient per month [PPPM]=$313; 95% CI=$110–536; p< 0.004), in the first year of the observation period. All-cause mean costs PPPM and differences between cohorts were higher closer to the date of HZ diagnosis (or an imputed date for Cohort B, Fig.2).Figure 2: All-cause monthly costs ConclusionHCRU and cost burden is higher in patients ≥50 years old with COPD and HZ vs. without HZ. HZ vaccination may potentially reduce this burden among patients with COPD.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (GSK study identifier: HO-19-19749)DisclosuresParinaz Ghaswalla, PhD, ORCID: 0000-0002-2883-5590, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Philippe Thompson-Leduc, MSc, ORCID: 0000-0001-9047-3941, Analysis Group, Inc. (Employee) Wendy Y. Cheng, MPH, PhD, ORCID: 0000-0002-8281-2496, GlaxoSmithKline (Other Financial or Material Support, I am an employee of Analysis Group, a consulting company that received research fund to conduct this study.) Min-Jung Wang, ScD, ORCID: 0000-0003-4432-3330, Analysis Group, Inc. (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Analysis Group received grant/research support from GSK) Michael Bogart, PharmD, ORCID: 0000-0002-1681-9710, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Brandon J. Patterson, PharmD, PhD, GSK (Employee, Shareholder) Mei-Sheng Duh, MPH, ScD, ORCID: 0000-0001-5035-6687, GlaxoSmithKline (Grant/Research Support) Suna Park, MS, GSK (Other Financial or Material Support, Analysis Group, Inc., where I am an employee, received funding for this study) Barbara P. Yawn, MD, Msc, ORCID: 0000-0001-7278-5810, GSK (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)

PCN102 Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) and Costs with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR TKIS) and Subsequent Chemotherapy Among Patients with LUNG Cancer

The study objective was to describe the HCRU and costs among patients with lung cancer during treatment with EGFR TKIs and during subsequent chemotherapy. This retrospective study used medical and pharmacy claims from the Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart for adults with US commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance with lung cancer initiating first-line therapy with EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, or osimertinib) from June 2013 - June 2019 who subsequently initiated chemotherapy. Continuous enrollment from 6 months prior to EGFR TKI initiation (baseline period) through ≥1 month after chemotherapy initiation was required. HCRU and costs per patient month were compared while on EGFR TKI therapy and while on subsequent chemotherapy using descriptive statistics. In the study sample of 192 patients, mean±SD age was 71 ±9 years, and 63% were female. Patients had a mean [median] of 250 [172] days on EGFR TKI therapy and 178 [124] days after chemotherapy start until chemotherapy cessation or end of data. During the EGFR TKI period, lung cancer patients had a lower prevalence of all-cause inpatient hospitalization (24% vs. 41% p=0.0005) compared to the chemotherapy period. During the EGFR TKI period there were lower mean monthly counts of all-cause inpatient hospitalizations (0.07 vs. 0.21 p<0.0001), outpatient ER visits (0.07 vs. 0.12 p=0.0134), outpatient office visits (1.77 vs. 2.45 p<0.0001), and other outpatient visits (4.61 vs. 8.62 p<0.0001) compared with the chemotherapy period. Total all-cause costs per month were lower during the EGFR TKI period ($15,811 vs. $40,730 p<0.0001) compared with the chemotherapy period. Healthcare utilization and costs per month were significantly lower for lung cancer patients while receiving EGFR TKIs than with subsequent chemotherapy. Prolonging time on EGFR TKI treatment before chemotherapy could reduce healthcare utilization and costs in EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer.

PDB15 Healthcare Outcomes for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with and without Comorbid Obesity

The increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity have led to the co-occurrence being labelled as “twin epidemics.” Given the high rates of comorbid diabetes and obesity, as well as the health benefits associated with lower weight among patients with type 2 diabetes, this research examines the burden of obesity associated with comorbid T2D. This U.S. administrative claims database study uses IBM® MarketScan® Explorys Claims Electronic Medical Records data from January 1, 2012 through April 30, 2019 to identify adults with T2D, two recorded body mass index (BMI) values in the same weight category, and continuous insurance coverage from 1 year prior through 1 year post index date. Patients with index 18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2 (normal/overweight) were matched to patients with index BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (obese) using propensity score matching (PSM). Using the PSM cohort, multivariable analyses examined the association between obesity and patient comorbidities, resource utilization, and healthcare costs. In the 1:1 matched cohort (16,006 normal/overweight; 16,006 obese), multivariable analyses showed that obesity, compared to normal/overweight, was associated with increased odds of a diabetes-related comorbidity (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.21; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14 – 1.28) and an obesity-related comorbidity (OR=1.42; 95% CI 1.29 – 1.56). Obesity was associated with increased odds of the specific obesity or diabetes-related comorbidities of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and metabolic disease (all P<0.05). Obesity was also associated with increased resource utilization as well as significantly higher annual diabetes-related ($8,987 v $8,057; P<0.0001) and all-cause total costs ($26,624 v $24,838; P<0.0001). Results increase the knowledge of how patients with T2D and obesity should be of greater concern for healthcare providers compared to T2D patients without comorbid obesity, given their worse comorbidity profile, increased resource utilization, and higher healthcare costs.