Total Adverse Events Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of the serratus anterior plane block (SAP block) for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures in the emergency department: a retrospective study.

Chest trauma is a severe and frequent cause of admission to the emergency department (ED). The serratus anterior plane (SAP) block seems to be an effective method of pain management; however, data on efficacy and safety of a single SAP block performed in the ED by emergency physicians (EP) are limited. This study aimed to compare SAP block performed by the EP in the ED plus standard therapy to standard therapy alone in terms of pain severity at 0-3-6-12-18 and 24h, total opioid consumption (milligrams of morphine equivalents, MME), respiratory function (SpO2/FiO2 ratio), and adverse events (i.e. pneumothorax, infections in the site of injection, or Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity syndrome due to SAP block) in the first 24h. This retrospective, monocentric study included adult patients admitted to the Sub-intensive Care Unit (SICU) of the ED with multiple rib fractures between 01/2022 and 03/2023. 156 patients (65.4% male; median age 62 years; median injury severity score 16; median thoracic trauma severity score 8) were included. 75 (48.2%) underwent SAP block. Patients undergoing SAP block showed significantly less pain 3-6-18h after a single block, required less MME (0 [0-20] vs. 20 [0-40], p < 0.001), showed higher SpO2/FiO2 ratio, and no adverse events were reported. The SAP block, in combination with standard therapy, appeared to be more effective in providing pain relief than standard therapy alone in patients admitted to the SICU for traumatic rib fractures.

Bifid triple viable preparation combined with enteral nutrition as a supportive treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The benefits and risks of bifid triple viable preparations in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are still controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bifid triple viable preparations in combination with enteral nutrition for the management of AIS. Eight public databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, VIP, WanFang, EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant clinical literature, published through January 2024. These data were then used in the present meta-analysis. A total of 15 studies involving 1,544 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of nutritional status, the results showed that compared with enteral nutrition alone, the bifid triple viable preparation combination group increased the levels of total protein (mean difference [MD], 5.53; 95%confidence interval [CI], 1.94-9.12; p = 0.003), albumin (MD, 4.01; 95%CI, 2.96-5.06; p < 0.00001), prealbumin (MD, 23.08; 95%CI, 16.22-29.95; p < 0.00001), hemoglobin (MD, 9.31; 95%CI, 6.34-12.27; p < 0.00001), and transferrin (MD, 0.64; 95%CI, 0.23-1.05; p = 0.002); in terms of neurological function, it improved the Glasgow Coma Scale (MD, 2.09; 95%CI, 0.69-3.49; p = 0.003), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (MD, -3.07; 95%CI, -3.73 to -2.40; p < 0.00001), and Neurological Disability Score (MD, -6.68; 95%CI, -7.29 to -6.08; p < 0.00001); in terms of intestinal barrier function, it reduced the levels of endotoxin (MD, -0.55; 95%CI, -0.71 to -0.39; p < 0.00001), D-lactic acid (MD, -3.17; 95%CI, -4.07 to -2.26; p < 0.00001), diamine oxidase (MD, -4.39; 95%CI, -6.20 to -2.57; p < 0.00001), and endothelin (MD, -21.35; 95%CI, -27.86 to -14.83; p < 0.00001); in terms of immune function, it increased the levels of immunoglobulin G (MD, 1.01; 95%CI, 0.20-1.82; p = 0.01) and immunoglobulin M (MD, 0.16; 95%CI, 0.02-0.30; p = 0.03). Additionally, it reduced the incidence of pulmonary infection, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea, while there were no significant differences in total adverse events, abdominal distension, anorexia, reflux, gastrointestinal bleeding, or electrolyte disturbance. The addition of bifid triple viable preparation to enteral nutrition improved the nutritional status, neurological function, intestinal barrier function, and immune function of patients with AIS, and reduced the risk of infection and gastrointestinal events.

Clinical Outcomes of Collagenase Injections in Management of Dupuytren Contracture of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

Dupuytren contracture is characterized by the formation of cords and nodules in the palm. Surgical release has historically been the definitive treatment. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has been used successfully as an alternative to surgery. The treatment of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) contractures is the most challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CCH treatment for Dupuytren contracture of the PIP joint. A retrospective chart review was performed for CCH treatment of Dupuytren contracture at a single institution from January 2010 to April 2023. Data collected included pretreatment/posttreatment total flexion contracture and adverse events. Contractures were analyzed both by severity (high >40° and low <40°) and type (isolated PIP; combined metacarpophalangeal and PIP). A total of 304 patients with 470 PIP joints treated were included. Digits with isolated and combined contractures each had an average pre-CCH treatment contracture of 51 (±23) degrees. Postmanipulations the contractures were 6 (±13) and 7 (±16) degrees, respectively. Clinical success (<5° residual contracture) and improvement (>50% correction of contracture) were associated with low severity contractures at postmanipulation. There were 256 adverse events recorded (54.5%), including 187 skin tears (39.8%), 68 cases of lymphadenopathy (14.5%), and one injection site infection (0.2%). High severity and combined contractures were independently associated with an increased incidence of skin tears upon manipulation. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment is effective for isolated or combined PIP joint contractures. Adverse events were associated with more severe contractures. Given the degree of improvement based on contracture severity, earlier intervention may provide better correction of contracture. Therapeutic III.

Assessing morinidazole for surgical site infection in class III wounds prevention: a multi-centre, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled study

Surgical site infections are significant postoperative risks, antibiotic prophylaxis is crucial due to the presence of anaerobic bacteria. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel nitroimidazole, morinidazole, in SSI reduction in class Ⅲ wounds, as there is currently a lack of evidence in the existing literature. A multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2020 to October 2022 in the general surgery departments of 12 tertiary hospitals in China. 459 patients in two treatment groups using morinidazole plus ceftriaxone or ceftriaxone alone. Efficacy and safety were evaluated including SSI incidence, adverse events, and compliance. Statistical analysis employed SAS 9.4 software. Data analysis was performed from February to May 2023. A total of 440 participants (median [IQR] age, 63.0 [54.0, 70.0] years; 282 males [64.09%]; 437 patients were of Han race [99.32%]) were randomized. The experimental group exhibited a significantly lower SSI rate compared with the control group (31 [14.49%] vs 52 [23.01%]; risk difference, 1.76%, 95%CI, 1.08% to 2.88%; P=0.0224). The superficial incisional site infections revealed a marked reduction in the experimental group (12 [5.61%] vs 31 [13.37%]; risk difference,2.68%; 95%CI,1.34%to5.36%; P=0.0042). Non-surgical site infections, severe postoperative complications, and total adverse events showed no statistically significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). The significant decrease in SSI rates and superficial incisional infections demonstrates morinidazole as a valuable prophylactic antibiotic. Our findings provided valuable insights for clinical practice, where this new-generation nitroimidazole can play a crucial role in SSI prevention.

A Risk-Difference Meta-Analysis for the Prophylactic Treatments of Chronic Migraine.

Chronic migraine (CM) imposes significant personal, societal, and financial burdens, historically lacking specific prophylactic treatments. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) represent a novel, mechanism-based, and migraine-specific prophylactic approach. Four mAbs, namely, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, have been marketed, although head-to-head trials with standard anti-migraine treatments are absent. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP mAbs with standard anti-migraine treatments using a cross-trial indirect model of the absolute risk difference (ARD) of a 50% responder rate, in order to express the final results in terms of the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). Phase 3 and 2b randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for CM prophylaxis were searched in the MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The ARD between groups for the percentage of trial participants who reported a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days and the differences in the number of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and participants who withdrew from each RCT were calculated, and subsequently, the NNT and NNH were calculated for each one of the outcome measures. In total, eight RCTs were considered eligible. A similar efficacy and safety have been demonstrated among CGRP mAbs and all standard CM treatments. The results of the ARD for the total number of studies concerning efficacy, total adverse events, serious adverse events, and dropout from the RCTs ranged from -0.688 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.821-(-0.513)) to -0.018 (95% CI: -0.044-(0.007)), from 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104) to -0.380 (95% CI: -0.589, -0.126), from -0.025 (95% CI: -0.046, -0.006) to 0.014 (95% CI: -0.015, 0.42), from 0.048 (95% CI: -0.112, 0.014) to 0.232 (95% CI: -0.016, 0.458) correspondingly. All anti-CGRP mAbs showed a roughly equal statistically significant ARD and similar NNTs, ranging from 5 to 8, while the ARD of onbotulinum toxin A (oBTA) was not significant with an NNT 56. The two studies of topiramate showed contradictory results, the one significant while the other not, with NNTs 2 and 22, respectively. All four anti-CGRP mAbs showed an invariably high efficacy among their studies, in terms of the ARD and its derivative measure of NNT, in contrast to oBTA, while in topiramate, the results are contradictory between the two studies.

Adverse events reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Danish region: a retrospective analysis.

The 2020 onset of the COVID-19 pandemic globally strained healthcare. Healthcare systems worldwide had to rapidly reorganize, impacting service delivery, patient care, and care-seeking behaviors. This left little time to assess the pandemic's effects on patient safety. This paper investigates COVID-19's influence on patient safety in a Danish region, using data from the national reporting system for adverse events during the initial COVID-19 surge in early 2020. This retrospective analysis investigated how the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (January-September 2020) affected the incidence of adverse events in a Danish Region, comparing it to the same period in 2019. Data were sourced from the Danish Patient Safety Database and regional systems. Adverse events were reported numerically. Descriptive statistics were employed to describe the percentage difference in adverse events and hospital activity, as well as the rate of adverse events per 1000 activities. Additionally, COVID-19-specific adverse events from April 2020 to March 2021 were identified and analyzed, categorizing them into seven risk areas across various healthcare sectors. During Denmark's initial COVID-19 surge in early 2020, the North Denmark Region's hospitals reported a significant decrease in adverse events, with a 42.5% drop in March 2020 compared to March 2019. From January to September 2020, the number of adverse events dropped 8.5% compared to the same period in 2019. In the same period, hospital activity declined by 10.2%. The ratio of reported adverse events per 1000 hospital activities thus decreased in early 2020 but showed only a minor difference overall for January-September compared to 2019. Between April 2020 and March 2021, out of 5703 total adverse events, 324 (5.7%) were COVID-19 related. COVID-19-related events were categorized into seven distinct risk areas, reflecting diverse impacts across healthcare sectors including hospitals, general practices, pre-hospital care, and specialized services. The initial decline in reporting of adverse events likely resulted from rapid healthcare changes and under-prioritization of the reporting system during the acute phase. However, a near return to pre-pandemic reporting levels suggests a resilient reporting system despite the crisis. The study's strength lies in the comprehensive data from Danish reporting systems, though it acknowledges potential underreporting and doesn't measure the pandemic's overall impact on patient safety.

Time From Colorectal Cancer Surgery to Adjuvant Chemotherapy

The timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for colorectal cancer and its association with long-term outcomes have been investigated in national cohort studies, with no consensus on the optimal time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy. To analyze the association between the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for colorectal cancer and disease-free survival. This is a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 SCOT randomized clinical trial, from 244 centers in 6 countries, investigating the noninferiority of 3 vs 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with high-risk stage II or stage III nonmetastatic colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intended surgery were randomized to either 3 or 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin regimens. Those with complete information on the date of surgery, treatment type, and long-term follow-up were investigated for the primary and secondary end points. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to February 2024. In the post hoc analysis, patients were grouped according to the start of adjuvant chemotherapy being less than 6 weeks vs greater than 6 weeks after surgery. The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were adverse events in the total treatment period or the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 5719 patients (2251 [39.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 63.4 [9.3] years) were included in the primary analysis after data curation; among them, 914 were in the early-start group and 4805 were in the late-start group. Median (IQR) follow-up was 72.0 (47.3-88.1) months, with a median (IQR) of 56 (41-66) days from surgery to chemotherapy. Five-year disease-free survival was 78.0% (95% CI, 75.3%-80.8%) in the early-start group and 73.2% (95% CI, 72.0%-74.5%) in the late-start group. In an adjusted Cox regression analysis, the start of adjuvant chemotherapy greater than 6 weeks after surgery was associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P = .01). In adjusted logistic regression models, there was no association with adverse events in the total treatment period (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.04; P = .09) or adverse events in the first cycle of treatment (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09; P = .13). In this international population of patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer, starting adjuvant chemotherapy more than 6 weeks after surgery was associated with worse disease-free survival, with no difference in adverse events between the groups. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN59757862.

REGENERATE-COBRA: A phase II randomized sham-controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of intracoronary administration of autologous bone marrow-derived cells in patients with refractory angina

AimsThe REGENERATE-COBRA trial (NCT05711849) will assess the safety and efficacy of an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in refractory angina patients with no revascularization options who are symptomatic despite optimal medical and device therapy. MethodsREGENERATE-COBRA is a single site, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, Phase II clinical trial enrolling 110 refractory angina patients with no revascularization options who are symptomatic despite optimal medical and device therapy. Patients will be randomized to either autologous bone marrow derived-mononuclear cells or a sham procedure. Patients in the cell-treated arm will undergo a bone marrow aspiration and an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow derived-mononuclear cells. Patients in the control arm will undergo a sham bone marrow aspiration and a sham intracoronary infusion. The trial's primary endpoint is an improvement in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class by 2 classes between baseline and 6 months. Secondary endpoints include change in: CCS class at 12 months, myocardial ischemic burden (as measured by perfusion imaging) at 6 months, quality of life at 6 and 12 months (as measured by EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-VAS and Seattle Angina Questionnaire), angina frequency at 6 and 12 months, total exercise time (as measured by a modified Bruce protocol) and major adverse cardiovascular events at 6 and 12 months. ConclusionsThis is the first trial to assess the safety and efficacy of an intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived unfractionated mononuclear cells in symptomatic refractory angina patients who have exhausted conventional therapeutic options.

Cardiovascular adverse events in patients with cancer treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy: A meta-analysis of both controlled and single-arm clinical trials.

e19006 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy presents a promising avenue in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, the application of CAR-T cell therapy comes with a range of adverse effects, some of which are not fully understood yet. While previous research has primarily focused on immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANs) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the cardiovascular safety profile of CAR-T cell therapy remains less defined. This meta-analysis assesses the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events associated with CAR-T therapy, thereby providing critical insights into these events and guiding clinical decision-making. Methods: We conducted a Pubmed search of clinical trials evaluating the effect of CAR-T cell therapy in cancer patients with cardiovascular adverse events. For phase III trials, a quantitative assessment of Grade 3 or higher CV events was performed using the Review Manager (Rev-Man) Version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) and the results were reported as Odd Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). A fixed effect model was used. For phase I/II trials, the event rates were calculated for all-grade as well as grade 3 and higher CV adverse events. Results: A total of four Phase III clinical trials with 1345 patients were included for the comparison analysis. Among those trials, two involved multiple myeloma patients, and two involved large B cell lymphoma patients. The age range across trials was 20-83 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in Grade 3 or higher CV events between the CAR-T cell therapy and control (standard of care) groups: OR with 95% CI was 1.44 (0.73,2.82) (p=0.29). Grade 3 and above CV adverse event rates were 3.4% for the CAR-T and 2.1% for the control groups. Notably, there were two CV deaths in the CAR-T group and one CV death in the control group. Additionally, a total of 41 single-arm, Phase I/II clinical trials with 1479 participants were analyzed. Seven studies included solid cancers such as metastatic pancreatic cancer, biliary tract cancer and melanoma. The age range was 17-86 yr and male/female ratio was 1.5:1. Total all-grade CV adverse event rate was 21.83% and total grade 3 and above CV adverse event rate was 8.82%. There were eight CV deaths. Conclusions: There were significantly more CV adverse events reported in Phase I/II trials when compared to those reported in Phase III trials. This indicates that CV adverse events are important consequences of CAR-T cell therapy but are likely underreported in the Phase III clinical trials. Increased awareness and more standardized evaluation of CV adverse events of CAR-T is needed in the future clinical trials.

Cardiovascular complications associated with asciminib use: A retrospective analysis.

6563 Background: Asciminib, a newly developed drug, has shown promising results in the treatment of several diseases. It is a cellular tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that specifically targets ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor, responsible for the malignant growth and proliferation of leukemia cells in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, assuring a positive treatment of CML. However, as with all medications, there are possible side effects that must be carefully monitored. In comparison to Ponatinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) which is extensively used to treat CML and exhibits a cardiovascular risk profile, cardiovascular side effects with the use of Asciminib are rarely reported in literature, prompting its use in patients at a higher risk of these events. Through this study, we aim to highlight the cardiovascular complications associated with the use of Asciminib by integrating patient experience and clinical research. Methods: A publicly available FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database was utilized to review cardiovascular events associated with the use of Asciminib in patients with Chronic Myeloid leukemia (CML) between 2018-2023. Cardiovascular events such as coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) were reviewed. The study focused only on adverse events reported by healthcare providers and observed in adults (above 18 years old). Results: We identified a total of 563 adverse events pertaining to the use of Asciminib in patients with CML. Of which, 63 were cardiovascular events, contributing to 11.2% of the total adverse events. Out of the reported cardiovascular side effects, 29 (46%) were due to CAD, 6 (9.5%) were due to PAD, and 28 (44.45%) were due to CVA. The mortality rate amongst patients who experienced cardiovascular side effects was 11%. Moreover, cardiovascular events contributed to 7% of all mortality associated with the use of Asciminib, with CAD contributing to most of the deaths. Conclusions: It is imperative to consider the potential of cardiovascular events in patients initiated on Asciminib. This study emphasizes the importance of using patient records and medical research to obtain complete information. Patients with underlying risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases should be thoroughly evaluated before drug initiation. The minimum threshold for drug discontinuation should be considered in patients with suspected heart disease.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with donafenib or lenvatinib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center real-world retrospective study.

e16137 Background: Combined Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment has been proven to be beneficial. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of Donafenib (DON)-TACE versus Lenvatinib (LEN)-TACE as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: From May 2020 to May 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 93 patients with previously untreated uHCC who underwent treatment at the department of Interventional Radiology of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Among them, 49 were in the DON-TACE group and 44 in the LEN-TACE group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to mRECIST, and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety outcome. Results: As of the data cut-off date Aug 26, 2023, the median PFS was 221 days (95% CI 141–366) in the DON-TACE group and 173 days (95% CI 108–215) in the LEN-TACE group (HR = 0.783, 95% CI 0.462–1.325, P = 0.362).ORR and DCR of the DON-TACE group were 55.1% (95% CI 40.23–69.33) and 75.51% (95% CI 61.13–86.66), respectively, while those of the LEN-TACE group were 61.36% (95% CI 45.49–75.64) and 81.82% (95% CI 67.29–91.81). No significant difference was observed either in ORR(P = 0.689) or DCR(P = 0.627) between the two groups. The incidence rates of total adverse events for any grade (85.71% vs 100.00%, P = 0.027) and ≥Grade 3 (22.496% vs 45.45%, P = 0.019) were significantly lower in the DON-TACE group. In addition, the incidence rates of AST increased (27.27% vs 56.82%, P = 0.005), diarrhea (6.12% vs 25.00%, P = 0.011), vomiting (0% vs 40.91%, P &lt; 0.001), proteinuria (0% vs 18.18%, P = 0.011), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0% vs 13.64%, P = 0.048) and hypertension (2.04% vs 36.36%, P &lt; 0.001) for any grade were also significantly lower in the DON-TACE group. Conclusions: DON-TACE and LEN-TACE showed comparable efficacy as first-line therapies for uHCC patients. DON-TACE demonstrated a lower incidence of severe adverse events.

Preoperative Physical Therapy is Associated with Decreased Length of Stay and Improved Postoperative Mobility in Patients with Sarcopenia Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Retrospective cohort study. To determine the relationship between preoperative physical therapy (PT) and postoperative mobility, adverse events (AEs), and length of stay (LOS) among patients with low normalized total psoas area (NTPA) undergoing ASD surgery. Sarcopenia as defined by low NTPA has been shown to predict poor perioperative outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, there is limited evidence correlating the benefits of PT within the sarcopenic patient population. NTPA was analyzed at the L3 and L4 mid-vertebral body on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine gender-specific NTPA cut-off values for predicting perioperative AEs. Patients were categorized as having low NTPA if both L3 and L4 NTPA were below these cut-off values. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients with low NTPA that underwent documented formal PT within 6 months prior to ASD surgery with those that did not. 103 patients (42 males, 61 females) met criteria for low NTPA for inclusion in the study, of which 42 underwent preoperative PT and 61 did not. The preoperative PT group had a shorter LOS (111.2±37.5 vs. 162.1±97.0h, P<0.001), higher ambulation distances (feet) on postoperative day (POD) 1 (61.7±50.3 vs. 26.1±69.0, P<0.001), POD 2 (113.2±81.8 vs. 62.1±73.1, P=0.003), and POD 3 (126.0±61.2 vs. 91.2±72.6, P=0.029), and lower rates of total AEs (31.0% vs. 54.1%, P=0.003) when excluding anemia requiring transfusion. Multivariable analysis found preoperative PT to be the most significant predictor of decreased LOS (OR 0.32, P=0.013). Sarcopenic patients may benefit from formal preoperative PT prior to undergoing ASD surgery to improve early postoperative mobility, decrease AEs, and decrease LOS. 3.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies: a living systematic review (protocol).

To determine the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies, in comparison with other current therapies. A living systematic review. We will include randomized trials evaluating the effect of CAR-T therapy versus other active treatments, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, best supportive care or any other intervention in patients with hematologic malignancies. Non-randomized primary studies will be searched in case we found no direct evidence from randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers will independently screen each study for eligibility, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. Efficacy measures will include overall survival rate, overall response rate, complete response/remission (CR) rate, partial response/remission (PR) rate, relapse from CR, progression-free survival, and time from CAR-T infusion to transplantation. Safety measures will include serious adverse events, the incidence of cytokine release syndrome, graft-versus-host disease, neurotoxicity, and total adverse events. Quality of life will also be assessed. Meta-analyses will be carried out to summarize the results. We will apply the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. A living, web-based version of this review will be openly available until there is solid evidence to respond to the review objective. We will resubmit it for publication every time the conclusions change or whenever there are substantial updates.

Sequential administration of peripheral nerve blocks andonabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine andother headache disorders-A retrospective tolerability and safety study.

To determine the tolerability and safety of concurrent peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. Procedural interventions are available for the treatment of headache disorders. OnabotulinumtoxinA and peripheral nerve blocks are used as alternatives or in addition to oral therapies to reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks. There is currently a lack of safety data focusing on the sequential administration of local anesthetic via peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA during a single clinical encounter for the treatment of headache. The primary aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of concurrent peripheral nerve blockade and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. We hypothesized that the dual intervention would be safe and well tolerated by patients with chronic migraine and other headache disorders. A retrospective chart review was performed using clinical data from patients seen by multiple providers over a 16-month timeframe at one outpatient headache clinic. Patients were identified by procedure codes and those receiving peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single encounter within the study period were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 18 years and older who were (2) receiving both peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of chronic migraine. Patients were excluded if they were under age 18, received their procedure outside of the clinic (emergency room, inpatient ward), or were receiving sphenopalatine ganglion blocks. Age- and sex-matched patients who received one procedure, either peripheral nerve blocks or onabotulinumtoxinA, were used for control. The primary outcome of this safety study was the number of adverse events that occurred in the dual intervention group compared to the single intervention control arms. Information regarding adverse events was gathered via retrospective chart review. If an adverse event was recorded, it was then graded by the reviewer utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ranging from Grade 1 Mild Event to Grade 5 Death. Additionally, it was noted whether the adverse event led to treatment discontinuation. In total, 375 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. After age and sex matching of controls, 131 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 131 patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone and 104 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 104 patients receiving peripheral nerve block(s) alone. The primary endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in total adverse events between dual intervention compared to nerve blocks alone or onabotulinumtoxinA alone. The number of adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation approached but did not reach statistical significance for those receiving dual intervention versus onabotulinumtoxinA alone in the number of adverse events that led to treatment termination (4.6%, 6/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131, p = 0.065); however, the number of patients who discontinued therapy was not significantly different between those groups (2.3%, 3/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131; p = 0.314; odds ratio 0.3 [0-3.2]; p = 0.338). In this retrospective chart review, there was no significant difference in adverse events or therapy discontinuation between patients receiving sequential peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus those receiving either peripheral nerve block(s) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections alone. As a result, we concluded that the combination procedure is likely safe and well tolerated in routine clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in COVID-19-associated pneumonia among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A real-world retrospective observational study.

To identify the effectiveness and safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) patients. RMD patients with COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province were polled between December 8, 2022, and February 1, 2023. Information on demographics, disease characteristics, antirheumatic drug use, vaccination status and survival state were collected. COVID-19-associated pneumonia was the primary outcome. The effect of COVID-19 immunization on RMD patients was assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the adverse events (AEs) following vaccination were evaluated. Among 592 RMD patients with COVID-19, 276 (46.6%) individuals experienced COVID-19-associated pneumonia, and 290 (49.0%) patients were injected with inactivated vaccines. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, vaccines reduced the incidence of COVID-19-associated pneumonia, and receiving booster vaccine was an independent protective factor for COVID-19-associated pneumonia in RMD patients (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, p = .034). In particular, inactivated vaccines have a protective impact on RMD patients with a high risk of developing pneumonia, including those aged 45 years and older (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83), and who have lung involvement (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.82). The total AEs rate of vaccines was 13.9% (40/290), only 11 (3.8%) experienced the recurrence or deterioration of RMDs, and no serious AEs occurred. Inactivated COVID-19 vaccines were safe and effective in reducing the risk of COVID-19-associated pneumonia of RMD patients in China.

Blind Spots in Therapy: Unveiling Drug-Induced Angle-Closure Glaucoma Through a National Analysis

To identify and quantify medications causing angle-closure glaucoma through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). National retrospective database analysis. There were 11 737 133 total adverse event reports from the FDA Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database 2004 to third quarter of 2023 (2023Q3), which included 1629 reports of angle-closure glaucoma. Drugs associated with reports of angle-closure glaucoma were identified in FAERS through disproportionality analysis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To ascertain if these reports yielded statistically significant signals, we used the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), and information component (IC). We considered a signal to be detected when all 4 disproportionality analysis metrics were positive. We identified a total of 1629 adverse event reports linked to 611 suspected drugs over the course of 20 years (2004-2023Q3). Frequently reported drugs included topiramate (520 reports) and citalopram (69 reports), amongst many others. Eighteen medications yielded a positive signal, including lesser-known medications like olanzapine, phentermine, and ranibizumab. Tropicamide exhibited the most robust statistical significance (n=18; PRR: 164.263; ROR [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 167.95 [104.994-268.655]; EBGM [EBGM05]: 162.421 [109.5]; IC [IC05]: 7.344 [4.591]), while acetazolamide was the second strongest (n=51; PRR: 113.088; ROR 95% CI: 114.782 [86.665-152.021]; EBGM [EBGM05]: 109.506 [86.501]; IC [IC05]: 6.775 [5.115]). Drug-induced glaucoma included both well-known medications such as topiramate as well as lesser-known medications such as olanzapine, phentermine, and ranibizumab. Clinician awareness of these findings is important. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Fentanyl in Pediatric Emergencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Intranasal fentanyl (INF) has gained popularity in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) as an effective alternative to intravenous morphine for treating acute moderate to severe pain. Intranasal fentanyl eliminates the need for invasive access, making it advantageous for patients with minor injuries. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of INF administration in pediatric emergency wards, particularly compared with other treatment options described in the literature. A thorough search strategy identified randomized controlled trials assessing INF in the pediatric emergency ward. Eligible studies were independently screened, and relevant data were extracted. The analysis used pooled risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous ones. Randomized controlled trials' quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2. In our study, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 806 patients, INF demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing pain compared with other comparators at the 15- to 20-minute mark (SMD, -0.23; 95% confidence interval, -0.37 to -0.08; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found at the 30- and 60-minute time points (SMDs, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.50, 0.19; P = 0.37; and -0.16; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.19; P = 0.78) except when excluding one study to resolve heterogeneity at the 30-minute mark (RR, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.20; P = 0.87). Intranasal fentanyl also exhibited a better adverse outcome profile, with a lower risk of total adverse events and nausea/vomiting (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; P = 0.01; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P > 0.001) compared with other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed for dizziness and hallucination (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P = 0.68; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P = 0.35). Our study assessed the effectiveness of INF compared with other analgesics in pain reduction. Intranasal fentanyl demonstrated superior pain reduction at the 15- to 20-minute point but showed no significant differences at 30 and 60 minutes. Intranasal fentanyl also had a more favorable adverse event profile, with a lower risk of nausea and vomiting than other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed in dizziness and hallucination between the groups.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Post-bariatric Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A significant number of patients face the issue of weight gain (WG) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) post-bariatric surgery for obesity. Several studies have been published evaluating the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) for weight loss post-bariatric surgery. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis (SRM) till date has evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GLP1RA in this clinical scenario. Hence, this SRM aimed to address this knowledge gap. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control, cohort and observational studies involving use of GLP1RA in the intervention arm post-bariatric surgery. Primary outcome was weight loss post at least 3months of therapy. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of body composition parameters, total adverse events (TAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). From initially screened 1759 articles, 8 studies (557 individuals) were analysed. Compared to placebo, patients receiving liraglutide had significantly greater weight loss after 6-month therapy [MD - 6.0kg (95% CI, - 8.66 to - 3.33); P < 0.001; I2 = 79%]. Compared to liraglutide, semaglutide had significantly greater percent reduction in body weight after 6-month [MD - 2.57% (95% CI, - 3.91 to - 1.23); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%] and 12-month [MD - 4.15% (95% CI, - 6.96 to - 1.34); P = 0.004] therapy. In study by Murvelashvili et al. (2023), after 12-month therapy, semaglutide had significantly higher rates of achieving > 15% [OR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.07-4.33); P = 0.03; n = 207] and > 10% [OR 2.10 (95% CI, 1.19-3.71); P = 0.01; n = 207] weight loss. A significant decrease in fat mass [MD - 4.78kg (95% CI, - 7.11 to - 2.45); P < 0.001], lean mass [MD - 3.01kg (95% CI, - 4.80 to - 1.22); P = 0.001] and whole-body bone mineral density [MD - 0.02kg/m2 (95% CI, - 0.04 to - 0.00); P = 0.03] was noted with liraglutide. Current data is encouraging regarding use of GLP1RAs for managing WG or IWL post-bariatric surgery. Deterioration of bone health and muscle mass remains a concern needing further evaluation. The predefined protocol has been registered in PROSPERO having registration number of CRD42023473991.

A retrospective comparison of postoperative outcomes in ovariectomised jennies (Equus asinus) treated with phenylbutazone or flunixin meglumine.

Clinically, flunixin meglumine (FM) and phenylbutazone (PBZ) are preferentially selected for the treatment of visceral and musculoskeletal pain, respectively, in horses. In donkeys, there is no information to support or refute this conventional conjecture. To compare postoperative outcomes in a group of jennies treated with intravenous FM or oral PBZ. Fourteen jennies unilaterally ovariectomised by standing left flank laparotomy. Retrospective cohort study. Data from medical records of ovariectomised jennies (case details, weight, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID] protocol, surgery duration, operative sequence, anaesthesia protocol, physical examination findings and outcomes) were collected. From collated data, postoperative adverse events were defined as fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, inappetence, altered mentation, abnormal oral mucous membranes, bruxism, colic, incisional complications (i.e., drainage, oedema, peri-incisional emphysema and pain) and non-survival, then further divided into occurrence during the early (≤24 h) or late (>24 h) postoperative period for data analysis using R software. Chi-squared test was used to compare individual adverse events between groups (PBZ vs. FM) and moments (early vs. late). Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. PBZ treatment (8/14) was associated with (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) more total (2.93, 1.97-4.36), early (3.01, 1.87-4.84) and late (2.69, 1.28-5.63) adverse events than FM treatment (6/14). Tachycardia (37.83, 2.21-646.66), tachypnoea (0.29, 0.13-0.66), altered mentation (2.78, 1.01-7.67), altered mucous membranes (18.38, 1.04-325.23), incisional oedema (44.33, 2.60-754.5) and incisional pain (47.78, 2.81-811.61) were significantly different between groups. Early adverse events significantly different between groups included tachycardia (50.2, 2.9-877.0), altered mentation (3.33, 1.08-10.29) and incisional pain (21.0, 1.2-374.5), with late adverse events being tachypnea (0.07, 0.01-0.62), incisional oedema (32.92, 1.85-584.28) and incisional pain (28.92, 1.62-515.68). Colic (2/8) and non-survival (1/8) were rare events that only occurred in the PBZ cohort and could not be further evaluated for differences. Small sample size; retrospective study; treatment bias; varied administration routes. Oral PBZ may be inappropriate to use following abdominal surgery in donkeys. More prospective and case-controlled studies are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these two NSAIDs in donkeys.

Postoperative Bisphosphonates Use is Associated with Reduced Adverse Outcomes After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty of Hip and Knee: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Bisphosphonates have been associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty of the hip or knee (TJA) because of their effects on decreased periprosthetic bone loss and prosthetic migration. However, the results in the early literature are inconsistent, and the influence of bisphosphonates on associated complications and subsequent TJA remains unknown. This study investigated the association between the use of bisphosphonates and the risk of adverse outcomes after primary TJA. This matched cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to identify patients who underwent primary TJA over a 15-year period (January 2000-December 2015 inclusive). Study participants were further categorized into two groups, bisphosphonate users and nonusers, using propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of revision surgery, adverse outcomes of primary surgery and subsequent TJA were calculated using Cox regression analysis. This study analyzed data from 6485 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 20,920 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of revision hip and knee arthroplasty was significantly lower in the bisphosphonate users than in the nonusers (aHR, 0.54 and 0.53, respectively). Furthermore, the risk of a subsequent total joint arthroplasty, adverse events and all-cause mortality were also significantly reduced in the bisphosphonate users. This study, involving a large cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroplasties, revealed that bisphosphonate treatment may potentially reduce the risk of revision surgery and associated adverse outcomes. Furthermore, the use of bisphosphonates after TJA is also associated with a reduced need for subsequent arthroplasty.Research Registration Unique Identifying Number (UIN): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier-NCT05623540 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05623540 ).