Top-level Subsystem Research Articles

Network architecture of intrinsic connectivity in a mammalian spinal cord (the central nervous system’s caudal sector)

The vertebrate spinal cord (SP) is the long, thin extension of the brain forming the central nervous system's caudal sector. Functionally, the SP directly mediates motor and somatic sensory interactions with most parts of the body except the face, and it is the preferred model for analyzing relatively simple reflex behaviors. Here, we analyze the organization of axonal connections between the 50 gray matter regions forming the bilaterally symmetric rat SP. The assembled dataset suggests that there are about 385 of a possible 2,450 connections between the 50 regions for a connection density of 15.7%. Multiresolution consensus cluster analysis reveals a hierarchy of structure-function subsystems in this neural network, with 4 subsystems at the top level and 12 at the bottom-level. The top-level subsystems include a) a bilateral subsystem related most clearly to somatic and autonomic motor functions and centered in the ventral horn and intermediate zone; b) a bilateral subsystem associated with general somatosensory functions and centered in the base, neck, and head of the dorsal horn; and c) a pair of unilateral, bilaterally symmetric subsystems associated with nociceptive information processing and occupying the apex of the dorsal horn. The intrinsic SP network displayed no hubs, rich club, or small-world attributes, which are common measures of global functionality. Advantages and limitations of our methodology are discussed in some detail. The present work is part of a comprehensive project to assemble and analyze the neurome of a mammalian nervous system and its interactions with the body.

Развитие территориальной системы высшего и среднего профессионального образования Иркутской области

The article reveals the features of the spatial development of the system of higher and secondary vocational education in the Irkutsk region. Two key stages are analyzed: the Soviet one, which formed the main frame of the territorial structure of vocational education, and the modern one, which saw periods of both the rapid growth of the number of higher educational institutions and the optimization of the higher education network. The results of the study show that the spatial development of the systems of higher and secondary vocational education in recent years in the Irkutsk region is multi-directional: centripetal movement in the top-level subsystem, due to the reduction in the network of branches in municipal centers, and the gradual dispersal of the network of secondary education institutions at the expense of agricultural and industrial regions of the region. A comparative analysis of the trends in the development of vocational education in the Irkutsk region with the national and situation in other regions allows us to note that in the higher education system they are almost identical, since they occur as a result of structural and institutional transformations at the state level. For the Irkutsk region, as well as other regions of Russia with a predominantly industrial type of economy, growth trends are characteristic, caused by the needs of the market.

Structure–function subsystem models of female and male forebrain networks integrating cognition, affect, behavior, and bodily functions

The forebrain is the first of three primary vertebrate brain subdivisions. Macrolevel network analysis in a mammal (rat) revealed that the 466 gray matter regions composing the right and left sides of the forebrain are interconnected by 35,738 axonal connections forming a large set of overlapping, hierarchically arranged subsystems. This hierarchy is bilaterally symmetrical and sexually dimorphic, and it was used to create a structure-function conceptual model of intraforebrain network organization. Two mirror image top-level subsystems are presumably the most fundamental ontogenetically and phylogenetically. They essentially form the right and left forebrain halves and are relatively weakly interconnected. Each top-level subsystem in turn has two second-level subsystems. A ventromedial subsystem includes the medial forebrain bundle, functionally coordinating instinctive survival behaviors with appropriate physiological responses and affect. This subsystem has 26/24 (female/male) lowest-level subsystems, all using a combination of glutamate and GABA as neurotransmitters. In contrast, a dorsolateral subsystem includes the lateral forebrain bundle, functionally mediating voluntary behavior and cognition. This subsystem has 20 lowest-level subsystems, and all but 4 use glutamate exclusively for their macroconnections; no forebrain subsystems are exclusively GABAergic. Bottom-up subsystem analysis is a powerful engine for generating testable hypotheses about mechanistic explanations of brain function, behavior, and mind based on underlying circuit organization. Targeted computational (virtual) lesioning of specific regions of interest associated with Alzheimer's disease, clinical depression, and other disorders may begin to clarify how the effects spread through the entire forebrain network model.

The network architecture of rat intrinsic interbrain (diencephalic) macroconnections

The endbrain and interbrain form 2 great vertebrate forebrain divisions, and the interbrain is subdivided into the hypothalamus ventrally and thalamus dorsally. General organizing principles of intrainterbrain axonal circuitry were examined here at the level of gray matter regions using network analysis tools in a mammal with the most complete available dataset-before examining interbrain input-output relationships with other nervous system parts. The dataset was curated expertly from the neuroanatomical literature using experimental axonal pathway-tracing methods, and evidence from 74,242 connection reports indicates the existence of 10,836 macroconnections of the possible 49,062 macroconnections between the 222 gray matter regions forming the right and left halves of the interbrain. Two identical sets of 6 putative hubs were identified in the intrainterbrain network and form a continuous tissue mass in a part of the right and left medial hypothalamus associated functionally with physiological mechanisms controlling bodily functions. The intrainterbrain network shows only weak evidence of small-world attributes, rich club organization is absent, and multiresolution consensus cluster analysis indicates a solution with only 3 top-level subsystems or modules. In contrast, a previous analysis employing the same methodology to the significantly denser 244-node intraendbrain network revealed 2 identical sets of 13 hubs, small-world and rich club attributes, and 4 top-level subsystems. These differences in intrinsic network architecture across subdivisions suggest that intrinsic connections shape regional functional specialization to a varying extent, in part driven by differences in density and centrality, with extrinsic input-output connectivity playing a greater role in subdivisions that are sparser and less centralized.

Macroscale intrinsic network architecture of the hypothalamus

Control of multiple life-critical physiological and behavioral functions requires the hypothalamus. Here, we provide a comprehensive description and rigorous analysis of mammalian intrahypothalamic network architecture. To achieve this at the gray matter region (macroscale) level, macroscale connection (macroconnection) data for the rat hypothalamus were extracted from the primary literature. The dataset indicated the existence of 7,982 (of 16,770 possible) intrahypothalamic macroconnections. Network analysis revealed that the intrahypothalamic macroconnection network (its macroscale subconnectome) is divided into two identical top-level subsystems (or subnetworks), each composed of two nested second-level subsystems. At the top-level, this suggests a deeply integrated network; however, regional grouping of the two second-level subsystems suggested a partial separation between control of physiological functions and behavioral functions. Furthermore, inclusion of four candidate hubs (dominant network nodes) in the second-level subsystem that is associated prominently with physiological control suggests network primacy with respect to this function. In addition, comparison of network analysis with expression of gene markers associated with inhibitory (GAD65) and excitatory (VGLUT2) neurotransmission revealed a significant positive correlation between measures of network centrality (dominance) and the inhibitory marker. We discuss these results in relation to previous understandings of hypothalamic organization and provide, and selectively interrogate, an updated hypothalamus structure-function network model to encourage future hypothesis-driven investigations of identified hypothalamic subsystems.

Subsystem organization of axonal connections within and between the right and left cerebral cortex and cerebral nuclei (endbrain)

The endbrain (telencephalon) is at the rostral end of the central nervous system and is primarily responsible for supporting cognition and affect. Structurally, it consists of right and left cerebral hemispheres, each parceled into multiple cortical and nuclear gray matter regions. The global network organization of axonal macroconnections between the 244 regions forming the endbrain was analyzed with a multiresolution consensus clustering (MRCC) method that provides a hierarchical description of community clustering (modules or subsystems) within the network. Experimental evidence was collated from the neuroanatomical literature for the existence of 10,002 of a possible 59,292 connections within the network, and they cluster into four top-level subsystems and 60 bottom-level subsystems arranged in a 50-level hierarchy. Two top-level subsystems are bihemispheric: One deals with auditory and visual information, and the other corresponds broadly to the default mode network. The other two top-level subsystems are bilaterally symmetrical, and each deals broadly with somatic and visceral information. Because the entire endbrain connection matrix was assembled from multiple subconnectomes, it was easy to show that the status of a region as a connectivity hub is not absolute but, instead, depends on the size and coverage of its anatomical neighborhood. It was also shown numerically that creating an ultradense connection matrix by converting all "absent" connections to a "very weak" connection weight has virtually no effect on the clustering hierarchy. The next logical step in this project is to complete the forebrain connectome by adding the thalamus and hypothalamus (together, the interbrain) to the endbrain analysis.