A CONCEPTUAL TOPOGRAPHYThere are multiple ontological explanations for, and technical definitions of, peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peacebuilding. However, post-Cold War explanatory framework, provided by former UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali in his Agenda for peace, serves as an essential theoretical elaboration, as well as pioneering comprehensive approach of contemporary conflict resolution within United Nations institutionalized peace culture.According this much-quoted document, peacemaking is defined as action bring hostile parties agreement, essentially through such peaceful means as those foreseen in Chapter VI of Charter of United Nations.1 Consequently, driven by ratio of conceptual proximity, peacekeeping is portrayed as the deployment of United Nations presence in field, hitherto with consent of all parties concerned, normally involving United Nations military and/or police personnel and frequently civilians as well.2 The obvious conceptual connection between peacemaking and peacekeeping is further exemplified and summarized by Boutros-Ghali at end of paragraph, since peacekeeping is referred as a technique that expands possibilities for both prevention of conflict and making of peace.3 Moreover, peacebuilding is termed postconflict.. .action identify and support structures which will tend strengthen and solidify peace in order avoid relapse into conflict.4 The theoretical proximity and operational linkage of these terms are subject an overriding criterion: peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peacebuilding are nothing less than means attain UN charter's preamble goal to save succeeding generations from scourge of war.Still, none of aforementioned terms is cited expressis verbis in UN charter: distinction between peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peace enforcement reflects express and implied boundaries, as well as latent interpretations of chapters VI and VII of UN charter. Whereas peacemaking provides for non-restrictive list of peaceful - diplomatic and judicial - means of dispute settlement in chapter VI, peacekeeping is be situated somewhere before peace enforcement - before sanctions regime foreseen by chapter VII. Moreover, peacekeeping has always been described as an imagined chapter six-and-a-half-a sui generis technique that proved be successful improvisation during Cold War and an even more promising conflict-resolution tool after Cold War. Furthermore, Boutros-Ghali underscores remaining pillar, peacebuilding, as an essential and structural underpinning of others:peacemaking and peace-keeping operations, be truly successful, must come include comprehensive efforts identify and support structures which will tend consolidate peace and advance sense of confidence and well-being among people. Through agreements ending civil strife, these may include disarming previously warring parties and restoration of order, custody and possible destruction of weapons, repatriating refugees, advisory and training support for security personnel, monitoring elections, advancing efforts protect human rights, reforming or strengthening governmental institutions and promoting formal and informal processes of political participation.5The above excerpt defines peacebuilding more as process than completion of one. But since Agenda for peace, concept of peacebuilding has been further elaborated, expanded, and refined, covering broader post-conflict agenda. The Brahimi panel on United Nations peace operations encapsulated ideas and proposals set forward by BoutrosGhali. In its hands, peacebuilding is more than process and more than an instrumentalist method secure peace. The Brahimi panel expands it deontological sphere of quasi solidarity right, as if it is empowered trigger an actio popularis. …