Purpose: Fecal incontinence (FI) has been receiving increased attention from health care providers. Better characterization of patients is needed to improve understanding and treatment. Differentiation of patients based on frequency and severity of fecal incontinence includes major incontinence (MajorI) representing frequent (at least one episode per week) occurrence of urge or passive incontinence and minor incontinence (minorI) representing occasional leakage. Some patients with fecal incontinence may also have concomitant constipation and urinary incontinence. Aim: To characterize fecal incontinence (FI) using both symptoms and motility testing. Methods: Patients referred to the Temple University GI Motility Laboratory for anorectal manometry between January to May 2008 filled out a questionnaire using validated questions and underwent anorectal manometry (ARM), anal electromyography (EMG), and balloon expulsion testing (BET). Results: Thirty-nine patients with FI were evaluated; fifteen patients had MajorI and twenty-four had minorI. Patients with MajorI reported 34 ± 12 stools per week compared to only 7 ± 2 for patients with minorI (P= 0.01). Constipation was present in 5/15 (33%) MajorI patients but in 18/23 (78%) minorI patients (P= 0.01). MajorI patients described their stool as 5.1 ± 0.6 on the Bristol stool form scale compared to 3.4 ± 0.5 for minor I (P= 0.05). Urinary incontinence was present among 9/15 (60%) MajorI patients and 6/24 (38%) minorI patients (P= 0.20). Of the 39 patients with FI, physiologic abnormalities included low resting anal sphincter pressure (12 patients), low volitional contractile response of the external anal sphincter (16 patients), elevated threshold for first sensation (18 patients), paradoxical EMG response while bearing down (17 patients), and prolonged balloon expulsion (16 patients). Compared to patients with minorI, patients with MajorI tended to have lower resting basal anal pressure (63 ± 9 vs 68 ± 4 mmHg; P= 0.59) and volitional contractile response (57 ± 15 vs 73 ± 11 mmHg; P= 0.39), but higher threshold for first sensation (29 ± 3 vs 25 ± 2 ml; P= 0.10), desire to defecate (129 ± 33 vs 87 ± 8 ml; P= 0.41), and maximum tolerable volume (167 ± 20 vs 142 ± 15 ml; P= 0.32). Evidence for dyssynergic defecation was present among 5/15 (33%) patients with MajorI and 11/24 (46%) patients with minorI (P= 0.52). Conclusion: Patients with major incontinence reported more frequent bowel movements and looser stools than those with minor incontinence. Interestingly, patients with minor incontinence also frequently reported constipation. Careful symptom evaluation in patients with fecal incontinence complements anal manometry in characterizing patients with fecal incontinence.