Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

Secukinumab: A Review in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Secukinumab (Cosentyx®) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, a proinflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Administered subcutaneously, the first-in-class anti-IL-17 agent is approved in numerous countries worldwide for the treatment of adults with active PsA. In the phase III FUTURE trials, secukinumab 150 or 300 mg improved the clinical signs and symptoms of PsA versus placebo in patients with active disease despite previous treatment with NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). The benefits of secukinumab were seen regardless of whether or not patients had received previous TNFi therapy, and were maintained during longer term (up to 5 years) treatment. In FUTURE 1 and 5, secukinumab inhibited structural joint damage and was associated with sustained low rates of radiographic progression through 1–3 years of treatment. Treatment with secukinumab improved physical function and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and was generally well tolerated, both in the short- and longer-term. In the head-to-head EXCEED trial, secukinumab did not quite attain statistical significance for superiority versus adalimumab in the joint domain. In conclusion, secukinumab is effective across all key PsA domains and is generally well tolerated, and thus represents a useful treatment alternative to TNFi and other bDMARDs in adult patients with active PsA.

Serum Metabolomics Signatures Associated With Ankylosing Spondylitis and TNF Inhibitor Therapy

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a type of spondyloarthropathies, the diagnosis of which is often delayed. The lack of early diagnosis tools often delays the institution of appropriate therapy. This study aimed to investigate the systemic metabolic shifts associated with AS and TNF inhibitors treatment. Additionally, we aimed to define reliable serum biomarkers for the diagnosis. We employed an untargeted technique, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS), to analyze the serum metabolome of 32 AS individuals before and after 24-week TNF inhibitors treatment, as well as 40 health controls (HCs). Multivariate and univariate statistical analyses were used to profile the differential metabolites associated with AS and TNF inhibitors. A diagnostic panel was established with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The pathway analysis was also conducted. A total of 55 significantly differential metabolites were detected. We generated a diagnostic panel comprising five metabolites (L-glutamate, arachidonic acid, L-phenylalanine, PC (18:1(9Z)/18:1(9Z)), 1-palmitoylglycerol), capable of distinguishing HCs from AS with a high AUC of 0.998, (95%CI: 0.992–1.000). TNF inhibitors treatment could restore the equilibrium of 21 metabolites. The most involved pathways in AS were amino acid biosynthesis, glycolysis, glutaminolysis, fatty acids biosynthesis and choline metabolism. This study characterized the serum metabolomics signatures of AS and TNF inhibitor therapy. We developed a five-metabolites-based panel serving as a diagnostic tool to separate patients from HCs. This serum metabolomics study yielded new knowledge about the AS pathogenesis and the systemic effects of TNF inhibitors.

CCL25 and CCR9 is a unique pathway that potentiates pannus formation by remodeling RA macrophages into mature osteoclasts.

This study elucidates the mechanism of CCL25 and CCR9 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA synovial fluid (SF) expresses elevated levels of CCL25 compared to OA SF and plasma from RA and normal. CCL25 was released into RA SF by fibroblasts (FLS) and macrophages (MΦs) stimulated with IL-1β and IL-6. CCR9 is also presented on IL-1β and IL-6 activated RA FLS and differentiated MΦs. Conversely, in RA PBMCs neither CCL25 nor CCR9 are impacted by 3-month longitudinal TNF inhibitor therapy. CCL25 amplifies RA FLS and monocyte infiltration via p38 and ERK phosphorylation. CCL25-stimulated RA FLS secrete potentiated levels of IL-8 which is disrupted by p38 and ERK inhibitors. CCL25 polarizes RA monocytes into nontraditional M1 MΦs that produce IL-8 and CCL2. Activation of p38 and ERK cascades are also responsible for the CCL25-induced M1 MΦ development. Unexpectedly, CCL25 was unable to polarize RA PBMCs into effector Th1/Th17 cells. Consistently, lymphokine like RANKL was uninvolved in CCL25-induced osteoclastogenesis; however, this manifestation was regulated by osteoclastic factors such as RANK, cathepsin K (CTSK), and TNF-α. In short, we reveal that CCL25/CCR9 manipulates RA FLS and MΦ migration and inflammatory phenotype in addition to osteoclast formation via p38 and ERK activation.

Cost-utility analysis of treatment options after initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who discontinued initial treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), 2 approaches are commonly used: cycling to another TNFi or switching to a drug with another mechanism of action. Currently, there is no consensus on which approach to use first. A report from the IBM MarketScan Research administrative claims database showed adalimumab (cycling strategy) and abatacept (switching strategy) were more commonly prescribed after the first TNFi discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of adalimumab versus abatacept in patients with RA whose initial TNFi therapy failed. METHODS: A probabilistic cost-utility microsimulation state-transition model was used. Our target population was commercially insured adults with RA, the time horizon was 10 years, and we used a payer perspective. Patients not responding to adalimumab or abatacept were moved to the next drug in a sequence of 3 and, finally, to conventional synthetic therapy. Incremental cost-utility ratios (2016 USD per quality-adjusted-life-year gained [QALY)] were calculated. Utilities were derived from a formula based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and age-adjusted comorbidity score. RESULTS: Switching to abatacept after the first TNFi showed an incremental cost of just more than $11,300 over 10 years and achieved a QALY benefit of 0.16 compared with adalimumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $68,950 per QALY. Scenario analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio range of $44,573 per QALY to $148,558 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that switching to abatacept after TNFi therapy failure had an 80.6% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to abatacept is a cost-effective strategy for patients with RA whose discontinue initial therapy with TNFi. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this project was provided by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award (principal investigator: Maria A. Lopez-Olivo). Karpes Matusevich's work was supported by a Doctoral Dissertation Research Award from the University of Texas, School of Public Health Office of Research. Lal reports competing interests outside of the submitted work (employed by Optum). Suarez-Almazor reports competing interests outside of the submitted work (consulting fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Agile Therapeutics, Amag Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead). Chan, Swint, and Cantor have nothing to disclose.

Perceived clinical utility of a test for predicting inadequate response to TNF inhibitor therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a decision impact study

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies are often the first biologic therapy used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, a substantial fraction of patients do not respond adequately to TNFi therapies. A test with the ability to predict response would inform therapeutic decision-making and improve clinical and financial outcomes. A 32-question decision-impact survey was conducted with 248 rheumatologists to gauge the perceived clinical utility of a novel test that predicts inadequate response to TNFi therapies in RA patients. Participants were informed about the predictive characteristics of the test and asked to indicate prescribing decisions based on four result scenarios. Overall, rheumatologists had a favorable view of the test: 80.2% agreed that it would improve medical decision-making, 92.3% said it would increase their confidence when making prescribing decisions, and 81.5% said it would be useful when considering TNFi therapies. Rheumatologists would be more likely to prescribe a TNFi therapy when the test reported that no signal of non-response was detected (79.8%) and less likely to prescribe a TNFi therapy when a signal of non-response was detected (11.3%–25.4%). Rheumatologists (84.7%) agreed that payers should provide coverage for such a test. This study shows that rheumatologists support the clinical need for a test to predict inadequate response to TNFi therapies. Test results were perceived to lead to changes in prescribing behaviors as results instill confidence in the ordering rheumatologist.

Relation Between Fatigue and ACR Response in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy: A Population-based Cohort Study.

The objective of this population-based cohort study was to investigate the association between fatigue with disease activity and drug survival in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving their first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Data on patient characteristics, disease activity, and drug survival were obtained from the DANBIO database on all patients with PsA from 2006 through 2015. Information on comorbidities was obtained through linkage with the Danish National Patient Registry. A total of 880 patients were eligible for analyses. Patients with upper median fatigue scores had statistically significant higher disease activity measures (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on C-reactive protein), pain, and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores; tender joint counts; comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2); and current smoking status at baseline compared to patients with lower median fatigue scores (P < 0.05). In the upper median fatigue group, fewer patients achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and improvements in visual analog scale (VAS) fatigue compared to patients in the lower median fatigue group. Kaplan-Meier curves showed shorter drug survival in patients in the upper median fatigue group compared with the lower median fatigue group at 6-month follow-up. Fatigue remains a dominating symptom after TNFi treatment, and is associated with higher baseline disease activity, pain, and HAQ scores; more comorbidities; and increased risk of TNFi treatment discontinuation in a cohort of Danish patients with PsA. The agreement between ACR and VAS fatigue responses is weak to moderate, suggesting heterogeneity between experienced fatigue and joint inflammation.

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies with Biologics in Accordance with Treatment Guidelines for Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Patient-Level Model.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a form of rheumatic disease caused by chronic inflammation of the axial skeleton. Patients with AS experience significant functional limitations and reduced quality of life. Consequently, AS imposes a substantial economic burden on society due to productivity loss and work disability. Biologics, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody (IL-17A) agents, are effective treatment strategies in relieving symptoms and slowing down disease progression. Currently, 5 TNF inhibitors and 2 IL-17A antibody agents are approved by the FDA for the management of AS. Of these agents, there is no clear preferred agent in initial biologic therapy, although an IL-17A antibody agent or alternative TNF inhibitor agent is recommended after failure of the initial TNF inhibitor therapy. To assess cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies with biologics, TNF inhibitor or IL-17A, in accordance with the treatment guidelines for patients with AS. An economic patient-level simulation combining decision-tree and Markov models was constructed from the U.S. health care payer's perspective over a 10-year time horizon. The current model examined 5 treatment strategies: (1) conventional care treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, (2) 1 TNF inhibitor, (3) an IL-17A antibody agent, (4) sequential therapy with 2 TNF inhibitors, and (5) sequential therapy with a TNF inhibitor followed by an IL-17A antibody agent. Initially, treatment responses were determined after 12-week treatments. Patients who responded to treatment entered a "responders" Markov model. Patients entered a "nonresponders" Markov model if they inadequately responded to treatment. In sequential treatment strategies, patients who inadequately responded to treatment with the first TNF inhibitor received a second TNF inhibitor or an IL-17A antibody agent. Health utility was estimated based on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Functional Index (BASFI) scores. The models accounted for real-world adherence to TNF inhibitor treatment. Scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness and uncertainty of the model results. Over a 10-year time horizon and 100,000 simulated patients for each treatment strategy, base-case results produced average total discounted per-patient costs of $19,765, $130,302, $159,934, $190,553, and $179,118 and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 4.675, 5.410, 5.499, 5.919, and 5.893 for conventional care, treatment strategies with 1 TNF inhibitor, an IL-17A, 2 TNF inhibitors, and a TNF inhibitor followed by an IL-17A, respectively. The optimal treatments at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds ≤ $130,813 per QALY, between $130,813 per QALY and $442,728 per QALY, and > $442,728 per QALY were conventional care and sequential treatment strategies with 1 TNF inhibitor, followed by an IL-17A agent and 2 TNF inhibitors, respectively. Study findings suggested that all treatment strategies with biologics, TNF inhibitors or IL-17A antibody agents, in the treatment guidelines for AS were not cost-effective at the common WTP of $100,000 per QALY. However, the sequential treatment with 1 TNF inhibitor followed by an IL-17A antibody agent was considered cost-effective at a higher WTP of $150,000 per QALY. No outside funding supported this study. The authors have nothing to disclose. Primary findings of this study were presented in part at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) in Baltimore, MD, May 2018.

Persistence on biologic DMARD monotherapy after achieving rheumatoid arthritis disease control on combination therapy: retrospective analysis of corrona registry data

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.

Efficacy and safety results from a randomized double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar ABP 798 with rituximab reference product in subjects with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis

Background/objectivesABP 798 is a proposed biosimilar to the originator biologic rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. This comparative clinical study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of ABP 798 versus rituximab reference product (RP) in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsAdults with moderate-to-severe RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including 1 or more tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapies (n = 311) received ABP 798, US-sourced rituximab RP (rituximab US), or EU-sourced rituximab RP (rituximab EU) (1000 mg, 2 weeks apart). At week 24, ABP 798- or rituximab EU-treated subjects received a second dose of the same treatment, while rituximab US-treated subjects transitioned to receive ABP 798. The key efficacy endpoint was DAS28-CRP change from baseline at week 24. Other efficacy endpoints included DAS28-CRP at other time points; ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 criteria; and hybrid ACR. The rituximab RP groups were pooled for all efficacy endpoints since PK equivalence had been established between rituximab US and rituximab EU.ResultsClinical equivalence between ABP 798 and rituximab RP was established as the 90% confidence interval for DAS28-CRP change from baseline at week 24 fell within the prespecified equivalence margin (− 0.6, 0.6). Safety and immunogenicity profiles of ABP 798 were comparable across treatment groups and not affected by single transition from RP to ABP 798.ConclusionsClinical equivalence in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity was established between ABP 798 and rituximab RP in this comparative clinical trial in patients with moderate-to-severe RA.Key Points• ABP 798 provided similar efficacy as rituximab reference product (RP) in patients with moderate-severe rheumatoid arthritis.• The safety and immunogenicity profiles for ABP 798 were similar to those for the rituximab RP.• The single transition from rituximab RP to ABP 798 did not show differences in efficacy, safety, or immunogenicity.

Dry eye in rheumatoid arthritis patients under TNF-inhibitors: conjunctival goblet cell as an early ocular biomarker

Dry eye disease (DED) is common in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients. The application of conjunctival goblet cell count as a clinical biomarker to diagnose and respond to treatment can take place in rheumatoid arthritis patients under TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the ocular surface parameters and the long-term effects of TNFi therapy on ocular surface features and goblet cell count of rheumatoid arthritis patients. At baseline, rheumatoid arthritis patients eligible to TNFi were compared to healthy controls (similar age/gender), regarding Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Schirmer I test, tear break-up time test, vital dye staining of the ocular surface, and conjunctival impression cytology. DED severity grade, impression cytology score, and goblet cell count were analyzed. Rheumatoid arthritis patients were followed after three (3 M) and 12 months (12 M), during TNFi treatment. Sixteen rheumatoid arthritis patients and 24 controls were compared: a higher frequency of abnormal OSDI (68.8% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.002), Schirmer’s test < 10 mm (37.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.042), meibomian gland dysfunction (50% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.007), abnormal impression cytology (75% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), and mild to moderate DED (81.3% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001) were observed in rheumatoid arthritis patients, who also had lower goblet cell count [325 (274–707) cells/mm2 vs. 742 (562–863) cells/mm2, p = 0.004]. The presence of Meibomian gland dysfunction was associated with higher disease activity scores (p < 0.05). The prospective early observation of these patients at 3 M showed an increase improvement in tear production by Schirmer’s test [13 (7.5–17.5) vs. 23.5 (16–35); p = 0.001], and an improvement in impression cytology score [1 (0.5–2) vs. 1 (0–1), p = 0.031] and in goblet cell count [325 (274–707) vs. 931 (656–1,244), p < 0.001]. Eight RA responders to TNFi were also re-evaluated at 12 M with further improvement in goblet cell count [393 (275–827) vs. 872 (502–1,185) vs. 1,079 (867–1,244), p = 0.047]. Multifactorial DED is frequent in RA patients, comprising aqueous, lipid, and mucin components. TNFi prompt improves tear production and recovers the goblet cells, which can be a biomarker of the pathological process and response to therapy in this population.

Active implications for dermatologists in 'SARS-CoV-2 ERA': Personal experience and review of literature.

Linked articles: COVID‐19 SPECIAL FORUM. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34: e346–e380.

Peripheral Enthesitis Detected by Ultrasonography in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis-Anatomical Distribution, Morphology, and Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-Inhibitor Therapy.

Objectives: To investigate the anatomical distribution, morphological abnormalities and response to adalimumab therapy of ultrasound(US)-detected peripheral enthesitis in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, investigator-initiated trial (NCT01029847), patients with axial SpA according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria were randomized to subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg every other week or placebo from baseline to week 6. From week 6 to 24, all patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Of 49 patients enrolled, 21 patients participated in our observational US sub-study. US assessment applying the OMERACT US definitions for enthesitis of 10 peripheral entheseal regions of the upper and lower extremities and clinical examination were performed at baseline, weeks 6 and 24. US was performed by one experienced investigator. Hypo-echogenicity, increased thickness and Doppler activity of the enthesis were considered signs of active inflammation, whereas insertional bone erosions, intratendinous calcifications, and enthesophytes were regarded as signs of structural lesions.Results: Enthesitis on US was mostly present in the lower limbs, especially in the Achilles tendon (81%), the quadriceps tendon (62%), and the greater femoral trochanter (52%). Structural lesions were predominant (38 vs. 12% of examined entheses with inflammatory changes), particularly in the entheses of the lower limbs, and exhibited no change during treatment.Conclusion: US-detected structural lesions were common while inflammatory lesions were relatively rare in patients initiating adalimumab due to axial SpA. Structural lesions did not appear to change during 24 weeks follow-up, suggesting that these lesions may not be helpful outcome measures in short-term clinical trials.

Clinical Validation of a Blood-Based Predictive Test for Stratification of Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Objectives: For rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients failing to achieve treatment targets with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (...

OP0019 STABLE VERSUS TAPERED AND WITHDRAWN TREATMENT WITH TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITOR IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS REMISSION (ARCTIC REWIND): A RANDOMISED, OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 4, NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL

Background:Remission is the preferred treatment target in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and many patients require biologic DMARDs to reach this state. It is debated whether tapering of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment to discontinuation should be considered in RA patients who sustain remission on treatment (1).Objectives:The primary study objective was to assess the effect of tapering and withdrawal of TNFi on the risk of flares in RA patients in clinical remission.Methods:In the non-inferiority ARCTIC REWIND trial, RA patients in remission for at least 12 months on stable TNFi therapy were randomly assigned to continued stable TNFi or tapering (half-dose TNFi for 4 months, thereafter withdrawal of TNFi), with visits every four months. csDMARD co-medication was kept stable in both arms. Patients had to be in DAS remission at inclusion with 0/44 swollen joints. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with disease flare during the 12-month study period (defined as DAS&gt;1.6, change in DAS&gt;0.6 and 2 or more swollen joints, or the physician and patient agreed that a clinically significant flare had occurred). Full-dose TNFi was reinstated in case of flares in the tapering arm. The non-inferiority margin was 20%, with a predefined superiority test if non-inferiority was not shown. The inferiority null-hypothesis was tested in the per-protocol population by mixed effect logistic regression. Radiographs were scored by van der Heijde modified Sharp score (0 and 12 months, average of two readers, progression: ≥1 unit change). ClinicaltrialsNCT01881308.Results:We randomised 99 patients, 92 received the allocated treatment strategy, 84 were included in the per-protocol population. Baseline characteristics, clinical and ultrasound disease activity were balanced (Table). csDMARD co-medication was used by 93% in the stable and 88% in the tapering arm. In the primary analysis, 5% of patients in the stable TNFi arm experienced a flare during 12 months, compared to 63% in the tapering TNFi arm. The risk difference (95% CI) was 58% (42% to 74%, Fig 1), with stable treatment being deemed superior to tapering. 90% in the stable and 81% in the tapering arm did not show progression of radiographic joint damage, difference (95% CI) -9% (-24%, 6%). At 12 months, DAS scores, DAS remission and function were similar between groups (Fig 2). The numbers of adverse events (AE)/serious AE in the stable and tapering arm were 57/2 and 50/3, respectively, with 26 and 15 infections.Conclusion:In a randomised clinical trial assessing patients in prolonged and deep RA remission, we observed a large increase in the flare rate in patients who tapered and discontinued TNFi. Patients responded well to reinstated treatment and remission rates in the two study arms were comparable at 12 months.

Pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature research for the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis

ObjectiveTo perform an update of a review of the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsThis is a systematic literature research of 2015–2018 publications on...

PMS28 COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT OPTIONS AFTER INITIAL TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITOR THERAPY FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

To use real-world data to analyze the cost-utility of sequences of therapeutic drugs used by rheumatoid arthritis patients whose initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy failed. We developed a microsimulation Markov model to analyze 10,000 rheumatoid arthritis patients (80% female, mean age 52yrs) beginning their second biological treatment with adalimumab (cycling) or abatacept (swapping) and followed them for 10 years or until death. Patients not responding switched to the next drug in a sequence of three (adalimumab-abatacept-tocilizumab versus abatacept-tocilizumab-rituximab) and then shifted to palliative treatment. Demographics, the most common drug choice per cycling or swapping cohorts, subsequent treatment sequences, direct medical costs, and transition probabilities were derived from a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the 2008-2016 Truven Health MarketScan Research database. Baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) were derived from an age-adjusted comorbidity index and converted to utilities using the formula from the Birmingham Rheumatoid Arthritis Model. Scenario analysis was used to vary the time horizon, utility formula and baseline HAQ-DI. We also performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Swapping to a sequence beginning with abatacept showed an incremental discounted cost of $11,357 over ten years and achieved a discounted cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) benefit of 0.16 compared with cycling to adalimumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $68,950/QALY was within current willingness-to-pay thresholds. Scenario analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio range of $44,573/QALY to $148,558/QALY: abatacept was more cost-effective over longer periods of time and when baseline HAQ was lower. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that swapping to abatacept after tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy failure had an 80.6% likelihood of being cost-effective at $100,000/QALY. Abatacept is a cost-effective strategy for rheumatoid arthritis patients whose initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy fails. Being able to stratify patients by reason for switch would improve the validity of our conclusions.

Costs and Health Outcomes Associated with Tofacitinib Treatment for Active Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic progressive inflammatory condition associated with significant direct and indirect costs. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA. Economic evaluations, alongside clinical data, help inform papers and formulary decisions in the United States. To evaluate outcomes and costs of including tofacitinib in treatment strategies for PsA from a third-party U.S. payer perspective, using a health economic model. A decision tree model was developed to evaluate treatment sequences (up to 4 lines of advanced PsA therapy) with or without tofacitinib. Patients included in the model had active PsA and a previous inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. The analysis time horizon was 2 years; decision points for continuing/switching treatments occurred quarterly, based on clinical response (assessed using the primary rheumatoid measure of efficacy, American College of Rheumatology [ACR]20 response only) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Costs included those related to ADRs and drug acquisition, monitoring, and administration. Other endpoints of PsA, such as assessment of enthesitis and dactylitis, were not integrated into the model. Treatment strategies including tofacitinib were associated with cost savings versus strategies without tofacitinib across all modeled scenarios, with an estimated 2-year cost saving of up to $8,454,858, based on 1 million insurants. Similarly, costs per member per month and per ACR20 responder were lower for sequences including tofacitinib versus sequences without. These savings arose because of lower ADR and drug acquisition/administration costs for sequences including tofacitinib. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust. This analysis suggests that including tofacitinib in the treatment of active PsA in csDMARD-IR or TNFi-IR patients is a cost-saving alternative to sequences without tofacitinib, potentially reducing costs for PsA advanced therapies by up to $8.4 million over 2 years for payers insuring 1 million individuals. This work was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Bungey is an employee of Decision Resources Group, which received financial support from Pfizer Inc to develop the treatment-cost model used in the development of this manuscript. Chang-Douglass was an employee of Decision Resources Group at the time of the analysis. During development of this publication, Chang-Douglass started a role at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The publication only reflects her views and does not reflect the views of NICE. Hsu, Cappelleri, Young, and Woolcott are employees of Pfizer Inc and own stock or stock options in Pfizer Inc. The data reported in this manuscript have been previously presented at the American College of Rheumatology Annual Scientific Meeting; October 19-24, 2018; Chicago, IL, and the AMCP Annual Meeting and Expo; March 25-28, 2019; San Diego, CA.

Incidence, Clinical Features, Management, and Prevention of Herpes Zoster in Patients Receiving Antitumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Clinical Review.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been used as an excellent therapeutic option in a variety of chronic inflammatory conditions. However, a recognized significant adverse effect of TNF inhibitor therapy is the increased risk of infections. The influence of TNF inhibitors on the course of coexisting or newly developed viral infections has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, we reviewed the recent publications to highlight the incidence, clinical features, management, and prevention of herpes zoster in patients who are receiving TNF inhibitors.

O07 Randomised, open labelled clinical trial to investigate synovial mechanisms determining response: resistance to rituximab versus tocilizumab in RA patients failing TNF inhibitor therapy

Abstract Background Biologic therapies have transformed the outlook for RA but the significant health economic impact of these therapies has highlighted the need to define predictive markers of response. Rituximab (RTX) is licensed for use following failure of csDMARDs and TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. However, in this increasing therapeutically resistant cohort only 30% of patients achieve an ACR50 response. The observation in early RA that 50% of patients show low/absence of synovial B-cells prompted us to test the hypothesis that in these patients a biologic agent targeting alternative pathways maybe more effective. We report results from the first pathobiology-driven randomised controlled trial (RCT) in RA (R4RA) evaluating whether patient stratification according to the synovial B-cell rich/poor status enriches for response/non response to RTX. Methods R4RA is a phase IV open-label RCT conducted in 19 European centres recruiting patients failing or intolerant to csDMARD therapy and at least one TNFi. Synovial tissue was obtained at trial entry and used to classify patients as B-cell rich or poor using both histological and RNA-seq classification criteria. Patients were randomised to receive RTX or tocilizumab (TCZ). The study was powered to test in the B cell poor population superiority of TCZ over RTX at 16 weeks. The primary and co-primary end-points were defined respectively as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≥50% improvement from baseline and Major Treatment response (MTR)= CDAI improvement ≥ 50% and CDAI ≤10.1. Results The trial recruited to target (n = 164) with a power of 89.5%. In the B cell poor cohort a numerically higher number of patients achieved the primary endpoint and a significantly higher number of patients achieved co-primary endpoint (MTR). Classification of patients as B cell poor/rich according to RNA-seq criteria enhanced the difference between TCZ and RTX, with a significantly higher number of TCZ treated patients reaching both CDAI 50% improvement and CDAI MTR in the B-cell poor group. Conclusion In a RA B cell poor population failing csDMARDs and TNFi therapy, TCZ is more effective than RTX. This first biopsy-driven RCT suggests clinical utility for integrating molecular pathology profiling into treatment algorithms to allocate targeted therapies. Disclosures F. Humby: Honoraria; Roche, Pfizer. Grants/research support; Pfizer. P. Durez: BMS,Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB. M. Buch: Consultancies; Pfizer, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Grants/research support; Pfizer, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Sanofi. M. Lewis: None. M. Bombardieri: None. H. Rizvi: None. S. Kelly: None. L. Fossati: None. R. Hands: None. G. Giorli: None. A. Mahto: None. C. Montecucco: None. B. Lauwerys: None. V.C. Romao: None. A.G. Pratt: Member of speakers’ bureau; Eli Lilly and Janssen-Cilag Ltd. Grants/research support; Pfizer. S. Bugatti: None. N. Ng: None. F. Rivellese: None. P. Ho: None. M. Bellan: None. P. Sainaghi: None. P. Verschueren: None. N. Gendi: None. B. Dasgupta: Abbvie, BMS, GSK, Roche, Roche Chugai, Sanofi, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi-Aventis. A. Cauli: BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Lilly MSD, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sigma Wesseumen, UCB. C. John: None. A. Nerviani: None. G. Thornborn: None. D. Holroyd: None. M. Congia: None. C. Thompson: None. P. Reynolds: None. J. Cañete: None. R. J. Moots: Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sandoz, UCB. P.C. Taylor: AbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Fresenius, Fresenius SE &amp; Co, Galapagos, Gilead. GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, UCB. C. Edwards: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Fresenius, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. J. Isaacs: None. P. Sasieni: None. J. E. Fonesca: None. E. Choy: AbbVie, Abbvie, Roche, Chugai, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Regeneron, R-Pharm and Sanofi, Amgen, Amgen, Roche, Chugai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly Janssen, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi and UCB., AstraZeneca, Bio-Cancer, Bio-Cancer, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, Pfizer and UCB ,Biogen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Hospira, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, Merrimack Pharmaceutical, Napp, Novartis, Novimmune, ObsEva, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, R-Pharm, Sanofi, SynAct Pharma, Tonix, Union Chimique Belge. C. Pitzalis: None. NIHR have funded the study.

P248 Subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg provides rapid and sustained relief in total and nocturnal back pain, morning stiffness and fatigue in patients with active AS over 4 years

Abstract Background Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory condition with pain, stiffness and fatigue reported as the most troubling symptoms. Early and sustained relief of these symptoms is essential for effective management. Secukinumab provided sustained relief from pain and fatigue in AS patients over 2 years in the MEASURE 2 study. We report the effect of subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg on key clinical symptoms (pain, morning stiffness and fatigue) in AS patients over 208 weeks in MEASURE 2. Methods This post-hoc analysis of MEASURE 2 assessed mean change from baseline to Week 208 in total and nocturnal back pain scores (by VAS [0-100]; ASAS outcome component), overall level of spinal pain (neck, back or hip) from BASDAI scores, and morning stiffness (overall level; mean of question 5 and 6 of BASDAI score). Additionally, the SF-36 physical component summary score, overall level of fatigue (BASDAI question 1), FACIT-Fatigue score and patients meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria across multiple clinical domains were assessed. Data are shown for patients originally randomised to secukinumab 150 mg and placebo. Data are reported as observed for the overall population and by prior TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy status (naive vs inadequate response [IR]). Results Baseline characteristics were comparable across secukinumab 150 mg (N = 72) and placebo (N = 74) groups; total mean back pain score was 67.7±17.79, nocturnal back pain score was 64.9±19.58 and morning stiffness was 6.5±2.11. Secukinumab 150 mg-treated patients reported rapid and early reductions in pain scores by Week 4, which were sustained through Week 208 (Table 1). Improvements with secukinumab 150 mg were reported for all key clinical symptoms by Week 4, which were sustained at Week 208. A higher proportion of secukinumab 150 mg-treated patients met MCID criteria at Week 16 vs placebo across multiple clinical domains, which was sustained or further improved through Week 208. Improvements were observed in TNFi-naive and -IR patients, with a greater magnitude of improvement in TNFi-naive patients. Conclusion Secukinumab 150 mg was associated with rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in total and nocturnal back pain, morning stiffness and fatigue, with improvements sustained over 4 years of treatment. Disclosures H. Marzo-Ortega: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis. C. Miceli-Richard: Consultancies; Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Wyeth, Merck. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, Wyeth. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Wyeth. S. Gill: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme. Other; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme. M. Magery: Consultancies; Eli Lilly, Novartis. Grants/research support; AbbVie, UCB, Amgen. P.G.P. Machado: Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of Novartis. A. Shete: Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of Novartis. J. Wang: Other; Employee of Novartis. S. Rohrer: Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis. Other; Employee of Novartis. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Grants/research support; Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB.