Tirofiban Group Research Articles

Tirofiban in the treatment of cancer-associated ischemic stroke.

It is still unknown whether early tirofiban treatment improves prognosis in patients with cancer-related ischemic stroke without intravenous thrombolytic therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in patients with cancer-associated ischemic stroke. A retrospective analysis was performed on 75 patients with cancer and mild to moderate ischemic stroke, 34 of whom received tirofiban treatment and 41 aspirin treatment. The aspirin group received aspirin 100 mg QD, while the tirofiban group received continuous intravenous administration of tirofiban at a dosage of 0.1 μg/kg/min for 48 hours before switching to oral aspirin. The 24-hour and 7-day National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores for the tirofiban group were lower than those for the aspirin group (p=0.017 and p=0.035, respectively). The proportion of intracerebral hemorrhage occurring within 7 days did not differ significantly between the two groups (p>0.05), and neither did the 90-day Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores nor the incidence of ischemic stroke. Early administration of tirofiban in the treatment of mild to moderate ischemic stroke is safe, which can reduce 24-hour and 7-day NIHSS scores and has potential value.

Safety and Efficacy of Tirofiban Bridging Therapy During a Hybrid Carotid Artery Stenting and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Single-center Study

The optimal perioperative antithrombosis management for carotid artery stenting (CAS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) hybrid surgeries remains unclear; however, a more aggressive antithrombotic therapy might be required after a hybrid CAS+CABG duo stent-related intimal injury or the use of protamine-neutralizing heparin. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of tirofiban as a bridging therapy after a hybrid CAS+CABG surgery. Between June 2018 and February 2022, a total of 45 patients undergoing a hybrid CAS+off-pump CABG surgery were divided into either the control group (standard dual antiplatelet therapy postsurgery, n=27) or the tirofiban group (tirofiban bridging+dual antiplatelet therapy, n=18). The 30-day outcome was compared between the 2 groups, and the primary end points included stroke, postoperative myocardial infarction, and death. Two patients (7.41%) from the control group experienced a stroke. There was a trend toward a lower rate of composite end points, including stroke, postoperative myocardial infarction, and death, within the tirofiban group that did not reach statistical significance (0% vs 11.1%; P=0.264). The need for a transfusion was similar between the 2 groups (33.33% vs 29.63%; P=0.793). There were no major bleeding events in the 2 groups. Tirofiban bridging therapy was safe, with a trend toward reducing the risk of ischemic events after a hybrid CAS+off-pump CABG surgery. Tirofiban might be a feasible periprocedural bridging protocol in high-risk patients.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy after Emergency Stenting in Patients Exhibiting Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Associated with Large-vessel Occlusion with and without Intravenous Infusion of Tirofiban

PurposeIntracranial rescue stent angioplasty is a bailout strategy for acute stroke patients in cases of unsuccessful endovascular thrombectomy due to underlying atherosclerotic stenosis. However, there is no consensus on a preprocedural and intraprocedural antiplatelet regimen. The aim of this single-centre study was to compare the safety and efficacy of emergency stenting in patients exhibiting intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related acute large-vessel occlusion with or without peri-interventional intravenous infusion of tirofiban.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 78 patients who were treated with rescuestent angioplasty between 2010 and 2019 due to acute ischaemic stroke. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received peri-interventional intravenous tirofiban and those who did not receive tirofiban. We compared clinical safety and functional outcomes in both treatment groups with symptomatic haemorrhage as the primary endpoint. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between tirofiban and outcome measures.ResultsThirty-seven patients were treated with intravenous tirofiban (47.4%), and 41 patients did not receive intravenous tirofiban (52.6%). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of symptomatic haemorrhage (16.2% in the tirofiban group versus 14.6% in the control group, p = 0.847). The 3-month mortality (21.6% in the tirofiban group versus 17.1% in the control group, p = 0.611) and good functional outcomes according to the modified Rankin scale (45.9% versus 34.1%, p = 0.289) were comparable.ConclusionThe results of our study suggest that the application of tirofiban for rescue stenting after failed mechanical thrombectomy is safe.

Abstract TMP7: Efficacy And Safety Of Intravenous Tirofiban Combined With Endovascular Therapy For The Treatment Of Basilar Artery Occlusion Due To Large-artery Atherosclerotic

Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether intravenous tirofiban can improve the functional outcome without promoting risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) due to large-artery atherosclerotic (LAA) receiving endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods: Consecutive patients with acute BAO duet to LAA within 24 h who underwent EVT and had tirofiban treatment from the BASILAR Registry study were enrolled. All eligible patients were dichotomized into tirofiban and non-tirofiban subgroups according the use of intravenous tirofiban. The primary efficacy outcome was the favorable functional outcome (defined as mRS score of 3 or less), Safety outcomes were mortality within 90 days and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) within 48 hours. Results: A total of 417 patients were included in this study, of which 275 were in the tirofiban group and 142 were in the non-tirofiban group. After adjusting for multiple factors, patient in the tirofiban group were 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.31) times more likely to achieve favorable outcome at 90 days than those in the non-tirofiban group. The mortality of the tirofiban group was higher than that of the non-tirofiban group (40.7% vs. 58.5%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.74-0.89; P <0.001). The 1-year follow-up results were also similar to that at 90 days. Any ICH occurred in 19 (7.1%) patients in the tirofiban group, which was lower than that of 22 (15.8%) in the non-tirofiban group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.68; P=0.004) and symptomatic ICH occurred in 15 (5.2%) patients in the tirofiban group, which was lower than that of 17 (12.2%) in the non-tirofiban group (adjusted risk ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.76; P=0.005). Conclusions: Tirofiban may associated with improve 90-day favorable outcomes and reduced mortality risk decreased incidence of ICH in patients with BAO due to LAA receiving EVT. The treatment effect of tirofiban may be maintained for one year.

Abstract WP8: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The Effect Of Intravenous Tirofiban In Combination With Endovascular Thrombectomy On Functional Outcomes In Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: The RESCUE BT Trial

Background: In the RESCUE BT (Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion) trial, enrollment in extended time window was based on non-contrast computed tomography. To assess whether tirofiban was safe and effective in the RESCUE BT trial according to advance imaging selection criteria based on current American Heart Association guidelines. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, double-blinded and randomized trial that was conducted at 55 centers in China and involved 950 participants with stroke with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion from October 2018 to October 2021. All randomized patients were screened according to the current guidelines and were followed up for 90 days from stroke onset. The primary outcome was the distribution of the 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores. Secondary outcomes included the rates of functional independence (mRS 0-2) and favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Safety outcomes included the incidences of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours and 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 652 patients (319 in tirofiban group and 333 in placebo group) who met the current guidelines were included in this analysis, with median (IQR) age of 68 (58-75) years, 278 (42.6%) were women. The median 90-day mRS score was 3 (IQR, 1-4) in tirofiban group, and 3 (IQR, 1-4) in placebo group. The adjusted common odds ratio (OR) for a lower level of disability with tirofiban than placebo was 1.08 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.83-1.42). Incidence of sICH (10.1% vs 6.3%; adjusted OR 1.70 [95%CI 0.95-3.04]) was not different between groups. However, intravenous tirofiban might be associated with lower disability level (adjusted common OR 1.74 [95%CI 1.14-2.65]; P=0.01) in large artery atherosclerosis patients. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in severity of disability at 90 days with intravenous tirofiban compared with placebo among patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular therapy according to current guidelines. We observed potential benefits of tirofiban in large artery atherosclerosis patients, and further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the present results.

Abstract WP153: Tirofiban Increase Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Endovascular Therapy In Cardio-embolized Stroke Patients: Insight From Rescue Bt Trial

Introduction: Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in endovascular therapy among cardio-embolized ischemic stroke patients remains controversial. We aimed to assess effects of tirofiban before endovascular therapy in cardio-embolized stroke patients. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of Endovascular Treatment With vs Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (RESCUE BT) trial. Before endovascular therapy, participants were randomized to tirofiban or placebo group in ratio of 1:1. Tirofiban was administrated as a bolus dose of 10 ug/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 0.15 ug/kg /min for up to 24-hour. We collected cardio-embolized stroke patients according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification. The efficacy outcome was global disability at 90-day assed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) assessed by Heidelberg bleeding classification within 48-hour. Secondary safety outcome was any radiologic intracranial hemorrhage and death at 90-day. Results: 406 cardio-embolized stroke patients were collected. Tirofiban did not correlated to favorable shift to lower 90-day mRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.64-1.3; P = 0.617). However, tirofiban subgroup had a significantly higher risk of sICH within 48-hour (aOR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.4-7.57; P = 0.006) compared with placebo group. The aOR was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.94-2.19; P = 0.094) for any intracranial hemorrhage and 1.48 (95% CI, 0.88-2.52; P = 0.143) for death at 90-day. Conclusions: Tirofiban increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular therapy in cardio-embolized stroke patients. Figure 1 . Outcomes of endovascular therapy in cardio-embolic stroke participants in tirofiban vs placebo group.

Abstract TMP6: Association Of Tirofiban With Outcomes After Thrombectomy In Stroke Due To Atherosclerosis: An Exploratory Analysis Of The RESCUE BT Placebo-controlled Randomized Trial

Background: The efficacy and safety of tirofiban, as an adjuvant medication of endovascular therapy (EVT), in patients with large vessel occlusion due to atherosclerotic thrombosis was still unclear. Methods: The Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban in Stroke (RESCUE BT) trial was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that was performed at 55 centers in China from October 10, 2018 to October 31, 2021. This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of the RESCUE BT trial and 435 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome was the proportion of functional independence (defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 90 days. We estimated the efficacy and safety of EVT plus placebo versus EVT plus tirofiban using binary logistic regression analysis. A causal mediation analysis was also performed to assess the potential mediators of tirofiban on functional outcome. Results: This study included 435 patients, including 197 patients assigned to the tirofiban group and 238 patients assigned to the placebo group. The median age was 65 [IQR, 56-72] years, and 311 (71.5%) patients were men. Tirofiban was associated with higher rates of functional independence at 90 days compared with the placebo (adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI, 1.68 [1.11–2.56], P = 0.014). There was no significant difference in mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups, thought the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was numerically higher in the tirofiban group (29.1% versus 23.2%, P = 0.165). Tirofiban was also associated with fewer number of thrombectomy passes (beta, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.34; P < 0.001). Treatment-reduced passes explains 20.0% (95% CI, 4-76) of the beneficial effect of tirofiban on functional independence. Conclusion: Tirofiban plus EVT might be an effective and well-tolerated option for patients with anterior large vessel occlusion due to atherosclerosis. These findings are needed to be confirmed in future trials.

Abstract 23: Effect Of Intravenous Tirofiban Vs Placebo On First-pass Effect In Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy: Insights From The Rescue Bt Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: First-pass effect (FPE) defined as a complete or near-complete reperfusion achieved after a single thrombectomy pass is predictive of favorable outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion. It remains uncertain whether intravenous tirofiban is effective to improve the rate of FPE in anterior circulation strokes. Methods: RESCUE-BT (A randomized controlled trial of intravenous tirofiban or placebo prior to endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke) enrolled 948 patients with proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well to receive intravenous either tirofiban or placebo before endovascular thrombectomy. Patients who did not treated with endovascular thrombectomy were excluded from this cohort. The endpoint was FPE, which defined by extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) scale 2b, 2c or 3 after the first pass. A modified Poisson regression analysis was performed to assess the association between intravenous tirofiban treatment and FPE. Results: Twenty-two patients were excluded for not treating with endovascular thrombectomy. The remaining 926 patients were included (mean age, 66 years; 380 [41.0%] women), with 450 in the tirofiban and 476 in the placebo group, respectively. Among them, an FPE was achieved in 141 patients (31.3%) of the tirofiban group vs 114 patients (23.9%) of the placebo group. The adjusted risk ratio for FPE with tirofiban vs placebo was 1.24 (95%CI, 1.02-1.52). Conclusions: Treatment with intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy significantly increased the incidence of FPE in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well.

Effects of Antecedent Intravenous Thrombolysis on Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke Using Tirofiban

PurposeTo investigate whether preceding intravenous thrombolysis combined with tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment is safe and effective. Materials and MethodsConsecutive data were identified for patients who experienced acute ischemic stroke and were admitted to 2 comprehensive stroke centers from January 2015 to August 2021. All patients were divided into 2 groups—a thrombolytic with tirofiban group and a tirofiban-alone group—on the basis of whether intravenous thrombolysis before emergency endovascular angioplasty was used. Multivariate regression and propensity adjustment analyses were performed to characterize differences in safety and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. ResultsOf 373 eligible patients, 111 (29.7%) were treated with thrombolysis with tirofiban. There was a significant difference in the rate of any intracerebral hemorrhage (35.1% vs 24.8%; P = .04) but not in the rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (16.2% vs 11.5%; P = .23) and reocclusion at 24 hours (5.4% vs 7.6%; P = .51) between the 2 groups. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with any or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, artery occlusion, functional outcome, or death at the 3-month follow-up (all adjusted P > .05). After propensity adjustment, the thrombolytic with tirofiban group showed nonsignificant rates of clinical and safety outcomes compared with those of the tirofiban-alone group (all P > .05). ConclusionsTirofiban may be used without increasing the risk of adverse events in selected patients who experienced ischemic stroke and were treated with intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy.

Influence of tirofiban on stroke outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion

BackgroundEven undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT), patients with acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (AVBAO) still have a high rate of mortality. Tirofiban is a novel antiplatelet agent which is now widely empirically used in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for MT in AVBAO.MethodsFrom October 2016 to July 2021, consecutive AVBAO patients receiving MT were included in the prospective stroke registry. The short-term outcomes were (1) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH); (2) in-hospital death; (3) National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge. The Long-term outcomes were: (1) modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months; (2) death at 3 months.ResultsA total of 130 eligible patients were included in the study, 64 (49.2%) patients received tirofiban. In multivariate regression analysis, no significant differences were observed in all outcomes between the tirofiban and non-tirofiban group [sICH (adjusted OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.12–7.82, p = 0.97), in-hospital death (adjusted OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.17–1.89, p = 0.36), NIHSS at discharge (95% CI, -2.14–8.63, p = 0.24), mRS (adjusted OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.40–3.62, p = 0.75), and death at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.24–2.90, p = 0.77)].ConclusionsIn AVBAO, tirofiban adjunctive to MT was not associated with an increased risk of sICH. Short-term (in-hospital death, NIHSS at discharge) and long-term outcomes (mRS and death at 3 months) seem not to be influenced by tirofiban use.

Association of Intravenous Tirofiban with Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Receiving Endovascular Thrombectomy

Introduction: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intravenous tirofiban improves functional outcomes without promoting the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in stroke secondary to basilar artery occlusion (BAO) receiving endovascular thrombectomy. Methods: Patients with acute BAO stroke who were treated with endovascular thrombectomy and had tirofiban treatment information were derived from “BASILAR”: a nationwide, prospective registry. All eligible patients were divided into tirofiban and no-tirofiban groups according to whether tirofiban was used intravenously. The primary endpoint was the 90-day severity of disability as assessed by the modified Rankin scale score. Safety outcomes were the frequency of ICH and mortality. Results: Of 645 patients included in this cohort, 363 were in the tirofiban group and 282 were in the no-tirofiban group. Thrombectomy with intravenous tirofiban reduced the 90-day disability level over the range of the modified Rankin scale (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45–2.97; p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality of patients in the tirofiban group was lower than that in the no-tirofiban group (41.6% vs. 52.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47–0.77; p < 0.001). The frequency of any ICH (6.7% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.004) and symptomatic ICH (4.8% vs. 10.1%; p = 0.01) in the tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in the no-tirofiban group. Conclusions: In patients with acute BAO stroke who underwent endovascular treatment, intravenous tirofiban might be associated with favorable outcome, reduced mortality, and a decreased frequency of ICH.

The efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients with early neurological deterioration.

Many patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) develop early neurological deterioration (END), leading to disabilities or death. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban in treating patients with AIS and END who missed the thrombolysis time window. A total of 123 AIS-END patients participated in the study between January 2021 and December 2021. Patients were randomized into the tirofiban group (n=63) and the control group (n=60) based on whether a tirofiban injection was administered. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to assess neurological function at the 48th hour and on the 7th day after intervention, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess neurological recovery 90 days after AIS. Adverse reactions during the intervention were recorded for safety analysis. The 7th day NIHSS and 90th day post-AIS mRS scores of the tirofiban group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05), while the 90th day good prognosis (mRS ≤ 2) rate of the tirofiban group was significantly higher (84.13% vs. 65.00%, p < 0.05). Logistic regression demonstrated a protective effect of tirofiban for good prognosis in AIS patients with END (OR=4.675, 95% CI [1.012-21.605], p < 0.05). No cases of intracranial haemorrhage transformation or death were observed during the treatment in either group. Tirofiban injection exhibited a high safety profile and significantly improved the prognosis of AIS-END patients who missed the intravenous thrombolysis time window.

Low-dose intravenous tirofiban infusion after endovascular recanalization for non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion

Background and purposeEndovascular recanalization for patients with symptomatic non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion still remines challenging. Postoperative treatment is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of tirofiban after elective angioplasty in patients with non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion related ischemic stroke. MethodsOur study is a retrospective case series study of 48 stroke patients who received elective endovascular recanalization for middle cerebral artery occlusion. Patients who received EVT without hemorrhage were divided into 2 groups: those who did not receive intravenous tirofiban treatment (control group, n = 25); those who received continuous intravenous infusion of 0.2–0.3 mg/h tirofiban for 48 h after endovascular recanalization (intravenous tirofiban group, n = 23). Early reocclusion of treated arteries, symptomatic hemorrhage, and 90-day functional outcome of the 2 groups were compared. ResultsThe 90-day mRS score and NIHSS score after endovascular recanalization showed no significantly different between the two groups. However, the rate of mRS score reverse (≥1) was significantly higher in the intravenous tirofiban group than the control (73.9% versus 24.0%, P = 0.001), and the rate of NIHSS score reverse (≥3) in the intravenous tirofiban group was also higher (43.5% verse 16.0%, P = 0.037). The rate of early reocclusion, symptomatic hemorrhage (4.3% versw 4%, P = 0.734), showed no difference between the two groups. ConclusionsLow-dose intravenous tirofiban infusion (0.2–0.3 mg/h for 48 h) after endovascular treatment seems to be safe and potentially effective for non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion patients.

The Outcome of Intracoronary Tirofiban Administation at Primary Percutenous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background and Aim: Thrombosis within the coronary arteries causes ST-elevation myocardial infarction. STEMI can be vascularized by primary PCI, which is class-I indication and the gold standard. The present study aimed to assess the outcome of pericardial tirofiban administration in patients with ST-level myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 228 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in the Bahawalpur Heart Center, Bahawalpur for the duration of Six months from March 2022 to September 2022. Patients of both gender having an age range 25 to 65 years with STEMI were enrolled and categorized into two groups based on Tirofiban administration are as follows: Group-I comprised of Tirofiban group and Group-II control (non-tirofiban group). All the patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Major bleeding, MACE, TIMI Grade flow, hematoma, myocardial blush, minor bleeding, and mortality were different variables measured. SPSS version 28 was used for data analysis. Results: The overall mean age was 42.82± 10.26 years. Of the total 228 STEMI patients, there were 166 (72.8%) male and 62 (27.2%) were females. The mean age of group-I (n=114) and group-II (n=114) was 41.74 ± 11.62 years and 43.9± 8.9 years. The age-wise distribution of patients were as follows: 74 (32.5%) in 25-35 years, 70 (30.7%) in 36-45 years, 64 (28.1%) in 46-55 years, and 20 (8.8%) in 56-65 years. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and smoker in Tirofiban and non-tirofiban group was 32 (28.1%) vs. 34 (29.8%), 24 (21.1%) vs. 28 (24.6%), and 31 (27.2%) vs. 33 (28.9%) respectively. A p-value of 0.05 indicated that there was an independent difference in TIMI flow grades between the two groups. Based on clinical outcomes, the incidence of partial reperfusion TIMI flow grade, normal myocardial blush grade, major bleeding, MACE, hematoma, minor bleeding, and mortality was found in 72 (31.6%), 146 (64%), 60 (26.3%), 68 (29.8%), 61 (26.8%), 52 (22.8%), and 8 (3.5%) respectively. Conclusion: The present study found that patients with severe thrombus burden and STEMI who underwent emergency coronary intervention received intracoronary tirofiban treatment that was simple, safe, and effective. A significant difference in TIMI flow and myocardial blush grades was observed when intracoronary Tirofiban was administered to STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared with patients who did not receive intracoronary Tirofiban. Keywords: Intracoronary Tirofiban, Percutaneous coronary intervention, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Outcomes

Clinical safety and possible efficacy of tirofiban in combination with intravenous thrombolysis by recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for early treatment of capsular warning syndrome (CWS).

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in treating patients with capsular warning syndrome (CWS) who failed to respond to the treatment of intravenous thrombolysis alone. Tirofiban was approved for the treatment of CWS patients with fluctuating symptoms or no substantial improvement after intravenous thrombolysis within 24 h in our hospital from October 2019 to June 2021. Patients were evaluated with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, at 72 h post-thrombolysis, at 1-week, and at 3-months with the modified Rankin Scales (MRS) score. A total of 12 patients received tirofiban and eight patients received control treatment with a history of CWS in our cohort. Among the patients, 13 patients smoked more than one pack of cigarettes a day, 17 had hypertension, 17 had hypercholesterolemia, 7 had diabetes, 1 had the history of cerebral infarction, 2 had atrial fibrillation, 7 had mild big vascular stenosis, 13 had lesions of the perforating branch by imaging, and 19 had acute capsular infarction. In both the tirofiban and control groups, NIHSS scores were significantly reduced after intravenous thrombolysis or 1-week after onset compared with before intravenous thrombolysis (P < 0.001). Before and after intravenous thrombolysis, there were no differences between the tirofiban group and control group (P = 0.970, P = 0.384, respectively). The tirofiban group, however, showed remarkably lower scores in both 1-week NIHSS and 3-month MRS than the control (P = 0.012, P = 0.003, respectively). Our study revealed that tirofiban did not increase the risk of hemorrhage and had favorable clinical efficacy as a remedial treatment for CWS patients with poor prognosis for intravenous thrombolysis, therefore indicating great potential for broader use.

Safety and efficacy of adjunct tirofiban treatment following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulting in successful reperfusion.

Tirofiban administration after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) that resulted in successful reperfusion on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This retrospective study was conducted in Zhengzhou University University People's Hospital, an advanced stroke center in China. Consecutive patients with AIS who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT) were enrolled from June 2018 to January 2022. The safety endpoints were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), total intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3-month mortality. The efficacy endpoints were 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and 24-h neurological improvement. A total of 145 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent MT were analyzed, of whom 51 (35.2%) patients were in the tirofiban group. There were 30 (20.7%) patients with sICH, 50 (34.5%) patients suffered from ICH within 24-h post-MT, and 47 (32.4%) dead at 3-month. Besides, 31 (21.4%) patients achieved excellent clinical outcomes (mRS, 0-1), and 24-h neurological improvement was found in 29 (20.0%) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, total ICH, and 3-month mortality, as well as efficacy outcomes on 3-month mRS scores (0-1) and 24-h neurological improvement between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). Additionally, tirofiban was associated with 3-month mRS scores of 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-10.02, P = 0.008). Adjunct tirofiban treatment following MT for AIS patients with LVO that resulted in successful reperfusion on DSA was not correlated with the increased risk of safety endpoints on sICH, ICH, and 3-month mortality, and it may be associated with a lower 3-month mRS score.

Role of platelets aggregation in the process of ductus arteriosus closure of newborn pups

To investigate the role of platelets aggregation in the developing process of ductus arteriosus closure of newborn pups, and the effect of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa) receptor antagonist (tirofiban). Four 24-month-old Beagle bitches were selected and numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively, and their pups were removed by cesarean section in two batches 1-2 days before the expected date of delivery. Bitches 1 and 2 were the first batch. Eighteen newborn pups were removed after cesarean section as the control group. They were divided into three subgroups: 1-hour subgroup, 4-hour subgroup, and 12-hour subgroup according to postnatal time point, with 6 pups in each subgroup. The newborn pups were injected with normal saline 10 mL/kg via jugular vein immediately after birth. Bitches 3 and 4 were the second batch. Nineteen newborn pups were removed by cesarean section as tirofiban group. They were also divided into three subgroups: 1-hour subgroup (n = 6), 4-hour subgroup (n = 6), and 12-hour subgroup (n = 7) according to the postnatal time point. The newborn pups were injected with tirofiban hydrochloride injection 10 mL/kg (10 mL injection including 2.5 mg of tirofiban) via jugular vein immediately after birth. The diameter of ductus arteriosus was measured by echocardiography. Ductus arteriosus was removed by surgical dissection and divided into two parts. Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the expression of platelet membrane GPIIb-IIIa, respectively. In the control group, 1 newborn pup died at 0.5 hour after birth in the 1-hour subgroup. The experiment was completed by 19 in the tirofiban group. Ductus arteriosus of all pups were not closed in 1-hour subgroups of the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the diameter of ductus arteriosus between the control group and the tirofiban group (mm: 1.72±0.08 vs. 1.70±0.11, P > 0.05). Ductus arteriosus of 1 newborn pup in 4-hour subgroup of the control group was closed, but the ductus arteriosus of all the newborn pups in 4-hour subgroup of the tirofiban group were not closed. The diameter of ductus arteriosus of the tirofiban group was significantly larger than that of the control group (mm: 1.52±0.15 vs. 0.95±0.48, P < 0.05). Ductus arteriosus of all pups were closed in 12-hour subgroup of the control group, but the ductus arteriosus of 2 pups of the tirofiban group were still not closed, with the diameter of ductus arteriosus of 1.0 mm and 1.1 mm, respectively. Western blotting showed that at 1-hour, 4-hour and 12-hour after birth, the expression of platelet membrane GPIIb-IIIa was gradually increased in ductus arteriosus of newborn pups of the two groups. The expression of GPIIb-IIIa in 1-hour subgroup of the tirofiban group was significantly lower than that in the control group (GPIIb-IIIa/β-actin: 0.67±0.07 vs. 0.84±0.16, P < 0.05). The expression of GPIIb-IIIa in 4-hour and 12-hour subgroups of the tirofiban group were slightly lower than those in the control group (GPIIb-IIIa/β-action: 0.85±0.12 vs. 0.95±0.11 in 4-hour subgroup, 1.04±0.16 vs. 1.09±0.17 in 12-hour subgroup, both P > 0.05). Immunohistochemistry showed that the change trend of platelet membrane GPIIb-IIIa in ductus arteriosus of newborn pups in both groups was similar to the results of Western blotting. The ductus arteriosus of newborn pups begin to close 1-4 hours after birth, and all closed at 12 hours after birth. The expression of platelet membrane GPIIb-IIIa in ductus arteriosus increase gradually after birth, and the platelet aggregation may participate in and promote ductus arteriosus closure to some extent. Tirofiban, a platelet membrane GPIIb-IIIa receptor antagonist, may delay ductus arteriosus closure of newborn pups to some extent by inhibiting platelet aggregation.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke without large-vessel occlusion and not receiving intravenous thrombolysis: A randomized controlled open-label trial

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) without large-vessel occlusions and not receiving intravenous thrombolysis. MethodsOverall, 267 cases were included in the study (134 cases in tirofiban group; 133 cases in control group). After admission, patients in the tirofiban group were administered tirofiban for at least 72 h, and aspirin 100 mg and hydroclopidogrel 75 mg were administered 4 h before discontinuation of tirofiban administration. All patients were followed for 3 months, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission, 24 h, and 7 d after treatment, intracerebral hemorrhage transformation within 48 h from stroke onset, and bleeding were assessed. ResultsThere was no significant difference between both groups in the incidence of non-symptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), extracranial hemorrhage events, and thrombocytopenia (p > 0.05). There was a significant different between the NIHSS scores at baseline and 7 d after treatment in the tirofiban group (p = 0.043). At 90 d after treatment, the proportion of patients with a good prognosis in the tirofiban group (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] = 0, 1) was higher than that in the control group (p = 0.021). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with a mRS score of 0–2 between the two groups (p > 0.05). ConclusionAdministration of tirofiban for >72 h (72 h–108 h) is safe and can improve the long-term (90 d) prognosis of patients with AIS without large-vessel occlusions and not receiving intravenous thrombolysis.

Early tirofiban administration for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveIn the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of tirofiban administered in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with or without mechanical thrombectomy (MT). MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between 2001 and 2021 that provided outcomes of AIS patients who underwent IVT alone or IVT bridging with or without tirofiban. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included the rates of (1) an excellent outcome defined as a mRS score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, (2) any type of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), (3) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (4) mortality, and (5) successful recanalization. ResultsWe included 722 patients with IVT bridging therapy in 3 trials; there were 171 patients in the tirofiban group and 551 patients in the nontirofiban group. We included 846 patients with IVT alone in 7 studies; there were 471 patients in the tirofiban group and 375 patients in the nontirofiban group. The patients treated with tirofiban had a reduced risk of mortality compared to the patients treated without tirofiban during IVT bridging (OR, 0.46; 95 % CI, 0.24–0.89; p = 0.02), but no significant differences were found in safety outcomes on sICH, ICH, recanalization or efficacy outcomes on modified Rankin scale 0–2 (p > 0.05). Pooled results showed that tirofiban combined with IVT alone did not increase the risks of sICH, ICH or mortality but was significantly associated with excellent (OR, 2.68; 95 % CI, 1.58–4.55; P = 0.0003) and favorable (OR, 2.36; 95 % CI, 1.58–3.52; p < 0.0001) functional outcomes at 90 days. ConclusionIn AIS patients who underwent IVT or bridging therapy, early administration of tirofiban may be effective and safe, but further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose and long-course tirofiban in large hemispheric infarction.

BackgroundThe clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of large hemispheric infarction (LHI) remain controversial.MethodsThis study prospectively enrolled patients with acute LHI who were admitted to Putuo Hospital affiliated with Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2021 to December 2021. The patients were randomly assigned to the tirofiban group [3–4 μg/(kg·h)] or control group (clopidogrel 75 mg/d).ResultsA total of 71 patients with acute LHI were selected: 36 in the tirofiban group and 35 in the control group. The reduction of the NIHSS score in the tirofiban group was 2.92 ± 9.31 at discharge, and that of the control group was −3.23 ± 12.06 (p = 0.021, OR, 0.006; 95% CI, 0.004–0.008). Six patients (16.7%) in tirofiban group and 14 patients (40%) in control group died during hospitalization (p = 0.029, OR, 0.300; 95% CI, 0.099–0.908). There was significant difference in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 5–6 scores at 90 days between the two groups (p = 0.023, OR, 0.327; 95% CI, 0.124–0.867). However, there was no significant difference in mRS 0–1 (p = 0.321, OR, 0.972; 95% CI, 0.920–1.027), mRS 2 (p = 0.572, OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.173–23.109), mRS 3 (p = 0.225, OR, 2.214; 95% CI, 0.601–8.161), or mRS 4(p = 0.284, OR, 1.859; 95% CI, 0.593–5.825) scores between the two groups. There was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.29, OR, 0.305; 95% CI, 0.030–3.081), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.123, OR, 0.284; 95% CI, 0.053–1.518). There was a significant difference in systemic bleeding events during hospitalization (p = 0.044, OR, 0.309; 95% CI, 0.096–1.000).ConclusionsLow-dose and long-course tirofiban treatment may significantly improve the early neurological function and reduce the in-hospital mortality in LHI patients. Meanwhile, tirofiban does not increase the risk of any type of bleeding events.