Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Frame Count Research Articles

Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Rosuvastatin versus Atorvastatin Loading Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a single high-dose rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin preloading in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI.) Methods: A total of 99 patients presented with STEMI and were randomly divided into three groups—a control group (n = 33) with no statin treatment, an atorvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 80 mg atorvastatin dose and the rosuvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 40 mg rosuvastatin dose in the emergency room (ER) prior to PCI. Post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) were recorded, and ST-segment resolution was measured. Results: CTFC was significantly lower for the atorvastatin group (p-value < 0.01) than in the control group. A final TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved in 32 (97.0%) patients in the rosuvastatin group and 28 (84.8%) patients in the atorvastatin group compared with only 25 (75.8%) patients in the control group (p = 0.014). Peak CK-MB in the rosuvastatin group (263.2 [207.2–315.6]) and the atorvastatin group (208 [151.0–314.1]) was lower compared to that in the control group (398.4 [303.9–459.3]); p < 0.001. Conclusions: A single extensive dose of lipophilic atorvastatin prior to primary PCI in STEMI patients showed better improvement in microvascular myocardial perfusion compared to hydrophilic rosuvastatin.

Efficacy and safety of intracoronary pro-urokinase injection during percutaneous coronary intervention in treating ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Intracoronary injection of pro-urokinase (Pro-UK) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) seems to be a promising treatment in improving myocardial perfusion. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of intracoronary Pro-UK injection during PCI in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. A comprehensive literature searched on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Ovid-Cochrane Databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until June 1, 2022, in English only. The primary outcome was myocardial perfusion, including thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grades, corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grades (TMPG). The secondary outcomes were ST-segment resolution (STR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial marker, cardiac function and hemorrhagic complications. We identified 5 studies (all RCTs) involving 761 participants. Under PCI procedure, compared with placebo, intracoronary Pro-UK injection may improve myocardial perfusion, including increasing the TIMI grades [odd ratio (OR) 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28-0.75; p = 0.002; I2 = 0%] , CTFC (OR -3.47; 95% CI [-5.60, -1.33]; p = 0.001; I2 = 0%) and TMPG (OR 0.17; 95% CI [0.06-0.44]; p = 0.0003; I2 = 0%), increase the rate of STR (OR 2.25; 95% CI [1.56-3.26]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%), reduce the incidence of MACE (OR 0.51; 95% CI [0.33-0.81]; p = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and reduce myocardial infarct size (CK, standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.45; 95% [CI] [-0.62, -0.28]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 10%. CK-MB, [SMD] -0.43; 95% CI [-0.68, -0.18]; p = 0.0007; I2 = 60%. cTnI, [SMD] -0.31; 95% CI [-0.46, -0.17]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). Moreover, the treatment may improve the cardiac functions (LVFE, pooled mean difference [MD] 1.23; 95% CI [0.66-1.79]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 24%. LVEDd, pooled MD -0.13; 95% CI [-0.17, -0.09]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). But there is no statistically significant difference between the Pro-UK group and placebo in the occurrence of hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.19; 95% CI [0.75-1.87]; p = 0.46; I2 = 0%). Intracoronary Pro-UK injection during PCI in STEMI patients is an effective and safe treatment to perform. The treatment may improve myocardial perfusion and rate of STR, as well as decreasing the incidence of MACE and myocardial infarct size. Importantly, the treatment may improve the cardiac functions and life quality. In the future, more multi-centered and massive sample studies are required.

The Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the Flow in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients-Geometry in Focus.

Evaluation of the effect of three dimensional (3D) coronary plaque characteristics derived from two dimensional (2D) invasive angiography images (ICA) on coronary flow determined by TIMI frame count (TFC) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been thoroughly investigated. A total of 71 patients with STEMI, and 73 with NSTEMI were enrolled after primary angioplasty. Pre- and post-PCI TFCs were obtained. From 2D images, 3D reconstruction was performed of the culprit vessel, and multiple plaque parameters were measured. In STEMI, the average post-PCI frame count decreased significantly, resulting in better flow. With regards to 2/3D parameters, no differences were found between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. The 3D parameters in the subgroup with an increase with at least three frames resulting in worsening post-PCI flow were compared to parameters of the patients with improved or significantly not change flow (delta frame count < 3), and greater minimal luminal diameter and area was found in the worsening (increased) frame group. In STEMI 2/3D, parameters showed no correlation with worsening flow, whereas in NSTEMI, greater minimal luminal diameter and area correlated with decreased flow. We can conclude that certain 2/3D parameters can predict slower flow in ACS, resulting in the use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blocker.

The role of deferred stenting in the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: There have been a big number of studies assessing the efficacy of delayed coronary artery stenting (DCAS) in the prevention of no-reflow microvasculature injury compared to the standard immediate coronary artery stenting (ICAS) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the results of these studies are contradictory in a lot of ways.&#x0D; Aim: To summarize studies on the assessment of DCAS in the prevention of no-reflow compared to the standard ICAS.&#x0D; Materials and methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and eLIBRARY.RU databases. The analysis included 17 studies with a total sample of 3505 patients. The comparative analysis included angiography-based endpoints prevalence of no-reflow (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, TIMI 3 and myocardial blush grade, MBG 2, corrected TIMI frame count, CTFC) and clinical endpoints of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), recurrent myocardial infarction and recurrent revascularization. In addition, the analysis included the assessment of ST-elevation resolution, left ventricular ejection fraction values in the delayed post-intervention period and between-group differences.&#x0D; Results: The no-reflow phenomenon was significantly less frequent in the DCAS groups for the following parameters: epicardial flow TIMI 3 (odds ratio (OR) 2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.492.69; p 0.00001; I = 16%), myocardial perfusion MBG 2 (OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.9811.14; p = 0.0005; I = 59%), CTFC (mean difference (MD) 10.29; 95% CI 0.9619.62; p = 0.03; I = 96%). The analysis of secondary endpoints showed that MACE were less frequent in the DCAS groups (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.041.60; p = 0.02; I = 42%), the difference becoming more significant in the studies with high initial thrombotic burden (TTG 3) (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.282.62; p = 0.0009; I = 41%). The most clinically significant decrease of the MACE rate was found in 5 studies (n = 656) with high initial thrombotic burden (TTG 3) and mean time to repeated intervention from 4 to 7 days (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.865.32; p 0.0001; I = 0%). The reverse trend for a benefit in the ICAS group was observed in the studies with a high initial thrombotic burden (TTG 3) and mean time to recurrent intervention of 48 hours (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.301.19; p = 0.14; I = 20%). The ICAS and DCAS groups did not differ in overall mortality (p = 0.31), cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.49), repeated revascularization (p = 0.66), and ST resolution of 70% (p = 0.65). In the DCAS groups, there was an obvious trend to lower incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.951.73; p = 0.10; I = 0%), as well as to higher myocardial mass during the deferred analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (OR -0.79; 95% CI -1.61 -0.04; p = 0.06; I = 36%).&#x0D; Conclusion: Deferred coronary artery stenting is an effective method for prevention of no-reflow. In patients with extended coronary thrombosis (TTG 3) and STEMI, the DCAS technique with time to recurrent intervention of 4 to 7 days decreases the probability of MACE compared to that with immediate stenting of the index coronary artery.

Relationship Between Systemic Inflammation Index and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between no-reflow phenomenon and systemic inflammation index (SII) and to compare the predictive capacity of SII together with the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 785 patients were included. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow degree has been used to describe the no-reflow phenomenon. The study population was divided into two groups regarding the presence of no-reflow phenomenon including 110 patients with no-reflow (TIMI frame count 0-2) and 675 patients without no-reflow (TIMI frame count 3). The NLR [6.6 (4.6-11.6) vs 3.2 (2.0-5.3); P < .001], PLR [175 (121.3-220) vs 102.6 (76.1-150.1); P < .001] and SII [1921(1225-2906) vs 738.5 (450.5-1293); P < .001] were significantly higher in the no-reflow group. High NLR (OR: 1.078, 95%CI: 1.027-1.397; P = .021), PLR (OR: 1.009, 95%CI: 1.003-1.021; P = .041) and SII (OR: 1.216, 95%CI: 1.106-1.942; P = .004) were found to be independently associated with no-reflow phenomenon. The comparison of the receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that area under the curve of SII was greater than that of NLR (.789 vs .766, P = .007) and PLR (.789 vs .759, P = .048). SII levels may predict no-reflow phenomenon better than NLR and PLR.

The effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on angiographic parameters according to diabetic status in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction

Aim. We aimed to compare post-interventional angiographic outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel according to glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Material and methods. The study included a total of 532 patients, with 334 receiving ticagrelor (62,8%) and 198 clopidogrel (37,2%). Diabetic status of the patients was assessed with HbA1c. TIMI flow grade and TIMI frame count were calculated and compared between two groups.Results. TIMI flow grade 3 was higher and TFC was lower after percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery in patients treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (89,2% vs. 73,7%; p&lt; 0,001, 20 vs. 24; p&lt; 0,001). There was a positive correlation between the increases in HbA1c and TFC levels in the whole group (r=0,225; p=0,004). In subgroup analysis, higher HbA1c levels did not affect TFC in patients using ticagrelor (r=-0,060; p=0,326 for patients with noreflow, r=-0,133; p=0,321 for patients with TIMI-3 flow). While level of HbA1c did not affect TFC in patients with TIMI-3 flow, the presence of post-procedural no-reflow caused worsening of TFC in patients using clopidogrel as HbA1c levels increased (r=0,374; p=0,005).Conclusion. Ticagrelor was found to be better in terms of angiographic parameters regardless of diabetes.

Efficacy of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills in a Swine Model of Coronary Slow Flow.

Objective: Preliminary clinical studies have confirmed that Shexiang Tongxin dropping pills (STDPs) could improve angina pectoris and attenuate vascular endothelial dysfunction in patients with slow coronary flow, but the underlying mechanism is not fully unclear. We aimed to investigate the impact of STDP in a swine model of coronary slow flow (SF) and related mechanisms. Methods: SF was induced by coronary injection of microspheres, and pigs were randomly divided into the SF group and SF plus STDP group. Pigs in the STDP group received sublingual STDP for 10 min, followed by 1 g STDP oral administration daily for 6 days. Coronary angiography was performed, the TIMI frame count (TFC) was determined, and hemodynamic measurements were performed before, at 30 min, and 7 days post-SF. Serum levels of total NO, NOS, ET-1, C-TNI, and BNP were measured. Myocardial expressions of TNF and IL-6, eNOS, VEGF, CD31, and α-SMA were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Results: Compared to the SF group, LVEF and TFC were significantly improved at 7 days post-SF in the STDP group. The serum ET-1 level was significantly reduced at 7 days, and NO and NOS levels were significantly higher in the STDP group. Seven days post-SF, myocardial TNF and IL-6 expressions were significantly downregulated, while the expressions of eNOS and VEGF, CD31, and ɑ-SMA were significantly upregulated in the STDP group. Conclusion: Our results showed that STDP improved cardiac function and coronary flow, possibly through reducing inflammatory responses and upregulating myocardial eNOS and VEGF, CD31, and the ɑ-SMA expression.

The Mean Corrected TIMI Frame Count Could Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Slow-Flow Phenomenon.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with the coronary slow-flow phenomenon. A total of 98 patients with coronary slow-flow phenomenon who met inclusion cri- teria from 2015 to 2020 were retrospectively included in the analysis. The patients were ranked according to their mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count values and were divided into quartiles based on those. Group 1 consisted of patients who had a mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count value >36.68 (third quartile), while group 2 consisted of patients who had a mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count value ≤36.68 (first quartile+second quartile). Mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular complications were compared between the groups. Mean follow-up duration was 3.93 ± 1.50 years. Recurrent chest pain and major adverse cardiovascular events increased in group 1 compared to group 2 (P ≤ .001, P ≤ .001, respectively). Hypertension (odds ratio 2.627, P=.033), hyperlipidemia (odds ratio 2.469, P = .028) and mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count (odds ratio 1.106, P = .002) were independent predictors of recurrent chest pain according to Cox regression analysis. Although older age (odds ratio 1.125, P=.011), hypertension (odds ratio 6.081, P=.026), hyperlipidemia (odds ratio 12.308, P = 0.019), and mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count (odds ratio 1.476, P = .001) were found to be significantly related with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary slow-flow phenomenon, only mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count (odds ratio 1.161, P = .021) was an indepen- dent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in Cox regression analysis. Higher mean corrected thrombolysis in myocardial frame count could predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with the coronary slow-flow phenomenon.

Administration of intracoronary adenosine before stenting for the prevention of no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Objectives: No-reflow phenomenon during the primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is accompanied by a poor clinical outcome and mortality. We aimed to determine the effect of intracoronary adenosine in preventing the no-reflow phenomenon, as detected by three different methods, in patients who underwent primary (PCI). Design. In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, patients with acute STEMI who presented to our center and underwent primary PCI were randomized to the intervention group who received intracoronary adenosine before stenting or the control group who received the standard treatment. No-reflow phenomenon was detected using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, TIMI frame count, and myocardial blush grade (MBG). The incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon was then compared between the intervention and control groups. Results. The adenosine group consisted of 110 patients (age = 57 ± 11 years; 92 (84%) male) while 118 patients were in the control group (age = 59 ± 12 years; 89 (75%) male). There was no difference between the study groups in baseline characteristics. The frequency of no-reflow phenomenon was lower in the adenosine group as assessed by TIMI flow grade (15 [14%] vs. 41 [35%]), MBG (23 [21%] vs. 63 [53%]) and TIMI frame count (16 [14%] vs. 50 [42%]) (p < .001 for all). This effect remained significant after adjustment for confounding variables. Conclusion. Intracoronary adenosine could effectively prevent the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI.

Intracoronary epinephrine versus adenosine in the management of refractory no-reflow phenomenon: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The no-reflow phenomenon is associated with a considerable reduction in myocardial salvage in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). There has been no head-to-head comparison of intra-coronary epinephrine to adenosine in the management of no-reflow phenomenon.OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of using intracoronary epinephrine versus adenosine for management of the catastrophic no-reflow phenomenon that may occur during primary PCI.DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.SETTING: Single center in Egypt.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included STEMI patients who developed refractory no-reflow phenomenon during primary PCI after failure of conventional treatments and received either intracoronary epinephrine or adenosine.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: No-reflow management measured through improvement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade (TIMI flow), myocardial blush grade, TIMI frame count and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year follow up.SAMPLE SIZE: 156 patients with refractory no-reflow phenomenon during primary PCI.RESULTS: Successful reperfusion was achieved in 74 of 81 (91.4%) of patients who received epinephrine and in 65 of 75 (86.7%) who received adenosine (P<.05). Fifty-six of 81 patients (69.1%) achieved TIMI III flow after epinephrine administration versus 39 of 75 patients (52.7%) in the adenosine group (P=.04). The incidence of heart failure after 1 year of follow up was lower in the epinephrine group compared to the adenosine group (6.3% vs. 19.2%, P<.017). MACE after 1 year of follow up was lower in patients who received epinephrine compared to those who received adenosine (11.3 % Vs. 26.7 %, P<.01).CONCLUSION: During primary PCI, intracoronary epinephrine is as effective as adenosine in successful management of refractory no-reflow phenomenon with a more favorable long-term prognosis compared to adenosine.LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design.CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

The efficacy of the use of heparin in the emergency room in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

AimTo investigate the efficacy of the use of heparin in the emergency room in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods200 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly divided into the research and control groups (heparin administration in emergency room and catheterization laboratory, respectively). ResultsThe rate of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 2 flow in the research participants was significantly higher than that in the controls (P < 0.05). The stent diameter in the research patients was smaller than that in the control participants (P < 0.05); while the stent length in the research patients was shorter than that in the controls (P < 0.05). The slow flow rate in the research patients was similar to that in the control participants (P > 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in the corrected TIMI frame counts or intraoperative complications (P > 0.05). The ST-segment resolution rate within 2 h post-PCI was 90.0% in the research patients and 83.8% in the controls (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the cardiac troponin and N terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels between the two groups post-PCI (P > 0.05). The left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during hospitalization were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionAdministering heparin to STEMI patients in the emergency room can increase the rate of coronary artery revascularization.

Angiographic Profiles in Persistent Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf Cardiology dept. PGIMER, Chandigarh Background The relationship of atrial fibrillation (AF) with coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. Atrial ischemia due to obstructive CAD has been identified as one of the key risk factors, leading to AF. However, sufficient evidence exists as to the presence of myocardial ischemia on stress imaging, even without the presence of obstructive CAD in AF patients. Slow flow and coronary tortuosity on angiogram can lead to downstream myocardial ischemia independent of CAD. Purpose We aimed to delineate the angiographic profiles in AF patients with attention to slow flow and tortuosity leading to ischemia in those without obstructive CAD. Methods The study was a nonrandomised, prospective, single-centre observational study of consecutive patients of persistent non valvular AF. Symptomatic patients despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) for 3 months were recruited and all underwent coronary angiograms (CAG). Patients with known CAD or prior history of myocardial infarction were excluded. Further angiographic analysis was done in those without obstructive CAD to determine incidence of slow flow (&amp;gt;27 corrected TIMI frame count) and tortuosity (presence of ≥3 fixed bends in an epicardial artery). Results A total of 70 patients were recruited and followed for a mean duration of 12 ± 1.4 months. The mean age of the study group was 66.07 (±11.49). Hypertension (74%) was the commonest comorbidity followed by obesity (35%) and diabetes (30%). At CAG, 32/70 (46%) had obstructive CAD, 17/70 (24%) had non obstructive (&amp;lt;50-70% stenosis) CAD and 21/70 (30%) had normal coronaries without atherosclerosis. Amongst patients without obstructive CAD (n = 38) slow flow was seen in 16/38 (42%) and coronary tortuosity in 11/38 (29%) patients. There ware no differences in terms of death, HF and FVR hospitalisations or stroke at follow up between the obstructive CAD vs no obstructive CAD. However in patients without obstructive CAD, hospitalisations for FVR was significantly increased in those having slow flow on CAG, 9/12 (75%) vs 7/26 (27%) in those without slow flow (p value = 0.005). The mean TIMI frame count was also significantly higher in those with FVR hospitalisations 35.3 ± 11 vs 25.8 ± 8.9 (p value = 0.005). TIMI frame count &amp;gt;31 had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 69% for predicting hospitalisations for FVR on ROC curve(AUC = 0.71). Conclusions CAD is closely related to AF and majority (70%) of our patients had evidence of atherosclerotic CAD on CAG in our study. A large proportion of patients with no evidence of obstructive CAD on CAG had slow flow or coronary tortuosity. Significantly increased hospitalisation for FVR seen in the slow flow group shows its significance and may lead to newer treatment modalities in future. Further larger studies looking at these aspects on CAG may give further insight as to the nature and prognosis of these entities. Abstract Figure 1: Flow diagram showing the patie

A randomized controlled clinical trial of prolonged balloon inflation during stent deployment strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot study

BackgroundPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the standard procedure for reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but the occurrence of the no-reflow phenomenon remains common and is associated with adverse outcomes.AimsThis study aimed to evaluate whether prolonged balloon inflation in stent deployment would lessen the occurrence of the no-reflow phenomenon in PPCI compared with conventional rapid inflation/deflation strategy.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to either the prolonged balloon inflation in stent deployment group (PBSG) or conventional deployment strategy group (CDSG) in a 1:1 ratio. A subset of patients was included in the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment.ResultsThrombolysis in MI (TIMI) flow grade 3 was found in 96.7% and 63.3% of the patients of the PBSG and CDSG, respectively (P = 0.005). The results of the PBSG and CDSG are respectively shown as follows: 0% versus 30% no-reflow or slow flow (P = 0.002); 90% versus 66.7% ST-segment resolution ≥ 50% (P = 0.028); 35.6 ± 14.5 frames versus 49.18 ± 25.2 frames on corrected TIMI frame count (P = 0.014); and 60% versus 20% myocardial blush grade 3 (P = 0.001). At 1 month, the major cardiovascular adverse event (cardiovascular mortality) rate was 3.3% in both groups; at 1 year, the rate was 3.3% and 6.7% for the PBSG and CDSG, respectively (P = 1.00). In the CMR subset of cases, the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) was detected in 6.7% and 50% of the patients in the PBSG and CDSG, respectively (P = 0.023).ConclusionIn our pilot trial, prolonged balloon inflation during stent deployment strategy in PPCI reduces the occurrence of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI and improved the myocardial microcirculation perfusion (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03199014; registered: 26/June/2017).

Evaluate the Correlation between the TIMI Frame Count, IMR, and CFR in Coronary Microvascular Disease.

Objective To evaluate the correlation between the TIMI frame count, IMR, and CFR in coronary microvascular disease (slow flow phenomenon). Methods TFC and IMR were recorded in the nitroglycerin and ATP administration states, and the relationship between TFC, IMR, and CFR in specific states was analyzed. Results A total of 41 patients with baseline TFC >25 frames on coronary angiography were enrolled, and nitroglycerin reduced TFC by 50% from baseline in 24 (58.54%) patients; 16 of the remaining 17 patients were able to achieve a 50% reduction in TFC by further intracoronary ATP injection. 10 patients were further tested for IMR, and the results showed significant correlations between baseline TFC and IMR (r = 0.775, P=0.008), TFC and IMR after nitroglycerin (r = 0.875, P=0.001), and the minimal TFC and IMR that could be obtained with nitroglycerin or ATP administration (r = 0.890, P=0.001). There was also a significant correlation between the proportional improvement in TFC and CFR before and after nitroglycerin injection (r = 0.685, P=0.029). In addition, we observed a lower IMR measured after nitroglycerin than after ATP in three patients, suggesting that CMD may be dominated by NO-sensitive vascular such as prearterioles and that an extensive analysis of the target site of CMD may be achieved by stepwise drug administration. Conclusion Induction of TFC in different states by a stepwise drug approach may serve as a potential primary screening method for coronary microcirculatory dysfunction, thereby reducing the need for further IMR or CFR testing.

Prolonged P Wave Peak Time May Be a Sign of LV Diastolic Dysfunction in the Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon.

Background The coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP) is an atherosclerotic process that causes ischemia at the microvascular level. The CSFP may affect P wave durations, especially P wave peak time (PWPT), by microvascular ischemia, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and changes in the left atrial dimension. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess PWPT in the CSFP. Method One hundred and ninety-five patients were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Ninety patients were enrolled in the CSFP group and 105 patients in the control group. PWPT was defined as the duration between the beginning and peak of the p wave and obtained from the leads Dıı and Vı. Results The mean age of the study population was 48.5 ± 9.5, and 108 (55.3%) of the patients were female. We found PWPT was longer in the CSFP group than in the control group. Correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between PWPT in both leads (DII, Vı) and left atrial anterior-posterior diameter, mean TIMI frame count (TFC), and E/e. A significant relationship was observed between mean TFC, E/e, EF, heart rate, and PWPT in lead Dıı (β coefficient = 0.33, 95% CI 0.44–1.33, p < 0.001, β coefficient = 0.23, 95% CI 0.25–1.85, p=0.01, β coefficient = -0.140, 95% CI −1.04–−0.53, p=0.03, and β coefficient = −0.13, 95% CI −0.29–−0.014, p=0.03, respectively) in multivariable linear analysis. Conclusion In the present study, we found prolonged PWPT in patients with the CSFP and found a relationship between PWPT and mean TFC.

Comparison of Intracoronary Epinephrine and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (COAR Trial)

Background:Intracoronary epinephrine has been effectively used in treating refractory no-reflow, but there is a dearth of data on its use as a first-line drug in normotensive patients in comparison to the widely used adenosine.Methods:In this open-labeled randomized clinical trial, 201 patients with no-reflow were randomized 1:1 into intracoronary epinephrine as the treatment group and intracoronary adenosine as the control group and followed for 1 month. The primary end points were improvement in coronary flow, as assessed by TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow, frame counts, and myocardial blush. Secondary end points were in-hospital and short-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events.Results:In all, 101 patients received intracoronary epinephrine and 100 patients received adenosine. Epinephrine was generally well tolerated with no immediate table death or ventricular fibrillation. No-reflow was more effectively improved with epinephrine with final TIMI III flow (90.1% versus 78%, P=0.019) and final corrected TIMI frame count (24±8.43 versus 26.63±9.22, P=0.036). However, no significant difference was observed in final grade III myocardial blush (55.4% versus 45%, P=0.139), mean reduction of corrected TIMI frame count (−25.71±11.79 versus −26.08±11.71, P=0.825), in-hospital and short-term mortality, and major adverse cardiac events.Conclusions:Epinephrine is relatively safe to use in no-reflow in normotensive patients. A significantly higher frequency of post-treatment TIMI III flow grade and lower final corrected TIMI frame count with relatively better achievement of myocardial blush grade III translate into it displaying relatively better efficacy than adenosine.Registration:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04699110.

Assessment of triglyceride/glucose index with respect to coronary slow flow.

Coronary slow flow (CSF) is determined by delayed opacification of the epicardial coronary arteries without obstructive disease. The triglyceride glucose index (TGI) has been suggested as a useful marker of insulin resistance. Previous studies have shown that TGI is associated with cardiovascular disease, but no study has examined the relationship between TGI and CSF. Therefore, the primary objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship between TGI and CSF. This study retrospectively evaluated patients who were admitted to our clinic with complaints of chest pain and underwent coronary angiography between January and December 2018. A total of 1100 coronary angiography images were assessed, and 72 patients with CSF were detected. Coronary flow was quantified objectively using the TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) frame count (TFC) method as described by Gibson et al. TGI was calculated as follows: ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2]. The CSF group had significantly higher glucose levels (mg/dl) [ (114.92±30.92), (125.61±33.22), than the control and CSF groups, respectively, p=0.0001], TGI [ (9.02±0.56), (9.26±0.54), p=0.0001], and triglyceride levels (mg/dl) [ (170.67±110.81), (201.19±136.93), p=0.002]. There was no statistically significant correlation between TGI and left anterior descending artery TFC, circumflex artery TFC, right coronary artery TFC (r/p values; 0.24/0.06; 0.32/0.08; 0.18/0.36, respectively). TGI, HDL, HT, age, and sex were examined with a multiple logistic model, and TGI was found to be statistically significant for the risk of CSF (p=0.0001; O.R:7.459). TGI was statistically significantly higher in the CSF group than the control group. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only TGI was independently associated with the risk of CSF, but higher TGI did not predict more slow coronary flow. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic relationship of TGI and CSF in terms of future cardiovascular events (Tab. 2, Fig. 1, Ref. 19).

Effects of Loading-Dose Statins Combined with PCSK9 Inhibitor Pre-Treatment before Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Objective: This study was aimed at investigating the effects of preoperative treatment with a loading dose of statins combined with a PCSK9 inhibitor on coronary blood perfusion and short-term cardiovascular adverse events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Method: Sixty-five patients with STEMI who had visited the Shanxi Cardiovascular Disease Hospital between May 2018 and May 2021 were enrolled in the study. The enrolled patients had no history of oral statins or antiplatelet therapy. The patients were divided into a combined treatment group (loading dose of statins combined with PCSK9 inhibitors, 35 patients) and a routine treatment group (loading dose of statins only, 30 patients). The primary endpoints were thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) blood flow grading, corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC), and TIMI myocardial perfusion grading (TMPG), immediately after and 30 days after the operation. The secondary endpoint was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization 30 days after the operation. Results: The combined treatment group had significantly lower CTFC (14.09±8.42 vs 26±12.42, P=0.04) and better TMPG (2.74±0.61 vs 2.5±0.73, P=0.04) than the routine treatment group immediately after the operation. Similarly, the combined treatment group had a significantly lower CTFC (16.29±7.39 vs 26.23±11.53, P=0.04) and significantly better TMPG (2.94±0.24 vs 2.76±0.43, P=0.01) than the routine treatment group 1 month after the operation. Conclusion: Preoperative treatment with a loading dose of high-intensity statins combined with PCSK9 inhibitors increased coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion after emergency thrombus aspiration in patients with STEMI. However, the treatment did not significantly decrease the incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.

Relationship Between Corrected TIMI Frame Count (cTFC) and Coronary Haemodynamic Parameters in Patients With Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA)

The cTFC is an underutilised angiographic haemodynamic measure used in the diagnosis of the coronary slow flow phenomenon. The objective of this study was to correlate this angiographic measure with established coronary microvascular dysfunction measures – coronary flow reserve (CFR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (hMR).

Acute myocardial infarction reparation/regeneration strategy using Wharton's jelly multipotent stem cells as an 'unlimited' therapeutic agent: 3-year outcomes in a pilot cohort of the CIRCULATE-AMI trial.

CIRCULATE-AMI (NCT03404063), a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) infarct size-reduction-powered double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of standardized Wharton jelly multipotent stem cells (WJMSCs, CardioCell Investigational Medical Product) vs. placebo (2 : 1) transcoronary transfer on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) day ~5-7, is preceded by safety and feasibility evaluation in a pilot study cohort (CIRCULATE-AMI PSC). To evaluate WJMSC transplantation safety and evolution of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in CIRCULATE-AMI PSC. In 10 consecutive patients (32-65 years, peak CK-MB 533 ±89 U/l, cMRI-LVEF 40.3 ±2.7%, cMRI-infarct size 20.1 ±2.8%), 30 × 106 WJMSCs were administered using a novel cell delivery-dedicated, coronary-non-occlusive method (CIRCULATE catheter). Other treatment was guideline-based. WJMSC transfer was safe and occurred in the absence of coronary (TIMI-3 in all) or myocardial (corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) 45 ±8 vs. 44 ±9, p = 0.51) flow deterioration or troponin elevation. By 3 years, 1 patient died from a new, non-index territory AMI; there were no other major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and no adverse events that might be related to WJMSCs. cMRI infarct size was reduced from 33.2 ±7.6 g to 25.5 ±6.4 g at 1 year and 23.1 ±5.6 g at 3 years (p = 0.03 vs. baseline). cMRI, SPECT, and echo showed a consistent, statistically significant increase in LVEF at 6-12 months (41.9 ±2.6% vs. 51.0 ±3.3%, 36.0 ±3.9% vs. 44.9 ±5.0%, and 38.4 ±2.5% vs. 48.0 ±2.1% respectively, p < 0.01 for all); the effect was sustained at 3 years. CIRCULATE-AMI PSC data suggest that WJMSC transcoronary application ~5-7 days after large AMI in humans is feasible and safe and it may be associated with a durable LVEF improvement. CIRCULATE-AMI RCT will quantify the magnitude of LV adverse remodeling attenuation with CardioCell/placebo administration.