Timed Barium Esophagogram Research Articles

The Clinical Efficacy, and Long-Term Outcomes Between Pneumatic Dilation and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in Achalasia.

Introduction: Achalasia is the most well-known motility disorder, characterized by the lack of optimal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter during swallowing and the absence of peristalsis of the esophageal body. Laparoscopic Heller esocardiomyotomy (LHM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) were the main treatment options for achalasia. Currently, the therapeutic methods are complemented by per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Materials and Methods: we performed a retrospective study, analyzing the data and evolution of 98 patients with achalasia, admited and treated in the General and Esophageal Surgery Clinic of the St. Mary Clinical Hospital-Bucharest between January 2016 and June 2023. The treatment was performed by PD in 25 cases and the majority LHM. The average duration of symptoms in the case of PD was 48 months, and 24 months in LHM. The patients were evaluated before and after the treatment procedures by the Eckardt clinical score and investigations such as timed barium esophagogram (TBO) and esophageal manometry. Results: Although patients had the same Eckardt score before treatment, a statistically significant decrease of the Eckardt score was obtained at the post-therapeutic evaluation after undergoing LHM compared to PD. Recurrence of symptoms was more frequent in the case of PD, requiring another therapeutic intervention. The cost of treatment, as well as the number of hospitalization days were reduced in the case of PD. Conclusions: The treatment of achalasia with LHM is more effective regarding recurrence of symptoms, even if it involves higher costs and a longer hospital stay compared to DP.

Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.

Achalasia is a major esophageal motor disorder featured by the altered relaxation of the esophagogastric junction in the absence of effective peristaltic activity. As a consequence of the esophageal outflow obstruction, achalasia patients present with clinical symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, weight loss, and regurgitation of indigested food. Other less specific symptoms can also present including heartburn, chronic cough, and aspiration pneumonia. The delay in diagnosis, particularly when the presenting symptoms mimic those of gastroesophageal reflux disease, may be as long as several years. The widespread use of high-resolution manometry has permitted earlier detection and uncovered achalasia phenotypes which can have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Other tools have also emerged to help define achalasia severity and which can be used as objective measures of response to therapy including the timed barium esophagogram and the functional lumen imaging probe. Such diagnostic innovations, along with the increased awareness by clinicians and patients due to the availability of alternative therapeutic approaches (laparoscopic and robotic Heller myotomy, and peroral endoscopic myotomy) have radically changed the natural history of the disorder. Herein, we report the most recent advances in the diagnosis, classification, and management of esophageal achalasia and underline the still-grey areas that needs to be addressed by future research to reach the goal of personalizing treatment.

Intraoperative distensibility measurement in POEM for achalasia: impact on patient outcome and associations with other outcome variables at 1-year follow-up

Background and aimsThe functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) can provide measurements of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distensibility. Studies report that use of intraoperative FLIP examination during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia is associated with treatment success, but evidence is limited and inconsistent. The main aim of the present study was to assess associations between intraoperative FLIP values and 1-year outcomes. Additionally, associations between 1-year FLIP measurements and other 1-year outcome variables were studied.MethodsWe performed a single-center prospective study of consecutive achalasia patients treated with POEM with a standardized 1-year follow-up. The inclusion period was from June 2017 to January 2020. We compared 1-year outcomes (FLIP measurement values, Eckardt score (ES), reflux esophagitis, timed barium esophagogram (TBE), and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LES-rp)) in patients with and without intraoperative FLIP examination. We also assessed associations between intraoperative FLIP values, 1-year FLIP values, and other 1-year outcomes. Results are given as median (IQR), and non-parametrical statistical analyses were applied.ResultsSixty-two patients (27 females) with median age 45 years (35–54) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar in patients with (n = 32) and without (n = 30) intraoperative FLIP examination. In patients with intraoperative FLIP, ES was 2 (1–3) and LES distensibility index (DI) 3.7 (2.6–5.4) after 1 year, compared with ES 2 (1–3) and DI 4.0 (3.1–6.8)) in patients without intraoperative FLIP (ns). Intraoperative DI was not correlated with 1-year ES or DI. One-year DI correlated significantly with 1-year ES (rs − 0.42), TBE (rs − 0.34), and LES-rp (rs − 0.29).ConclusionsUse of intraoperative FLIP measurements in POEM for achalasia is not associated with improved 1-year outcome, and the clinical value of intraoperative FLIP in POEM for achalasia is questioned. Follow-up FLIP measurements are moderately associated with symptomatic outcome, and may serve as an additional diagnostic modality in post-treatment evaluation.Graphical abstract

Defining “true acid reflux” after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a prospective cohort study

Background & AimsThe symptoms of reflux in achalasia patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are believed to result from gastroesophageal reflux, and the current treatment primarily focuses on acid suppression. Nevertheless, other factors such as non-reflux acidification caused by fermentation or stasis might play a role. This study aims to identify patients with “true acid reflux” who actually require acid suppression and fundoplication. MethodsIn this prospective large cohort study, the primary objective was to assess the incidence and risk factors for “true acid reflux” in achalasia patients undergoing POEM. Acid reflux with normal and delayed clearance defined the “true acid reflux”, while other patterns were labelled as “non-reflux acidification patterns” on manual analysis of pH tracings. These findings were corroborated with symptom questionnaire, esophagogastroscopy, esophageal manometry, timed barium esophagogram at 3 months after the POEM procedure. Results54 achalasia patients, aged 18-80 years [mean age 41.1 years (12.8), 59.3% males, 90.7% type II achalasia] underwent POEM resulting in significant mean Eckardt score improvement (6.7 to 1.6;p<0.05). “True acid reflux” was noted in 29.6% as compared to 64.8% on automated analysis. Acid fermentation was the predominant acidification pattern seen in 42.7% patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, increasing age (OR,1.12;95%CI,1.02-1.27;p=0.04) and pre-procedural integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) (OR,1.13;95%CI,1.04–1.30;p=0.02) were significantly associated with “true acid reflux” in post-POEM patients. ConclusionA manual review of pH tracings helps identifying “true acid reflux” in post-POEM achalasia patients. Pre-procedural IRP can be a predictive factor in determining patients at risk for this outcome.

The impact of primary peristalsis, contractile reserve, and secondary peristalsis on esophageal clearance measured by timed barium esophagogram.

Primary and secondary peristalsis facilitate esophageal bolus transport; however, their relative impact for bolus clearance remains unclear. We aimed to compare primary peristalsis and contractile reserve on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and secondary peristalsis on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry with emptying on timed barium esophagogram (TBE) and incorporate findings into a comprehensive model of esophageal function. Adult patients who completed HRM with multiple rapid swallows (MRS), FLIP, and TBE for esophageal motility evaluation and without abnormal esophagogastric junction outflow/opening or spasm were included. An abnormal TBE was defined as a 1-min column height >5 cm. Primary peristalsis and contractile reserve after MRS were combined into an HRM-MRS model. Secondary peristalsis was combined with primary peristalsis assessment to describe a complementary neuromyogenic model. Of 89 included patients, differences in rates of abnormal TBEs were observed with primary peristalsis classification (normal: 14.3%; ineffective esophageal motility: 20.0%; absent peristalsis: 54.5%; p = 0.009), contractile reserve (present: 12.5%; absent: 29.3%; p = 0.05), and secondary peristalsis (normal: 9.7%; borderline: 17.6%; impaired/disordered: 28.6%; absent contractile response: 50%; p = 0.039). Logistic regression analysis (akaike information criteria, area under the receiver operating curve) demonstrated that the neuromyogenic model (80.8, 0.83) had a stronger relationship predicting abnormal TBE compared to primary peristalsis (81.5, 0.82), contractile reserve (86.8, 0.75), or secondary peristalsis (89.0, 0.78). Primary peristalsis, contractile reserve, and secondary peristalsis were associated with abnormal esophageal retention as measured by TBE. Added benefit was observed when applying comprehensive models to incorporate primary and secondary peristalsis supporting their complementary application.

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful peroral endoscopic myotomy

BackgroundAchalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that presents as dysphagia and severely affects quality of life. An esophageal myotomy has been the golden standard for treatment. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a first-line therapy has an acceptable outcome. However, after the clinical failure of POEM, appropriate second-line therapy is rather controversial. Here, we present the first published case in English of a patient who was successfully treated using laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful POEM.Case presentationA 64-year-old man with type 1 achalasia who had been previously treated with POEM visited our hospital for further treatment. After undergoing LHM with Dor fundoplication, his Eckardt score improved from 3 to 0 points. On a timed barium esophagogram (TBE), the barium height improved from 119 mm/119 mm (1 min/5 min) to 50 mm/45 mm. No significant complications have occurred postoperatively for 1 year.ConclusionTreating refractory achalasia is challenging, and treatment options are controversial. LHM with Dor fundoplication after POEM could be a safe and efficient option for the treatment of refractory achalasia.

Achalasia cardia sub-types in children: Does it affect the response to therapy?

Achalasia sub-types affect treatment response in adults, but there is no similar data in children. We studied the differences in clinico-laboratory features and response to therapy between achalasia sub-types in children. Forty-eight children (boys:girls-25:23, 14 [0.9-18] years) with achalasia (clinical, barium, high-resolution manometry [HRM], gastroscopy) were evaluated. The sub-type was determined by Chicago classification at HRM. Pneumatic dilatation (PD) or surgery was the primary therapy. Success was defined as Eckhardt score of ≤ 3. Dysphagia (95.8%) and regurgitation (93.8%) were the most common symptoms. Forty of 48 cases had an adequate HRM study: Type I (n-19), II (n-19) and III (n-2). Types I and II had similar clinical profile. Type II had higher basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (30.5 [16.5-46] vs. 22.5 [13-43] mmHg; p = 0.007) and less dilated esophagus on timed barium esophagogram (TBE, 25 [13-57] vs. 34.5 [20-81] mm; p = 0.006) than type I. Both types had similar success (86.6% [13/15] vs. 92.8% [13/14]; p = 1) after first PD and need of post-PD myotomy (5/17 vs. 1/16; p = 0.1) in follow-up. Twenty-three cases had TBE before and after PD; 15 (65.2%) had good clearance. These subjects required myotomy (1/15 vs. 4/8; p = 0.03) and repeat PD (5/15 vs. 4/8; p = 0.08) less often than those with poor clearance on TBE. Types I and II achalasia have similar frequency and clinical profile. Type II has higher LES pressure and less dilated esophagus than Type I. Both respond equally well to initial PD. Type I required post-PD myotomy more often, though not significantly. TBE is useful for assessing therapeutic response.

The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

For patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD) is the most frequently used treatment. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being investigated as rescue therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of POEM vs PD for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM. This randomized multicenter controlled trial included patients after LHM with an Eckardt score >3 and substantial stasis (≥2 cm) on timed barium esophagogram and randomized to POEM or PD. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 and without unscheduled re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the presence of reflux esophagitis, high-resolution manometry, and timed barium esophagogram findings. Follow-up duration was 1 year after initial treatment. Ninety patients were included. POEM had a higher success rate (28 of 45 patients [62.2%]) than PD (12 of 45 patients [26.7%]; absolute difference, 35.6%; 95% CI, 16.4%-54.7%; P= .001; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.54; relative risk for success, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.99). Reflux esophagitis was not significantly different between POEM (12 of 35 [34.3%]) and PD (6 of 40 [15%]). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4) were significantly lower in the POEM group (P= .034; P= .002). Barium column height after 2 and 5 minutes was significantly less in patients treated with POEM (P= .005; P= .015). Among patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM, POEM resulted in a significantly higher success rate than PD, with a numerically higher incidence of grade A-B reflux esophagitis. NL4361 (NTR4501), https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID= NTR4501.

Intractable Vomiting

Nausea and vomiting constitute one of the most common presenting symptoms in a variety of diseases in clinical practice. Recurrent vomiting can be due to simple gastritis which may lead to dehydration and electrolyte disturbances to threatening intracranial hypertension. Prolonged recurrent vomiting can also lead to malnutrition. Esophageal dysmotility is usually associated with dysphagia but is infrequently associated with recurrent vomiting. We report a case of acute-onset intractable vomiting in a 50-year-old Indian female who presented with severe dehydration and hypernatremia. A timed barium esophagogram revealed dilated esophagus with a rat-tail appearance. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed dilated esophagus with a tight esophageal-gastric junction. With a diagnosis of achalasia cardia, the patient underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy with complete resolution of symptoms.

Quality of life in patients with achalasia: Associations with Eckardt score and objective treatment outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Background and study aims Knowledge on self-reported quality of life (QoL) in achalasia and QoL improvements after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is limited. Furthermore, the clinical role of QoL in achalasia follow-up has not been evaluated. The present study aimed to examine QoL in achalasia patients before and after POEM and assess associations between QoL, Eckardt score (ES) and objective results. Patients and methods This was a single-center prospective study of treatment-naïve achalasia patients with 12-month follow-up after POEM including manometry, upper endoscopy, 24-hour pH registration, and timed barium esophagogram. QoL data were registered using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and esophageal module (QLQ-OES18). Comparison with a reference population was performed to assess impact of achalasia on QoL and effect of therapy. Mixed models for repeated measures were applied. Results Fifty patients (26 females) with a median age of 47 years (18-76) were included. Before treatment, all QoL domains were significantly impaired compared with an age- and gender-adjusted reference population ( P < 0.05). No significant QoL-differences were found after POEM, except for fatigue and nausea/vomiting. Clinically relevant QoL improvement was observed in ≥ 50 % of the patients in all QoL domains, except for physical and role functioning. QoL was significantly associated with ES ( P < 0.05) but not with objective results. Conclusions Achalasia is associated with severe QoL impairment. Following POEM, a significant and clinically relevant QoL improvement is observed. QoL is associated with ES, but not with objective results after POEM.

S2266 Achalasia as a Sequelae of COVID-19

Introduction: Achalasia is a neurodegenerative motility disorder of distal esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter characterized by loss of myenteric neurons in esophagus. It therefore results in deranged peristalsis and characteristic manifestations of regurgitation, dysphagia and retrosternal chest pressure sensation. Recent studies have suggested inflammatory neurodegenerative insult from viral infection as a potential etiology. Sars-Cov-2 causes multiple gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations like ageusia, nausea, vomiting, pain and diarrhea. We present a rare case of achalasia that presented soon after COVID infection in an otherwise healthy male. Case Description/Methods: A 63-year-old man was referred for further evaluation of dysphagia that started a few months after a non-severe COVID infection with associated ageusia. He reported progressive dysphagia to both solids and liquids with concomitant regurgitation and chest pain. By the time he presented, he had lost 45 lbs over the course of 6 months and had an Eckardt score of 8. High resolution manometry was suggestive of evolving type II achalasia. A follow up Endoflip exam with a 16 cm catheter inflated to 60 cc revealed a esophagogastric diameter of 7.3 mm and a distensibility index (DI) of 1.9. Timed barium esophagogram showed a 5 cm contrast column in distal esophagus at 5 minutes. The patient has since been referred for per oral endoscopic myotomy (Figure). Discussion: Sars-Cov-2 enters the GI epithelial cells through ACE2 receptors and exerts its effects through an aberrant immune response involving T- lymphocytes rather than direct epithelial damage. An anomalous immune reaction resulting in degeneration of inhibitory neurons in the myenteric plexus may be the cause of achalasia in COVID-19. On literature review, we came across at least 1 case report of a patient developing achalasia after COVID-19. A Venezuelan study noted that the frequency of patients with achalasia during the year 2020 and 2021 was far greater than those of previous years and at least 2/3rd of these patients had presented with COVID-19 infection. It will be interesting to note if coronavirus can be isolated from muscle biopsies of these subjects as has been the case with VZV previously. Further investigation especially into patients presenting with GI symptoms with COVID infection is warranted.Figure 1.: Endoflip ; Barium Esophageogram.

Identifying hiatal hernia with impedance planimetry during esophageal distension testing.

Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry evaluates the esophageal response to distension involving biomechanics and motility. We have observed that hiatus hernia (HH) is evident during FLIP studies as a separation between the crural diaphragm (CD) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) like what is seen with high-resolution manometry (HRM). The aim of this study was to compare FLIP findings to endoscopy and HRM in the detection of HH. A total of 100 consecutive patients that completed FLIP during sedated endoscopy and HRM were included. LES-CD separation was assessed on FLIP and HRM with the presence of HH defined as LES-CD ≥1cm. The agreement was evaluated using the kappa (κ) statistic. Hiatal hernia was detected in 32% of patients on HRM and 44% of patients on FLIP with a substantial agreement between studies (84% agreement; κ= 0.667). On FLIP, a 'new' HH (i.e. HH not observed on HRM) occurred in 14 patients and an "enlarged" HH (i.e., LES-CD ≥2cm larger than on HRM) occurred in 11 patients. Among patients that also completed, timed barium esophagogram (TBE), delayed esophageal emptying on TBE was more common in patients with new or enlarged HH on FLIP than those without: 7/11 (64%) versus 2/12 (17%); p= 0.017. FLIP can detect HH with a substantial agreement with HRM, though esophageal distension with FLIP testing appeared to elicit and/or enlarge a HH in an additional 25% of patients. Although this unique response to esophageal distension may represent a mechanism of dysphagia or susceptibility to reflux, additional study is needed to clarify its significance.

Relationship between esophageal achalasia subtypes and esophageal clearance.

The diagnosis and pathological evaluation of esophageal achalasia have been improved dramatically by the development of high-resolution manometry. It is currently known to be divided into three subtypes. However, the differences between subtypes in terms of esophageal clearance remain unclear. To compare the pathology of subtypes in patients with esophageal achalasia from the perspective of esophageal clearance. We classified the patients diagnosed with esophageal achalasia into three subtypes based on the high-resolution manometry findings and compared the patient background, esophagography findings, esophageal manometry findings, timed barium esophagogram (TBE) findings, and their symptoms. We also calculated the esophageal clearance rate from TBE to investigate the relationship with the subtypes. There were 71 cases of Type I, 140 cases of Type II, and 10 cases of Type III. No differences by subtype were found in patient background or symptoms. Regarding the esophageal manometry findings, the integrated relaxation pressure was high in Type II (p = 0.0006). The esophagography revealed a mild degree of esophageal flexion in Type III (p = 0.0022) and a high degree of esophageal dilation in Type I and II (p = 0.0227). The esophageal clearance rate in descending order was: Type III, II, and I (height: p = 0.0302, width: p = 0.0008). The subtypes by high-resolution manometry diagnosis had an association with the esophagography findings and best reflected the esophageal clearance, with no correlation to the patient backgrounds and symptoms.

Rapid Drink Challenge During High-resolution Manometry for Evaluation of Esophageal Emptying in Treated Achalasia

Incomplete esophageal emptying is a key variable predicting symptom relapse after achalasia treatment. Although optimally evaluated using the timed barium esophagogram (TBE), incomplete esophageal emptying can also be identified on rapid drink challenge (RDC) performed during high-resolution manometry. We evaluated if RDC differentiates complete from incomplete esophageal emptying in treated patients with achalasia, against a TBE gold standard. Unselected treated patients with achalasia with both TBE (200 mL of low-density barium suspension) and RDC (200 mL of water in sitting position) were enrolled in 5 tertiary referral centers. TBE barium column height at 1, 2, and 5 minutes were compared with RDC variables: pressurizations >20 mmHg, maximal RDC pressurization, proportion of RDC time occupied by pressurizations, trans-esophagogastric junction gradient, and integrated relaxation pressure. Of 175 patients recruited (mean age, 59 years; 47% female), 138 (79%) were in clinical remission. Complete TBE emptying occurred in 45.1% at 1 minute, 64.0% at 2 minutes, and 73.1% at 5 minutes. RDC integrated relaxation pressure correlated strongly with TBE column height, and a 10-mmHg threshold discriminated complete from incomplete emptying at all 3 TBE time points with area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.85, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively. This threshold had high negative predictive values for complete emptying (88% at 2 minutes, 94% at 5 minutes), and modest positive predictive values for incomplete emptying (77% at 2 minutes, 62% at 5 minutes). RDC during high-resolution manometry is an effective surrogate for TBE in assessing esophageal emptying in treated patients with achalasia.

Chicago Classification ver. 4.0: Diagnosis of Achalasia and Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction

Achalasia is a common esophageal motility disorder characterized by inappropriate relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and a loss of normal peristalsis in the esophageal body. The newly suggested Chicago Classification ver. 4.0 recommends conclusive diagnoses of types 1, 2, and 3. A conclusive diagnosis of type 3 achalasia requires no appreciable peristalsis compared to the previously used ver. 3.0. In the case of inconclusive diagnosis of achalasia, additional tests, including timed barium esophagogram (TBE) or functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), are strongly recommended in ver. 4.0. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) in Chicago Classification ver. 3.0 was defined as an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) without evidence of achalasia. On the other hand, the diagnosis of EGJOO in Chicago Classification ver. 4.0 requires elevated IRP in both positions, elevated intrabolus pressure, positive clinical symptoms, and additional positive test by TBE or FLIP. The newly suggested Chicago Classification Classification ver. 4.0 will be helpful in an accurate diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders, including achalasia and EGJOO.

Chicago Classification ver. 4.0: Diagnosis of Peristaltic Disorder

The Chicago Classification is being revised continuously for the accurate diagnosis of esophageal peristaltic disorders in which the etiology is unclear, and the disease behavior is heterogeneous. The ver. 4.0 was recently updated. A representative change in the diagnosis of esophageal peristaltic disorders of the ver. 4.0 showed that the distinction between major and minor disorders was eliminated and was divided into the following four diagnoses: absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm (DES), hypercontractile esophagus (HE), and ineffective esophageal motility. Compared to the ver. 3.0, it recommended a more detailed protocol of high-resolution esophageal manometry and methods of interpreting manometric. In addition, it emphasized the clinically relevant symptoms in diagnosing DES and HE, and presented provocative tests (e.g., multiple rapid swallow and rapid drinking challenge), as well as additional testing, including impedance, timed barium esophagogram and functional lumen imaging probe, which may provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for peristaltic patterns and to minimize the ambiguity in diagnosis. Although it will take time and effort to apply this revised Chicago Classification in clinical practice, it may help diagnose and manage patients with esophageal peristalsis disorder in the future.

Correlation of timed barium esophagography with Eckardt score in primary achalasia patients treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of timed barium esophagogram (TBE) in quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM. Also, we investigated the correlation of TBE with improvement of clinical symptoms as measured by Eckardt score. This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent POEM due to primary achalasia. As a baseline study, all patients underwent TBE and were evaluated for clinical status by Eckardt score based on presence and frequency of dysphagia, regurgitation, substernal pain, and weight loss. Follow-up evaluation was performed within 3months after POEM. Pre- and post-POEM TBE results were compared using a calculated value based on summation of height of the barium columns on 1-, 2- and 5-min delayed images. Also, the correlation of TBE with improvement of Eckardt score was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test. There was a significant decrease in the calculated value of height between pre- and post-POEM TBE studies (40.5 ± 15.8-17.0 ± 11.6, p < 0.01). Also, the Eckardt score decreased significantly after POEM (6.7 ± 2.0-0.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.01). Pearson's correlation test revealed a positive correlation between improvement of TBE results and Eckardt score (correlation coefficient = 0.56, p < 0.01). TBE is an objective method for quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM and shows positive correlation with clinical symptoms evaluated by Eckardt score.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Are We Missing in Our Busy Endoscopy Practice?

AbstractEsophageal motility disorders (EMDs) form a significant part of a busy endoscopist's practice. Endoscopy plays an all-encompassing role in the diagnosis and management of EMDs including achalasia cardia. The focus on in-vogue third-space endoscopic procedures such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy often digresses the important role of endoscopy. Endoscopic evaluation forms the part of standard first-line evaluation of any dysphagia and serves to rule out a secondary cause such as an esophagogastric junction malignancy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Moreover, endoscopic evaluation may itself provide corroborative evidence that may contribute to the diagnosis of the motility disorder. Achalasia cardia may present with a wide spectrum of endoscopic findings from being entirely normal and the well-known and pathognomonic dilated sigmoid-shaped esophagus with food residue, to lesser-known ornate signs. The evidence on the role of endosonography in EMDs is conflicting and largely restricted to evaluation of pseudoachalasia. High-resolution manometry (HRM) remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of EMDs. Endoscopists must also keep abreast of the latest iteration of the Chicago classification version 4.0, which differs significantly from its predecessor in being more stringent in making diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and disorders of peristalsis since these manometric findings may be seen in normal individuals and may be mimicked by opioid use and gastroesophageal reflux. The latest rendition also includes the use of provocative maneuvers and testing in both supine and sitting posture. Despite being the gold standard, there are certain lacunae in the use and interpretation of the Chicago classification of which the users should be well aware. Emerging technologies such as functional lumen imaging probe and planimetry, and timed barium esophagogram fill the lacuna in diagnosis of these motility disorders, which at times is beyond the resolution of HRM.

Clinical efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: A multicenter study in Taiwan

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a novel minimally invasive treatment for esophageal achalasia, is becoming more popular globally because of its efficacy and safety. We aimed to clarify the technical concerns, efficacy, and safety of POEM for treating esophageal achalasia in Taiwan. We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive patients with achalasia who underwent POEM between October 2016 and May 2021at three medical centers in Taiwan. All patients underwent a comprehensive work-up before POEM, including symptom questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, timed barium esophagogram (TBE), and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and were re-evaluated three months after POEM. We compared procedure variables, adverse events, and clinical responses, including Eckardt score ≤3 and TBE and HRIM findings. We analyzed 92 patients in total (54 men; mean age 49.5 years [range: 20-87]; type I/II/III/unclassified: 24/51/1/16). The mean POEM procedure duration was 89.5±38.2min, though it was significantly longer in patients with prior treatment or sigmoid-type achalasia. In total, 91 patients (98.9%) showed immediate technical success, and the overall clinical success rate at three months after POEM was 95.7%. Nearly 60% of patients experienced adverse events during POEM, but most of these were mild and none required further endoscopic or surgical intervention. During a follow-up period of up to five years (median 25 months), only four patients (4.3%) showed symptomatic recurrence, but none required further treatment. POEM is a very effective and safe treatment for Taiwanese patients with achalasia, irrespective of their achalasia subtype or prior treatment failure.

Is an objective evaluation essential for determining the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery among patients with esophageal achalasia?

Despite a high degree of satisfaction with laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia, some cases show no improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance. We investigated whether an objective evaluation is essential for determining the therapeutic effect of LHD. We investigated the difference in symptoms, regarding esophageal clearance, using timed barium esophagogram (TBE), in 306 esophageal achalasia patients with high postoperative satisfaction who underwent LHD. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two groups, in accordance with the difference in postoperative esophageal clearance, in order to compare the preoperative pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical results. Although the poor postoperative esophageal clearance group (117 cases, 38%) was mostly male and the ratio of Sigmoid type was high compared to the good postoperative esophageal clearance group (p = 0.046, p = 0.001, respectively); in patients with high surgical satisfaction, there was no difference in terms of preoperative symptom scores and surgical results. However, although the satisfaction level was high in the poor esophageal clearance group, the scores in terms of the postoperative dysphagia and vomiting were high (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The AUC was 0.9842 upon ROC analysis regarding the presence or absence of clearance at 2min following postoperative TBE and the postoperative feeling of difficulty swallowing score, with a cut-off value of 2 points (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 100%) in cases with a high degree of surgical satisfaction. The esophageal clearance ability can be predicted by subjective evaluation, based on the postoperative symptom scores; so, an objective evaluation is not essential in cases with high surgical satisfaction.