Achalasia cardia sub-types in children: Does it affect the response to therapy?

Abstract

Achalasia sub-types affect treatment response in adults, but there is no similar data in children. We studied the differences in clinico-laboratory features and response to therapy between achalasia sub-types in children. Forty-eight children (boys:girls-25:23, 14 [0.9-18] years) with achalasia (clinical, barium, high-resolution manometry [HRM], gastroscopy) were evaluated. The sub-type was determined by Chicago classification at HRM. Pneumatic dilatation (PD) or surgery was the primary therapy. Success was defined as Eckhardt score of ≤ 3. Dysphagia (95.8%) and regurgitation (93.8%) were the most common symptoms. Forty of 48 cases had an adequate HRM study: Type I (n-19), II (n-19) and III (n-2). Types I and II had similar clinical profile. Type II had higher basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (30.5 [16.5-46] vs. 22.5 [13-43] mmHg; p = 0.007) and less dilated esophagus on timed barium esophagogram (TBE, 25 [13-57] vs. 34.5 [20-81] mm; p = 0.006) than type I. Both types had similar success (86.6% [13/15] vs. 92.8% [13/14]; p = 1) after first PD and need of post-PD myotomy (5/17 vs. 1/16; p = 0.1) in follow-up. Twenty-three cases had TBE before and after PD; 15 (65.2%) had good clearance. These subjects required myotomy (1/15 vs. 4/8; p = 0.03) and repeat PD (5/15 vs. 4/8; p = 0.08) less often than those with poor clearance on TBE. Types I and II achalasia have similar frequency and clinical profile. Type II has higher LES pressure and less dilated esophagus than Type I. Both respond equally well to initial PD. Type I required post-PD myotomy more often, though not significantly. TBE is useful for assessing therapeutic response.