As recently as 1970, Erna Gunther (77) apologized for the enormous effort she had made assembling early travelers' accounts of the Northwest Coast, by reminding her readers that there was virtually no time-depth to our knowledge of the area. Given the prevalence of wooden artifacts and the rainy climate, everyone assumed that little could be. unearthed. But the pioneering of wet-site archaeology in the 19608 soon brought the realization that Coast culture, as first seen by Europeans in the eighteenth century, and as described by ethnographers beginning in the nineteenth, had an historical continuity of roughly 5000 years during which time there had been little discernible change (41). In 1975, Knut Fladmark (68) presented a general synthesis in which he argued that the Coast as a whole probably had become habitable about 15,000 BP, though nothing from that date had been then (nor has been now) uncovered. At the depth of 10,000 BP, however, there were two adaptations, with Johnson Straits as the dividing line. Then about 5000 BP, Fladmark argued, the environment became sufficiently stable that people could rely on the runs of anadromous fish as a basic resource of their diet. At this point, the adaptation becomes essentially indistinguishable from the adaptation at the time of first contact with Europeans. It formerly was thought that because of the apparent similarities with Asiatic, Oceanic, and Mesoamerican forms, the great number of languages and dialects recorded, as well as the simultaneous presence at the same level of culture of both matrilineal and patrilineal societies, that only an hypothe sis of recent origin could account for such an undigested amalgam of traits. So it was common practice to conjecture a history from the legends of migrations in the oral literature; from the geographical distribution of speakers of the various languages and dialects; and from the patterns of trait
Read full abstract